Users should be smug, and why the Apple iPhone makes you feel smarter

Summary: Manufacturers build complexity into their gadgets, but few take pains to hide it -- leaving users confused, bewildered and angry. Why?

Manufacturers build an awful lot of complexity into their gadgets, but very few of them take pains to hide it -- leaving users confused, bewildered and angry.

Who the heck wants to page through a 300-page instruction manual?

That kind of attitude can hurt a company's bottom line when customers return products before bothering to figure out how to use them.

It doesn't have to be that way.

MAYA Design's Mickey McManus says products should be so intuitive that a customer feels silly explaining to another how it works.

And by silly, I mean smug -- as in, "Isn't it obvious?"

That's why the Apple iPhone is so popular...it appears so obvious to use that you feel a little smug using it.

On SmartPlanet's Smart Takes blog, McManus explains why such innovation is necessary as technology grows more complex and our brains stay exactly the same. Who doesn't want to be a little smug?

Topics: Hardware, Apple, iPhone, Mobility, Smartphones

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

49 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • It works and it is NOT Microsoft

    It is so nice when people have the option to choose what they want than some lethargic aged NT kernel that is a virus/worm magnet.

    GOOD bye Windows Mobile it was as if you never existed!

    ha ha

    I am happy!

    :)

    Now to get rid of Windows on the desktop!

    :)
    Use_More_OIL_NOW
    • say what!?

      you oviously have a love affair with apple
      products.

      Honestly most of the people that get a computer
      virus these days would have to be uneducated in
      the use of a computer. you are referring to
      past incidences which could have happened also
      to macs... o but wait who would want to have
      attacked an OS that only served a small majority of the populous at the time...

      i almost forgot that microsoft is the one and
      only creator of Mobile OS as your post refers
      to -.-" have you been living under a rock?
      ellmondo
      • @ellmondo

        "Honestly most of the people that get a computer virus these days would
        have to be uneducated in the use of a computer."

        Which is the vast majority of computer users. That is why there are so
        many problems with viruses/spyware/trojans, etc. Did you forget that us
        tech geeks are the minority?
        Axsimulate
      • Or running XP

        at least to your comment about getting a computer virus. It's really not hard and I've been hit by a cross site attack on an XP machine that wasn't up to date here on this very site. I'm sure it was via one of the ads that come through. Still, I saw it happen and it even shut down my computer. When I booted back up I had a fake AV on there and it wouldn't let anything run.

        Same ad, same attack on a Win 7 machine later that day. UAC engaged, I told it no, nothing happened, life went on. While I advocate Windows I am all for people getting off XP, whatever their OS choice is. It's swiss cheese at this point.
        LiquidLearner
    • I felt smarter up until the point where

      I looked at the bill and wondered how I could have paid so much for so little.

      Now if I could convince my wife to use the phone I wouldn't feel as though I overpaid for a paperweight.

      I've been reading that it looks as thought the iPhone runs the most insecure OS of any phone out there, so did you have any real point?
      SoSueMeThen
      • The first two paragraphs were

        rather funny and you made a very good point. I would also feel a bit stupid by overpaying for something I don't need, be it the HW itself or the simplified user interface.

        As they say in France however: vive la diff?rence.

        Economister
        • Thanks! That was the whole point of it.

          The third was meant to be more serious in the fact that there have been alot of security issues coming to light lately about the iPhone OS.
          SoSueMeThen
    • I see......

      Windows got your panties in a bunch. Haha. Ever think logical you would understand Windows is the magnet because its on most computers around the world. Just a matter of time for the iphone to be right there in the mobile space, so watch what you wish for.
      OhTheHumanity
      • @daMan25

        Just because it's on the majority of computers, don't automatically make
        it the best.

        Just like in NASCAR, the fastest car don't always win.
        Axsimulate
        • Did I say...

          "the best". I stated that its on most computers so any logical thinking hacker is gonna target that puppy. I know its hard to understand, but think about it as a person going fishing. He is hungry so he knows this pond has many many fish, while the other he knows has very little. You think he is gonna spend his day fishing the pond with very little? I think not. iPhone is more and more becoming a pond with alot of fish so I state watch what you wish for or who you criticize, it may just end up being you in the end.
          OhTheHumanity
  • Congratulations, Andrew.

    Best tenuous link of the day.
    Sleeper Service
  • Designing easy-to-use things isn't easy!

    When designing a product, it's natural to think of the most complicated way to
    do something first. It takes time and lots of effort to refine a design to be simple
    and easy to use. Apple is absolutely unique In demanding simplicity of use as
    the most important design criteria, and it shows. The iPhone is a wonderful
    example of attention to detail in a design. And so far, no one has been able to
    match it.
    Userama
    • You are of course

      making a very important point. To get the masses to use technology, you HAVE to make it simple. And the people who's only access to technology is through extremely simplified interfaces, they may indeed feel smart that they can now use a certain gadget. It is hard to argue that this is a bad thing. If you show your grandmother how to send an e-mail, she may very well feel good about herself, and you should rejoice.

      To the purists however, these people are all stupid, I guess in a sense they have a point too. If however we develop technology to improve ALL our lives, it does not serve much purpose if you walk around with your nose in the air as the only person who has mastered a new and fancy gadget.

      When I sit bumper to bumper in the rush hour, I want an automatic transmission. When I drive that two lane winding road, I much prefer a 6 speed manual. It is so much more fun. But I do not knock the automatic tranny.
      Economister
    • Apple does push design much further than others

      And rightly so. Products, all products, ought to
      be well designed. We are way too forgiving, way
      too willing to push cheap ahead of good design.
      Users don't feel "smug". That is a slander. They
      feel happy that they have a well designed product
      in front of them. That is a different thing.
      HollywoodDog
      • Great point, Dog. (nt)

        Userama
      • I tend to agree.

        The original iphone was released a consumer-level smartphone and
        was not originally primarily intended as a business tool. As the
        design matures Apple is adding features that make it more powerful
        and more useable for businesses but It is clear that the foundation of
        the phone is about simplicity and user experience. And for many, that
        core design philosophy is more important than an approach that starts
        with a jumble of features that are difficult or more importantly, not
        enjoyable to use.

        Different people have different ways of looking at functionality. Many
        techies often look at the list of hardware specifications and define
        functionality that way. Other people look at how [b]they[/b] function
        with the product.
        Tigertank
      • I'd have to agree here...

        However Apple will push design over functionality or security which is likely to bite them sooner or later. Microsoft is trying for the middle ground but it's a tough line to walk.
        LiquidLearner
        • Very well said

          (nt)
          use_what_works_4_U
    • You can't make something foolproof...

      Because fools are too ingenious!
      UncleBubba
      • A saying I once read

        here it is:
        "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning."

        ? Rich Cook, author
        oncall