ie8 fix
madison

Here's why Apple is doing so well -- it's the top half, stupid

By | October 21, 2009, 6:09am PDT

Summary: Because when failure is not an option, you have to have the best tools, especially when the going gets tough. The sad part is that Apple does so well when so many are not.

I’ve been ruminating the past few days on why Apple is doing so well with it’s pricey high-end products and services during a recession. The answer came as I was reading today’s New York Times column by Thomas Friedman, whom I deeply admire and read anything and everything he puts out.

Friedman points out that the winners in today’s fast-shifting U.S. job market are the ones demonstrating “entrepreneurship, innovation and creativity.” He says, “They are the new untouchables,” in contrast to other still highly educated but less creative types.

Friedman cites Harvard University labor expert Lawrence Katz, who explains in the column that the now disadvantaged are “those engineers and programmers working on more routine tasks and not actively engaged in developing new ideas or recombining existing technologies or thinking about what new customers want. … They’ve been much more exposed to global competitors that make them easily substitutable.”

They are also more likely to be using personal computers with nine-year-old operating systems, with little choice but to take what their companies provide in terms of personal productivity IT. They are the 90 percent for whom good enough IT has made them as good as anyone anywhere.

In contrast, it’s the “top half” of the labor pool, and more specifically the apparent 10 percent that are “entrepreneurship, innovation and creativity”-focused among them, that know to succeed and win they need the very best computer and associated services, even if it costs $500 more. Nowadays there’s no better way to gain an advantage in business and life than to have the best technology.

The people who are succeeding are buying Macs, iPhones, iPod Touches and Apple’s services and applications. A flight to quality is usually spurred by disruption and uncertainty. It’s not about brand religion or pretty graphics. It’s about survival and success when the going gets tough. It works for me, it has to.

A chef doesn’t buy the cheapest knifes. A painter doesn’t buy the cheapest brushes. A carpenter doesn’t buy the cheapest hammer. And all the winners in the economy today — those that have a say in what they use to do all the digital things so critical now to almost any knowledge- and services-based job — need the best tools. And they will upgrade those tools just as fast as they can (hence the rapid adoption of Apple’s Snow Leopard OS X upgrade in recent months.)

So for all those millions of newly laid off workers who know that “entrepreneurship, innovation and creativity” is their only ticket to a new, fresh start — those that no longer have an IT department to tell them what to do (at lowest cost) — they seem to be making a new move to a Mac. I expect they won’t soon go back, once they taste the fruits of heightened knowledge productivity.

Because when failure is not an option, you have to have the best tools, especially when the going gets tough. The sad part is that Apple does so well when so many are not.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dana Gardner is president and principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, an enterprise IT analysis, market research, and consulting firm.

Disclosure

Dana Gardner

Dana Gardner is president and principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, LLC, a New Hampshire-based IT analysis and new media content production and consultancy firm that he founded in 2005. He produces a series of podcast/videocast/transcript/blog content shows, called BriefingsDirect[tm/sm], some of which are sponsored and which he blogs on. Such sponsored shows are declared individually as such and by what organization or company. When Dana blogs on ZDNet on companies that he does have, or has had, consulting and/or sponsorship relationships, he declares that in each blog entry. There is no connection between the negotiation of such sponsorships and the opinions expressed by Dana here on ZDNet. To date, the following organizations/companies have sponsored, or do sponsor, some BriefingsDirect content, or have consulting relationships with Dana: Active Endpoints Akamai Technologies Aster Data Systems BP Logix Business Technology Quarterly CA Compuware Electric Cloud Genuitec Gerson Lehrman Group Greenplum Hewlett-Packard iTKO JustSystems North America, Inc. Kapow Technologies LogLogic Nexaweb Technologies, Inc. The Open Group Paglo Panda Security Platform Computing Progress Software rPath Sailpoint Splunk TIBCO Software Weblayers Workday WSO2 ZDNet As a matter of CNET Networks and Interarbor Solutions policies, when Dana covers an organization that is also a sponsor of a BriefingsDirect-produced podcast, videocast or any other content, a disclosure will be included with the coverage. Updated (1/4/2010): Instead of providing a disclosure on just those editorials (blog posts, etc.) that intersect the above listed companies, we have changed the policy to include a link to this full disclosure at the end of every one of Dana's blog posts. In the case of audio or video-based coverage, such disclosures will be provided within the editorial content itself.

Biography

Dana Gardner

Dana Gardner is president and principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, an enterprise IT analysis, market research, and consulting firm. Gardner, a leading identifier of software and cloud productivity trends and new IT business growth opportunities, honed his skills and refined his insights as an industry analyst, pundit, and news editor covering the emerging software development and enterprise infrastructure arenas for the last 18 years.

Gardner tracks and analyzes a critical set of enterprise software technologies and business development issues: Cloud computing, SOA, business process management, business intelligence, next-generation data centers, and application lifecycle optimization. His specific interests include Enterprise 2.0 and social media, cloud standards and security, as well as integrated marketing technologies and techniques.

Gardner is a former senior analyst at Yankee Group and Aberdeen Group, and a former editor-at-large and founding online news editor at InfoWorld. He is a former news editor at IDG News Service, Digital News & Review, and Design News.

67
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

That wasn't even clever....
James Quinn 22nd Oct 2009
Of all the new systems you could have picked out you went with the
most expensive model. Why not choose one of those sweat Mac Mini's?
Now since I already own a former top of th line iMac I don't have any
need to purchase this latest model. But in a few short years I will be in
the market and you can bet your blank that I will be getting a 27" or
larger iMac I wonder if they will go larger still?

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
Heh... this is going to be fun to watch...
Hallowed are the Ori Updated - 21st Oct 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
I agree. This blog was written specificlly
GuidingLight Updated - 21st Oct 2009
to get those "flame war bonus bucks" that many of the bloggers here receive their checks based on; The more responses, the more money.

I wonder if this is a ZDnet requiremnet, or if the bloggers chose to do it on their own?

happy
0 Votes
+ -
NYT still had no clue
LBiege Updated - 21st Oct 2009
They seldom have one, that's why they lose business and are about to lay off 8% of workers.

You wanna know why Apple had a good qtr? B/c quite a few fools thought the depression was over in summer (while we only went through 1st inning of a double-header) and then started to pull out money they dared not spend in the first 2 qtrs of this year to buy some electronics, which was quite predictable considering how consumer-holic the general public are.

Well, it's not gonna last long b/c the second leg of this depression is coming w/ optional ARM expiring, commercial real estate collapsing, mass short-term treasury bond due next year and what not unseen disasters. All signs point to another mass drop in consumer spending in the next several months so I'm not expecting beautiful earnings from these consumer-oriented companies.
0 Votes
+ -
Ahhh... a fellow non-believer.
Hallowed are the Ori 21st Oct 2009
I too feel that we have just barely finished the appetizer in this fiasco, no matter what snake oil they're peddling out of Washington, or what their salesmen claim to the contrary.
0 Votes
+ -
not do I think sunny days are soon to be on the horizon. I think Apple
has been doing well not only this quarter but in all the quarters during
which we have been in this Recession. Prior and during as a matter of
fact.


Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
macs are cheaper
bannedfromzdnetagain 21st Oct 2009
when you consider full cost of ownership you not only get more value
with a mac they are even cheaper. sure sticker price is higher but you
have no costs associated with antivirus software every year or any
consumer software you might need (Llife included).

and when it is time to upgrade you can sell it for up to 30% of its retail
price because they keep lots of their value (unlike any pc which is
wothless after 2-3 years). case in point i just sold my 4 year old
powermac g5 for 700 euros on ebay.
0 Votes
+ -
Macs are cheaper?
bobiroc Updated - 21st Oct 2009
when you consider full cost of ownership you not only get more value
with a mac they are even cheaper. sure sticker price is higher but you
have no costs associated with antivirus software every year or any
consumer software you might need (Llife included).


Snore.. Good FREE malware protection is available today and has been for years. iLife?? Really?? Because Windows Home premium (or higher) does not have a comparable product already included for most things iLife gives you. And the couple things that iLife includes that Windows does not (like garageband) cannot be found for Free or at a cheap cost if the person wants it.

Resale value? I really do not think many people sell their computers off like you want to believe. Majority of people keep their PC until it dies or buy a new one and keep that one as a secondary or just stop using it. Maybe a handful do but not many.

