ie8 fix
Click Here
madison

Former star dotcom analyst sees no new bubble

By | April 12, 2011, 1:32pm PDT

Summary: Henry Blodget was Wall Street’s superstar analyst during the dotcom boom. Who’s better placed to tell us if we are in a new bubble…?

The poster boy for the dotcom bubble has to be the infamous Henry Blodget, the former Wall Street analyst.

At the height of the dotcom boom, Mr Blodget was the top Internet/E-commerce analyst and his research reports were famous for their enthusiastic support for lofty valuations.

When the dotcom turned into a dotbomb, and millions of investors saw their paper fortunes evaporate in the course of a massive market correction, Mr Blodget became a favorite target for Wall Street critics.

The SEC banned him from the securities industry and fined him for sending emails with different opinions to that of his published research reports.

These days he is editor of New York based Business Insider and although he is barred from working as an equities analyst, this doesn’t prevent him from continuing to publish analysis of companies and trends in tech.

So when people ask “Is there a new tech bubble?” because valuations of Facebook, Twitter, Zynga and other tech high flyers are rising faster than their revenues, Mr Blodget is well positioned to compare the present with the past.

He recently made a presentation on this topic to a group of private investors and his conclusion was: “No. But there are other things to worry about.”

Here are his key points:

- Valuations of Facebook, Zynga, Groupon (but not Twitter) are high but justified.
- A key difference with Bubble 1.0 is that “crap” companies are not rising.
- The tech sector appears to be in a cyclical boom rather than a bubble.
- A key worry is that US stock market fundamentals are “scary.”

Mr Blodget estimates that US stocks are overvalued by about 40 percent. A market correction would have a chilling effect on tech company valuations.

You can see his slide deck here.

- - -

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Tom Foremski reports on the business and culture of Silicon Valley at the intersection of technology and media.

Disclosure

Tom Foremski

Tom Foremski is the editor and publisher of Silicon Valley Watcher and Silicon Valley Watch. Tibco Software is an advertiser.

Biography

Tom Foremski

In May 2004, Tom Foremski became the first journalist to leave a major newspaper, the Financial Times, to make a living as a full-time journalist blogger. He writes the popular news blog Silicon Valley Watcher--reporting on the business of Silicon Valley.

Tom arrived in San Francisco in 1984, and has covered US technology markets for leading computer journals around the world.

12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Former star dotcom analyst sees no new bubble
yantangseo 17th Sep
@ipadsucks
You are welcome and thank you! chanel bag ^_^
0 Votes
+ -
who the heck is this person. Never heard of this wannabe
@ipadsucks
You are welcome and thank you! chanel bag ^_^
0 Votes
+ -
I don't know about everyone else
oncall 12th Apr 2011
But I certainly am feeling much better now that Henry is on the case. Because "this time it's different".
0 Votes
+ -
I agree
Robert Hahn Updated - 12th Apr 2011
Many "bubbles" are necessary. It's how we find out what some new infrastructure technology is good for.

Funding large numbers of companies, most of which will fail, is not a mistake. It is the fastest way to find out what works and what doesn't. Is it wasteful? Yes, but it wastes less than all the other ways humans have of figuring out new things.

The reason the U.S. ended up with Google, eTrade, eBay, Amazon, and all the rest is that we also funded a whole bunch of things that didn't work out. In the beginning, nobody knew which was which, and anybody who said he did was a liar. Since we humans do not know the future in advance, the only way we progress is by trying things... most of which don't work.

There really isn't any fundamental new infrastructure technology that's being explored right now. There's still tinkering around the edges of what can be done with the Internet, but we're not going to see a real, genuine bubble until something really revolutionary like nanotechnology gets commercialized. And then we should have a bubble.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Former star dotcom analyst sees no new bubble
intman Updated - 13th Apr 2011
@Robert Hahn

Bubbles aren't necessary if investors do their job instead of acting like sheep. There will always be some investments that succeed and others that fail, but bubbles cause the misallocation of capital that could better be invested elsewhere - in effect, hampering economic growth and acting no better than governments. The quicker these bubbles are burst, the better for our economy.

You just need to look at the investment the Color app received to know it's a bubble.
0 Votes
+ -
I see clouds in your future
Robert Hahn Updated - 13th Apr 2011
@intman I don't agree. There's no such thing as "investors doing their job" when the job consists of "knowing the future in advance." Some ideas that sounded tremendously dumb ("It's an auction site for people who collect plates and stuff") have turned into multi-billion-dollar companies, and some ideas that sounded great on paper ("Like Amazon, except we sell toys") promptly fell on their butts. Sometimes the most energetic, capable entrepreneurs (anybody remember Jugi Tandon? Philippe Kahn?) make perfectly reasonable plans, start out great, and then Fall Down Go Boom. I don't know why that happens, and neither does anyone else. What "oughta work" doesn't, and what shouldn't work does. The only way to open Schroedinger's box and see which it is, is to plunk down some money and go find out.

We can choose, in hindsight, to call the money invested in pets.com and WebVan "misallocated capital," but we could as easily say "It cost us X to find out that selling pet supplies (or groceries) online is not as good an idea as selling books on line." Finding out what doesn't work is worth money too. How much would Microsoft have paid in advance to be warned away from making "Bob"?
I think there is. investors are there to assess risk and then invest - they can't tell the future but they can make good guesses. Bubbles form when investors forget completely about risk, and start throwing money at random business ventures. Train lines in the 19th century (with few attempts made at checking how profitable they may be), stocks jn the 1920s (forgetting that stockmarkets can go down as well as up), dotcom bubble and then housing. Same story, same mistakes
0 Votes
+ -
There is no bubble... only clouds...
ITSamurai 13th Apr 2011
The new term for a hot buzzword with sales people flocking to it is cloud, not bubble - get with the program. There'll be alot of initial growth for sure but I doubt the sustainability and the foresight of many of the people championing the cause.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with Robert Hahn
Scottomatic 15th Apr 2011
I agree with you Robert. But I think Intman is also right in there is a line that must be drawn. All companies are going to strive to make themsleves look good on paper. The line gets drawn where those companies start crossing over into dishonesty. Companies that arent cheating on the SEC reports are fair game for all investors, and generally a crap shoot. Some will win big, most will either crumble or quickly become irrelevant and live out their lives in pinks. I remember my Dad looking at investing in Cisco, it must have been around 1986. I was working as a SQL programmer on a Unix mainframe and he asked me what I thought. I shrugged my shoulders so he didn't invest. Ooops.
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix