Google to sell a branded tablet - Android game-changer?
Summary: Is the Google brand enough to stem the tide of tablet customers who just can't seem to get enough iPads?
The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that Google will begin selling co-branded Android tablets, attempting to slow Apple's massive market share growth with the New iPad and a reduced-price iPad. Instead of getting into the OEM game, Google is expected to work with existing Android tablet-makers to market Google tablets through an online store and traditional brick and mortar retail outlets. But will it be enough to change public perceptions and get people to start purchasing Android-powered tablets instead of iPads?
Naysayers have been quick to point out the dismal failure of Google's initial efforts to sell their Nexus One smartphone direct to consumers and, as Jason Perlow noted recently, even their highest profile devices (including those from soon-to-be subsidiary Motorola) suffer from fragmentation, bloatware, and miserable update records. How will Google-branded devices (reportedly from Asus and Samsung) sold direct by Google and in retail channels (often right next to Apple devices) solve this problem that seems to be inherent in Android?
According to the WSJ article,
Google believes the current model for selling tablets is broken, said people familiar with its strategy. Google has watched as wireless carriers, who helped Android become the No. 1 mobile operating system for smartphones, have struggled to replicate that success with tablets...
...This time, however, Google won't have to worry about pairing with wireless carriers because tablets are primarily used with WiFi connections in people's homes.
The article also cited what may be a more effective strategy (one that has worked for Amazon with their Kindle Fire tablet): subsidizing the cost of the hardware sold under the Google brand. Google will also have the opportunity to heavily market the tablets and take advantage of its considerable reach online and, more recently, in traditional media, to capture potential customers and educate the market on the value of Android tablets. Unfortunately, many customers and more than a few analysts are skeptical about whether Android has any value at all in the tablet space.
I've argued for some time that Android will ultimately win the tablet wars, at least in terms of market share. Google's ability to market directly to consumers, though, is dubious at best. If it's going to keep new customers from simply defaulting to iPads, then it will be the potential for differentiation and market segmentation provided by Android and many OEMs that does it (just as it has in the smartphone wars); a Google online store won't exactly turn the market upside down.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
If their support is as bad as is was for their smartphone fiasco this wont
I think you're overestimating ...
And when I say that, i'm thinking globally - the figures may be more skewed toward enterprise in the U.S.
Well, that blows
Interesting move.
Detailed analysis of the tablet market - http://www.tech-thoughts.net
Blaming the carriers is an excuse
Google sits by and does nothing to help the situation.
The only thing you can blame the carriers for is selling this junk--all the while knowing that the product has issues from day 1.
I have yet to see Samsung release an update to fix the radio issues present in their Galaxy Nexus phone.
"Carrier effect" didn't kill the Nexus One
Android handsets succeed, as far as market share goes, by being cheap. The OEMs are scraping by on tiny, or [b]negative[/b] margins (cf LG). While Apple is capturing all the profits and consumer satisfaction. Google doesn't care because Android brings in a ton of data for the "The Algorithm" [b]and[/b] they still make [i]more[/i] money off iPhone users. Google's problem is that Amazon has taken their role in tablets.
Apple owns that high-end client that wants, and is willing to pay for, style, stability, and extensive ecosystem. Amazon has managed to come in and arguably (we don't know for sure since they don't release numbers) owns that lower-end where clients will sacrifice style, stability, and extensive ecosystem for a lower cost of entry. The doesn't leave Google much wiggle room. Google Play can't touch the iTunes store in [b]any[/b] way, and it would take them years to develop Apple-esque economies of scale-so count on crappy PlayBook/Fire levels of hardware, which will still probably have a negative margin. And Amazon simply can't be beat at media serving or online sales. Talk about being between a rock and a hard place.
Google's saving grace is that since they're not a technology company, they don't need to make money on technology. [b]Google is an advertising sales company[/b], so as long as they can sell advertising they're [i]in business[/i]. Given their deep pockets and even enough time, Google could develop enough market share to sell enough advertising (control of their own tablet platform does present many more opportunities) to make it worthwhile, but look at how that same basic approach has worked for Microsoft with Bing.
The real problem
I think the Nexus One would have sold better if they had a retail partner.
Chromebooks
Huh?
If the Nexus series of phones is any indication
The author argues that Android tablets will ultimatelly win the tablet war (which is interesting as i did not know it was considered a war) and that a Google branded tablet will rise top the top.
The reason that carriers and retailers are having a hard time selling Android tablets is obvious:
They are not given away for free.
The vast amount of Android based smartphone sales are attributed not to the consumers comparing the overall hardware and software package, making a choice at that point as to what is best for them, instead purchasing an inexpensive phone, and just taking the operating system that comes with it.
Android is the operating system found on all the give-away and no contract smart phones, so it is no wonder why it has done as well as it has.
Yet with tablets, customers are asked to spend 500 dollars or more for a tablet, which at that point in time they become more discerning, and the iPad is the clear choice over Android.
Unless the author realizes this, his conclusions will always be incorrect.
:|
another nail in apple's coffin
i disagree
Don't feed the troll
Finally getting it.
I've been saying for a while that it is more related to the mp3 player/ iPod market where consumers looked for the complete package of great hardware tied to great software and service, ecosystem, brand. This is why Apple is selling and why Amazon in a few months sold more than all the other Android competitors combined. Geeks know about Google the brand, the larger gen public do not in the consumer electronic space. A Google branded tablet (or Nexus) will do no better than any other Android tablets that's not forked. The ecosystem is just not on the levels as Apple's or Amazon's.
dream on...
- good luck with this. Win 8 and iPads will make android tabs bite the dust in short time.
Windows 8 pressure
"Quite obvious" "far superior"?
$$