EDIT: Oh I guess I should add that since many of the software items included in iLife that Windows has a comparable product for have moved to the cloud so to speak updates can be had for free of Charge. With Apple you have to buy the new iLife suite or get an upgraded OS. The features of either platform may vary a bit but for the most part they are very similar. I have heard Apple reps try to convince people that the iLife suite is worth $500 which is why Macs cost more. Same old story but those that use and are familiar with both platforms know that it is just an excuse Mac fans make to justify paying that much for a computer.
0 Votes
+ -
Macs are cheaper?
crudis01 21st Oct 2009
when you consider full cost of ownership you not only get more value
with a mac they are even cheaper. sure sticker price is higher but you
have no costs associated with antivirus software every year or any
consumer software you might need (Llife included).


No cost associated with Antivirus or any consumer software? Only for a fool. Macs have been Day 1 hacks at the security conferences recently, ahead of Windows and Linux. Apple has been scared to tell their customers they should use antivirus apps because it goes against their BS product marketing. ALL OSs are hackable, and MAC goes on with blinders.

As for other apps, sure it comes with nice toys, but they are toys, and you can get better free software for either Win or Linux. Hey, even great free antivirus. Apple overprices their products because they can, iSheep buy them no matter what. Ask my father-in-law about how feels about his unbeatable MAC.

I saved his data with Linux and I helped clear his stolen identity with the trojans he had. If you like a MAC, super, they are fun and nice and easy. But they lack customization, Apple doesn't like folks to play in their sandbox.
0 Votes
+ -
malware and iLife
bannedfromzdnetagain 21st Oct 2009
"Macs have been Day 1 hacks at the security conferences recently,
ahead of Windows and Linux. "

you know the difference between viruses in the wild and made up
hacks for "security" conferences? and you probably know that the
term "malware" is an umbrella term which consists of viruses, social
scams (trojans, phishing) and hacking attempts (weak spots in
software). you probably know all that so i don't have to explain it to
you.

"As for other apps, sure it comes with nice toys, but they are toys, and
you can get better free software for either Win or Linux."

for instance?


0 Votes
+ -
name them
bannedfromzdnetagain Updated - 21st Oct 2009
"Because Windows Home premium (or higher) does not have a
comparable product already included for most things iLife gives you?"

people saying that a lot. and never list any of these "better" applications.
... just wondering.

resale?

i would argue with your point. most people would like to sell their old
computer - if they could. but of course you can't sell an old windows
machine ... that's my point, by the way.
0 Votes
+ -
Macs are cheaper.
Bruizer 21st Oct 2009
It is as simple as that. I can develope custom apps faster under XCode/Cocoa than I can under VC++/.NET/C#. I have higher up-time (althouhg Win XP is actually pretty solid). The user interface is more fluid and much more intuitive (though Win 7 makes great strides in this area).

So if it only buys my 5-10% more productivity, THAT IS CHEAP!. I find, in actuallity, it is much more (10-15%).
0 Votes
+ -
What???
MLHACK 21st Oct 2009
This sounds like a lot of BS.. Apple is overpriced and the mac lovers will pay whatever Apple charges. There is the summary of this article.
0 Votes
+ -
It is a few rich and snub guys that fuel Apple growth.
It's the same reason why some rich guy buys a Lexus, not a Hunday when they have similar characteristics.
0 Votes
+ -
You mean Toyota
T1Oracle 21st Oct 2009
Hyundai is Korean and only recently have they not been crap. Still, they are far behind Toyota which owns Lexus.
0 Votes
+ -
Overpriced???
kisap 21st Oct 2009
I bought my first Mac system 1990 (Macintosh II fx, 13" color display and
LaserWriter NT II printer). It cost something like $20 000 and I had no
problem with the price; it was worth every cent. So, today's Macs are
practically free and I am happy to pay whatever Apple asks because its
nothing, anyway. I really can't understand this fuss about prices.
0 Votes
+ -
Practically Free
bobiroc 21st Oct 2009
How do you figure. Enlighten us on how they are even remotely free?
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, practically free
kisap 21st Oct 2009
20 years ago I paid $20 000 (and many times that amount later on) and I
survived. If I now pay, say $2 500 for a nice 17" laptop, its a fraction
what I payed earlier and yet, I get much more powerful and usable
computer.
0 Votes
+ -
And I bet
bobiroc 21st Oct 2009
I can get the same power, usability and reliability in a high quality laptop running Windows for hundreds cheaper. All you point out here is technology has gotten cheaper overall and that is across the board not just for apple. I remember spending $4000 for a 486 Dell many years ago and can get the same mid-high end desktop for $1500 today. What's your point?
0 Votes
+ -
My point
kisap 21st Oct 2009
Compared to what people usually spend overall (n x $10 000 per year) it
really doesn't matter if you spend n x $1 000 over a period of 2 - 3 year
(the typical life time of a computer). The money people spend on
computers is peanuts anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
So you agree
bobiroc 21st Oct 2009
That even though you referenced Apple your statement was general and applied to all computers of today compared to "yesterdays" models. And to some people $1000 - $2500 is not peanuts. I make a decent wage but a $1000 is still a lot of money to me and will do research and comparison's before I buy anything. Sometimes I will spend more if the item I am looking to buy is actually a better product but this blogger saying that Apple is the best and worth the price hike for the same hardware found in a comparable PC is just BS.
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly Rich A&s Mac Snob
MLHACK 21st Oct 2009
NT
0 Votes
+ -
I paid 950 dollars for my first VCR
GuidingLight 21st Oct 2009
so at 399.99 a DVR is practiclly free!!!
0 Votes
+ -
My first VCR
oncall 21st Oct 2009
Purchased around 1979 for about $1200 in todays inflation adjusted dollars is over $3500. Today you can get a DVD player for under $50 so yes practically free, LOL. Our disposable society has people focused on filling their homes with junk. Quality is a tertiary concern when the item will be tossed for next years model.
0 Votes
+ -
Now when I purchase a Mac I usually plan on giving it a good solid 3
years of use before I get another. Still the resale value of my 3 year old
Mac is always MUCH better than I could expect from a similarly aged Dell
or HP. I don't know if that makes my Macs cheaper but they certainly
hold their value and I often get from the sale of my old Mac a great deal
of the money I spend towards a new one:)

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
Linux
azurehi 21st Oct 2009
I have tried a Mac and did not like the way I have to do "things" their way. I have migrated from Windows to Linux and enjoy the relative freedom I have.
0 Votes
+ -
Right OVERPRICED.
MLHACK 21st Oct 2009
Not all of us can afford to drive Mercedes and BMW live in a 2 million dollar house and own a mac.
0 Votes
+ -
absurd
bannedfromzdnetagain 21st Oct 2009
that's an absurd analogy. a comparable mac is a hundred maybe two
hundred dollars (if at all) more expensive than a hardware comparable
pc. (and you get a lot more in value). so no mercedes or bmw or million
dollar house here. just a smart choice for more and more people who
don't think the the cheapest option is the best.
0 Votes
+ -
There is a difference in purchasing
GuidingLight 21st Oct 2009
the best product, verses the "perceived" best product.

I hear many of the same complaints from Apple users as I do from Linux and Windows users.

The problem with the author's opinion would be that he has already assumed that Apple is the best product, when the average life and ease of use of a Mac is no differnet then that of a Dell or HP.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't underestimate the power of Perception
The Mentalist 21st Oct 2009
It often enough to be perceived as creative and entrepreneurial to give you an edge and many people are betting on it and buying Apple.

Perception is hugely powerful and the next best thing to having real qualities.
0 Votes
+ -
since the beginning. I was there when CP/M was the OS of many a
computer maker. Then there was Commodore, and Apple. A few
other odd balls but that was the field when I entered the game. I
worked on Apple II's, Osbornes, Epsons, AST, Packard Bell's you name
it I've been inside of them. Heck I even owned at one time a dual 3.5"
floppy laptop make by NEC no hard drive baby:) I saw the PC Jr and
fondly remember those Charlie Chaplin commercials. Still even today
while I still often find myself supporting and repairing PC's so I know
of which I speak and of that which I remember the Macintosh to my
humble opinion is still the best for the novice and the experienced. It
is not perfect nor fool proof but if you are a fool you're chances of
getting some work done are better on a Mac than a PC. Will you hear
complaints about the Mac from Mac users? SURE you will... Will it
however be far lower on average than you find with others YUP and for
a reason.

Pagan jim
today than it was 100 years ago.
are bailing out the rest of the economy.
0 Votes
+ -
The funny thing was
LBiege 21st Oct 2009
... the guy (Chairman MAObama) who decided to give the un-deserving bankers bailouts at the other 90%'s expense was voted in by many of these 90% folks. Just goes to show how much brain the public have or lack thereof.
Hint: Recipients of government bailouts resulting from caving to government pressure to loan to non-producers who can't afford to pay back the borrowed money are not part of the 10%
0 Votes
+ -
Not sure it is as high as 10% (nt)
Richard Flude 21st Oct 2009
I'd be happy with "less than 10% have always carried the rest".

I was in an electronic store yesterday. The new Macs look great and
attract a great deal of attention. I don't know why the PC manufacturers
allow the Macs to be near them, they look so bad. Explains why no-one
goes up to them.

I'm sure I couldn't get in today with the windows 7 crowds (ROFL);-)
0 Votes
+ -
Translation:
bobiroc Updated - 21st Oct 2009
People that have the money are buying Macs because it is still represented as a status symbol.

What I don't get is this:

"Because when failure is not an option, you have to have the best tools, especially when the going gets tough. The sad part is that Apple does so well when so many are not."

What does Apple do well? Well I think their marketing is done well. After all they can release commercials with half-truths, lies, or misleading/incomplete information and get away with it. Apple has done a great job making computer buyer today believe that their products are problem free and virus free. While apple makes a good product this is far from the truth and pages upon pages of Apple support forums will prove that. I know many people that are happy they purchased an Apple and that is fine, they are good computers, but I also know many that are unhappy they bought an Apple computer when they find out that they have a more limited software selection, limited hardware compatibility selection, and when they want windows they have to pay extra. Even the ones that install windows some are surprised that they still need Malware protection even though the commercials implied that Macs are virus free. As a long time user of both MacOS and Windows I say they both are good operating systems but there is nothing and I mean nothing that makes Apple products superior as this article/blog implies. Yes their computers are on the higher end where many other OEMs offer low end, but if you compare Apples to Apples so to speak and look for the higher end PC you will find that the components used to make the computer are very similar. My Dell Latitude is very durable and has very similar features to my Macbook when it comes to parts. The difference is my Latitude was hundreds cheaper and has a bigger screen, more memory, and more onboard features. So I do not have a mag-safe power cord. Solution to that is watch where I walk and be careful where I plug the laptop in. The MacBook does get about an extra 20 minutes of battery life but most times the laptop is plugged in and when it is on battery I am only on it for a short time and I still can get 3 - 4 hours of battery out my dell as long as I am not spinning up the ROM drive or playing a game which I would never do on a work laptop wink I guess I am sick of the generalization that what Apple makes is great and everything else is crap. Sure there are a lot of low end/cheap computers out there but that does not mean all PCs are cheap and everything Apple makes is not. Contrary to belief Apple does not "Just Work" all of the time.

Ok Rant Over
0 Votes
+ -
Get a clue
rag@... 21st Oct 2009
OS X is (and has been since Day One) virus-free. Windows (any version) has never been.
OS X is (and has been since Day One) virus-free.

It has nothing to do with the technical merits of OS X.
0 Votes
+ -
flawed logic
bannedfromzdnetagain Updated - 21st Oct 2009
here are the reasons why the "security through obscurity" theory is a
myth (invented by the last microsoft faithful):

1. there have been hundreds of mac viruses before mac os x (that
means before mac os has become a unix system in 2001)
2. there are around 35 million mac users at this moment. sure there
should be less viruses then for windows but the target group is big
enough
3. it is very tempting for any hacker to write the first mac os x virus
(after eight years on one has accomplished that - imagine the
publicity!)

all that sad, there should be 1000, 100 or at least 10 viruses, but
there are none. zero.
...ever get the underlying technology that is protecting OS X.

1. there have been hundreds of mac viruses before mac os x (that means before mac os has become a unix system in 2001)

Times are different today than they were then. Today's malware is about money not kudos. And that "before Mac OS has become a UNIX system in 2001" is referred to as "classic Mac OS". And I'm very well aware of the history...being a Mac user since the LC II back in 1991.

2. there are around 35 million mac users at this moment. sure there should be less viruses then for windows but the target group is big
enough


Perhaps in the minds of Mac advocates. Meanwhile in the real world that represents a mere 3.5% of the market. With Windows having > 90% of the other.

3. it is very tempting for any hacker to write the first mac os x virus (after eight years on one has accomplished that - imagine the publicity!)

Already done...to no fan fare. Dead argument.

In the end the primary thing keeping OS X malware free is market share. Unless you can demonstrate some technology in OS X that protects it. Can you?
0 Votes
+ -
malware
bannedfromzdnetagain 21st Oct 2009
you know that malware is an umbrella term and what it consists of?

you know that viruses are something different than trojans or other social
scams?

you know all that?
if not please do us some favor, go to wikipedia for a quick update.

"Already done...to no fan fare"
when and where? to no fanfare? you mean no one noticed that the first
mac os x virus has occured??
reference please.
0 Votes
+ -
Virus Free
bobiroc 21st Oct 2009
Wow you are brainwashed. Less viruses and malware yes, but not 100% Free. Just because malware writers have very little to gain by going after an OS that has maybe 5% - 8% of the world marketshare. But that is slowly changing and the more ground MacOS gains the more it will become appealing to the cyber criminals out there. Why don't you look around the internet for the available malware for a Mac. You may be surprised to find out there is actual some out there. Granted you have to go to unsafe sites or download stuff like illegal software or music or something to get infected but in this day and age that applies to windows too. Throw a nice FREE protection software on there and use the Windows Firewall or another type of firewall and be mindful of what you do and click on and your windows computer is just fine.
0 Votes
+ -
virus vs. trojan
bannedfromzdnetagain Updated - 21st Oct 2009
malware?
what do you mean by that? viruses, trojans?

you know the difference between a virus and a trojan?

virus = infects your computer without your knowledge or interaction
thus can spread from one computer to thousands of others in no time

trojan = has to be installed by the user, one at a time, therefore
belongs to the category "social scam" (like phishing), no danger of
infecting thousands of computers overnight like viruses do

there are trojans for the mac, there always have been and probably
will (how do you protect a computer from its user?) and no, zero, nad,
zilsch viruses for nine years now. get used to it.
0 Votes
+ -
Malware covers it all
bobiroc 21st Oct 2009
Viruses, Trojans, Spyware, etc... Malware is short for malicious software. So you can get technical all you want and I understand the differences so live in your denial that MacOS is perfectly safe with no protection.
We live in a world where perception counts more than reality and Apple understands that like no one.

That's the reason they are so successful.
0 Votes
+ -
Recommendation
johnfenjackson@... 21st Oct 2009
"All those millions of newly laid off workers ... seem to be making a new move to a Mac."

The new quad-core, 27inch iMac looks just the ticket at $1999!

I mean what else would you want to spend money on if you'd just lost your job? Meals? Living quarters? Who needs them?
0 Votes
+ -
That wasn't even clever....
James Quinn 22nd Oct 2009
Of all the new systems you could have picked out you went with the
most expensive model. Why not choose one of those sweat Mac Mini's?
Now since I already own a former top of th line iMac I don't have any
need to purchase this latest model. But in a few short years I will be in
the market and you can bet your blank that I will be getting a 27" or
larger iMac I wonder if they will go larger still?

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
You nailed it.
MC_z 21st Oct 2009
I'm one of those creative professionals. I like working with the best, and that's Apple. Yes, you can do the same things--eventually--with Windows and related apps. But it's always a little slower, a little kludgier, a little less secure, and a little less integrated. My time is worth something, and when I can spend less of it then I'm happier.

I try to achieve excellence in my own work, and I don't like mediocrity in the tools I use.
0 Votes
+ -
I think it is netbooks that is killing margins for other PC vendors. Apple don't sell Netbooks and they sell notebooks/desktops at an average of $1200 per system and they make ton's profit out of it. If you look at other PC vendors, their profits are cannibalized by Netbooks. That's one of the reason they are not doing good. In my view all PC vendors should stop selling netbooks which is hurting profits and also consumer satisfaction and general perception of windows OS

-Ben
0 Votes
+ -
Cheap PCs in general IMO
bobiroc 21st Oct 2009
I know its tough economic times but what I see is many people opting for the $299 - $399 special just to get away spending less money and then complaining about performance and quality. In some cases the phrase "You get what you pay for" rings true. Apple does make high quality products but so do other vendors and it's not fair to generalize and say Apple makes the best just because other vendors make everything from low end to high end.

In response to your netbook comment I do agree that many people are getting them thinking they are just a small laptop and complain when the atom processor runs things slower and when they expect it to function just like a regular laptop that is a few hundred dollars more.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix