The ToyBox

Ricardo Bilton & Gloria Sin

Apple releases Safari 5.0 update; includes Extensions Gallery

By | July 28, 2010, 6:06am PDT

Summary: Apple has just published the latest upgrade to Safari, version 5.0.1, which includes a whole new feature called “Extensions Gallery,” as well as a number of other interesting fixes.

Apple has just published the latest upgrade to Safari, version 5.0.1, which includes a whole new feature called “Extensions Gallery,” as well as a number of other interesting fixes.

The Extensions Gallery is essentially a center for add-on features and toolbars for a variety of different web programs and services. Ones that are most likely to be popular among Safari users include extensions for Twitter, The New York Times, MLB.com, and Amazon. There’s even one called “Better Facebook” that will actually tell you when you’ve been “unfriended.” Bummer.

All of them are built using HTML5, CSS or Javascript technologies. You can get a full look at the Extensions function before downloading on Apple’s site.

But the 5.0.1 update doesn’t stop there. Taking a look at the Software Update window on my own Macbook, some of the big fixes include better CSS animations, improved scrolling on MobileMe mail and fixing some Javascript issues.

Then there are a few that stood out a bit, like fixing an issue that “prevented boarding passes from www.aa.com from printing correctly,” and another that “fixes an issue that could cause Flash content to overlap with other content on www.facebook.com, www.crateandbarrel.com, and other sites when using Flash 10.1.” Go figure.

Safari 5.0.1 is available for downloading now.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

Talkback Most Recent of 7 Talkback(s)

  • RE: Apple releases Safari 5.0 update; includes Extensions Gallery
    We loved MS Extensions so much, we're going to abandon open standards for Apple's proprietary take on HTML5?

    Apple must think it's on a mission from God to destroy the Babel of open standards.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ks2problema
    28th Jul 2010
  • Keep smoking whatever it is you smoke...
    @ks2problema... eventually it will make you retarded.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Snooki_smoosh_smoosh
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple releases Safari 5.0 update; includes Extensions Gallery
    @JM1981
    I've been designing web pages since 1995 and I've seen proprietary browser extensions cause nothing but trouble for developers.

    Those whose loyalties are to one company have their priorities.

    Me, I'm 'loyal' to the idea of open standards and cross-platform development. Call me a wide-eyed idealist.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ks2problema
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple releases Safari 5.0 update; includes Extensions Gallery
    @ks2problema Apple was the one who pushed for the concept of HTML5 in the first place instead of XHTML and created the consortium of independent browser makers (WHATWG) like Mozilla and Opera to push for modern HTML5, CSS3, and AJAX. There is nothing proprietary about Apple's push, it is all done within the purview of the W3C. It is official W3C policy to encourage browsermakers to experiment with proposed standards using temporary proprietary CSS exensions until a proposal has been agreed upon, which usually takes years; in the case of Firefox, it's 'moz-'. Are you going to rail against them and Opera too? Apple has not added ANY proprietary tags to HTML5. Considering that HTML5 may not reach recommendation status until 2022 or later, and CSS3 is not expected to be ratified for some time, that is just as well. That said, Apple do have a more immediate vision of what they want to accomplish with HTML5 and CSS3, so they do put proposals forward to the W3C and implement them in WebKit before they are approved. Once they are ratified, the 'webkit-' extension is removed from the CSS, the same as what Mozilla and Opera does. That, as mentioned, is the officially-sanctioned way of the W3C. All the proposals Apple have devised with Mozilla and Opera has been put forward for consideration by the W3C in the form of HTML5, nothing is kept proprietary. WebKit itself is an opensource project, everything in it is free in terms of freedom as well as in beer. Kudos to Apple for going the Standards route as they have a longstanding record of doing, and in this case as well as numerous others, the Opensource route. Apple has opensourced numerous major projects like Clang or released specs to Standards bodies or everyone to use freely. The only controversy in regards to HTML5 is the standard for the Video tag; Apple and Microsoft want to standardise in the MPEG4 standard, Mozilla and Opera want Ogg. Google is supporting both, and has now put forward their own proposal in the form of WebM. I see the logic in both positions, and I believe both H264 and WebM should be sanctioned for video, and AAC and Ogg for audio. Theora was never a good alternative technically.

    So I frankly don't know what you are babbling about.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    msandersen
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple releases Safari 5.0 update; includes Extensions Gallery
    I may be more than a little touchy on this subject. The politicization of the process has not sat well with me. Particularly galling have been things like Apple's attempts at manipulating public opinion via ploys like its HTML5 'demonstration site' that sniffed out competing browsers and wouldn't let them in, seeming to suggest that other more or less similarly capable browsers (like Chrome) were simply unable to render the 'advanced' contents while it was simply ID sniffing.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ks2problema
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple releases Safari 5.0 update; includes Extensions Gallery
    @ks2problema
    You do seem little 'touchy' yes. I'm assuming the politicisation you mention refers to the Flash war between Adobe and Apple, which was the reason Apple proposed HTML5 in the first place to fill an obvious need for rich media not met by the W3C standards, causing everyone to use Flash for streaming video and sound as well as dynamic and interactive content. As a web designer interested in standards, you should appreciate that Flash is bad for the open web, and the push by Apple and others for HTML5/CSS3/AJAX to replace it, with work on things like highly optimised Javascript engines, starting with Apple's 'SquirrelFish', to enable rich Web applications without Flash. There are also the highly-publicised security implications of Flash, as it is one of the most-exploited attack vectors, and on the Mac it is the leading cause of browser crashes as the Mac implementation is not as stable nor efficient, often causing excessive CPU usage. Linux users have even more reason to dislike it. This is even more relevant for Apple as they push into the mobile market, where people won't tolerate their phones crashing or slowing to a crawl, not to mention sucking the battery dry. Talks between Apple and Adobe on these issues go back many years, and it has now come to a head. Nor is it in anybody's interest, not least Apple's, to rely so heavily on one company for a plugin which has sadly become a defacto proprietary standard. As you mentioned, we have been there before in the Browser war; there are still sites relying on ActiveX components. You would have to agree that Apple's push for standards using HTML5/Javascript and H264/AAC is preferable to Microsoft's strategy of challenging Flash with their own proprietary Silverlight and Windows Media.

    As for Apple's HTML5 Showcase (at www.apple.com/html5/ ), which is a brochure site promoting Safari in their devices and part of Apple's campaign against Flash; yes, they do test for Webkit. Yes, it blocks Firefox and Opera as they are not supported. But go there with Chrome or any other Webkit-based browser, and you will be able to see most of the demos. In the instances where Chrome doesn't support it yet, a popup tells you so, as in the case of 3D Transforms on the Transitions page. It will also urge you to download Safari if you want to see the effect. As a brochure showcase site touting the HTML5, CSS3, and Javascript capabilities of Safari, specifically, that is hardly surprising (it is stated clearly at the top). It is not a generic test site like their SunSpider Javascript test or their Acid2/3 CSS test aimed at developers generally. WebKit is at the forefront of HTML5 development, Apple being a primary backer of HTML5, as such new proposals often appear first in it. Some things may never be adopted, or the specs changed down the line. This site is a showcase of the possibilities of the proposals as they stand.
    HTML5 as a whole is yet to be ratified, and only parts of it is approaching maturity, like the , and elements. The thirst for it after years of HTML stagnation is such that sites are prepared to adopt it as it stands even before the dust has settled, and this despite no support from IE. Youtube has been testing the element with H264, and my tests back up their assessment that it is not ready yet. On Chrome, my main browser, playback is flakey, at least in their implementation. Both Youtube and Chrome are of course owned by Google.

    Personally I support the move away from Flash wherever possible for various reasons, Standards and Security being the big ones. Less memory and CPU usage is equally welcome. Even then something like Flash may have its place. Certainly there are currently no IDEs like Flash for Standards-based web applications or animation, and none will be forthcoming from Adobe, and Microsoft is busy pushing Silverlight and ASP in the Expression Studio suite. One might suspect Apple could be working on something if they are serious about taking on Flash with web standards now they are positioning themselves as a mobile device maker.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    msandersen
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple releases Safari 5.0 update; includes Extensions Gallery
    a great Safari 5 extension i use is called F.B Purity, it filters the junk messages from your fb homepage / newsfeed. its received rave reviews from various media outlets, including Lifehacker, CNET PCWorld if you want to try it, you can get it here: http://www.fbpurity.com
    ZDNet Gravatar
    misterzee
    4th Oct 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources