Ditching Firefox for Google Chrome not an option?
Summary: After my article last week, I received an incredible number of emails explaining why the new version of Chrome still isn't a good alternative for Firefox. There are some valid points, but for me, none of them hit home enough to prevent me from thinking that switching is a great idea.
After my article last week, I received an incredible number of emails explaining why the new version of Chrome still isn't a good alternative for Firefox. There are some valid points, but for me, none of them hit home enough to prevent me from thinking that switching is a great idea.
Here are some of the main complaints that I heard (multiple times) from readers:
1) Printing doesn't work well in Chrome I don't really print anything, so I've never noticed this issue before, but several people complained about the printing engine in Chrome. If you often print out websites, it sounds like you should probably think twice before switching to Google Chrome.
2) Google Chrome is "spyware" This complaint is complete garbage in my opinion. Many people sent me email saying that they would rather take the risk of getting spyware with Firefox or IE than directly installing "spyware" by using Chrome. Comparing Chrome to spyware is ridiculous -- I'd personally take Google Chrome over "spyware" any day -- how about you?
3) Some websites don't work properly still I haven't found any websites that don't work with Chrome, so I can't really speak to this one. There are many people who do seem to have issues still, however.
4) Lack of hardware integration (like fingerprint scanners) Firefox doesn't work either, so this is more of an issue for people that use Internet Explorer. If you have, and use, fingerprint scanners, you are out of luck.
None of these complaints really have me wondering if I should switch or not -- in fact, I've been using Chrome exclusively since the article I wrote last week. I haven't looked back.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
if you chose a side, stick with it and dont pretend to ask questions
not about sides
On a side note, I have noticed one website that doesn't work exactly right. Hotmail. In every version since I started using chrome and on different machines, if I scroll down in my messages I can only select one message at a time, which is a pain in the butt when I'm trying to mass clean the junk mail. The only other issue I've experianced is lacking some plugins, but thats got a lot better as market share has been growing.
I still use Chrome as my primary browser.
Have you tried Gears?
that'll help, but I'm not really very sure if it
does.
Irrational
Fixed opinions that don't change based on the evidence are ridiculous.
Always look for a better way. Try everything with an open mind and realise that effort is needed to review the options and make a sensible choice.
I like chrome
Well on the top of my head, one site that doesn't work with Chrome 4.0l.249.89 unknown (38701) is http://forums.pcworld.com
All formatting is screwed up and sometimes you don't see the thumbs up/down icons...
However, editing is screwed up in Firefox 3.6 and IE8 the latest...
Go figure! So I use Chrome to edit my posts, but IE8 for everything else including sensitive banking...
Now why this exclusivity thing? Why not use all three of them? This isn't marriage.
A good craftsman, has more than one hammer...
~~~~~~~~~~~
Attack complexity with simplicity.
~ Sun Microsystems
Works for me
problem w/the link to pcworld.
Chrome's clean, fast and doesn't crash (at
least on me).
Other Options
I also loaded Chromium Plus, which is an offshoot of Chrome, and I seem to like it much better than chrome. It's as fast, looks and feels the same, and some features are standard, without the need of extension. Doesn't have some of the features I use yet, but definitely better than chrome. Some features that are standard (which are with extensions in others) are Gestures, IE like browsing (some pages don't load correctly unless in IE).
The one feature that would bring me over most fully into Chromium would be full integration of Roboform. As it is currently, the extension doesn't work as well as in IE or Firefox. And I rely heavily on this little program.
In answer to the main question, I wouldn't ditch Firefox, at least not yet, as firefox has many features supported through extension, which chrome definitely lacks. However, Chrome or chromium, would be a good addition when one needs a quick look at a webpage as it is faster to load.
Chrome faster than Firefox
If You're Addicted to IE, Just Pop in the IE Extension! :D
set up of my router. Where it's safe from actually
venturing out on the web! lol
Seriously though, in Chrome Beta (which is better
than any final release browser) you can install IE
tab extension and not even have to reboot your
browser or Win 7! ;)
As far as the FEAR MONGERS here, M$ has been
spying on Windows users for ages and we haven't
heard a peep out of people over that. Right now
they've come up with a new slant on WGA that
should be raising some eyebrows. Not to mention
that they have refused to grant full privileges to
3rd party Firewall Developers unless they build in
Microsoft access both on and off your computer.
They claim it's for their hyper tunnel server
feature. But that will only be available to
Corporate Subscription Clients ONLY!
...and don't give that OLD M$ bullshizt spiel
about them not using your personal information
crapola! haha ;)
... and it's not crashing like Firefox
I like have many tabs opened. 20 tabs is an average. It is when Firefox is getting stuck. It draws ~50% CPU utilization and becomes unresponsive. While I like Firefox very much for its plug-ins, I did not experience this problem with Chrome 2.0. So, go figure...
SPYWARE????
spyware.
Spyware? They people that said that are employed
by Microsoft!
Chrome works best for me
used to be a big Firefox supporter but after
using Chrome it seems too smooth and fast to
ever use Firefox as my default browser again. I
tried uninstalling the add ons to pick up speed
but even then it couldn't keep up and now with
the Chrome extensions I'm way ahead of the
game. I've only had 2 web pages not open with
it so far so I stepped back in time and used
Firefox and used the sites.
See your narrow little column of text?
Rubbish
You misunderstand
I Wish It Would Auto-Format Narrow Column Of Text !
newspaper with only one column stretched across
the page.
RE: Ditching Firefox for Google Chrome not an option?
don't really care about #1 and #4. #2 is just ridiculous
like you said. And #3, eh, most do. I just open up Fx/IE
if Chrome doesn't like a certain website. But everyone
has their own preferences, and the more options that
users have, the better. Plus, competition accelerates
innovation. That's a win for consumers :)
Competition. That is the best point...
FF or Chrome?
That' s a bit harsh
But what I hate about both is that I still can' t use a 64 bit version on my
mac. I think that is why for regular browsing I still prefer Safari.
Furthermore I' m starting to get annoyed by some little faults/short
comings in the complete google products set. Everything works, ... ,
almost (let' s make it beta a decade). I also think I don' t like all my
information to be available to google and only google.