ie8 fix
Click Here

Googling Google

Christopher Dawson

Privacy worries? Google shouldn't be your biggest fear

By | June 13, 2011, 3:30am PDT

Summary: The bigger threats to compromising your privacy are you, your friends and your family - they’re posting about you on social networks, too.

I’ve been thinking a lot about privacy lately, mostly about my own comfort levels with what’s known about me from my Internet footprint. Granted, there’s a lot of information about me on the Web - mostly because of my work as a tech journalist - so I’m not really all that paranoid anymore.

Maybe that’s why I tend to not buy into a lot of the Google bashing that goes on over privacy and the suggestion that Google is spying on us and stealing our information so that they can do something sinister with it - like make money and provide online services that impact our daily lives. I’ve been using free GMail, Google Maps and Google Search for years and I’ve yet to have my identity stolen, my personal data compromised or my trash sifted through by a stalker who tracked me down because I used Google Maps for driving directions.

Here’s what’s funny: When it comes to being worried about the information being made available about me on the Web, it’s not Google that I’m worried about. It’s me that I’m worried about, the guy who’s posting regularly on social networks. It’s my family and friends and what they might be saying - or posting - about me on their pages. It’s all of you, the readers, and what you’re saying about me in the comments or in your own blogs. (Yup! Easily searchable.)

This might explain why I was particularly intrigued by something that was said by author and social media expert Brian Solis at the Latinos in Social Media conference in Silicon Valley over the weekend. Solis, who was talking about how people engage in social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, suggested that people who are concerned about privacy on the Internet don’t really understand how social media works.

His point was that we all have three lives: our public lives, our private lives and our secret lives - and it’s up to each one of us to determine what sort of information we put out there about ourselves. Solis got a great laugh when he noted that Congressman Anthony Weiner just screwed up because he forgot which life he was broadcasting on Twitter.

All laughs aside, I think Solis made an excellent point - and his suggestion that we have three types of lives got me thinking about privacy again. Could I actually place every detail about my life into one of those three categories? Would there be overlap? How would I control it? I actually put some thought into it - and here’s what I came up with:

My Secret Life: To me, secret almost seemed like the incorrect word here because it implies that I’m doing something wrong in my life and am trying to keep people from finding out. Sure, maybe we all have something that fits into that category - but I thought that “My Secret Life” would be better as “Stuff in my life that’s none of your damn business.” What sort of details would I put in there? Well, for starter’s my social security number and my personal finances would fall into that category. Of course, those aren’t necessarily “secret” details. I share this kind of information with my wife, my accountant, my bank and the IRS. I might broadcast on my social networks that I’ve taken a new job but I’m certainly not going to announce my salary at that new job.

My Private Life: Again, thinking about what I would share on social media, I would think that things like my home address, my kids’ names or my mother’s maiden name would be private. Certainly, I’m limiting how much of this information I put online. But as your family, neighbors and even your teenage kids start popping up on social networks more often, checking in and snapping pics all the while, it’s harder to keep some details quiet. Here’s how I see it: I’m not renting out a billboard on the side of the freeway to advertise any information about myself - but I’m also not losing any sleep if my daughter’s friend “checks in” at our house.

My Public Life: How old am I? Where did I go to school? Where have I worked? I have no problem with my resume being online. (In fact, it is.) What are my thoughts about the iPad, Google, Facebook? Clearly, I have no problem posting those thoughts to the Internet, given my work for ZDNet. What kind of music do I listen to? What do I watch on TV? Which way do I lean politically? If you’re my Facebook friend (or my wife’s), you already know these things about me.

Speaking of politics, my thoughts about privacy popped up again last week when the news media began to salivate over the release of the Sarah Palin e-mails, hoping to outscoop each other with some juicy detail - only to find that there really wasn’t a there there. I don’t have much respect for Palin, her politics or her loose-cannon style of speaking before thinking - but I do think the media frenzy was a bit too much. Palin has proven that she’s savvy enough to recognize the difference between her three lives and has worked hard to manage them.

She wouldn’t have gotten as far as she has if Secret Life stuff had slipped into the Public Life stream, right?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sam has been a professional journalist for more than 20 years and has spent the last dozen years covering the tech beat. Today, he is a Silicon Valley-based writing consultant and freelance writer.

Disclosure

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz has been a technology and business blogger, reporter and editor at ZDNet, the Washington Post and San Jose Mercury News and Fresno Bee for more than a dozen years. He is a Silicon Valley-based writing consultant, freelancer and quoted technology expert. For more information about Sam, visit about.me/sam-diaz or www.sam-diaz.com.

