Is Windows 7's taskbar really better than Mac OS X's dock?

Summary: The Windows 7 taskbar is the single most important change to the Windows interface since Windows 95, and it's expected to dramatically change the way users use Windows in the 21st century.And, according to Gizmodo's Matt Buchanan, it's better than the Mac OS X dock.

The Windows 7 taskbar is the single most important change to the Windows interface since Windows 95, and it's expected to dramatically change the way users use Windows in the 21st century.

And, according to Gizmodo's Matt Buchanan, it's better than the Mac OS X dock. Period.

Let the battle royale begin!

The oft-called "superbar" of Windows 7 gets its name because it's no longer just an open window manager, but also a high-powered application launcher -- and it integrates the two functions seamlessly. (See ya later, Quick Launch.)

Windows 7

 Mac OS X LeopardAccording to Buchanan, it breaks down like this:

  • The translucent style is now more than eye candy, integrating management and visual notification of launched and unlaunched applications/windows;
  • Thanks to live thumbnails and Aero Peek, usability is actually working for you;
  • Right-click "jump lists" give you the depth of instant functionality that a static icon can't;
  • And ultimately, the Windows 7 "superbar" for the first time truly addresses users who run and manipulate multiple applications all the time.

...which all adds up to being better than Mac OS X Leopard. (Snow Leopard, well, we'll see.)

Now, ZDNet readers are generally PC and Linux users, so I don't expect the same firestorm rebuffing of "Windows beats Mac" as Buchanan will get on his site. After all, there are a lot of "Expose" and bouncing-icon fans out there.

Still, I ask you, readers: How does Windows 7's "superbar" match up to whatever you've got running on your machine?

Do you find Windows 7's changes helping productivity? Tell me in TalkBack.

Topics: Windows, Apple, Hardware, Microsoft, Operating Systems, Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

351 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • No, it is not better

    It is about the same. I have tried OSX and Windows 7...
    they're pretty equal to each other, outside of gaming,
    of course.

    That is the ONLY thing where Windows 7 has an advantage
    over OSX.
    Lerianis
    • At least Windows support two-button mice

      Windows +1.
      LBiege
      • As Winston Churchill once said

        it is better to be thought a fool rather than open your mouth and remove all doubt.

        Macs have supported two-button mice at the OS level since OS 8.1. Fifteen years ago.
        frgough
        • Trouble with windows zealots and fanbois

          is that they are 15 years behind with information as someone else has to do it first so windows can copy it.

          And your quote has been atrributed to a lot of "authors"- Bible, Mark Twain, Abraham Lincoln.... - but not a truer word was said. probably needs updating to "it is better to be thought a foolish Windows zealot rather than open your mouth and remove all doubt." :o)
          deaf_e_kate
          • The problem with Mac fanboys ....

            ... is they are hypochrites. You acuse Microsoft of copying even though Apple took the whole OS from FreeBSD and reskinned it. So just exactly who is the biggest copier?
            ShadeTree
          • Apple didn't copy Free BSD, uses it as the engine of it OS

            You never heard Apple claim to be the author of the infra structure of Os X.

            On the other hand, microsoft has always been doing the oposite, copying and patenting the work of others.
            InAction Man
          • Weak!

            Apple has lost IP lawsuits also. In fact it is hard to find a company of any size that hasn't. Apple regularly takes credit for OSX and never mentions that it is BSD. Your arguement is disingenuous.
            ShadeTree
          • Careful what you say and how you say it.

            "On the other hand, microsoft has always been doing the oposite, copying and patenting the work of others."

            OS/2 = Original author: Microsoft. Now licenses from IBM whot hey sold all rights to.

            Xenix (Unix) = Original author: Microsoft. Sold to SCO and became a distro of Linux. The origins of MS's claims to patents in some Linux distros.

            GUI = Original author: Xerox. Both Apple and Microsoft licensed the technology and went to court over it more against each other. The judges ruled for Microsoft after Apple admitted they signed a contract with MS giving them full access to their GUI.

            This would not the the last time that Apple would engage in a partnership with MS in which they would sign away their technology. Dirty on MS's part? Most certainly! Stupid on Apples part? Most definately!

            Now if you have evidence that MS is really stealing technology, then please show us some evidence and plenty of people would love to see MS take a fall. However until you actually show evidence, then what you say is slander, and can in some cases, open you up for a lawsuit.

            You should now that stealing ideas does not always equal stealing of technology or IP infringement under federal law though. Research the first Apple Vs. Microsoft case to see what I mean.

            Also:
            "Apple didn't copy Free BSD, uses it as the engine of it OS"

            How is that different?
            ShadowGIATL
          • @ShadowGIATL

            InAction Man isn't etirely correct with his protestations. Apple didn't
            steal/copy BSD because BSD is open source. NExT adhered to the BSD
            license, which permits the use of the source code and developed the MACH
            kernel. The Mach kernel is available from Apple (remember Apple bought
            NeXT) as Darwin for you to make an OS of your design in the same way they
            did, if you so wish. See http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/ .
            SimonUK
          • @SimonUK

            That was the point basicly of my post. The whole thing was pointing out the he was not correct in what he said or how he said it.
            ShadowGIATL
          • @ShadowGIATL

            You are wrong on so many points.

            xenix=Microsoft licensed AT&T Unix, They did not create it.

            OS/2=Microsoft wrote OS/2 to IBM specs. Nothing Microsoft did with OS/2 was their own work, they did what IBM paid them to do.

            GUI=Xerox was not the original creator of the GUI. They were the first to put it to practical use. Origins of the GUI predate Xerox by several years. The first GUI elements were shown by Doug Engelbart at Stanford University when he was demonstrating the first mouse 1967.

            As for evidence? All one needs to do is a little google research and just look at snapshots of different GUIs and the time line. One such feature was overlapping windows. Neither Microsoft nor Xerox used overlapping windows, the Mac did. It wasn't until Windows 2 that Windows supported overlapping windows. In court the judge ruled that was not copyright able. MS got away with it.
            Axsimulate
          • Speaking of fanboys...

            of the Microsoft variety...

            Yes, FreeBSD is the (UNIX) core of OS X. Apple needed a "clean" OS rewrite and rather than keep hacking at an existing OS (ala MS), Apple used the available FreeBSD thru the NEXT (and NEXTStep) acquisition.

            But it's the Mac GUI that users actually see and "use", and make it a powerful and usable OS.

            MS must agree (see Vista and Win7, and from internal MS emails) as imitation is indeed the sincerest form of flattery.

            Congratulations to Microsoft (cough) for shamelessly making it's closest copy of OS X yet.

            It should be relatively easy to improve upon copied and functioning existing work/IP so any perceived pluses of Win7 over OS X should not be surprising.

            (ie, Flip 3D was Vista's answer to OS X's Expose but failed in usability so Win7 has moved closer to OS X's look & feel/functionality with it's "new" windows manipulation features)

            Though judging by all the iPhone wannabes, getting the copycat details down right must be harder than it seems.

            Deny all you want (I know you will), but Win7 IS the closest MS version of OS X yet.

            What a surprise.

            ...
            MacCanuck
          • Speaking of fanboys...

            Very well said...saved me all that typing! LOL
            tayeboy
          • Explain something to me...

            How is taking someone else's operating system any different than 'hacking at an existing OS'?
            Spiritusindomit@...
          • Apple never copies anyones ideas

            Lets see
            1 TimeMachine hmmmmm system restore(MS)
            2 widgets hmmmm Konbaulator (Yahoo if I remember correct)
            There are more but this old man can not remember rite now what they are.
            SO yes Apple copies what others think of first so WHAT.
            Michael L Hereid Sr
          • Another country heard from.

            Please enlighten me what Microsoft copied from OSX. You do know that the Linux guys claim it is a copy of Linux? So which is it?

            Everything in the world of coding leverages the code that came before. Whom is to say who copied who and why does it matter? The OSX Dock is quite different then the Microsoft Task Bar that you say they copied.

            I find it a little disingenuous that Apple fans accuse Microsoft of copying when Apple didn't even write their own OS. So sue me!
            ShadeTree
          • windows 7 closest to os x yet

            That's probably the reason I'm liking what I see from
            windows 7 so far...
            Of course, not enough to stop using os x...
            *ahem...
            But, anyhow, way to go, Microsoft! Looking good so far...
            unclefixer@...
          • "Closest MS Version of OS X"

            Oh the irony.

            "What a surprise."

            Oh, the sarcasm.

            LMAO.

            Platform agnostic, but I am (unlike the *majority* of Joe Sixpacks who *think* they're "stuck* with Windows) thrilled with *my* computing eXPerience.

            Of course, I use OS X, mostly.
            brian ansorge
          • Sorry, not a MAC fanboy

            Apple and MS, as companies, are peas in a pod. I can't stand control freaks.
            deaf_e_kate
          • Ohhh

            You're one of those people who think they are "superior" by
            hacking and building their PC from the ground up? Good for
            you!
            3monkies