Why The Big Fuss Over Microblogs?

Why The Big Fuss Over Microblogs?

Summary: I microblog.Why? The truth is, I learn by doing and by speaking with others who do.

SHARE:
TOPICS: CXO, Browser, Mobility
3

I microblog.Why? The truth is, I learn by doing and by speaking with others who do. So I dabble with Twitter, Plurk, Pownce, Spoink, Rakawa, Tumblr, Utterli, Yammer, FriendFeed, 12seconds, and probably a few others that I signed up for and forgot to use. I have found a nice collection of people that I like to follow, and some people follow me too. So microblogging appeals to the extrovert in me, and I'm strangely fascinated reading what other people are doing (or what they say they are doing). Narcissism and voyeurism are at play.

The current pattern of Web 2.0 innovation starts with the incubation and socialization of a concept in the consumer space. For many vendors, this is just baiting the hook. Once these behaviors are socialized, maybe the most devoted users will want to take those behaviors to work too. And then someone with budget to burn might be willing to pay to support the habit. All the devotees have to do is convince the person with the purse that there is a real business need to satisfy. Addiction and justification are at play.

Microblogging now appears on stage. Smart people spend many coffee-infused hours thinking of reasons that real employees might need to microblog. Some of the use cases may even make sense. If people (and automated systems, sensors, and applications) are willing to emit bits of insight, these info-bit streams eventually compile into some form of valuable information. The idea of short message communication is chic and appealing. But microblogging requires patience on the part of the reader to learn the patterns emitted from the stream. Elegance and tediousness are at play.

But why the appeal? Why the fuss? I believe two factors are at play:

  1. Mobility makes us omnipresent, but short on time. Microblogging appeals to those who use mobile devices. It provides a channel that honors our thumbs and encourages us to say just a few words. And we can connect to the intranet from anywhere. For some, this is true power.
  2. The list of people I "follow" may be interesting to you. Although Web 2.0 tools present information, their use becomes increasingly more interesting when we look at the network of people who generate and care about the information. In the case of the microblog: my "follow -list" may be more interesting to you than my micro-posts.

As enterprises become more mobile, when we break out of the cube farms and conduct our primary work from our mobile devices, then we'll see more miniaturization of communications. I expect enterprise microblogging to serve as a place where mobile workers check in. Maybe a few conversations take off, but then employees will revert to email the moment the conversation becomes something not sharable with everyone. And we'll need some good filtering tools to help us organize and manage microblog streams. Right now, there's just too much out there to be useful to the already-overworked information worker. We barely handle the volume of corporate emails now. So microblogs will have to provide evidence they are an improvement, or they will not thrive in the enterprise.

The more interesting behavior emerges when network-graphing tools surf through the people whom you follow and identify the influential people they follow. This is where human context makes information more valuable. Social connection farming is a bit creepy, especially in the enterprise. But if it catches on, then we'll see a wave of new tools that harvest "follow-lists." So if you think I'm interesting to follow, then you might be more interested in the people I follow. Maybe you follow me because you found someone else who does. All this will be followed by tools that protect the "follow lists" from prying eyes too. So these little blogs are creating a big fuss.

Will the Information & Knowledge Management professional see microblogs as narcissistic, voyeuristic, and addictive toys that have no place at work? Or will mobile workforces find real use for a technology that keeps messages short and visible?

What do you think?

Topics: CXO, Browser, Mobility

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • microblogging as part of blogging

    True story, I came to this blog posting and read it because I follow ZDNet on Twitter. Thats the main reason I use microblogging, to promote my blog while seeing who's updating their's, and about what.
    However you make an interesting point about looking and who is following whom. Marketers are already creating and selling databases about our buying habits, why wouldn't they want to use our following habits to the same end?
    LadyVoIP
  • RE: Why The Big Fuss Over Microblogs?

    Regarding KM : microblogging provides an heuristic and effective approach, although not perfect, to knowledge management !

    Voyeurism & narcissism : I fully agree, and you can also add an other human nature rule : "nature abhors a vacuum"
    llathieyre
  • RE: Why The Big Fuss Over Microblogs?

    Perhaps it's just me, but I'm eagerly waiting for the "Web 2.0" fad to die down. You'd swear that the entire freakin' planet just discovered the internet and are excited to tell all their friends about it, who also just made the discovery, so they're eager to tell all their friends, and so on.

    What are we really getting out of all this, though? We have a global network of computers capable of processing, transmitting, and storing tens of millions of gigabytes of information at our disposal, and the best the business world can come up with to make use of it is giving some schmuck on an iPhone/BlackBerry/$SMART_PHONE_OF_THE_DAY the ability to tell their friends about their indigestion from the pastrami sandwich they ate at lunch?

    Did anyone else read this article?
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10045321-2.html

    Tim O'Reilly has a huge point. Where is all this lovely new technology leading us? What -real- problems is Web 2.0 solving? I don't think that businesses and IT shops who have built their strategies around the "revolution" have an idea of how powerful the internet could be, if they would only use it to do something -useful-.

    Hell, I'd go as far as to say the only people in the world who realize the true power of the internet are the pricks who create those clever little zombie botnets that we all love. Meanwhile, John Consumer is busy hammering away into his mobile, updating his Twitter feed to let everyone know he isn't feeling well.

    Put down your damn phone. Nobody cares that you just ate a pastrami sandwich. Really.
    jklein@...