Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
Summary: Newspaper paywalls have come under attack but how else can we support quality media so that we can make the right decisions as a society?
I don't understand the current debate over the New York Times paywall. Yes, it has holes in it and yes it is a bit lame but the question it asks is: will you support quality journalism?
That's an important question.
But it seems that the Geekorati believe that once something is free then it should be free forever, and that if you can get past the New York Times paywall, then you are smart.
I disagree and here's why:
I remember when the Internet first started, when domain names were free. When the first advertising appeared on the Internet it was greeted with howls of derision. The pundits claimed that Internet users wouldn't stand for it.
Well, we got used to it and that's what will happen to quality journalism — we will get used to paying for it, and dare I say it: see it as a civic duty.
Because there has to be a mechanism to pay for the good stuff. Otherwise we will be overrun with mediocre and poor quality content.
That's a very bad thing.
We need serious journalists to be healthy and able to challenge the claims of companies and governments, and to stand up to those that buy freedom of speech through money, through PR and other means.
We need quality journalism because: media is how a society thinks about things.
Media is vital to our decision process.
Software engineers are familiar with the expression "garbage in, garbage out."
If we, as a society, have garbage media, then we will make garbage decisions.
We are facing a media landscape that is becoming ever more dominated by garbage media and that means that we, as a society, will be making bad decisions.
And we have some very important decisions to make, about: energy, education, environment, economy, elder care, external conflicts -- and that's just the "e" subjects... There's more, far more, yet we are witnessing a whole scale dumbing down of our media, and therefore a dumbing down of our ability to make the right choices.
We need good media to make the right decisions and to make a good society for ourselves and our communities.
I hope you can join me, it doesn't have to be supporting the New York Times, it can be a local newspaper that you admire but it is important to support quality journalism wherever you see it.
"Pay the wall" and help to make an important contribution to the quality of our society and government.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
Message has been deleted.
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
HAHAHAAHA such nonsense and hate from you. FOX certainly covers the news
Message has been deleted.
Message has been deleted.
bitcrazed: O'Reilly and Beck, are in the "commentary" section of FOX
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
The Economist is an exception to the rule. The Times of London? not so much
"Quality journalism" taught me
If it's in print, then it's a lie.
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
Ohhhh ... so you subscribe to the belief that if its on the interwebs then it's the truth? Please tell me you're not THAT naive?
Your criticism of the "interwebs" is very outdated and out of fashion
It's up to people, who hopefully have at least some common sense, to know how to find the information they seek and to be able to tell truth from lies, and facts from opinion.
So, you need to upgrade your criticism of the internet and come up to a more knowledgeable recognition of what it has become.
Quality journalism has been under attack for a long time.
<b>Update [5pm EDT]: After a quick browse through the other comments, I rest my case.</b><br><br>Not all is lost. There are still people who pay extravagantly for <b>information</b> as opposed to generic news. It may not be a path to celebrity and adoration by millions, but it does put food on the table.
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
you said it best
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
Quallity media is already being AD supported
Sadly the NYT hasn't provided 'quality journalism' in a long time.
It's not the internet killing newspapers, it's the newspapers and their corporate owners doing it themselves.
Regards,
Jon
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...
Oh, and I defy you to get more than three randomly selected people to give you a common definition of "quality journalism".
RE: Here's why you should pay-the-wall and support quality journalism...