ie8 fix
Click Here
madison

A lack of tech IPOs is blocking US job creation says leading VC

By | July 8, 2010, 10:11am PDT

Summary: President Obama is looking to the tech sector to help create millions of new jobs but a scarcity of IPOs is blocking that goal

Robert Ackerman, a leading Silicon Valley venture capitalist and founder of Allegis Capital, says that tech IPOs will remain scarce and that this will curtail job creation in the US.

A continued scarcity of tech IPOs means that the Obama Administration won’t be able to count on Silicon Valley startups to help spark a job boom and help alleviate tough economic conditions for millions of unemployed.

Mr. Ackerman said, “These days, tech startups have to rely on being acquired by a larger company once they reach a certain size because there isn’t an IPO market to help them recapitalize and grow to the next stage. The largest expansion in jobs for a young company comes in the period after an IPO. If a company is acquired it doesn’t lead to the same job growth.”

But tech IPOs are unlikely to return to their former high levels because the infrastructure that supported and financed them has changed.

There used to be many boutique investment brokerages that had analysts following companies and sectors. After the dotcom bust many of those boutique brokerages disappeared or were acquired and now there is a massive shortage of analyst coverage. Without analyst coverage there is little liquidity in the trading of shares of small companies, and this discourages larger investors.

Mr. Ackerman said, “In 2007 we sold IronPort to Cisco for $830 million. This is a company that could have easily gone public but we chose to sell it. The lack of analyst coverage was a large factor in that decision.”

Sarbanes-Oxely is another issue. Young companies have to bear the very large costs of compliance, reducing their earnings, which makes them look less appealing to investors.

And there are significant challenges in attracting investors in startups because of tax policies.

Mr. Ackerman has spent a lot of time in Washington, D.C. meeting with politicians and lobbying for the VC industry, seeking favorable tax benefits that would encourage investment in innovative companies. He says that venture capital is being regulated in the same way as hedge funds and private equity funds, which is wrong.

“Washington is trying to regulate the risk out of everything. We need policies that encourage risk taking, that encourage risks by entrepreneurs — that’s the way to create jobs.”

He says that one staffer admitted to him that, “We don’t really understand the issues around investing.” His reply was, “That’s fine but then don’t pass legislation about issues you don’t understand.”

He is also highly critical of US immigration policies because they restrict US access to the world’s most talented people. Attracting the best human capital is essential to maintaining US innovation yet many foreign-born top graduates of US universities are forced to return home.

“Every advanced degree issued by a US university should come with a green card attached,” he says. “Otherwise we will lose our lead in innovation to China and India. Investment in startups is already pouring into those countries and it wont be long before it overtakes the US.”


Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Tom Foremski reports on the business and culture of Silicon Valley at the intersection of technology and media.

Disclosure

Tom Foremski

Tom Foremski is the editor and publisher of Silicon Valley Watcher and Silicon Valley Watch. Tibco Software is an advertiser.

Biography

Tom Foremski

In May 2004, Tom Foremski became the first journalist to leave a major newspaper, the Financial Times, to make a living as a full-time journalist blogger. He writes the popular news blog Silicon Valley Watcher--reporting on the business of Silicon Valley.

Tom arrived in San Francisco in 1984, and has covered US technology markets for leading computer journals around the world.

4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

What, we can't innovate?
fromthehip 9th Jul 2010
Mr. Ackerman seems to be implying that those of us born in the US can no longer innovate. Only the foreigners are smart enough or hungry enough to invent anything. What's that all about?

BTW, I noticed that Apple stopped innovating after the IPO, didn't you? It's a good thing that foreigner, Steve Jobs, came along to help them invent new things.

On one point, however, he is correct. There is an alarming lack of VC money out there for technology companies, and especially for tech companies that actually build a product. There is money available for social networking companies, and web based companies. If, however, you want to actually manufacture a device, forget it.

FTH
0 Votes
+ -
... in funding the Lottery Feaver from Silicon Valley? Say it isn't so! I have software with no clue how it is going to make money, but I was going to cash in on the IPO.
0 Votes
+ -
Back in the days when IPO's were common I was constantly reading the news reports and trying to figure out just what the company was trying to sell. Often it seemed like there was nothing but a man behind a curtain.

On the other hand the author does have a point. The economy has to have a certain number of risk takers in order for any new business to get off the ground. Zero risk = zero reward. The key is to prevent fraud and cease the bailouts. You can take as much or as little risk as you want as long as no one is committing fraud or deliberately deceiving by understating the risk. And when you take the risk, you reap the rewards if it succeeds and the losses are limited to the risk takers if it fails. That's what capitalism is all about. When a venture succeeds, everyone benefits but when it fails the costs are limited.

All the bailouts and government intervention are serving to 1. isolate the risk takers from the consequences of failure by bailing them out and 2. In the long run squeezing out all risk taking.
Basically when a company goes public, it stops innovating. When a company gets bought by a public company, it stops innovating. Public companies are not in business to create innovative products and services to sell at profitable prices. They exist only to generate wealth for shareholders. This can be accomplished by off shoring, right sizing, and aggressive marketing of the same old tech. Public companies can bring small evolutionary changes to existing products but since research and development don't fit a short term profitability model, the budgets for these operations are usually cut or reduced.

Adam Smith free market economies would be a very good solution to the U.S.A.'s current innovative slump and job creation but it involves principles that have been co-oped and corrupted by public and huge corporations. Adam Smith really was about small to middle sized companies competing in local markets. Can a public company do that? Sometimes. But it tends to be not the average behavior. Look at computer hardware manufacturers. There product offerings have different names but the same basic products. You can buy a 14 inch screen laptop with the same characteristics from any of the major brands. They probably even source the components from the same Chinese suppliers.

You want to bring innovation back to the U.S.A.? encourage small and medium sized companies to focus on competing with other small to medium sized companies to bring innovative products to consumers at profitable prices. Encourage the companies to stay small, lean, and mean. Encourage competition with sane copyright and patent laws.

Once you start to eliminate small to medium sized companies your markets are dominated by small numbers of competitors you basically have an effective monopoly. Sure their marketing departments will be earning their money trying to separate brand recognition but really the consumer doesn't have as much choice or in some cases none at all. There is a company in China called Foxconn, it supplies parts to Apple, HP and Dell. Aside from marketing "coolness" is the consumer really getting different competing products?
0 Votes
+ -
What, we can't innovate?
fromthehip 9th Jul 2010
Mr. Ackerman seems to be implying that those of us born in the US can no longer innovate. Only the foreigners are smart enough or hungry enough to invent anything. What's that all about?

BTW, I noticed that Apple stopped innovating after the IPO, didn't you? It's a good thing that foreigner, Steve Jobs, came along to help them invent new things.

On one point, however, he is correct. There is an alarming lack of VC money out there for technology companies, and especially for tech companies that actually build a product. There is money available for social networking companies, and web based companies. If, however, you want to actually manufacture a device, forget it.

FTH

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix