ie8 fix
Click Here

Googling Google

Christopher Dawson

Report: Google+ is courting celebrities

By | July 19, 2011, 4:19pm PDT

Summary: Reports are circulating that Google+ is preparing a “celebrity acquisition plan” that would bring major media figures into the social network.

Can a social network succeed without the darlings of Hollywood posting about their breakfasts? Reports are circulating that Google+ is preparing a “celebrity acquisition plan” that would bring major media figures into the fledgling social network.

Much like how Twitter provides the prized “Verified Account” badges for high-profile accounts, Google+ is planning a system that would confirm the identities of celebrity profiles and eliminate the chance that fans are following a ringer. In other words, Google+ wants to entice celebrities to join up by ensuring them that their personal brand will be protected and promoted.

How will the verification work? Well, CNN, which broke the story by reviewing internal Google e-mails, says it may come down to something as silly as having celebs fax over copies of driver’s licenses or passports. But more likely, a pre-vetted list of Hollywood talent agents would be given leave to confirm client identities.

A Google spokeswoman declined CNN’s e-mailed request for comment, saying only:

“We aren’t yet sharing any details on future plans around Google+. We plan to add a lot of features and functionality to Google+ over time.”

From where I’m standing, I doubt CNN is too far off the mark. I know plenty of people who joined Twitter in the first place because of some artist or writer or musician, and verified celebrity accounts like Kanye West’s have followers in the multiple millions.

Moreover, the upcoming Google+ business profiles test run will provide companies with a similar guaranteed-real stamp of approval, so extending that verification to high-visibility individuals seems natural.

It’s no wonder that Google+ wants some of that word-of-mouth power - 10 million users is really good for a 3-week-old social network, but it’s clear that the search giant is looking to keep that momentum going.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Matthew has written about consumer and personal technology for The New York Daily News and comic book culture for ComicMix.com.

Disclosure

Matt Weinberger

Matt Weinberger has no financial investments in the companies he covers.

Biography

Matt Weinberger

Matthew also covers software as a service (SaaS), cloud computing and recurring revenue models for the IT channel at TalkinCloud.com and MSPmentor.net. He has written about consumer and personal technology for The New York Daily News and comic book culture for ComicMix.com. Matthew is a graduate of the Stony Brook University School of Journalism.
17
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Report: Google is courting celebrities
NathanaelCulver 14th Oct
Umm ... wait! Ninety percent of the entertainment industry uses professional pseudonyms. Imagine G+ inviting the likes of Tom Cruise, Alan Alda and Whoopi Goldberg, then having to ban them for violating the Real Names Policy. After all, their real names are Thomas Mapother, Alphonso d'Abruzzo and Caryn Johnson.

Or is G+ a place where some are more equal than others? Where most of us have to play by the rules while Important People get special passes?
0 Votes
+ -
The nerdy beta factor in Google+ is very high and this warrants the alpha male support. The few women on Google+ would also appreciate some more masculine content.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
yandor Updated - 20th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Who?
wright_is 19th Jul
Why celebs?

I only know a couple of celebs, to talk to, and I don't follow them on Twitter anyway. For Facebook and Google+, why would I want to put them into my friend lists?

I deleted my Facebook account over a year ago, but I never "friended" any celebrities (or corporations for that matter). I friended family, a few close friends and a few work colleagues. I would never dream of "friending" somebody I didn't know.

I just don't understand this obsession with celebrity.
0 Votes
+ -
Zuckerberg's take on Google
mrim86 19th Jul
Tom from MySpace just tweeted this viral video about Mark Zuckerberg's reaction to Google+

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9MtttXI2q8
0 Votes
+ -
Seems counterintuitive. Banning Captain Kirk from a platform where 99.99% of the people on the forum want to be Captain Kirk.
0 Votes
+ -
I have had invites and still cannot join.
So too bad for them.
Been using Google for many years and have a Gmail account although I don't use it.
0 Votes
+ -
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
0 Votes
+ -
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite
I really enjoyed reading this post !!!have bookmarked w e b s will come back to read more.
0 Votes
+ -
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one.
Booking Tiket Pesawat Murah | TIKET PESAWAT MURAH | JASA SEO | Kamera CCTV | Wireless Portable Sound System | HARGA EMAS | LOGAM MULIA

Tablet Android Honeycomb Terbaik Murah
Bejubel Market Place Terbaik Indonesia
Ezytravel - Shanghai Modern Taikang Lu
Ezytravel - Mengalami Empat Musim Di Australia Great Ocean
Ezytravel - 15 Tempat Menarik di Cina Yang Bukan Tembok Besa
Ezytravel - Jatuh Cinta Pada Pulau Jeju
Booking Tiket Pesawat Murah
Belum Temukan Tiket Pesawat Murah Kamu Temukan Disini
Ezytravel Situs Booking Tiket Pesawat Murah
Jasa Membuat Website
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Umm ... wait! Ninety percent of the entertainment industry uses professional pseudonyms. Imagine G+ inviting the likes of Tom Cruise, Alan Alda and Whoopi Goldberg, then having to ban them for violating the Real Names Policy. After all, their real names are Thomas Mapother, Alphonso d'Abruzzo and Caryn Johnson.

Or is G+ a place where some are more equal than others? Where most of us have to play by the rules while Important People get special passes?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix