California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
Summary: The California politician whose failed video game law was overturned by the Supreme Court earlier this week vows to continue fighting, and says that evidence is "crystal clear" that violent video games hurt kids.
The Supreme Court ruled earlier this week to overturn a California law legislating the sale of violent video games as unconstitutional, but that's not stopping the creator of the law from vowing to continue to fight.
State Senator (and San Francisco mayoral candidate) Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) told the San Francisco Appeal that he hopes to "create a pathway for a successful bill that could withstand a challenge" from the Supreme Court.
Yee's bill was signed into law in 2005 by then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. It would have fined video game retailers up to $1,000 per infraction for selling violent video games to minors.
The law was immediately challenged by a video game industry consortium; U.S. District Court Judge Ronald Whyte put in place an injunction to prevent the law from being enforced.
In addition to arguing on First Amendment grounds, lawyers representing the video game industry noted that major retailers already abide by a voluntary rating system created by the video game industry itself. The Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB) rates video games by content and provides an age rating and description of content. The system is modeled after the Motion Picture Association of America's (MPAA) movie rating system.
The law was ultimately overturned by the Supreme Court in a 7-2 ruling that found that video games are entitled to the same artistic protection under the First Amendment granted to books, movies, plays and other creative works. It's a precedent-setting ruling and the first time the Supreme Court has heard such a case.
Michael Gallagher, president and CEO of the Entertainment Software Association (ESA), called the Supreme Court's ruling "an historic and complete win for the First Amendment" and artists and storytellers.
"The Court declared forcefully that content-based restrictions on games are unconstitutional; and that parents, not government bureaucrats, have the right to decide what is appropriate for their children," said Gallagher.
Yee, a child psychologist before he turned to politics, said that "the evidence is absolutely crystal clear that there are harmful effects on our children" from violent video games - a claim refuted by the Supreme Court, which said the evidence is far from convincing.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I'll lay money right now that the people who
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
- Peter
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
Yee is not concerned about the facts, he just has a belief and that's more important to him and his buddies Tim Winter and James Steyer than anything else.
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
Actually, the evidence is quite conclusive debunking any claim of connection between the two.
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
Yee shall raise his own kids
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
- Peter
Probably not
Edit:
Notice that the article mentioned that Sen. Yee is a San Francisco Democrat and a candidate for mayor of that city. I don't really know anything about him other than what is said in the article, but I think it safe to assume that he's not a Conservative.
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
Being a Democrat and being a conservative are not mutually exclusive, any more than being a liberal and being conservative are. You can easily be both, or all.
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
I'll take that bet.
I KNOW violent video games are harmless, and I do not support banning fast food ads.
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
Oh, they didn't? Oh well...
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
False argument. One does NOT detract from the other.
Let's look back 50 years
One hundred years? Same thing.
One thousand years? Yep, violence.
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight
I think Mr. Yee will be reading the decision very closely
...and writing his new bill in a way that the Supremes are likely to accept.
RE: California's failed video game law sponsor vows to continue fight