Very scary: Google is now "in the hands of a true corporate radical"

Summary: Google's new CEO, Larry Page, wants to change the world and he's taking us along for the ride...


Steven Levy, a senior editor at Wired, spent a lot of time at Google researching his new book, "In the Plex." And he spent a lot of time with the new CEO Larry Page.

Mr Levy says Google is now "in the hands of a true corporate radical."

In an article for Wired, "Larry Page Wants to Return Google to Its Startup Roots" he writes that Mr Page has told him many times, that he has always wanted to do something that changes the world.

He sees the historic technology boom as a chance to realize such ambitions and sees those who fail to do so as shamelessly squandering the opportunity. To Page, the only true failure is not attempting the audacious.

Interesting stuff.


So what will be Mr Page's audacious ventures? That's not clear yet. Whatever it is, he'll be taking about 25,000 staff, tens of thousands of shareholders, and hundreds of millions of users on the ride with him.

Will this distract Google? Will it take its eye off the ball?

Google occupies a tremendously important position within the global economy, it's ability to continue doing what it does best, affects huge volumes of global commerce and many millions of businesses.

My concern about the "corporate radical" Mr Page is that improving search and contextual advertising is not very glamorous, it certainly doesn't change the world but it's hugely important to all Internet users.

Will it be important enough for Mr Page's ambitions? It doesn't look like it, he's shown interest in everything from space flight to nuclear reactors.

I'm sure that he has an imaginary Wikipedia page from the future in his mind, and it doesn't include something like this:

"Larry Page resumed the CEO position on April 1, 2011, where he spent the rest of his years honing his Page Rank algorithm, incrementally improving the search experience for Internet users ... searching for skateboarding cats and cheap coupons."

My concern is that the road to hell is paved with good intentions and I'd rather not be in the same vehicle as Mr Page. But because of Google's dominance -- we are all sitting in the passenger seat.

But shouldn't Mr Page "change the world" somewhere else? After all, Bill Gates does it through his foundation, not through Microsoft.

I'd advise Mr Page to head up Google Foundation and leave the mundane work of improving search to those that are comfortable with more modest ambitions.

Otherwise, expect more self-driving cars, neighborhood nuclear power stations, and whatever else Mr Page thinks is a world changer.

Or, maybe there's not too much to worry about?

Mr Levy writes that Google staff have figured out ways of dealing with Mr Pages' "nuttier instincts."

... Googlers have learned that the best way to counter some of his more problematic idiosyncrasies is not by having a frank discussion but through misdirection. For instance, Wesley Chan, a top product manager ... has learned that instead of arguing his case with Page, a better strategy is “giving him shiny objects to play with.”

If you want Google to remain Google, please send your shiny objects to: Larry Page, Googleplex, Santa Clara, CA 94043.


Topics: Google, Browser, Collaboration, Telcos

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

77 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • They already changed the world

    Remeber internet pre google?
    ..a land of unstructured data, and a growing industry of publishers of book like "how to navigate internet" or "the top 100 most interesting sites"...
    that is gone. In a short span of time google emerged as the gatekeeper of all relevant public information, and that is not a small feast.
    theo_durcan
    • RE: Very scary: Google

      @theo_durcan - you've obviously forgotten AltaVista (among others) which, until Google came along and did an incrementally better job of indexing sites' pages, was doing a good solid job of doing exactly what Google search does today.
      bitcrazed
      • RE: Very scary: Google

        @bitcrazed
        And Yahoo.

        The fact that Google has "emerged as the gatekeeper of all relevant public information" is a terrifying situation. But, add to that that they have become the profiler of all users of the internet, and the largest stockpiler of private individual information in the world, and now have a megalomaniac CEO.

        I would rather not think about it.
        jorjitop
      • RE: Very scary: Google

        @bitcrazed No way... Alta vista, lycos etc. sucked big time. You used to have to wade through 5 6 sometimes 10 pages of results to find what you wanted AND use "advanced search" and all sorts of random arcane operators. It was NOT adequate. I'm sure you have many fond memories of those times, but as time wears on people's minds tend to remember certain things selectively.

        What Google did was put what you wanted on page 1 or page 2. That was revolutionary that you didn't have to sift through 10 pages and then filter the results. Google replaced the needle in the haystack that was the previous search engines results with a stack of needles.
        snoop0x7b
      • Megalomania?

        @jorjitop

        Pathetic really. I wonder if you consider Jobs, Ellison, Gates/Ballmer, and all the other "corporate radicals" to be cute and fluffy beneficiaries of mankind.
        ego.sum.stig
      • RE: Very scary: Google

        @bitcrazed

        several poeple have already complained that these search engines were never near as goodas Google. Be that as it may, under pressure from Google, Bing and Yahoo! have much improved. And there is a new kid on the (English speaking) block: Yandex.

        For the Russian language world, Yandex returned much better results thatn Google did for YEARS. It was Google that had to catch up with Yandex.

        Now that Yandex is open in the US we can watch them give Google a run for their money.
        mejohnsn
      • RE: Very scary: Google

        @bitcrazed

        Thank you so much ^O^ <a href="http://www.classicchanelbags.org">chanel bags</a>
        yantangseo
    • RE: Very scary: Google

      @theo_durcan Remember "hot links" pages on everyone's website?
      snoop0x7b
    • RE: Very scary: Google

      @theo_durcan Don;t worry we are coming back to pre-google times on high speed. Its search results becoming more and more useless day by day ... :-)
      Nikolayev
  • What all the spying and data thief

    the world would be a better place without Google
    iPad-awan
    • Same ol' big corp self-promotion

      ... and hubris. What changes?
      LBiege
    • RE: Very scary: Google

      @iPad-awan
      Google privacy policy is clearly displayed for everyone... Nobody is forcing you to use Google...
      prof123
      • RE: Very scary: Google

        @prof123

        But Google is profiling you whether you use them or not. How many web sites do you go to that use Google-Analytics in script? All that data goes to Google as part of your profile.
        jorjitop
      • Simple

        @prof123

        When I check my NoScript options, Google Analytics is blocked. Where is the problem?
        Economister
      • Your short argument falls short.

        @prof123

        Nobody forces you to use Google. True.

        That of course speaks nothing to the huge huge difference between not being "forced" to use something and choosing not to use something that has a myriad of compelling reasons almost necessitating its use.

        I don't think anybody is getting very far with an argument that would state Google isn't providing a very effective search engine, that and a number of other very effective services they make available.

        So sure, nobody forces you to use Google, but they sure make it difficult in many respects not to. When any company gets into the position of Google they have to show some strong social morality because they HAVE asked to be put in the position they are in, and it certainly is a position that involves a great deal of societal trust.
        Cayble
      • RE: Very scary: Google

        @prof123 You people don't see it. Data mining is a MAGIC POWER, like on Heroes, except cooler. It allows you to know otherwise unknowable things (omniscience) and to predict the future. It's elevating mankind to the level of Gods! (Bwhahahaha!) Why so much hatred for a technology that can do the mundane (find you books or movies you'll like but not yet read/seen) to uncovering genetic markers for diseases, making you billions in the stock market forecasting stock prices, saving you money by spotting insurance and credit card fraud, predicting weather, predicting imminent hardware failures, etc.? It's incredible, amazing stuff and you should be embracing it instead of running from it. Heck, every time I get served an ad for my dream car, the Cadillac CTS-V, instead of for a feminine hygiene product, I thank Google profusely.
        jgm@...
    • RE: Very scary: Google

      @iPad-awan Well, the world would be a better place with MORE HUMILITY, IMHO. But eh...different strokes for different folks.
      gork platter
    • RE: Very scary: Google

      @iPad-awan Yeah, I loved sifting through many pages of irrelevant results to find what I wanted back in the day. Metacrawler was the poo!

      Google, and every other search engine, yahoo, bing, etc. All profile you based on your search terms. You choose to share what you are searching for with the search engine to get results. Logically it should follow that you have consented to share what you're searching for and what results you clicked... There's no such thing as a search engine that doesn't take the keyword you're searching for and the link you clicked.

      Google analytics is here because people want to know how you use their websites. You were previously sharing that information with another company, Urchin (who also sold ads), before google bought them. And you know what else? Yahoo has competing developer and publisher tools and advertising platforms. Lycos used to do the same thing (albeit unsuccessfully).
      snoop0x7b
    • RE: Very scary: Google

      @iPad-awan No,it would be better without Apple.
      anto31
  • RE: Very scary: Google

    "Google occupies a tremendously important position within the global economy, it?s ability to continue doing what it does best, affects huge volumes of global commerce and many millions of businesses."

    The above statement is rubbish. Google has very limited enterprise presence and there are better products in the market for each and every product they offer. They can be easily replaced.

    Remember what happened to Computer Associates???


    In the consumer space its just Gmail. Plenty of better alternatives

    Oh search ! , Bing has matured enough to kick ass google search and the bing result representation is elegant and beautiful.

    Android and Chrome Os will be dead in a couple of years.

    Those coorporates which abuses business ethics and public confidence are doomed.

    Remember Enron/Lehman brothers?.

    Google is not too big to fail.
    owlnet