ie8 fix

The ToyBox

Ricardo Bilton & Gloria Sin

Apple Mac OS X Lion: what you need to know (so far)

By | October 20, 2010, 12:02pm PDT

Summary: Apple CEO Steve Jobs has unveiled the latest version of its desktop operating system, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion. Here’s what you need to know.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs on Wednesday unveiled the latest version of its desktop operating system, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion. Here’s what you need to know.

While the Cupertino, Calif.-based company gave only a preview of the operating system, the theme is that the desktop operating system found on MacBooks, iMacs and Mac Pro computers is taking steps toward its newer mobile operating system, iOS, found on iPhones, iPods and iPads.

That means Apple is even more apparent in its decision to play the platform and tighten the integration of its product portfolio, instead of supporting two distinct development paths. That also means Lion is in a way a transitional release for Apple — in direct contrast to 10.5 Leopard, which set the modern standard, and 10.6 Snow Leopard, which refined it — and has an odd marriage of desktop and mobile features.

The biggest indication of this shift is the inclusion of the company’s wildly popular (and wildly lucrative) App Store on its Mac platform. Running as a separate application with a dock icon, the App Store is a window into a new category of apps: desktop apps. (Some of you tech-inclined folk would call this “software”; GDGT’s Ryan Block was indeed correct in saying that this spells the end, finally, of boxed software.)

The App Store works the same way that it does on an iPhone, iPad or iPod: find what you want, download it and install it in one step. It’s a lot like iTunes in this regard, but it’s an important step in moving toward a single, curated, pay-to-play (unless it’s free) portal for (approved) content.

Apple also introduced Launchpad, which it calls “a new home for all of your Mac apps.” It displays them much like an iPad does: as spaced out applications in an invisible grid that opens on the screen, organized as pages to move (on an iPhone, iPad or iPod, swipe) through.

You can also create folders of apps, which are managed in a gray strip, just like the latest version of iOS.

That feature dovetails with another called Mission Control (paging NASA…), which combines the Exposé, Dashboard and Spaces applications of OS X with full screen apps. If that doesn’t make sense, consider that when you trigger Exposé, you can see distinct selections for your open windows and your open apps in one place.

Apple also declared that Lion has full support, across the entire system and including gestures, for full screen apps.

Finally, Apple added Mac support for FaceTime, which you’ll remember is the company’s Wi-Fi-only videochat application.

That means Mac users can videochat with iPhone 4 and iPod touch users, as well as other Macs. The program automatically uses Address Book contacts, but oddly operates distinctly from the OS X’s own iChat program.

The application is downloadable now for Snow Leopard users or higher.

The company didn’t reveal much more about the operating system. Jobs pitched these features as “fresh” and “new,” but they’re really rather necessary to wed the two concepts of Mac OS X and iOS together. But it’s clear that Apple has tried, to the best of its ability, to fuse two product lines together. It’s the company’s first foray into this, and it will no doubt be a rocky one as users get used to the idea of these distinct platforms operating as one. But, in a way, it portends the next phase of computing.

The App Store will be available for Snow Leopard within 90 days. It will be included in Lion when it ships in summer 2011.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Andrew J. Nusca is editor of ZDNet and SmartPlanet.

Disclosure

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew J. Nusca is an editor for ZDNet and SmartPlanet. As a journalist based in New York City, he has written for Popular Mechanics and Men's Vogue and his byline has appeared in New York magazine, The Huffington Post, New York Daily News, Editor & Publisher, New York Press and many others. He also writes The Editorialiste, a media criticism blog.

He is a New York University graduate and former news editor and columnist of the Washington Square News. He is a graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. He has been named "Howard Kurtz, Jr." by film critic John Lichman despite having no relation to him. He lives in his native Philadelphia with his wife, cat and Boston Terrier.

Follow him on Twitter.

90
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Apple Mac OS X Lion: what you need to know (so far)
rrattigan 13th Nov 2010
I have to say that this sounds pretty pathetic. I use Witch, Hyperspaces, and QuickSilver to do all my app management. I have tweaked the dock so that i never see it. I have made my OSX usable in spite of itself. I never need to look at my Applications folder - I just hit command-space and type 'lr' for LightRoom, 'ch' for chrome. I have no interest in organizing my applications. In addition, I absolutely hate the AppStore, and iTunes store for that matter. They are completely unusable, and useless for finding quality applications/media. To find an app that I want, I do research on the goog, and then look it up in the AppStore by name. I can't believe that Apple is trying to bring that crap to their flagship OS. I will be politely ignoring it.
0 Votes
+ -
The App Store:
find what you want, download it and install it in one step

Oh, you mean exactly like Steam on Windows?

Launchpad:
spaced out applications in an invisible grid that opens on the screen

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! Have any of you ever seen a screen shot of Windows 3.1? Why that looked like spaced out applications on an invisible grid that opens on the screen!!!!!!! HILARIOUS!!!!!!

You can also create folders of apps

Wow. Folders of apps. Just like... Win 3.1!

Apple also declared that Lion has full support, across the entire system and including gestures, for full screen apps.

Oh. Just like Vista. Good job Apple!

Facetime:
Oh, just like Skype on Windows. Cool.

Apple, you truly have outdone yourself. I'm not sure there has ever been a release of OS X that was based so heavily on stuff copied from MS!
0 Votes
+ -
Ok...Ok
rag@... 20th Oct 2010
@NonZealot Time to let your mom have her e-Machine back.
0 Votes
+ -
Good rebuttal!
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
@rag@...
Oh, wait, no, it wasn't.
  • Flagged
@SuperZealot... Its a great rebuttal! You're obviously a M$ plant. For a Windoze Zealot, you spend 90% of your time commenting on Apple stories. Are you in tech or not?
@rag... Now that was funny... great rebuttal to such a ridiculous post!
0 Votes
+ -
@Non Zealot@... yes it was- :))
It seems as though you're fond of Windows 3.1- if that's the best you can run, I say go for it! happy
But, I'm really not being a smartass here- (meaning: yes, I am being a smartass here) I know that Windows is the single greatest innovation... nay, INSPIRATION that has happened in the 19th AND 20th centuries combined!
That being said- if you like Windows so much, stick with it! Now, you've had your turn to talk- the grownups are talking now... if you hurry, you might be able to catch a Spongebob rerun! happy
www.dfwsupergeek.com
0 Votes
+ -
Pathetic..
mamouneyya 20th Oct 2010
@NonZealot
HA... HA... HA... trying to be funny, huh?
0 Votes
+ -
Good rebuttal!
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
@mamouneyya
Oh, wait, no, it wasn't.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
actually....
Techloaded 20th Oct 2010
@mamouneyya yeah he was kinda funny
0 Votes
+ -
@mamouneyya Yep- this one was a good one too! happy
www.dfwsupergeek.com
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple Mac OS X Lion: what you need to know (so far)
mamouneyya Updated - 20th Oct 2010
@NonZealot
It's really crap to say that Apple is STEALING ideas FROM Micro$oft. What a bu**sh**..
0 Votes
+ -
I fixed your post
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
@mamouneyya
It's really true to say that Apple is STEALING ideas FROM Microsoft.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@NonZealot I don't want to talk out of my a** here... but I remember reading something about how the buttons ended up on the right side of the Windows frames...
0 Votes
+ -
@mamouneyya

Unfortunately some people like NonZealot (see Internet Troll) can't see the truth past what they wish to portray. They ignore little truths that get in the way - such as the fact that Bill Gates was employed by Apple (pre-Windows 3.1) to work on a GUI for one of their apple machines, or that the GUI he (Bill Gates) assisted writing never got out as it was superceded by the Lisa (again pre-windows 3.1) before he (Bill Gates) had finished it.

Oh - and the GUI was also pretty much copied from an unpatented one developed by Xerox

Also regarding gestures - I'm pretty sure that these first came out on Palms before anything else.

Steam - isn't that a pretty much a games only distribution channel?
0 Votes
+ -
Gods...
olePigeon 20th Oct 2010
"Oh, you mean exactly like Steam on Windows?"

Or like the App Store on iPhone.

"Have any of you ever seen a screen shot of Windows 3.1?"

I'm trying to forget.

"Why that looked like spaced out applications on an invisible grid that opens on the screen!!!!!!!"

Actually it looked like someone vomited on my computer screen. Maybe you mean the Xerox Alto and Apple Lisa.

"Wow. Folders of apps. Just like... Win 3.1!"

Or like the iPad.

"Oh. Just like Vista."

Or not. Windows 7 was the first version Windows to bring system wide multi-touch, which was spurred by development on the iPhone.

"Oh, just like Skype on Windows."

Or Skype on Macintosh.

"Apple, you truly have outdone yourself. I'm not sure there has ever been a release of OS X that was based so heavily on stuff copied from MS!"

Microsoft invented the app store, application grid overlay, multi touch, and Skype? When did this happen?
0 Votes
+ -
LOL!!!
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
@olePigeon
Or like the App Store on iPhone.

No, that was stolen from Handango InHand on Windows Mobile. When it comes to application stores on the desktop, this idea was stolen from Steam.

Maybe you mean the Xerox Alto and Apple Lisa.

Nope, I meant Windows 3.1, the OS that popularized the GUI.

Or like the iPad.

Are you suggesting that the iPad was the first implementation of application icons in folders? Well, you probably would suggest that. Sorry bud but this one came straight from the implementation that MS popularized in Win 3.1

Windows 7 was the first version Windows to bring system wide multi-touch

Nope. The OS codebase underneath MS Surface is Vista and we all know that Apple copied its multi-touch implementation from that.

Microsoft invented the app store, application grid overlay, multi touch, and Skype? When did this happen?

I just laid it out for you. So sorry you weren't able to follow along!
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
In your own little fantasy world...
olePigeon 20th Oct 2010
"Nope, I meant Windows 3.1, the OS that popularized the GUI."

In your own little fantasy world, maybe. Meanwhile in reality, it is commonly held that the Apple Macintosh popularized the GUI.

"Are you suggesting that the iPad was the first implementation of application icons in folders? Well, you probably would suggest that. Sorry bud but this one came straight from the implementation that MS popularized in Win 3.1"

No, I didn't suggest that. The style and implementation obviously comes from the iPad. The icon and folder motif was popularized by Macintosh Toolbox and Finder on the Macintosh. Susan Kare designed the original icons, she also went on to design the icons for Windows 3.

"Nope. The OS codebase underneath MS Surface is Vista and we all know that Apple copied its multi-touch implementation from that."

No, we're talking about system-wide integration, the feature you just quoted about. Windows 7, according to Microsoft, is the first version of Windows to include system-wide multi touch integration.

"I just laid it out for you. So sorry you weren't able to follow along!"

Except, you just stated, "I'm not sure there has ever been a release of OS X that was based so heavily on stuff copied from MS!"

You can't even follow yourself. How the hell do you walk and chew gum at the same time?
0 Votes
+ -
Just in your reality
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
@olePigeon
Meanwhile in reality, it is commonly held that the Apple Macintosh popularized the GUI.

Just in your reality. If we were to count the number of people who have used a Windows GUI and compared it to the number of people who have used a Mac OS GUI, Windows GUI is by far the more popular GUI. Therefore, it is MS that popularized the GUI.

Same goes for your grid of icons claptrap. It was MS that popularized it. Interestingly enough, it is also MS that is getting us away from that 20 year old design!

And so sorry but I've proved you wrong about multi-touch. It was available in MS Surface which used the Vista codebase. So you are wrong. Again.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
You're completely lost.
olePigeon Updated - 20th Oct 2010
"If we were to count the number of people who have used a Windows GUI and compared it to the number of people who have used a Mac OS GUI, Windows GUI is by far the more popular GUI."

Way to move the goal posts. First you're talking about Windows 3, now you you're talking about all versions of Windows.

"Therefore, it is MS that popularized the GUI."

Windows 3 did not exist in the 1980s, ergo it did not popularize the GUI. Now you're changing your claim to fit your new argument, and it isn't even supported by any published material.

If you were to make any claim remotely relevant, you could argue that Windows 95 was the most important release of Windows, which helped secured Microsoft's desktop dominance by making it more Mac-like.

"And so sorry but I've proved you wrong about multi-touch. It was available in MS Surface which used the Vista codebase. So you are wrong. Again."

You don't read, and you certainly don't comprehend; as I just stated not two minutes ago that this is in regards to system wide integration of multi touch which you originally quoted, and which I replied quoting Microsoft stating that Windows 7 is the first version of Windows to include system wide integration of multi touch.

Surface ran applications with a special set of libraries to demonstrate multi touch. It was not integrated system wide into the operating system, which is the argument you originally made, which is wrong; quod erat demonstrandum.
0 Votes
+ -
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NonZealot Updated - 20th Oct 2010
@olePigeon
Windows 3 did not exist in the 1980s, ergo it did not popularize the GUI.

But the iPhone didn't exist in the early 2000s, ergo it did not popularize the smartphone.

But the iPod didn't exist in the 1990s, ergo it did not popularize the MP3 player.

But Mac OS did not exist in the early 1980s, ergo it did not popularize the GUI.

You were talking about moving goal posts? Yeah, you are the master at that.

MS Windows, all versions, popularized the GUI, starting at Windows 3.1. Now, if you want to put an artificial end date of April 5, 1992 for the declaration of an OS to popularize the GUI, feel free to do so. Just realize though that you've done exactly what I did above, chosen a date to suit your argument.

My argument is far simpler: what is the most popular desktop OS GUI in the world? No dates, no cherry picking numbers. What is the most popular desktop OS GUI in the world? That would be Windows. Therefore, MS popularized the GUI with Windows. And no amount of latin can change that. :)

As for Vista and multi-touch, argue all you want, the facts simply don't support you. Vista was the first popular multi-touch desktop OS in the world. Apple copied MS, once again, on this one.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@olePigeon Sir, based on this comment, and your reply below, I would humbly like to shake your hand.
Thank you.
www.dfwsupergeek.com
0 Votes
+ -
@olePigeon
Wasn't there a lawsuit against MS for "stealing" Apple's ideas right after 3.1 came out?
0 Votes
+ -
During that trial, Xerox then sued Apple for stealing the GUI from them.

The Xerox case was thrown out on a technicality but they would have won otherwise.

Apple's case was thrown out because the judge found that there was absolutely no merit to the case.

So yes, Apple did sue and lost. Miserably. And since a court of law has ruled on it, it is official, MS did not steal anything from Apple. A judge has ruled it to be so.
0 Votes
+ -
@olePigeon
What non Zealot need to do is look up the Windows Vista video done on a Mac. When they announced Visa's new features on a video some redid the Video showing everything coming to Vista already being done on the Mac. I know it was a while back but it really puts Microsoft in it it's place.
0 Votes
+ -
And of course you will be...
zkiwi 20th Oct 2010
First in line to buy it, just so you can hate on it in person.
0 Votes
+ -
Nope, won't be buying this one
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
@zkiwi
I was able to buy Snow Leopard for a few bucks so yes, I did buy that one. I'll be giving this one a big pass. Thanks but no thanks Steve-O!
0 Votes
+ -
@NonZealot

Sure, Apple copied from MS, that is just hilarious!!
0 Votes
+ -
Take another pill and calm down Dude.
GeoffMichael 20th Oct 2010
@NonZealot Whatever is bothering you, I hope it gets resolved soon before you stroke out.
0 Votes
+ -
@GeoffMichael I don't know if anyone is qualified to treat issues that severe.
www.dfwsupergeek.com
@GeoffMichael Aw, let him stroke out. Then we don't have to read his drivel anymore. I wish ZDNet had an option to exclude spam comments.
@NonZealot. What a jerk.
Nonzi,

You're in full form! I've missed you!

HILE NONzi !!!!
@NonZealot You know, I actually believed at one point that you knew what you were talking about. But if Windows 3.1 is the furthest you can go back to find grid based icons and folders for apps, then you clearly don't. Ever heard of GEM. It's a little thing was being used on computers, way before Windows 3.1 was ever invented... more than 6 years before in fact. The system it allegedly stole elements from (Apple Lisa) was out 12 years before Windows 3.0. So much fail on just one item in your list... sorry, two elements, you can add your "folders of apps" fail to it. Christ, you can even include Amiga Workbench, as an icon and folder based system before Windows 3.x.

Steam: A-ha-ha-ha... that's funny. Steam's a piece of turd, who would want to copy that?
@NonZealot

Do you really have nothing else to do? Stop wasting our time.
0 Votes
+ -
Well from the response of the "Windows" types, I guess MS has something like this out there. I have only been on the Apple side of the fence for just a little over a year, of my 30+ years of computer use, but I know from the get go Apple's will work and MS's has crashed and burned countless times and is a joke. You can keep your MS trash.
0 Votes
+ -
I think not
Yaminom Updated - 20th Oct 2010
@Zealot -

The Macintosh had folders of apps long before Windows 3.1, and still has them, of course. You can have folders, and you can put application short cuts or executable files in them. That's basic to pretty much all current graphical operating systems.

But in Lion, we are talking about something a bit different.

What's new in OS X Lion is the ease with which one can create folders of apps, and the way the app folders behave within the system.

For example, in Win 3.1, could you drag one app's icon on top of another, and have the operating system automatically create a folder named for the type of apps the two of them are? Having used Windows since version 2 (and 286), I can say that no, you could not. Nor can you in any version of Windows.

And this is a special type of folder, too, which as I said behaves in different and useful ways. Did Win 3.1 have that? Again, I recall, no.

As for the App Store being a copy of Steam, who gives a damn? It wasn't presented as being a new invention. It was presented as being cool and useful to people who use Macintosh computers.

I could go on, but it would be pointless.
0 Votes
+ -
This entire thread is lame
dpatjhh 21st Oct 2010
You have all stooped to the level of the first poster which means he accomplished his goal.
0 Votes
+ -
@NonZealot
Hey, you're a funny guy. Of course you know that Windows was actually a rip-off of IBM's OS/2, which Microsoft were working on with IBM, sorry to inconvenience you with the facts.

When most using a Microsoft OS were still running DOS-2.1 on PCs that needed installation of a separate card for everything other than basic text on a monochrome monitor, Steve Jobs released Mac OS:



No black turtle-neck, but the showman was in the house! Note the use of text-to-speech at the end.
0 Votes
+ -
@NonZealot Just turn off your computer and take your meds!
since it can transform crap into gold.
0 Votes
+ -
If we compared company profits...
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
it looks like MS has a lot more gold than Apple does! happy
0 Votes
+ -
golden delicious
buddhistMonkey Updated - 20th Oct 2010
@Zealot ((( "If we compared company profits... it looks like MS has a lot more gold than Apple does!" )))

Not any more, it doesn't. Microsoft's profit for last quarter was $4.5 billion, while Apple's was a little more than $4 billion. Apple already blew past Microsoft in market cap, to become the second-most valuable company in the world. Within a year (maybe even next quarter), they'll blow past Microsoft's profits, too. I so look forward to your wailing and gnashing of teeth when that happens.
0 Votes
+ -
Do you even know what Market Cap is?
Michael Alan Goff 21st Oct 2010
If so, you would know that it means absolutely nothing.
...or the cult leader has deemed the crap to be gold now, and all the cult followers said "Oh yes, Master, this is gold now". "Thanks for allowing us to partake of it". "You are so brilliant".
0 Votes
+ -
Yikes, I just had a horrible thought!
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
@phess11
What if Steve Jobs, like the emperor in the fable, did his presentation with no clothes on? Hey, if the Apple zealots can see gold where there is none, I'm sure they can see clothes where there are none.

EEEEEWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@NonZealot Do you think about Steve Jobs naked a lot, then? Inquiring minds want to know!
I'm not thrilled by it. I was really hoping they'd put a fresher looking GUI on it. This must be a move towards the touch interface they're working on, but I still don't like the look.

Very 'meh' about this current round of releases.
0 Votes
+ -
Me too. (nt)
NonZealot 20th Oct 2010
@I12BPhil
0 Votes
+ -
Sounds like they are trying to put the iPad on life support until next summer when OS X 10.7 is released. Then the need for the iPad will be gone.
0 Votes
+ -
Editor
I'd argue the complete opposite.
andrew.nusca 20th Oct 2010
@Loverock Davidson Notice which operating system is migrating toward which: it's OS X becoming more iOS-like, not the other way around.
I have to say that this sounds pretty pathetic. I use Witch, Hyperspaces, and QuickSilver to do all my app management. I have tweaked the dock so that i never see it. I have made my OSX usable in spite of itself. I never need to look at my Applications folder - I just hit command-space and type 'lr' for LightRoom, 'ch' for chrome. I have no interest in organizing my applications. In addition, I absolutely hate the AppStore, and iTunes store for that matter. They are completely unusable, and useless for finding quality applications/media. To find an app that I want, I do research on the goog, and then look it up in the AppStore by name. I can't believe that Apple is trying to bring that crap to their flagship OS. I will be politely ignoring it.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix