Can you be trusted? The subtext of what you say in social media could be used against you

Can you be trusted? The subtext of what you say in social media could be used against you

Summary: Can someone be trusted? And can an algorithm work it out?

SHARE:
3

As more and more services focus on the arbitrage of consumer-to-consumer transactions and rentals, the problem of trusting a stranger becomes a significant drag on success.

Airbnb, the rent-out-your-home service had a very bad and very public problem last year when a renter trashed and robbed a home.

Whit.li. an API designed for collaborative applications, is addressing this problem with its API, which looks at a person's social media activity and determines a trust score.

Jack Holt, founder of Whit.li writes:

The things you tell the world (city, age, etc.) and those you do not--specifically, your choice of words in your status updates or reviews.

You could call it the, "dependability" or, "reliability" score.

... we track your use of ingestion and perception words, which allows us to divine a particle of your personality and attitude. Combined with other factors we calculate like lifestage, class, income and more, we can paint a pretty good picture of who you really are.

We have a psychologist on retainer who has pointed us to research and, with our own testing, has validated the correlations we use. But we are early, so the algos will surely improve greatly as we track their effectiveness in apps.

You can test it against your Facebook activity.

Foremski's Take:

It's a reasonable approach to use social media activity to gauge 'trust.' However, only a tiny number of people are active in social media compared with the large number of people engaging in consumer-to-consumer services.

And will the headlines of articles that people share be counted and the wording used against them?

People who trashed and robbed peoples' homes won't be found through their social media trails. There's little protection to be gained from that type of behavior using this approach.

Also, Whit.li sort of sounds like "white lie," which is not encouraging when it come to matters of trust.

Topic: Social Enterprise

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Unconvinced . . .

    "Its a reasonable approach to use social media activity to gauge 'trust.' "

    Color me unconvinced. Why would it be considered reasonable? It's largely untested and unproven.
    CobraA1
  • test it

    You are not seriously recommending us to try this test? The application wants to post on my profile as me even if I am not logged on
    iansim
  • Forgive me, Tom, but..

    Can you provide more background on this site? As folks have indicated above, this application wants about as much access to my Facebook account as Mark Zuckerberg. Can we get more assurance and verification that this site is a non-profit, academic exercise and that our data won't get permanently dumped into some database that hackers will pillage later?
    If it's safe please repost this on another ZDNet email so I can come back to this, otherwise I got to steer clear.
    wkyrouz