75
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Privacy worries? Google shouldn't be your biggest fear
kevinmogee@... 21st Jun
@aaronc0027 For me it wasn't the "I don't have respect much for Palin...", as much as it was the "She wouldn?t have gotten as far as she has if Secret Life stuff had slipped into the Public Life stream, right?" It seems to me that she's gotten as far as she has because she is exactly who she says she is. As far as her 'secret life' stuff, clearly that's what the media was after when they went trolling through her private e-mails. It sounds as though Sam was as disappointed as the media when it came to just how boring her e-mails were. You may not have much respect for her, but I just lost ALL respect for you and will no longer be reading your trash.
One fundamental thing you missed in your complete blog is automatic spoofing vs. deliberately posting. And that point itself totally made this entirely moot. I am not saying it is waste. You could have gone with "how best you, your friends could damage your privacy and social reputation" or something like that instead of bragging about Google by undermining its automatic spoofing issue.
@Rama.NET The American 'moot', where it is used as a mis pronounced form of 'mute' .. or the 'moot' the rest of the world uses where it is a topic of debate?
@prof.ebral

Americans use moot the same way everyone else does. I have no idea what that 'mute' thing you are talking about is unless you picked it up off of Jersey Shore or something.
0 Votes
+ -
@prof.ebral Perhaps this will help:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/moot

particularly these parts: of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic., of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic.

Which is HOW it was being used.

Mute on the other hand...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/mute

?adjective
1.
silent; refraining from speech or utterance.
2.
not emitting or having sound of any kind.
3.
incapable of speech; dumb.


I hope this helps you out and enables a better understanding of what was said.
0 Votes
+ -
moo yute
jparr 15th Jun
@prof.ebral

If I use "mute", some moron corrects me and tells me it's "moot".

If I use "moot", some moron corrects me and tells me it's "mute".
0 Votes
+ -
Our "Job-seeking" lives
jparr 15th Jun
@Rama.NET, I think the greatest reputational risk is to our "job-seeking" lives... perhaps a fourth classification of information. In your public life, you share information with your friends and family that you might not want a current, future, or former employee to see.
@Sam - too true.
Same boat but different arena.
Gmail since inception. No "G" issues at all.
My biggest issue is what other people post about me and the level of detail they feel free to include with no real thought. They feel free to share their info and auto-include you in the same bucket.

Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc.... As long as they let me know what they are doing Incan plan accordingly. Bucketing your "life" is a good step.
happy
0 Votes
+ -
Public LifeStream
tcurranmortgage 13th Jun
Sam,
Well said; I love that you've potentially coined the phrase "Public Life Stream" to describe our lives on the information Super Highway! I came to the 'net mostly for business, so I've spent considerable time and effort carefully presenting my "Public Life Stream."

I heard the radio spot this morning for Reputation Defender and I had to smirk. Reputation is as much a part of Public Life Stream as any other information we present ourselves and I think the best way to protect it is to actively work on it. I accept flaming and bad comments as a given when commenting on the 'net, but I also accept personal responsibility for my reactions to negativity I encounter. I know---as should anyone who posts on the 'net---that my words, once I hit SEND, are forever pasted out there so I'd better be very careful and keep my cool before I say something I'm going to regret later.

Thanks again Sam for a thought-provoking blog!
Trevor Curran tcurranmortgage.com
My gmail address hasn't been hacked, but one of my son's accounts was infected. Sorry, but no email is completely safe from malicious attacks.
0 Votes
+ -
@Starman35 Sorry but no web mail account can ever be infected nor has one. But your computer can be affected or infected by malicious email sent to you. If you don't have proper preventive measures in place and don't heed the warnings plastered all over the web, then no doubt you'll reap the results in the cyber world just a you would in the real World!
@Starman35 In such cases, the root cause is usually malware on a client used to access the account, rather than a hack at Google's end (that would definitely be big news).
0 Votes
+ -
Gratuitous Palin Slam
jthuringer@... 13th Jun
When I read your column, I didn't appreciate the gratuitous Palin slam. It undermined the very point you were making about the media salivating to find a juicy detail about her. It's not what I'm looking for or expecting in a tech piece.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Gratuitous Palin Slam
aaronc0027 13th Jun
@jthuringer@...

Good call. I found the "I don?t have much respect for Palin, her politics or her loose-cannon style of speaking before thinking - " trite and silly. It's the kind of thing somebody posts to prove their "intellectual" credentials when they dare to defend somebody who it is faddish to call "stupid." It pretty much translates to "I think she's stupid too, guys, just like all of you self-declared smart people, but this went too far." Way to insulate yourself from having to worry about anybody accidentally believing that you're a Palin fan, Sammy. Gotta protect that "Public life stream," eh?
0 Votes
+ -
@aaronc0027 So Sam has little respect or love for Palin... so what? As it happens I don't care for her myself but I do find it quite amusing that nothing was found in those emails. She's either as she appears to be or is really that good at covering her tracks or has hired someone that good at covering her tracks.
@athynz
It goes beyond that. It's funny watching people qualify their statements so they don't fall afoul of the faddish. It's pretty cowardly. He obviously felt the need to qualify the fact that he doesn't care for Palin before he felt comfortable commenting on the situation lest he be accused of being a fan of Palin. Weak sauce.
@aaronc0027 I didn't have any opinion on Sarah Palin what so ever prior to the Paul Revere incident. Being neither conservative or liberal. My politics ride somewhere in the middle being more moderate. But that all changed when she opened her big mouth in Boston of all places!

Wrong!!! Paul Revere had already put up the two lanterns in the church steeple. "One if by Land, Two if by Sea" and rode warning other patriots that the British were coming as well as helping to get as many as 40 other riders. He also helped move some of our leader's family to safety.

He was captured and torture till he finally told them what he had been up to and to call that warning the British the Patriots were coming is asinine and ludicrous at best. Most likely she got confused and meant Benedict Arnold, who did warn the British about us. "Warning" is a prevenative action or measure not an informative one as she claims was his sole intent!!!

So ......seems she forgot about the "British are Coming" Warning to colonists, with lanterns and horse ride being Paul Revere's primary goal. Then her and her fans tried to rewrite history! Which is disgraceful, that she couldn't just admit she made a mistake!!!

As for Sam stating his opinion? He has every right to. Do I think he's right about Google? Absolutely!!! ....never had one single problem with Google's products and revealing information about me. If anything it's been FACEBOOK!!!
Sam is incapable of understanding that, there are always two or more sides to any story or any issue.
0 Votes
+ -
and you're the type that doesn't use his mind to just accept the facts, because, those facts are quite contrary to your idealism or your agenda.

So, according to you, Palin must've covered her tracks or somebody did it for her, because, she is a republican and evil, and there absolutely must be some dirt in anything she ever did.

It's time to face reality and realize that, the people doing the witch-hunt against Palin are most likely the ones with the dastardly agenda, namely the liberal press and the liberal leadership which put the up to the witch-hunt.
to be right on the Revere history, and the press and pundits who thought they knew better and attacked her, have all been proven wrong, and in actuality, many of them have admitted it and even many historians have vouched for Palins account of history.
Or maybe, just maybe, "nothing" is the right answer. No particular skeletons, and no particular good points either. I'm not that concered about whether palin is "stupid" or "smart" but the general preoccupation with her, tells me one thing about the society I live in: we put a HUGE stock in how somebody looks. To some extent we do not even listen to the vacuous things she says, we just shut down the cortex and look at her with the brain stem. Does this not relate to the subject at hand? Maybe, maybe not: vacuous behavior is partly what we are being warned against, in terms of giving up our hard fought freedoms and presumed boundaries of privacy. Palin just represents one of the many facets of our societal vacuousness. Both good and bad points, those.
adornoe@...
Time to update your knowledge, because, Palin has been proven to be right on the Revere history, and the press and pundits who thought they knew better and attacked her, have all been proven wrong, and in actuality, many of them have admitted it and even many historians have vouched for Palins account of history."

Some proof would be nice, not a political blogger but an actual historian with credentials. Maybe a link or two to substantiate your post? Have you seen the footage? I have, and she obviously got it wrong, look at her tone and body language. Does that warrant all the press she got? Doubtful. On the other hand, she's probably not as bad as George W., and he got re-elected, so maybe it's an act.

Of course that just my opinion, I could be wrong.
0 Votes
+ -
914four: Proof?!?
adornoe@... Updated - 13th Jun
From NPR, even....

The guy being interviewed is a history professor, and NPR brought him in thinking that they could make Palin look foolish, but, the professor didn't go along with what NPR was hoping to make Palin look ignorant.


How Accurate Were Palin's Paul Revere Comments?

http://www.npr.org/2011/06/06/137011636/how-accurate-were-palins-comments-on-paul-revere


Yeah, I know...

It's such a bummer and disappointment to many that Palin was not hammered and made to look foolish and dumb and ignorant.
0 Votes
+ -
adornoe@...
914four 19th Jun
Yeah, I know...

It's such a bummer and disappointment to many that Palin was not hammered and made to look foolish and dumb and ignorant.


Have you watched the video footage of when she made the comment adornoe? And read the NPR interview? If you still believe she knew what she was talking about when she made the original statement then you deserve to have her as your next president.

Of course that's just my opinion, I may be wrong.
@aaronc0027 For me it wasn't the "I don't have respect much for Palin...", as much as it was the "She wouldn?t have gotten as far as she has if Secret Life stuff had slipped into the Public Life stream, right?" It seems to me that she's gotten as far as she has because she is exactly who she says she is. As far as her 'secret life' stuff, clearly that's what the media was after when they went trolling through her private e-mails. It sounds as though Sam was as disappointed as the media when it came to just how boring her e-mails were. You may not have much respect for her, but I just lost ALL respect for you and will no longer be reading your trash.
0 Votes
+ -
How in the world?
harrim47 13th Jun
@jthuringer@...
How in the world do you take what Sam said as a slam? All he stated was a very mild opinion. Anyone calling that a slam needs to work on his objectiveness and grow a thicker skin.
0 Votes
+ -
Not very analytical are you?
adornoe@... 13th Jun
What Sam did was very uncalled for, and he took the opportunity, like many bloggers and reporters do, to attack those they disagree with, and there was absolutely no reason for his Palin comments in the context of what he was writing about. It's people like you who can't understand how the subtle attacks and lies are steering you and the country in the wrong direction.
@jthuringer@... It was meant to serve as an example of the sorts of things I don't mind exposing in my "Public Life Stream." I'm not a fan and I'm not hiding that opinion. But I also understand how to practice restraint. I kind of thought the "slam" was pretty mild.

Thanks for your thoughts. Apologies if you were offended by my remarks.

Sam
0 Votes
+ -
Not believable...
adornoe@... 13th Jun
because, there were probably millions of other and better examples to use to make your point, and I believe that you deliberately chose Palin for a left-hand slap.
and you saved me the trouble of teaching him a few lessons.

Tangential and gratuitous attacks never serve a good purpose in an otherwise good blog or article.
@kronjohn...

You just proved how little you know about your own history. You're repeating the popular story of Paul Revere as told by Nathaniel Hawthorne. It was a piece of fiction, loosely based on fact. The start of an American myth. Learn your facts before you spout off about a pundit who happened to be right in what she said, if only technically. If that is what drove you away from her, you'll be happy to know you can go back now that it has been established that she wasn't actually wrong.
@adornoe I'm not a Palin hater, but what she said is a major distortion of the truth. From Paul Revere's own writings and others at the time, changed and manipulated the documented accounts of these events in no uncertain terms.

Now what I said is closer to the facts in every history book I've ever read. By his own account:

"He said they should not, they were only waiting for some deserters they expected down the road. I told him I knew better, I knew what they were after; that I had alarmed the country all the way up, that their boats were caught aground, and I should have 500 men there soon. One of them said they had 1500 coming; he seemed surprised and rode off into the road, and informed them who took me, they came down immediately on a full gallop. One of them (whom I since learned was Major Mitchel of the 5th Reg.) clapped his pistol to my head, and said he was going to ask me some questions, and if I did not tell the truth, he would blow my brains out. I told him I esteemed myself a man of truth, that he had stopped me on the highway, and made me a prisoner, I knew not by what right; I would tell him the truth; I was not afraid."
http://ahp.gatech.edu/midnight_ride_1775.html

Here's the link to the ehow that pretty much also refutes your statements. His primary mission was to keep Samuel Adams and Col. John Hancock of the British Troops movements. Which he did, even joining in to get their family's to safety. The other riders took to the streets as he made his way on his route informing Patriots (not yelling "the British are coming" as in the poem). By the time he met up with the other two writers there were 40 riders total.

He absolutely was no traitor and his own statements proved that on their own. On his way he had also alarmed and instructed Robert Newman about the "one if by land, two if by sea" lanterns placed in the church tower!
Even if she didn't get the exact wording or exact happenings of what really happened at the time, the fact is that, she was technically correct.

Look at an interview done by NPR with a professor brought in by NPR with the hope of embarrassing Palin. The professor didn't play along with their intentions.

From NPR:


How Accurate Were Palin's Paul Revere Comments?

http://www.npr.org/2011/06/06/137011636/how-accurate-were-palins-comments-on-paul-revere
@jthuringer@... I didn't appreciate the Palin comment either - it has no place in the piece and, as someone else points out, is intellectual cowardice. Stating one's political standpoint first for fear of being thought sympathetic for making a neutral observation on an issue - it says a lot about how you personally think and react, and how you believe those you run with think and are going to react. It's like prefacing a comment on race with 'I'm not racist but...' As for "She wouldn?t have gotten as far as she has if Secret Life stuff had slipped into the Public Life stream, right?", how's this for a concept - maybe what you see is what that person is. Maybe there isn't anything to hide, no matter how much some want there to be.

Still, it hardly matters - it just proves even you Sam have problems with Secret/Private/Public seeping into one another. After all, you've just outed yourself politically.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Privacy worries? Google shouldn't be your biggest fear
BeenThereDunnThat Updated - 14th Jun
@jthuringer@... Here, here! I thought it was rather gratuitous as well. I could say many things about the opposition but this isn't the forum for it -- is it??? It is sort of like going to a rock concert or watching a movie and having somebody spill their guts politically because they have a captive audience. Well, in this case, I'm not so captive and some of the positions of people aligned with Gov. Palin (those evil conservative capitalists) have made ZDNet what it is... a rag to report on the inventiveness and creativity of the -- mostly -- American companies that have spawned the tech revolution! They all started here in the good old U.S.A. under a capitalist system supported by those evil capitalists. I actually thought about this before I wrote it. BTW: Whatever happened to "free speech" in this country? Is it now owned only by the left?
@jthuringer@...
testicle shrivel - the effect Palin has on weak men, usually manifested in democrats and liberals, especially college professors and cable news talking heads
@jthuringer@... I agree. think this is a good article with respect to its technical content. I can't make up my mind, however, as to whether your apparent need to distance yourself from Sarah Palin is sad or amusing. For me, personally, it is annoying. I happen to have essentially the opposite views as you do about her. The sad or amusing bit is that you even feel the need to even mention your views of her views in an article like this.
0 Votes
+ -
Sifting thru Palin's e-mails
Speednet_ 13th Jun
You're right, it was very slimy for the mainstream media to "salivate" over the prospect of rummaging through Sarah Palin's e-mails. I think both sides can agree on that.

I don't see the same urge to sift through Obama's old e-mails. I guess that's because the Messiah's e-mails (and kids) are considered off-limits from the worshipers, lest they be shunned and locked outside the kingdom.

But unlike your commentary, I enjoy Sarah Palin's tell-it-like-it-is, plain-speaking style, and I relish her non-insider, conservative views on how to get this country back on track.

I'm old enough to vividly remember all the Ronald Reagan haters, and they were just like all the Sarah Palin haters of today. Funny how these days most of the former Reagan haters want to pretend they never said those horrible things about him. Only a few fringe-left people still carry their hatred for Reagan around. The rest have joined the media in their amnesia.

I guess I was wise enough to recognize greatness at the time of Reagan, and wise enough to recognize it now with Palin. The rest of you will need to wait 20 years or so before you get it. Too bad for you.
@Speednet_ Obviously you have bought into the Palin hype just as so many bought into the Obama hype. They have more in common than you seem to realize. The big differences is that Palin has used mass media to a greater extent, but they both tell people what they think we want to hear and promise the unatainable. Standard proceedure for politicians seeking office at any level of government. They both have simple solutions for complex problems and way too many people fall for their PR and Hype which is why we are in the current dire straits that we are in now. Think for yourself instead of blindly believing the Hype and PR. She reminds me of Biden to a certain extent as she frequently says something before engaging her brain.
0 Votes
+ -
Nope, you're wrong
Speednet_ 13th Jun
@jldurham@... If you think you have me pegged, think again. You also have no idea as to what the "mass media" is and how it's being used. You probably think the "mass media" (i.e., mainstream media) is conservative, right? I've heard that one before, makes me laugh out loud.
@jldurham@...

Personal freedom is "unattainable." Gotcha. Thanks for letting people know not to waste their time with that silly thought.
as night and day.

You need to study up more about the real world, because, when it comes to the media, they protected Obama and continue to do so today, while they're constantly hounding and following Palin around trying to find any dirt they can about her. When the media is about 85-90% liberal, your assertions about how Palin has used the media are about as correct as saying that good and bad mean the same thing. When it comes to Palin, the reason she's in the press so much is because they're very busy trying to destroy her before she gets to run against their preferred candidate, Obama. She's in the news and on TV a lot because of the hate that the media has for her. If the media had done to Obama what they're doing against Palin, there never would have even been a candidate Obama, and heck, there never would have been a senator Obama. Somebody with so much negative history in his background, should never have made it beyond a shoe-shining job.
@Speednet_ If, as you say, both sides are in agreement, then why was only one side salivating?
0 Votes
+ -
I was being optimistic
Speednet_ 13th Jun
@Polkaboy - I've seen the typical liberal pundits saying comments similar to Sam's - i.e., "I hate Sarah Palin, but digging thru her e-mails is slimy". I'm sure there are some die-hard progressives who think doing ANYTHING to Sarah Palin is fine, but I'm referring to "normal" everyday people.
@Polkaboy
Exactly! Plus, the news outlets are corporate owned and the mouth pieces usually carry the corporate water. If this is true, then how can we think they gave and/or give President Obama a break, when some on the other end of the scale says Mr Obama is the corporate world worst enemy??? Maybe we need to redefine enemy, or we need to learn the definition??
@Speednet_

...whereas insisting that the POTUS display his birth certificate to the world despite all the sworn affidavits is just being safe.
0 Votes
+ -
Asking for a legitimate birth certificate shouldn't be an unreasonable request, especially when it comes to someone running for president, where the constitution requires that a person be a "natural born citizen" of the U.S.

As of now, Obama still has not produced a legitimate birth certificate, and I'm pretty sure that, any candidate on the republican side would be glad to produce a real birth certificate.

Ever ask yourself why Obama still refuses to produce a real long form birth certificate?
0 Votes
+ -
Palin email..
Tholian_53 Updated - 13th Jun
@Speednet_
This includes AFAIK only her "public" emails and none of the "private" emails the Palins used to conduct government business. So there is certainly a lot missing here.

Correction Added. Those emails are supposedly all there from her "private" accounts. So I correct myself on this misinterpretation.
@Tholian_53 - No, they also included any of her private e-mails (from her Yahoo account) in which she conducted public business with any government officials.

As an aside, you think there's a lot missing from the public's knowledge about Sarah Palin? That is an extremely warped position, considering we elected Obama president without any kind of thorough investigation into all the seedy relationships he developed over the years. All we knew was a bunch of hollow slogans like "Yes we can!" Give me a break.

People are ridiculed as "birthers" simply for asking to see his birth certificate. And where is the media investigations that SHOULD be taking place when the White House released an obviously fake birth certificate?! I downloaded it directly from the White House web site myself, loaded into Adobe Illustrator, and I could easily break apart all the layers it was constructed with. And the media is SILENT??

I tell you, there is a massive, but still growing, number of people in this country who are absolutely sick over what has happened in (and to) this country, and the 2010 elections were only the beginning.
0 Votes
+ -
Tut, tut....
Tholian_53 Updated - 13th Jun
@Speednet_
Since a "birth certificate" is no longer considered a "legal document" in the US your arguments about it don't really mean much.
I don't recall GW going through a "vetting" process such as you wanted for Obama. Or you crying about all the "seedy relationships" GW had over the years.
and it all depends upon what it's for and who is requesting it.

However, why sidestep the issue? Speednet did make a 100% correct point regarding the Obama BC, and you are just being dismissive about the issue. As it stands, the last BC that Obama released a couple of months ago, is just as fake as the one he released 2 1/2 years earlier, except that the most current fake has more data in it. Speednet is right, and the last BC Obama released has been proven to be a phony. Ever ask yourself, "what if Obama really did release a fake"? Doesn't it matter to you at all that the president is deliberately hiding something and deliberately lying to the American people?

Another part of the issue surrounding the lies by omission from Obama, is the deliberate hiding of this school records from his days at universities. He is the first president in history whose grades and work is being deliberately being held from the American people. If Palin had done any of that, she would be working as a clean-up lady in some hotel somewhere, because, the attacks against her would've been so brutal that she would've wanted to disappear from sight.

So, why not engage your brain and start asking a more balanced set of questions?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix