5 lessons Matt Drudge can teach the rest of the media world

By | May 16, 2011, 5:00am PDT

Summary: What makes The Drudge Report so overwhelmingly successful? And what lessons can other media take from those characteristics?

The New York Times yesterday ran an article entitled How Drudge Has Stayed on Top. If you can’t read it because it’s behind NYT’s new and silly paywall, don’t worry. I’ll tell you all about it.

In breathless terms, The Times discusses how amazing it is that The Drudge Report has remained at the top of the media food chain (and, incidentally, is bigger online than the Times itself).

The Times cites (but, tellingly, does not link to) a Pew Research Center Project for Excellence in Journalism report stating that Drudge drives double the traffic as all of Facebook to the top news sites in the country.

This doesn’t surprise me. I check Drudge before my first cup of coffee in the morning (or what, for me, passes as morning). I check The Drudge Report last, before I get ready for bed. I probably check it at least once an hour during the day.

I am not alone. 15 percent of all the traffic going to the Washington Post arrives there via Drudge. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve talked to officials in DC and the discussion turns to what they read on Drudge. Not only is the site an information site, it’s rapidly become the first-responder information site, far more so than, say, the cable news providers.

Many people claim the Drudge Report has conservative lean, but I would tend to somewhat disagree (although Drudge protege, Andrew Breitbart, is almost insanely conservative). My impression of the Drudge Report is that his editorial slant is for the juicy headline. He seems to have revolutionized media with is personal interpretation of that old saw, “if it bleeds, it leads”.

So what makes The Drudge Report so overwhelmingly successful? And what lessons can other media take from those characteristics? What follows are five lessons Matt Drudge can teach the rest of us.

1. Make it blazingly fast

Although there have been a rare few times when the site took a little while to load, The Drudge Report is almost always a rocket-fast load. You’re never making a time investment to check Drudge, so many news junkies like me feel confident that a single quick click will result in instant chewy, newsy goodness.

2. Make it instantly digestible

While we’re on the topic of instant, it’s possible to see what’s happening the world over, in a single glance. That’s why I find the site so valuable. At any time of the day (less so on weekends, sadly), I can feed my jones for “what’s going on in the world” with a quick Drudge fix.

Of course, that doesn’t mean I’m done quickly. While I can absorb all the headlines instantly, I can often get sucked in for an hour or more (especially during my morning reading), when I use The Drudge Report as a jumping off point for fascinating article after fascinating article.

3. Make it timelessly trustworthy

Did you ever go out to a restaurant that claims to be open until 9pm, but closed at 8:15 because it was a slow night? Didn’t that almost immediately erode your trust in the restaurant? I’ll bet it did. And I’ll bet you thought twice before going back on another evening. The restaurant had lost your trust.

Web sites lose readers’ trust as well. Every time a site redesigns, puts up a wall, adds a registration layer, moves things around, and otherwise gets in the way of the expected user experience, readers leave. Many sites never had a perfect formula to begin with, so they keep tinkering, hoping to find what works.

Somehow, Matt Drudge stumbled on the perfect formula early on. He has no registration feature. He doesn’t try to trap readers on his page. He doesn’t do regular redesigns and move things around.

Plus, he provides one other excellent, and completely predictable service. When there’s something HUGE breaking, he puts an ugly flashing light graphic at the top of his page.

To me, that means I can take a quick glance and trust that if something’s really, REALLY important, there would be a flashing light graphic and I’ll know to pay more attention. If there’s something important, but less world-shattering, he’ll make the headline red. He always has, and we trust that he always will.

Because he hasn’t changed that format for years and years, I (and all the rest of us) have learned to trust that Matt will tell us when we really need to pay attention.

4. Make it always informative

There is always something interesting on The Drudge Report. Always. No matter when you check the page, there’s something to read. Some days, Drudge keeps his headlines on the important topics of the day. But on slow news days, Drudge knows we need our fix, so he’ll dig up a bunch of interesting, but less major news items. No matter what, there’s something there to read.

That leads me to the fifth lesson Matt Drudge can teach the rest of us…

5. Make it completely irresistible

Much noise has been made of Drudge’s hyperbolic headlines, but you gotta give the guy this: they’re often completely irresistible. Who can resist clicking “NYT: IMF Head Arrested in New York, Accused of Sexual Attack… Developing…” or “HUCKATEASE: WILL HE OR WON’T HE?” or even “DISNEY settles suit after woman claimed she was fondled by Donald Duck…”?

My point is that while you could accuse Drudge of editorializing in headlines like “FAIL ‘N’ BAIL: US Middle East peace envoy to resign…”, the fact is they are like catnip to us news hounds.

Add up those five elements, instant access, quick to digest, trustworthy, informative, and juicy, and you’ve got the formula for a site that came from nowhere and now sends everyone everywhere — and we love it.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets.

Disclosure

David Gewirtz

At various times during his adult life, David has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, and has been disappointed by both. He is deeply disturbed by how partisanship has come before patriotism in America, which gives him the freedom to pick on both sides.

David is a frequent guest on TV and radio stations across America and can usually be heard or seen on-the-air at least once a week. He writes weekly commentary and analysis for CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 and has been interviewed by Fox News, CNN, various ABC and NBC affiliates, and Canada’s Global TV. He has been a featured guest on National Public Radio and has also been featured on Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty where his commentaries on technology, industry, and emerging nations have been broadcast into 46 countries (all in their own unique translations).

David is the executive director of U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization. He is the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security and a special contributor to Frontline Security Magazine. He is a member of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the security partnership between the FBI and industry. David is also a member of the U.S. Naval Institute and the National Defense Industrial Association, the leading defense industry association promoting national security.

David is an advisory board member for the Technical Communications and Management Certificate program at the University of California, Berkeley extension. He is also a member of the instructional faculty at the University of California, Berkeley extension.

David’s “day job” is as publisher and editor-in-chief of ZATZ publishing, an online publisher of technical magazines. Other than than his ownership stake in Component Enterprises, Inc. (the parent company of ZATZ), David has no additional industry investments.

ZATZ has many advertisers who do, in part, provide for David’s lush income and extravagant lifestyle. Most of them are IBM and Lotus aftermarket suppliers, some of them make goodies for Microsoft Outlook, and a few make all sorts of strange mobile devices and add-on products. David has been a regular judge of the IBM Awards, but has no formal financial interest in or with IBM.

Because the ZATZ online magazines often review products, David and ZATZ are sent an overwhelming stream of unsolicited, silly, and often useless products to review. Because they’re such a pain to track and ship back, these products often wind up in a dumpster or fill up the corner of a large closet. Although David has no plans to review products in connection to his ZDNet blog, if he does do a product review, he will disclose any relationship completely in that posting.

Both through ZATZ and independently, David derives a small income through various advertising and sales relationships with Amazon.com and Google. These are minor relationships and they will not impede his willingness or ability to chastise either company should they deserve it.

David has many other business relationships, but none of them relate to anything he covers in his ZDNet blog. David does have a bit of the sales-guy bug and if he’s not doing a sales deal with someone at least once a month, he goes through withdrawal. He has a number of consulting clients, but none of them relate to anything he covers for ZDNet (and if they ever do, he will either disclose that fact, or decline to write about them).

Back in the 1980s, David held the unusual title of “Godfather” at Apple. He has written and published 40 incredibly simplistic applications for Apple’s iPhone.

Although David is forbidden to disclose the terms of his iPhone developer agreement, he isn’t drinking the Apple Kool Aid, will never be confused with a metrosexual, and feels free to mock Apple, and Apple users, any time the occasion permits, on alternate Tuesdays, or if he’s bored.

Biography

David Gewirtz

In addition to hosting the ZDNet Government and ZDNet DIY-IT blogs, CBS Interactive's Distinguished Lecturer David Gewirtz is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets, is one of America's foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs. He is also director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute as well as the founder of ZATZ Publishing.

David is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberwarfare Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a regular CNN contributor, and a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is the author of Where Have All the Emails Gone?, the definitive study of email in the White House, as well as How To Save Jobs and The Flexible Enterprise, the classic book that served as a foundation for today's agile business movement.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
42
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: 5 lessons Matt Drudge can teach the rest of the media world
kstarksdev 29th Oct
@Joe Dufflebag Once thought of as a hothouse flower of the Lewinsky scandal, the Drudge Report is now more powerful in driving news than the half-billion folks on Facebook. (According to the study, Facebook accounted for 3.3 percent of the referrals to news sites, less than half as many as generated by The Drudge Report.)
0 Votes
+ -
I hope ZDnet pays close attention to #3
Michael Kelly 16th May 2011
I don't care about the registration, but ZDnet probably peaked about 3 overhauls ago and has gotten progressively worse with each one. A shame, because there is a lot of good talkback that supplements the main articles here, but it's harder than ever to sift through the trolls and find the good stuff.
@Michael Kelly

Amen
@Joe Dufflebag Once thought of as a hothouse flower of the Lewinsky scandal, the Drudge Report is now more powerful in driving news than the half-billion folks on Facebook. (According to the study, Facebook accounted for 3.3 percent of the referrals to news sites, less than half as many as generated by The Drudge Report.)
You forgot one thing. Tell the TRUTH. Maybe that's the most important thing missing from MOST News feeds these days. Drudge will go after stories that most of the media won't because they aren't afraid to tell the truth about things regardless of how the establishment deems it. Drudge wasn't afraid to print that 911 was an inside job, he wasn't afraid to print the fact that Osama has been dead since 2002. Tell us all, when was the last time any of you guys at ZDNet has the guts to run anything of these truths THAT MATTER? That is WHY ZDNet is dieing off. You want to be back at the top of the NEWS cycles, start running/linking to stuff from sites like www.infowars.com as Drudge has been doing. Start putting out some NEWS that matters and stop trying to please all the lemmings and trolls.
0 Votes
+ -
@netquestz

Drudge tells nothing.

Drudge only links to other pages. Some of those pages are highly questionable.

This way Drudge can 'report' something without actually writing any content and thus not be held responsible for anything 'reported'.
@rmhesche Whatever. There goes the trolls splitting hairs again. The info gets to the reader doesn't it? The reader gets exposed to the content correct? So what is your point other then to be a troll and to make statements about "questionable" sources. Exactly what sources aren't "questionable" these dayz? Maybe you'd like to state that all spew from the White House is pure truth and contain nothing questionable EVER right? Questionable is a matter of personal opinion in this context and everyone has an a*****, even you. Go back to FUX NEWS or MSNBC or one of the other talking head mind bending spew sites. You aren't ready for grown up content just yet.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Loosen your tinfoil hat a bit
use_what_works_4_U 16th May 2011
@netquestz
It's interfering with your ability for information analysis.
@macadam Tin foil Hat? Whom exactly is the one with the issues here. Is this your answer to anything you don't agree with/understand or otherwise wish to demonize in one manner or another? Your response is typical of the masses of lemmings and its what you run to when you have nothing of any value to contribute. You learned that phrase from the very media this article is addressing. You are a perfect example of what the mainstream media has done to the masses and why Drudge is growing. So please, keep up with the Tin Foil Hat comments. You have no idea how much it demonstrates whats wrong with the system and how utterly un-informed you personally are to your own world. Got anymore media learned buzz words you can call me? Zionist? Birther? Truther? Tea-Bagger? Got anymore mindless words you can throw out? Tin Foil Hat has always had to do with aliens and UFO's. None of that in this posting. So, what else would you like to twist in the name of establishment media?
  • Flagged
@netquestz
Amen to the importance of telling the truth, but Drudge didn't tell us 911 was an inside job or that Osama has been dead since 2002. What Drudge does is tell us that other people are saying these things and give us the chance to read it for ourselves. It's reporting, as opposed to conjecturing.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: That is WHY ZDNet is dieing (sic) off.
fatman65535 16th May 2011
@netquestz

This site has gone down hill ever since CBS Interactive bought it.
0 Votes
+ -
Where the heck do you get your "news"?
adornoe@... Updated - 16th May 2011
You talk about getting to the truth, yet, you quote nothing but lies and conspiracy theories.

9/11 as an inside job is nothing but a mindless conspiracy theory, So, how do you ascribe any kind of truth to that nonsense?

Osama being dead since 2002? Okay, give any real and credible sources for that garbage. You're probably one of the worst purveyors of nonsense I've encountered in ZDNet, and then you're going to accuse others of what you seem to be very experienced at?

Drudge is an indirect source, and the site will give you access to the truth and to the lies and to everything in between. Hopefully the reader is smart enough to distinguish between facts and lies and spin. It amazes me that you even know how to spell truth, but it's real meaning is something that's beyond your capabilities.
@adornoe@...

Dear UsefulIdiot Comrade,

I must congratulate you on your reply. We must keep the truthers in check or they may expose us. I would be in error if I did not point out your failures as well. Remember that all ?required? words and terms must be used at least once in each reply to any site. In your next post remember to include all of these once, preferably many times since repetition is most effective.

Tea bagger (hot list word; use as frequently as possible)
Conspiracy theory wacko (or) nut job (an oldie but a goody)
Denier or Climate Denier (we still have not given up on the climate change angle so be sure to use this often)
Birther


Have a nice day and Hail Centralism!
Comrade Smith
Sector 7 Chief
But, as always, being an idiot isn't going to win you the argument.

Try arguing the points and you might actually contribute something of value. Acting like an idiot is no contribution at all.
@netquestz

Sadly, I don't think TRUTH was left out unintentionally.

I'd like to belie that Gewirtz is at least honest even if biased but leaving out the most important point, that DRUDGE reports not based on what the government or big money tells him to but based on what?s really going on in the world and he doesn?t let pro-collectivism fools (like some posters here) discourage him from referencing sites like PrisonPlanet & InfoWars simply because the lame stream media and the yuppies want to pretend they don?t exist and deny that these websites have far more visitors and traffic then even the best of the mainstream sites could ever hope for.
0 Votes
+ -
Been a while since I've been to Drudges page,
rmhesche Updated - 16th May 2011
A links page,

Links to sometimes questionable sources (apnews.MYWAY.com, a subdomain of an ISP. You consider this trustworthy?)

At least one link is to a 'reported attack site'.

No registration feature ... whats there to register for?

I'll give you that Drudge has kept it simple, which I can appreciate. When dancing bears and spinning stars started I felt the impending "brain "sex"", then came the major media presentations and 'movies', what the web has become ... so yes, I can appreciate simplicity. At least with NoScript and AdBlock enabled.

But I went looking for the mention of Senator Ensign, not one word about him.

Seems to me that someone is living in an illusion of being informed.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
netquestz Updated - 16th May 2011
@netquestz
Chill out. If you want to say something constructive, I'll read it. This drivel you go on about makes me want to hate Drudge, not like it.
0 Votes
+ -
Drudge report
ricksterd6 16th May 2011
We have tightly controlled firewalls and multiple layers of security and have had to on two occasions disable our users ability to get to drudge report as the main page was trying to push us a viruses. Good sight and I agree but they need to do a better job of protecting the people using the site.
@ricksterd6 It happens. We had to do the same thing a few months back with a Century21 website, it happens.

But whenever you have a site that getting so much traffic you're bound to have this type of activity. Someone probably felt it was "Tin Foil Hat" material and attack the site to "teach those stupid fools" a lesson type of thing. When you are over the target you catch the flack.
@netquestz Nah.

It was someone who figured that anyone who actually believes what Drudge throws out wouldn't be able to figure out how to defend themselves against an online attack.
All I can say is that ZDNet seems to have focused most, themselves, on hyperbolic headlines ... the rest needs a lot of work.
"Many people claim the Drudge Report has conservative lean, but I would tend to somewhat disagree"

Well, that's because you're a wingnut who loathes everyone left of Rush Limbaugh. It's fine to point out that Drudge's site-- which has few graphics, loads lickety-split even when it's getting ten jillion per hour, doesn't lose readers by using obnoxious marketing/data-mining tactics-- could teach most companies a thing or two about web sites. But shut up about your ignorant views when you do it.

If you merely do searches of the type of sensational stories that (in your silly little mind) Drudge impartially presents for both sides, you'll see the bias, e.g.:

John Ensign, who was sleeping with a staff member (whose husband was also his staff member), paid them $96,000 in hush money through his parents (not legal), pressured a constituent to hire them (also illegally), became the first senator in 150 years to resign and is likely to be investigated and fined by the FEC and indicted for criminal conduct: 9 stories.

U.S. Senator Larry Craig, who was arrested for soliciting gay sex in an airport bathroom: 6 stories.

S.C. Governor Mark Sanford, who had a Brazilian mistress, used government funds to travel to her, lied about where he was and had to resign: 11 stories.

Carl Paladino, candidate for N.Y. governor, sent racist and pornographic e-mails out to supporters during the campaign: 6 stories.

Congressman Chris Lee, who resigned after it was revealed that he was advertising for sex partners on craigslist.com, and had sent topless photos of himself to one potential partner: No hits.

Jeff Gannon, the gay prostitute who received a White House Press pass fron the Bush Administration: 1 story.

David Vitter, Louisiana Senator, who was a regular client of the D.C. Madam: 1 story.

Eliot Spitzer, New York Governor who resigned after it turned out he was seeing prostitutes: 64 hits. Not all about the hooker story, but more than any of these others.

I'm getting tired of reading political opinions in what ought to be a policy-oriented blog.
0 Votes
+ -
Explain the bias you saw...
adornoe@... 16th May 2011
because, it seems that, you're the one picking out stories, which are exclusively reporting on the misdeeds of republicans.

so, what are you trying to say? Were there any misdeeds to report about democrats? Or, couldn't you find any?

I fail to see your point.
0 Votes
+ -
Selection bias
Woody Goode 17th May 2011
@adornoe@... I'll spell it out more clearly for you.

1. Gewirtz claims that Drudge isn't a conservative who likes to run stories that make Democrats look bad-- that he's a non-partisan observer who just likes sensational stories about sex and corruption.

2. If Gewirtz's fantasy were true, it would be easy to verify. Drudge would run stores about scandals of all kinds, with no regard for party affiliation. One could go to his Search archives function, type in the names of anyone involved in a sex scandal, and see roughly the same number of results.

3. This doesn't happen. Republican Senator David Vitter-- who turned out to be a favorite client at the brothel run by the DC madam, has only one story in Drudge archive. Ensign, Craig, Sanford, Paladino, Lee, Gannon-- all Republicans caught in major sex stores-- have a combined total of 32 hits

Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer, who resigned after it was revealed that he patronized a prostitute, has 64.

Republican Congressman Mark Foley-- a pedophile who resigned after people learned that he pressured teenage congressional pages for sex (some of whom complied)-- has 16 stories.

Democratic Senator Robert Torricelli-- who was accused of taking gifts from lobbyists in return for favors (but neither tried nor convicted)-- has 20 stories.

There's no counterexample-- no Republican who got far more coverage from Drudge than a Democrat whose offenses were roughly comparable.

Matt Drudge is a conservative pushing an agenda, and to pretend that he isn't is offensive to anyone who has a brain. It's perfectly reasonable to point out that his web site works really well, but to say he's impartial is nonsense.
You decry Drudge's "selective" reporting, but, you fail to be balanced when you fail to report how most of the media reported those same cases.

Let me get something out of the way to begin with: the Spitzer case was more sensational because he was the governor of a very large state, and in the number one media market. The other cases, though big, did not warrant as much attention, although they did in most of the rest of the media.

The case of Mark Foley was the most reported political incident in 2006 and the republicans lost the majority in congress because of it, and I could not turn on a TV or radio station without hearing or seeing about Foley. That Foley story received perhaps a million stories in the newspapers and TV and radio, and that Drudge didn't report it as much, is irrelevant to the whole issue of misreporting by omission. Drudge is just one player in the reporting industry, and one has to look at the overall industry before making a judgment on the reporting.

Now, when it comes to the outcomes from the reporting, which side, republican or democrat, had more politicians resign from their positions after their misdeeds came to light? Which side at least had the decency to ask for the resignations from their miscreants? Hint: it wasn't the democratic party.

If Drudge, who might be a conservative, "decides" to not report a news story as much as others, but still reports it, why is that not the same as reporting or being fair? Drudge might be one of the few outlets which attempts to balance the reporting that you see out there.

I actually don't depend upon Drudge to get my news and information, and I tend to get a good balance from using many sources. Now, what do you think about the overall balance in the media when it comes to reporting certain stories? Remember that, it's the overall that counts, and Drudge is just one of many. I would say that, on balance, most of what's reported favors the democrats, because, most news and information outlets are controlled by democrats and contain more democrat reporters and columnists than republicans. In fact, it's between 85-90% in favor of democrats. So, though Drudge may be partisan towards conservatives/republicans, why not just accept that as an attempt for "balance"?

However, do you think that there is a solution to "the problem" as you perceive it? What would you do to "fix" the problem? And, no, just getting Drudge to be balanced is not the solution. What is the real solution? Think about that.
Unfortunately, there's a signal to noise problem with Drudge's readership, which diminishes the value of being linked to from his site. Although a story may get more widely known, his readers can all but destroy another site's comments section. For example, every time he links to a story on the Hollywood insider Web site Deadline, there's a flood of irrelevant political rants about "Hollywood Liberals," which overwhelm the on-topic comments from people actually in the entertainment industry.
0 Votes
+ -
They probably don't care about most of the comments, and they're probably happier with the hits if they depend upon traffic to get advertising which helps pay their bills.
0 Votes
+ -
Drudge protege, Andrew Breitbart, is almost insanely conservative

Care to elaborate on that?

What is it that Breithart says that solicits that statement from you? Could it be that, it's you that's "insanely liberal"?
@adornoe@... Breitbart doctors video and audio clips to make Democrats look bad. He prints demonstrably false information on his website to embarass and smear Democrats.

I wish I'd seen this message before I explained my first message in such detail. Clearly you have no interest in listening to factual information.
of doing.

So, what exactly did Breithart "doctor" to make somebody sound like what he or she isn't or didn't do.

And, what information is it that Breithart prints that is false? If someone is falsely accused, then they can resort to the courts with lawsuits. But, getting embarrassed with the truth isn't actionable. You may not like hearing the truth, and I'm sure neither do those who are exposed, but, complaining about it doesn't change the facts. BTW, telling the truth is not the same as "smearing" someone.

Clearly, you have an agenda, and the truth is not part of it at all.

I won't hide the fact that I'm a conservative, but, I cherish the truth or facts. Democrats love it when the facts aren't revealed, and they love to misreport or omit the facts. A dumbed-down electorate is their best weapon. Perhaps you need to start thinking outside of your ideology. I did, and, after being a liberal myself for so long, I couldn't stand the lies being perpetrated upon the American people, and I just had to leave. I didn't become a republican immediately, and I experimented with being "independent" and then "libertarian", but, I finally had had enough and decided to do something about the damage being caused by democrats, and so, I finally switched to conservative/republican.

However, I still would like "balance" and "fairness" in reporting. I think I might have the answer for doing it. Perhaps you'll hear about it in the future. Meanwhile, do you know how to get balance and fair reporting for yourself?
Great comments all, makes you think and discuss, not a bad thing at all.
One thing not noted bout Drudge's site, links to news agencies across the world. For another news junkie, I can use those links of the weekends, see what's going on in the rest of the wrold.
RE: article above? Yes! Total agreement, but also agree there are seven reasons:

- As netquestz says, he tells the truth about things a lot of others won't touch (until they see that Drudge did and so now we know.....)

- Drudge also doesn't waste time with a lot of opinions. I'm so tired of everyone else thinking that opinions are somehow the same thing as news. Such a waste of time...I don't care. Drudge just tells you the story. Period. D
0 Votes
+ -
Without opinion, there would be no need for news. News that's not reflected upon, and that people can use for their decision-making, is of no consequence, and, if that were to be the case, there would be no need for news. We might as well be cattle if we didn't care about what's happening around us. We demonstrate that we care by voicing opinions and listening to opinions.
@adornoe@... Big difference between caring and being informed about what's going on around me (Who? What? Where? When? How?).....and having to sit through reams of ill-informed or at times, just illogical and jargonistic opinion.

I was raised to be a questioning, thinking, considering person. I can think for myself most every day about most topics.

Sure, there are times when I'd like to know what some intellectual giants in one field or another have to say about a topic.

But rarely do I care what 'spokespeople' who've been trained to use media to generate viewers and/or sales think about it. (I include TV hosts and tons of bloggers here.)

Sadly, there are far more of the latter opinionating than the former. And in general, far less coverage of actual stories than opinions. (Remember the BP oil spill and Haitian earthquake? We're so inundated with 20 armchair quarterback's opinions about the story of the week that very few are actually aware that these first two stories are still unfolding - like many others.)
0 Votes
+ -
sctc: We're in a new world now...
adornoe@... Updated - 17th May 2011
and what the "giants" think or opine is important, but, they're not the only opinion that matters.

Everyday folks also have opinions, and what those folks decide to do with the news and opinions, is what shapes the world. If the powers that be don't listen to what the everyday folks have to say or opine, than the results will the that those powers will be replaced, or we'll get government that works against the wishes of the people.

We have to accept the fact that, opinion is not the exclusive domain of those pundits that you see on TV or hear on the radio. Bloggers, whether we like it or not, are the new "shapers" of the world around us, and there are more bloggers than there are regular journalists and commentators/editorial writers.

As an example, Newt Gingrich, made the "mistake" of referring to Paul Ryan's budget ideas "right-wing social engineering", and once, those remarks hit the internet, the bloggers and posters everywhere immediately castigated him as out of touch with republicans and with the direction of the party. Gingrich is no longer a "front-runner" and he might as well drop out now, because, the bloggers and people who frequent "right-wing" blogs, won't have anything to do with Gingrich anymore. That is the power of bloggers and of posters and the new reality which many still fail to understand. The regular journalism sources are not as powerful as they used to be, and the internet, with bloggers and regular people expressing their opinions, are now holding more power than those giants of the past. That's the way it should be, with the people expressing themselves, and being the ones to shape the news and opinion and the world.
0 Votes
+ -
Drudge and News
Rasmuncher 16th May 2011
It is not the slant the media or bloggers such as Drudge put on the new they tell you, it is what they don't tell you which is the important missing ingredient.
0 Votes
+ -
and it's been a regular practice ever since journalism was "invented".

But, rather than complaining, why not think of a solution or create one? How would you fix the problem?
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting...
onslaughtoner 18th May 2011
Number 3 scares me. The Drudge Report is just trash; no, if's, and's, or but's. It spreads hate, and ignorance all across the web. There is already enough of that not just on the Web, but also on mainstream media news sites.

What bothers me is that people who watch mainstream news, no matter what it is, they always have something to say; nowadays, it's all about opinion. If you were to look back in the 1960's, you would never hear Walter Cronkite expressing his opinion about the Vietnam War to the American people. The reason the war in Vietnam took a turn for the worst is because the American people made their own opinion by seeing the deaths of Americans on TV; the viewer was not made to go with the opinion of the company, they (the viewers) formed their own educated opinion with facts. That was Walter's job; he reported the facts, and the viewers came up with their own opinion.

Nowadays, it's different. You have so-called "experts" saying "Oh, this is wrong." or "That is wrong, but this is right." It's all about opinion. Also, here is another old saying: "Opinions are like a*******. Everybody's got one."
0 Votes
+ -
It wasn't very hard to notice his bias, unless you were of the same mindset, which would render you incapable of noticing the partisan views, not only with the spoken reporting, but with the body language.

Cronkite was very liberal, and his Vietnam reporting reflected that. He did take sides, and even until his death, he still spoke like a rabid liberal.

It looks like you're an awful candidate for determining what constitutes unbiased reporting.

Cronkite Targeted by Soviet Intelligence

http://www.aim.org/aim-report/cronkite-targeted-by-soviet-intelligence/

Many people considered him to be a Soviet collaborator and even a communist.

FBI files discuss Cronkite aiding Vietnam protesters

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2067
The most important element of Drudge's success is that his site reports the news. It tells us what is going in the world. It's really that simple. Drudge reports things that most of the "mainstream" media ignores because it doesn't fit their political views.
Drudge simply reports what is going on in the world. That's the key behind his success. Most of the "mainstream" doesn't do that because of their political biases and they often ignore important news because it doesn't fit the narrative they wish to promote.
Web site is terribly designed. Line after line of text; no category breaks. Serif fonts; wall to wall text. Looks like it was designed in 1998. Loads fast, that's great. But from an information architecture point of view, it's shite...

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix