The ToyBox

Ricardo Bilton & Gloria Sin

Shared data plans coming from AT&T...eventually

By | June 2, 2011, 1:39pm PDT

Summary: With its unlimited plans dead, AT&T plans to introduced shared data plans, allowing customers to spit data between multiple devices.

Speaking at the All Things Digital D9 conference today, AT&T CEO Ralph de la Vega said that his company was “working on” introducing shared data plans. The CEO however, could not provide a timetable for when the new plans would arrive, so it may be a while until the company actually announces anything.

AT&T would not be alone. As Verizon CEO Fran Shammo revealed last month, Verizon, too, plans to introduce shared data plans for its customers. This would allow a fixed amount of data to be split among various devices, including phones and tablets.

Of course, all of this is something that the companies likely should have offered from the beginning. Better late than never, right?

[Via ThisIsMyNext]

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ricardo Bilton writes for ZDNet's The ToyBox. His work has appeared in The Japan Times, The New York Observer, and The International Business Times, among other publications.

Disclosure

Ricardo Bilton

Ricardo Bilton has no investments that may conflict with his work with ZDNet. Similarly, he has not worked with any companies that he may write about in his technology coverage.

Biography

Ricardo Bilton

Ricardo Bilton writes for ZDNet's The ToyBox. His work has appeared in The Japan Times, The New York Observer, and The International Business Times, among other publications. He lives in New York, and is a graduate of Amherst College.
22
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Shared data plans coming from AT&T...eventually
TOP_SWATTA_SHANE 5th Jun
@geoff@...
Agreed. I have avoided purchasing a smartphone for a while now, even though I dream of owning one daily. It's just not cost effective for my family, plus the usages for each individual phone would be disproportionate, making it even more difficult to justify.
It blows my mind that this isn't already the case. I know loads of people that don't have smart phones simply because there needs to be a data plan on each and every phone.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes and .....
Economister 2nd Jun
@Aerowind

how can they ban tethering and contemplate data plan sharing? Isn't that what tethering is?
0 Votes
+ -
No, it is really different.
DevGuy_z 2nd Jun
@Economister Sharing a data plan means that, for example, if you have 1G of data in your plan, it could be shared with n cell phones as long as they don't cumulatively use more than 1G of data. Tethering simply allows a PC to use your cell phone as an internet source generally via a USB cable. Now MIFI allows your cell phone to act like an AP. MIFI is an advanced form of tethering. Sharing is just a nice convenience and works especially well when there are some who only occasionally need it combined with those who utilize it heavily. This way the whole family can have smart phones even if some of them rarely utilize the full capability
@DevGuy_z
It would make more sense if tethering was incorporated into a shared plan. No matter what devices are on my account, if I have a 2gb plan, I can use up to 2gb; for my heavy devices AND for my infrequent devices.

This would also allow ATT to cut down / back on "unlimited" accounts.

Your reference to infrequent use and need for a data plan if you get a smartphone also applies equally to tethering.

Just a thought... grin
0 Votes
+ -
Fundamentally.....
Economister Updated - 3rd Jun
@DevGuy_z

they are still the same. If you tether, you are sharing your phone's data allowance with another device, which may or may not be able to connect on its own to the carrier's network.

You are paying for a certain number of bits to be transmitted. The precise technical means of sharing those bits among devices are irrelevant.

In a sense, when you connect a Bluetooth headset, you are tethering also - wirelessly. The Bluetooth headset is a digital device separate from the cell phone. What is the difference between a Bluetooth headset and a tablet tethered via Bluetooth to your phone? Nothing. It is just the carriers trying to fleece you.
@Economister
Tethering is using a single physical cellular connection to allow data communication from a non-cellular device or devices. They would have to be physically co-located.

A shared data plan is allowing multple cellular devices to be billed to a single bill. All devices have their own cellular connection and could be anywhere the service is available.
@Aerowind
banning 18 wheelers on the fast lane on highways. It makes sense to everyone except the inconsiderate jerks. If the "tethered" device didn't consume so much data/bandwidth they would be undetectable. Many websites throttle useless junk to mobile devices but go hog wild on computers thus slowing EVERYONE down.
AT&T has nothing I want. They can keep their useless technology
@Luddite24
Your lack of a relevant opinion is meaningless to me.
You can keep it.

wink
0 Votes
+ -
@rhonin

It is his opinion, and is as relevant as any other. Your opinion of his opinion is irrelevant.
@Luddite24 And you have nothing this forum or any of the world wants. You can keep your unintelligent opinions to yourself and go troll another site.

I guess this would be useful for some people, but having an unlimited plan currently, this just isn't something I see myself signing up for in the near future.
Not having a shared data plan has kept me from any smartphone as the cost for a Family quickly goes to absurd and not an option.
at shared data plan. They are seeing lost potential revenue by not having it. Because, you see, in a capitalist market, in order for a company to make money, it has to please the customer. In a socialist market, all the company needs is the right political connections. Fortunately, the U.S. is still more capitalist than socialist.
0 Votes
+ -
Ridiculously simplistic
Economister Updated - 2nd Jun
@fr_gough

and fundamentally wrong in that particular market.
@fr_gough
True.
If you can entice more users into the "smartphone" market, it gives you more options, more opportunities to leverage future revenue - ATT may finally be seeing the light. grin
@fr_gough, Well, repeat that mantra when ATT sucks up T-Mobile and you only have two choices and they collude. Unbridled capitalism always ends up in monopoly. In fact, ATT is purchasing T-Mobile to limit competition.

There is no reason to kill unlimited plans. Most people do not abuse it because land-line speeds are still significantly better. So if you ask current owners of iPhones if ATT is making them happy or has justified the change, there is a resounding "NO!". Please note that Verizon, who now has the iPhone, is making the same move, within months. Both are basically saying, "yeah, we have more capacity, but screw the customer. They will eat whatever we feed them." So, where is your "capitalism"?
@rhonin, The reason ATT has killed unlimited and added overcharge havens, errr, shared plans is to get people to spend more. You know the old days of cell phone overages that broke the bank. Now they can do it for data. The only companies that offered alternatives have been bought up and we are down to basically three, almost mirror images, providers. So, block sizes will be whittled down until they start getting nice blocks of overcharges and/or bump ups.
@chrlsrchrdsn

Not true. Unbridled capitalism almost NEVER ends up in monopoly. The governments half-ass support of ETFs and other artificial barriers to entry are the mechanisms creating consolidation and monopolies. These things are antithetical to free market capitalism. What's with everyone gladhanding the -isms? Yes, the market now sucks, but that doesn't mean it's capitalistic or socialistic. It's just corrupt. Is there an -ism for that?
0 Votes
+ -
Yes .....
Economister 4th Jun
@tkejlboom

corruptism wink
0 Votes
+ -
@geoff@...
Agreed. I have avoided purchasing a smartphone for a while now, even though I dream of owning one daily. It's just not cost effective for my family, plus the usages for each individual phone would be disproportionate, making it even more difficult to justify.
Yes, please! And add Rollover Bytes as well, where unused data is carried over to the next billing cycle for up to a year. (Just like Rollover Minutes work currently.)
the problem is that I have been grandfathered into having an unlimited dataplan. If I should share data, then I will have to end up paying more for less amount of data.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix