Maingear unleashes Shift desktop, child-sized 'personal supercomputer' for $2,199 (or $13,394)

Summary: Boutique computer maker Maingear on Monday unleashed its Shift desktop PC, a child-sized "everyday supercomputer" that marries extreme performance and upgradeability to industrial design for a barnburning rig that can handle the highest-definition media.

Boutique computer maker Maingear on Monday unleashed its Shift desktop PC, a child-sized "everyday supercomputer" that marries extreme performance and upgradeability to industrial design for a barnburning rig that can handle the highest-definition media.

Or, as the company's written in its marketing materials, "There's a fine line between genius and insanity. We've just erased it."

In a market crowded by players who use the same parts, Maingear's trying to differentiate itself with style, case engineering and quality technical support.

On the style front, the company's doing away with the blinking-lights-and-neon look of geeky gaming computers and ushering in an industrial look with straight lines and black-on-black aluminum attitude. In person, the Shift is a massive, steel-framed desktop tower -- almost the size of a seated small child, from my visual guesstimate -- and impressive in its footprint.

(It's actually 24 inches tall, 8.6 inches wide and 21.5 inches deep.)

The folks at Maingear are quite fervent about case engineering, and the Shift continues that tradition with bottom to top airflow, aggressive liquid cooling and a 90-degree rotation of the motherboard. Further, the system is fairly future-proof, and offers user-accessible expansion slots, full eATX motherboard support, full sized 5.25” optical drives, multiple SATA hard drive configurations and up to two 2.5” HDDs in each 3.5” HDD drive bay.

Finally, as CTO Chris Morley mentioned in a ZDNet interview back in June, customer support is the way his company is differentiating itself from other boutique shops. Maingear says each Shift owner will be able to talk directly to the builder that assembled their system. They'll also have virtual, private on-site support through an internal remote-desktop setup, as well as traditional on-site support when necessary.

Inside, it's full-on extreme computing. The $2,199 Shift P55 sports the following:

  • 750W Silverstone Strider Modular Industrial Power Supply
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 512MB GDDR3 w/ PhysX (upgradeable to 13 other options, including dual NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 1792MB GDDR3 w/ PhysX in SLI)
  • Intel P55 Extreme Series CrossFire and SLI Ready DP55KG motherboard
  • Intel Core i7-860 2.8GHz Quad-core CPU (2.93 GHz available)
  • 4GB Kingston HyperX Dual-Channel DDR3-1333MHz Low Latency memory (8GB available)
  • 750GB Western Digital Caviar Black SATA 7200rpm 32MB Cache (upgradeable to dual 160GB Intel X25-M Gen2 SSDs in each of the first two drive bays and single X25s in the third and fourth)
  • All-in-One Integrated USB 2.0 Flash Card Reader & Writer
  • 22X Dual Layer DVD RW Drive w/ LightScribe Technology (upgradeable to 8X Lite-On SuperMulti Blu-ray/DVD Burner with Software)
  • 7.1+2 Channel High Definition Surround Sound Supporting S/DIF Optical In and Out
  • Bluetooth
  • Gigabit Ethernet

A Shift X58 model, which starts at $2,599, offers up to 12GB of DDR3 2,000MHz memory, another optional optical drive, two more drive bays (for a total of six) and the potential to easily blow several paychecks. In a test run, I was able to configure a Shift X58 to a breathtaking $13,394 without tangential software or accessories.

Here's the breakdown between the two models:

The company says a Shift system geared specifically toward creative professionals -- that's video production, audio editing, and CAD -- is coming before the end of the year.

The Shift series starts at $2,199 and is available from the company's website.

Related on ZDNet:

Topics: Storage, Hardware

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

46 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Without demonstrated Linux or OSX support...

    ...what's the point? Who does video stuff on Windows?
    Henry Miller
    • Plenty do.....

      You just don't get out much. My XP system with cakewalk software did me just fine and that was on a P4 system that couldn't keep itself cool, ever. But my audio quality was 24-bit 96Khz, which is way better than cd quality and it showed on my final cuts, all done on XP. Sure I wasn't cool, but my objective was the final cuts and not if someone thought I was hip using a Mac for audio production, I was using what works. In the end it is all 1's and 0's my man.
      OhTheHumanity
      • Cakewalk... Really?

        I used to use Cakewalk too... In the early 90's!

        My first copy was on a floppy disk and I had a $600 Card-D (sound card) with Gold RCA's for in/out but that was a long time ago.

        My next studio will be Mac with Logic. It's far and away the best I've seen. I've still got Cakewalk Pro for messing about.

        awasson@...
    • Who Cares?

      It gets the job done at a much better price/performance point than a Mac-based solution.

      Where is the software for Linux that will take advantage of the hardware capabilities AND provide the same productivity as Windows apps will for the primary audience?
      d.gruntled
      • Not just video

        CAD, 3d simulation, virtualization platform for development... windows excels at all of these. And the obvious - a gaming rig.

        And it doesn't matter if it's OSX or not - this machine will run Adobe CS4 smoothly. I can think of plenty of heavy windows workloads to put on this thing. If I had the cash to put down, I'd get one today.
        crazydanr@...
        • I've yet to see

          top of the line CAD and simulation software written for Windows. It just doesn't provide the facilities needed for the high end work demanded by aircraft and automotive manufacturers. That's all STILL on Unix and now, Linux.
          akulkis
          • Not correct

            I started working with SGI workstations with Irix (Unix) for the OS in the late 80's. These workstations ran SDRC Ideas for FEA pre/post processing/CAD and MSC/Nastran for FEA solves, but all of that has changed.

            Now SDRC Ideas and Unigraphics have merged into NX and the primary platform is a high end PC running 64-bit Windows (Vista or XP) and has been for about 10 years. Pro Engineer has also been on Windows for years. For FEA I now use Ansys and for at least 2 years it too has been running under 64-bit Windows for HPC hardware. Windows is now the standard for CAD/FEA.

            My current (old) hardware is a "home built" workstation/PC, with a Supermicro SC743TQ-865B Case, a Tyan S5397 motherboard, dual quad core Intel Xeon 5400 series processors, 64 GB of ECC RAM (FB-DIMMs), an HIS 4850 (for gaming), an ATI FirePro V5700 (for CAD/FEA), and 8 single platter Seagate 7200.12 500 GB SATA drives (2 in RAID 0 for OS/Software/CAD and 6 in RAID 0 "short stroked" for FEA workspace providing 650+ MB/s read/write + "remaining stroke" in RAID 5 for archive/hourly backup). I will likely maximize the RAM with 128 GB in the near future. I am running Vista 64-bit Ultimate for the OS and Ansys is able to fully utilize all 8 CPU cores, all of the memory, and the high speed disk I/O.

            I will admit that my last HPC workstation, 3 years ago, did run Linux for Ansys, but these days Vista makes more sense.

            Regarding this blog posting, I was a rather disappointed to see this apparent "supercomputer" only has a single i7 processor and only 24 GB of RAM. To me a "personal workstation", let alone a "personal supercomputer", needs much, much more computing power than that. As a minimum my next workstation will have a pair of Xeon 5500 series processors and 128 GB of RAM.

            Why don't these guys offer a true personal supercomputer based on 4 or more Xeon 7400 series six core CPUs with support of 512 GB of RAM? I wouldn't mind having something like that sitting beside my desk.

            As an absolute minimum they should be using a pair of Xeon 5500 series 4 core CPUs in their "personal supercomputer" line (although I would call that a "personal workstation", not a "personal supercomputer").
            HT Slider
          • Agreed, this isn't any sort of "supercomputer" just a custom build

            This is just a suped up desktop computer and doesn't even use supercomputer technology. If I were doing serious number crunching, this would not be the rig I'd use.

            As far as Linux vs Windows goes: more and more power tools are usable on Linux these days. I'm pretty sure all of Autodesk's offerings now have a Linux version, and they aren't the only ones supporting Linux now.

            Doesn't mean Linux is the right tool for every situation, just saying it's not necessarily the wrong tool any more. =) (and I'm a confirmed Windows guy)
            Drakaran
          • You just blew...

            any credibility out your ass.
            woofa
      • Anybody with a brain cares.

        Even if your primary application isn't multi-threaded, Linux takes advantage of multiple cores MUCH better (and multi-tasks better even on a single CPU. Hell, when I was on college, I used to routinely multi-task on Unix ON A CHARACTER TERMINAL, as we didn't even have GUI systems back then).

        Windows consumes far too much resources to do even the most simple of things.

        And it's not like multi-tasking is all that big of a deal... I had to write a multi-user, multi-processing operating system, complete with multiple logins, and a couple simple apps (to demonstrate that the time-sharing multi-processing actually worked, such as a utility for two users to talk to each other)... in only 4 weeks... of 13-week 1-credit hour lab.

        On an 8-bit Motorola 6809 CPU no less.

        Microsoft is always late to the tech show, and when it gets there, it's driving a car with octagonal wheels, and ballyhooing about how the 8-sided wheels make driving SOOO much better than their previous implementation, in which their car had 5-sided wheels. -- because Microsoft ALWAYS misses the big picture (such as, wheels aren't suppposed to have vertexes).
        akulkis
        • You are just too awesome...

          Man I wish I was as awesome as you. AND you let the world know just HOW awesome you are. Sheesh!
          Lovs2look
    • I see a green-eyed monster...

      That's what my grandma used to call someone with an incurable case of jealousy or envy. I wasn't aware trolls could have green eyes.

      Considering the predominance of the Windows platform, there's probably much more video manipulated with Windows software worldwide.
      djchandler
    • OS X could not be ran legally and like a hacked iPhone,

      I do not trust the veracity of hacked OS X. Sleeper malware, potential crashes...

      And I'd rather play by the rules in the first place. I don't care for swindlers.
      HypnoToad72
  • But the $2199 (the core base)..

    But the $2199 (the core base) is not a supercomputer, just a expensive computer.
    magallanes
    • I beg to differ.

      It will run circles around anything ever sold by Cray, or the Control Data Corp. Cyber 205, which is the first computer to EVER have the destinction of being able to predict the weather both ACCURATELY and BEFORE the weather actually occurred.

      I went to Purdue precisely because they had one of the first 4 off the production line. And then... in all the time I was there, I never ran a line of code on the thing (although I did have to run some pascal programs in "submission mode" to some CDC 6600/6700's. GACK. I'm so glad I took my freshman programming course in the EE department where the pascal was run natively on the dual-cpu VAX-11/780's (homebuilt by George Goble) instead of having to do that damned batch-submission files from (way overloaded) PDP-11's
      akulkis
  • RE: Maingear unleashes Shift desktop, child-sized 'personal supercomputer' for $2,199 (or $13,394)

    Tragically when you look at the parts list you realize the you can obtain the same or better parts at a lower price and better integration in to your own needs.

    You don't need to pay the mark up associated with a system builder anymore.

    Read ZD Net, Maximum PC and go to Newegg.com Build your own machine and get much, much more for less money.

    Selling hardware is the poor man's game.

    Steve Jobs learned this with his NEXT computer company failure.
    jbscpa
    • Part for Part

      I'd like to point out that Apple is in it for the hardware, not the software. His paradigm hasn't shifted from the Next days. In any event, while you can build a PC for cheaper than what they (Maingear) have, you're going to have a very hard time getting it to [i]look[/i] as nice as this one. The back of this case doesn't look like ass, and the inside is very clean.

      I think with these systems, you're paying for the custom case and extra labor involved in making perhaps the cleanest looking ATX form factor PC I've ever seen. It's very minimalist with a splash of industrial, and I think Maingear has gone to the very edge of what can be done with an ATX case short of building their own motherboard.

      Nicely done, imo, but yeah, the added cost is rather prohibitive.
      WarhavenSC
      • Part for Part

        I just built a Core i7 940 with 12G OCZ 1600mghz Ram, Gigabyte X58 MB, ATI 4870X2, 5 SATA HDD's, Coolermaster HAF 932 case and a 750W OCZ MOD Extreme PSU, 2 SATA LG DVD Burners and a 26" Samsung T260 monitor for just around $3000 and I can encode a 2 hour video to DVD in just 15 minutes. I have Windows 7 Pro x64 installed. If you haven't seen the HAF932 check it out. I think this system is better than the one advertized here.
        bvonr@...
        • HAF932 is ugly...

          Looks like a pair of sneakers that a juggalo would wear.
          Metronome49
        • Apparently you missed the part about the computer not looking like ass. [nt

          [nt]
          olePigeon