Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2" touchscreen now shipping; $149.99
Summary: Another Archos tablet is now on the market, and this one is, well, compact to say the least. More likely to be mistaken for a smartphone, the Archos 32 should be able to fit in your pocket with that 3.2-inch touchscreen.
Another Archos tablet is now on the market, and this one is, well, compact to say the least. More likely to be mistaken for a smartphone, the Archos 32 should be able to fit in your pocket with that 3.2-inch WQVGA touchscreen.
Anyone interested in using a tablet for productivity would most likely have a very hard time with this tiny mobile Internet device, but there are plenty of good qualities to be mentioned. Here's the rundown:
- Android 2.2
- ARM Cortex A8 800MHz processor
- 8GB of onboard flash memory
- 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi
- Bluetooth 2.1+EDR
- G-sensor
- Built-in microphone
- Supports most video, audio and photo file types (including up to MPEG-4 HD 720p at 30fps)
- Camera/camcorder (records in VGA H264 format)
- Compatibility with Mac, Windows and Linux-based computers
- Battery life: up to 24 hours (audio playback), eight hours (Internet) or six hours (video playback)
- Connectivity: USB 2.0, Composite-out
Interested buyers can order one now for $149.99.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
If this is "tablet", then why do not you call iPod touch "tablet"?
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
care to explain who decided and why a tablet should be a minimum of 7 inches? ipod touch is a tablet. Just because apple doesn't market it as such doesn't mean its not. Tablet = form factor. Its not delimited by size. Isn't a 10 inch notebook also a laptop? Why do we need to play with semantics and mince words all the time.
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
agreed that the iPod touch should qualify as a tablet it this does, however, there is no screen size (or function) requirement to earn the title yet. This is a PMP with Andriod just as the Touch is a PMP with iOS IMHO.
No Google App Store
There is good article on how "open" Android is:
<b>Good article on how "open" Android is</b>:
http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/09/android-open/
Yeah that's a selling point for your average consumer:)
Pagan jim
Android is "open" only for the carriers. -nt-
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
exactly. Some people are so foolish. They probably think ipods cannot obtain music outside of itunes.
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
The Archos 32 is running Android 2.2 which can access Google's app store....
Are they trying to redefine the word "tablet" or something?
Anything Android that has no apps is cr@p
This is what Google calls and UNLICENSED Android product. It means that it has no access to the Android app store or any other licensed 3rd party store. In other words .... a useless piece of junk.
And BTW, why the hell are you calling this a "tablet"? It is just a hand held device. Like others said before. Anything with less than 7" display should not be called a "tablet".
hmmm
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
ummm there is an entire line of products here not being mentioned
And being archos products, I'm sure you can reconfigure it in any of a dozen ways to obtain and run existing android apps. That is one great strength of archos products. btw, the 10" version is $299.
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
RE: Archos 32 Android tablet with 3.2
Personally I own the previous generations archos 5 internet tablet, and for most things it is an ideal halfway house between phone and notebook. It fits into a jacket pocket, its big enough to take notes on, and allows me to carry a smaller cheaper phone when space is a premium.
As for the lack of Android Market, it is not a fault of the device more a question of the hardware requirements for approval to use the market since it has no compass or cellphone radio etc. I downloaded the Android Market app, and so have access to the market, so it's a none issue really.