ie8 fix
Click Here
madison

Apple alliance with Murdoch raises troubling questions

By | November 21, 2010, 3:40pm PST

Summary: Apple is working with Rupert Murdoch’s News Inc to create an iPad-only newspaper. Will Apple relax its tight publishing rules? What will it mean for other publishers?

The UK’s Guardian reports: iPad ‘newspaper’ created by Steve Jobs and Rupert Murdoch | Technology | guardian.co.uk

‘The collaboration, which has been secretly under development in New York for several months, promises to be the world’s first “newspaper” designed exclusively for new tablet-style computers such as Apple’s Apple’s iPad, with a launch planned for early next year.

…there will be no “print edition” or “web edition”; the central innovation, developed with assistance from Apple engineers, will be to dispatch the publication automatically to an iPad or any of the growing number of similar devices.

With no printing or distribution costs, the US-focused Daily will cost 99 cents (62p) a week

According to the US elite fashion industry journal Women’s Wear Daily, the Murdoch-Jobs “newspaper” will be run from the 26th floor of the News Corp offices in New York, where 100 journalist have been hired…

Apple’s alliance with News Corp will ring alarm bells among other newspaper publishers. What isn’t clear from the reports is if Apple is providing News Corp. with technology and assistance not available to other companies.

Apple should not get into the content creation business it should remain a neutral distribution platform and maintain a level playing field for all publishers. Apple should make its technology available to all publishers not just News Corp.

Without a web version of the “Daily” its news will only be available to iPad users, which means news and headlines cannot be shared.

This also means Google News and other news aggregators won’t be able to list “Daily” news headlines and send traffic. Mr Murdoch has been a vociferous critic of Google and other aggregators.

Bloggers will still be able to write about “Daily” news stories under fair use provisions but they won’t be able to link to them. This could result in potentially damaging misinformation campaigns by nefarious third parties if content on the “Daily” can only be verified by iPad subscribers.

There are other potential problems: online ads try to target users across a range of web sites but this won’t be possible within the closed system of the iPad. This means ad networks won’t be able to operate on the iPad/Daily giving Apple’s own ad network a captive customer.

Also: It’s not clear if Apple will maintain its veto rights on publishing through its online iTunes store. It has blocked publication of major publications such as Germany’s respectable magazine Die Stern because of a nude gallery of photos.

Mr Murdoch’s publications include racy tabloids with half-naked “page three girls.”

- Will Apple be allowed to censor the content of the “Daily” before publication?

- Will Mr Murdoch allow Steve Jobs to essentially become the Editor of the “Daily”?

- How will Apple be able to monitor for racy content without introducing publication delays when newspapers have such tight deadlines?

Will Mr Murdoch allow Apple to censor the “Daily” at any time it chooses? Or will Apple relax its strict publication rules?

It’s either one or the other.

It’s a potentially shaky alliance with plenty of room for discord.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Tom Foremski reports on the business and culture of Silicon Valley at the intersection of technology and media.

Disclosure

Tom Foremski

Tom Foremski is the editor and publisher of Silicon Valley Watcher and Silicon Valley Watch. Tibco Software is an advertiser.

Biography

Tom Foremski

In May 2004, Tom Foremski became the first journalist to leave a major newspaper, the Financial Times, to make a living as a full-time journalist blogger. He writes the popular news blog Silicon Valley Watcher--reporting on the business of Silicon Valley.

Tom arrived in San Francisco in 1984, and has covered US technology markets for leading computer journals around the world.

48
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Apple alliance with Murdoch raises troubling questions
yantangseo 17th Sep
@mrgoodall
Lovely! It looks very nicely done! cheap replica watches
Funny, how nefarious things can appear to be when people don't have the facts. How about creating a relationship with people within Fox and Apple and getting the facts rather than presenting your irrational "possibilities"? Whats to stop me from irrationally posting about the possibility of your inability to deliver a quality story based on facts rather than conjecture?
0 Votes
+ -
I was thinking exactly the same thing...
adornoe@... 22nd Nov 2010
The author of the piece above is creating his own set of FUD and spreading it here.

Why not let the publication get started before making judgments about its content?

Chances are that, if people don't like it and/or don't want to pay for it, that it will be in for a fairly quick death. Furthermore, content in the "newspaper" can be matched by other free sources, and from other tablet manufacturers/vendors. Whatever appears on the "iPad newspaper" will be not be exclusive, especially with so much competition in the tech arena and in the regular information world, aka, the media.
@adornoe@...
"We will, however, challenge you to a discussion, and in a very civil manner. That's where liberals always fail. They don't know how to be civil and they'll react violently, either verbally or physically, against anything the veers from the liberal behavior or ideology."

good one. your "civil" manner just grouped every single liberal in the world as uncivil and violent. yeah, yours is a reasoned mind.
0 Votes
+ -
what is meant in a statement unless it's explained in very detailed fashion for you.

When I state, "That's where liberals always fail.", that's not to say that "all liberals" have those faults. The statement applies to those who are politically and actively involved in the liberal agenda. Most people on the left and on the right are not "activists", and they're not getting involved in the attacks, either verbally or physically.

Now, is there anything else that I need to help you understand?

Look, if you're not old enough to understand what is meant, or not intelligent enough to understand without somebody having to break it down for you, then perhaps you shouldn't be involved in adult conversations.

BTW, your post is out of place and not directly in-line with the original post from mine that you're responding to.

Here's another example for you to try to help you understand:

This is just an example, although it might hold a lot of truthfulness in it:

When conservatives accuse liberals of not understanding "free-market" principles, conservatives are not accusing "all liberals"; it's expected to be applicable to those that set policy and who are leaders in the liberal movement and who also don't believe in the free-market system or don't do what would be appropriate in that free-market system.
had a problem at all, but Apple is helping Murdoch, the evil antichrist. Saying his name in front of a liberal is like waving a cross in front of a vampire. It's actually kind of fun. Go ahead and try it at a party.
@frgough Say Soros in front of a Glenn Beck fan... I dare you.
to external stimuli.

While Soros is not a favorite amongst conservatives or amongst Glenn Beck fans, we don't react violently or with threats. We don't do what the liberals do when Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin is mentioned around them. We will, however, challenge you to a discussion, and in a very civil manner. That's where liberals always fail. They don't know how to be civil and they'll react violently, either verbally or physically, against anything the veers from the liberal behavior or ideology.
  • Flagged
@adornoe
Conservatives don't react violently? Tell that to Lauren Valle, head stomp victim, or George Tiller, deceased. Or, for that matter, anyone who has attended a Town Hall meeting with a Democratic Senator or Representative in the last two years.
@mrgoodall
Lovely! It looks very nicely done! cheap replica watches
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple alliance w/ Murdoch...
David in Chelsea, MA Updated - 21st Nov 2010
What's troubling is that Apple's first attempt at an exclusive "newspaper" is being done with such a slime bag publisher as Murdoch.
Wow, "e-propaganda" for only 99 cents a week? Where do I sign up?
0 Votes
+ -
@David in Chelsea, MA I suppose you'd rather them link up with the slime balls at MSNBC???
@Tiggster Personally I'd rather them link up with a real news source like NPR... Disliking Fox news for making crap up doesn't mean you like MSNBC, which is almost as bad.
0 Votes
+ -
Partisan news sucks.
nix_hed 22nd Nov 2010
@Tiggster That's all there is to it.
with something that threatens their world view.
@frgough ...when MSNBC has the exclusive news app for Windows Phone.
Why not wait to see what it actually looks like and then comment?

What does it mean for other publishers? Publishers will and always have exploited any distribution vehicle that is successful in gaining and maintaining readership for at least the last hundred years. I wouldn't worry too much about them.

News publications are localized if not cultural in the kinds of content they present. I wouldn't worry too much about nudity in a North American news daily. LOL

We are up to our armpits in news publications. Are those in the form of an iPad application going to mean that non-iPad users are missing something?
0 Votes
+ -
The irony of Mr Goodalls' concerns regarding nefarious threadbare reporting and irrational 'possibilities' when it comes to speculative editorial on the actions of Rupert Murdoch is amusing beyond words.
99 cents for Murdoch propaganda without any page three ?

Doomed from the start.
@Chipesh Unfortunately, Murdoch's publications are just about the only place you can find fair and balanced news these days. You certainly can't find it on MSNBC, CNN, or the network news.
@Tiggster That was said as a joke, right? Calling Fox News fair and balanced is like calling a 1992 Hyundai a luxury car. MSNBC isn't much better, but at least they don't make a joke of it with an oxymoronic tagline like "fair and balanced"
@Tiggster while I'll agree that network news has a lack of balance, I'd say that Fox is appallingly biased. They've even admitted that they're essentially an advertising arm of the Republican Party. Comedy Central is more "fair and balanced."
other news properties of NewsCorp have become the number one source for news and information in the U.S.?

Is the vast majority of cable news watchers very clueless, or, has it ever occurred to either of you that you are the ones without a clue? No need to answer that because, it's already very clear that, neither of you can admit the success of FOX or any other NewsCorp property. You'd rather remain on the outside and get fed the news from the real biased news sources, like NBC, CBS, MSNBC, ABC, NPR, BBC, NY Times, Washington Post. No doubt, because of your liberal upbringing, you can't recognize where the true bias really exists. To both of you, anything that even slightly veers away from the liberal line of thinking, must be biased.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@wessia
frgough 22nd Nov 2010
You can tell how far left someone is by how much they hate Fox News. Fox news is actually somewhat center left if you objectively look at the stories they print, but folks like you are in bed, snuggling with Marx and so, of course they look like a far-right publication. And, of course, being Marx's plaything, you'll also do everything in your power to prevent people from having access to it.
Yeah when they gave money to the republican governors association, that was a really fair and balanced move wasn't it? That's openly expressing your bias.
@Tiggster - agreed, though MSNBC and CNN can be biased as well. BBC News I still prefer, mostly because Murdoch and his ilk bash it at every opportunity. (Freedom being a threat and all, ironically...)
Considering that FOX is the "Carl Rove Creates The News" channel when it comes to politics and even the company has directly given money to the right wing, you probably should realize they're going to spin EVERYTHING to the right.

FOX News/News Corp is the most biased "News Organization" in the world. Not to say that everyone else isn't biased, but FOX is the worst about it.
0 Votes
+ -
Murdoch is not a reporter or journalist or columnist. He is the owner and chairman of NewsCorp. The content and direction of the news division is handled by the people in the corresponding news divisions of the corporation.

As such, he is not constrained in the same sense as the people who are responsible for reporting the news to you. So, he is allowed to make contributions to political parties as he wishes. Get the difference? Likewise, GE (parent to NBC/MSNBC) and Disney (parent to ABC) and Apple and Microsoft, also make political contributions. Now, when a reporter/journalist/commentator that works for a news division, makes a political contribution, then that's where you need to be concerned. That's why MSNBC had to suspend Keith Olbermann for a week or so. However, MSNBC kept Olbermann and he's as rabidly liberal as always. Now, can you name a reporter/columnist on FOX that has made political contributions? That's where you should be looking. Also, were you aware that 90-92% of journalists/reporters, in all different types of media, vote as democrats? Isn't that biased reporting? BTW, the BBC and NPR are highly political and very biased and liberal. Why aren't you complaining about the majority of the media which is, without a doubt, biased?

Also, since you and others keep accusing FOX of being biased, why not try to prove it by picking out examples of that bias in the reporting and/or commentating?

What you are just noticing on FOX is a network which is not parotting the liberal line, and thus, to you and other liberals, anything that even remotely veers from your mind-set and your political beliefs, must be "biased".

If "biased" is the same as having a different opinion, then by all means, bring on the biases. You don't have to concur with the different set of beliefs or opinions. You can go and watch or listen to a different set of beliefs on another network. Nobody is going to hold it against you. But, it would be better if you actually heard the opposing views because, you might get to learn something that you didn't know before. As a former liberal myself, I can attest to that learning journey. Don't close your eyes and pretend that your side is the only side that is right and matters. Open-mindedness is the best way forward in order to better oneself.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: silly analogy
scripter 29th Nov 2010
@adornoe:
I understand your point about Murdoch, but you ask "Now, can you name a reporter/columnist on FOX that has made political contributions?"

Well, Hannity gave $5K to Michele Bachmann's PAC over the summer. When asked about it, Bill Shine said he had no problem with the contribution and there was no company policy prohibiting it. Hannity gave $4800 to Sean Gomez and has *headlined* at a number of Republican fundraisers.

Huckabee has donated to Doug Matayo, Beth Anne Rankin, Daniel Webster. And he has his own personal PAC that gives cash to a number of candidates.

Palin is now officially a Fox commentator. She gives money and endorsements all over the place.
I didn't hear all the bloggers get all crazy when Apple's iPad launched with the New York Times emblazoned on every ad and demo, with the Obama inauguration article being proudly displayed by Steve Jobs.

All of the sudden, when News Corp -- a TRULY successful news media outlet -- announces a truly innovative partnership with Apple, there's all kinds of hand-wringing and perturbance.

It's just your liberal bias showing. Don't worry, everyone gets it.
0 Votes
+ -
@Speednet Right, like the only reason people even know News Corp is because Murdoch has a way with innovation. Apple tries to be politically neutral supporters of the ?green? party, partnering with those who fuel success by putting money behind good ideas, like Murdoch.
Apple joining the axis of fear? Why is this news? "curated" experiences for the well off and prissy is their stock in trade. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
0 Votes
+ -
An additional two pennies worth ....
wideeyedoptimist 22nd Nov 2010
Yes, it's true, I confess before I delve any deeper into this monologue that I am a bleeding heart liberal. What makes it even worse is that I'm the armchair-socialist type. Ahem, my issue is not with the somewhat bizarre political shape to some of the comments herein but rather the increasing proximity of content creators, publishers and computing/CE businesses. I am rather old fashioned and like the idea of device makers remaining content-neutral. Any opinions on this?
It's unbelievable to me that so many people still believe Murdoch's faux news outlets are ``fair and balanced.'' Please do some fact checking on some of the stuff that gets aired on Fox News. Probably won't change minds, but it should.
@runnut1@... Probably won't change our minds because we are RIGHT. happy Most of America agrees with me BTW!
@Tiggster Actually, fox's viewership doesn't represent most of America, it just represents the highest viewership of any network news channel. The 2M people who watch at any given time are less than 1% of the total population of the US (300m). Also, facts aren't by consensus... Most people believed in the 1600s that the universe revolved around the Earth, that didn't make Galileo wrong.
0 Votes
+ -
While it might be true that, at times, the viewership could be around 2 million, and at night, anywhere between 3 and 4 million, the total impacted audience is a lot more.

Think about it. The impact of FOX news a lot bigger than any of the regular networks, including ABC, NBC or CBS. And, FOX makes a lot bigger profit in the news division than any of the networks, and if I remember correctly, it makes more money from news than the other cable news networks and major regular network news COMBINED? Why would that be?

When FOX gets a viewership of 2 million for a certain news program or hour, it's not exactly that same audience that might be watching the next program or hour. And so, it continues like that throughout the day, with new/different audiences tuning in during the whole day, and most especially during the primetime/night programs or hours. Thus, the total audience for FOX, when it comes to the unique number of people, might be a lot more than 10 million and doubtlessly more. That's more than any other regular network, and more than all the other cable news networks combined.

So, no matter how you break it down, the number of people impacted by FOX news is a lot greater than you imagine. Then, we're not even talking about the other news properties from NewsCorp, like the Wall-Street Journal and it's other network properties and its local newspapers. When you add them all up, you're talking humongous impact all around the country and around the world.
you'd discover how blatantly wrong your opinion is.

The fact is that, when studies have been done, through analysis and surveys, FOX news always ends up on top in the "believability" and fairness and balance factors. But, you would not be aware of those studies/surveys because you're too busy swallowing the liberal bias coming to you from whatever liberal media that you do prefer. To somebody like you, it's inconceivable that anyone would be anything but liberal. Try taking an actual trip or a mental trip outside of that liberal box that you reside in. You'll discover how absolutely wrong your thinking has been. I should know because, I was, a long while back, someone who thought exactly like you do while being a rabid liberal. But, I decided to take a trip outside of my liberal mainstream thinking and, it was a trip worthwhile. I didn't change overnight, but the thought process for conversion from liberalism was underway and and opened my eyes to an alternate reality which is very foreign to liberals. Perhaps, if you're a real thinker, you should do the same.
@adornoe@... It's humorous to me to hear the anti-Fox crowd talk about unbiased coverage. I guess they truly believe what they say, because in the bubble in which they live, it's actually true. happy
0 Votes
+ -
The general concensus seems to be ...
Gaius_Maximus 22nd Nov 2010
... that this says something surprising about Jobs and/or Apple.

Shouldn't we instead be asking ourselves what it says of Murdoch and/or FOX?
that he wants to get the most eyes and impact for his bucks.

Going with the biggest and most recognizable news organization around makes more sense than the knee-jerk reactionaries can envision.
0 Votes
+ -
It isn't insidious. Apple refuses flash, and Mr. Murdoch wants his sheeple to have their one sided "News" stories. They can't get it from Foxnews.com, so they need help in making a non-flash one.
instances or cases where FOX news was "one-sided" or is being insidious?

But, no doubt you can't because you don't even watch them.
@Tiggster Fox News shoots down anyone that questions 9/11,
the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan etc you can't convince smart people that Faux News is anything but unbalanced!
No further text needed.
This is a very interesting article. Thanks.
0 Votes
+ -
Fox News Out right lie
dkillian1980 23rd Nov 2010
I remember during the election said a senator from Utah had his vote paid for health care bill by promoting his brother. The thing this senator didn't vote for the health care bill. He should sue them for liable.
but then both parties will do anything to boost their egos/bank balances so there's no point in quibbling about morals. I'd hoped Steve Jobs' vaguely left-leaning liberalism (e.g. Apple's Green efforts, etc.,) might have dissuaded him from having anything to do with a velociraptor like Murdoch but I suspect he sees it as the biggest opportunity to get the biggest notice for his iPad and Apple. I certainly won't be buying anything Murdoch has a hand in.
The whole things a lot like the printed magazine model, or the printed newpaper model.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix