Assassination of Neda, played and replayed on the Web, marks turning point for Iran

Summary: Could one bullet take down the Iranian regime? When that bullet kills an innocent young woman and her last minutes are captured on cellphone and played over and over again on YouTube, it's possible.

Could one bullet take down the Iranian regime? When that bullet kills an innocent young woman and her last minutes are captured on cellphone and played over and over again on YouTube, it's possible.

Especially if the Iranian government continues to act with its current tone-deaf impulse to repression and denial. After Neda, it must be clear even to the mullahs that the world world is watching.

This video of Neda Neda Salehi Agha Soltan, 26, dying from an Iranian police bullet changes everything. And it's not just the footage itself; it's engendered so many YouTube responses that (once again) the conversation has escaped those who would seek to control it.

There are tribute videos, photo montages, footage of a message from Neda's sister, and protest songs.

Watch her father with her face in his hands
Scream her name out to the sky
You will not defeat the people
When they learn that they can fly

Meanwhile, the government has ordered the family to take down their mourning posters, The Times reports. Seeking to stop the home from becoming a place of pilgrimmage, the authorities also banned the family from having a memorial service in a mosque.

And the Iranian courts are promising to "teach [protesters] a lesson," Reuters reports.

"Those arrested in recent events will be dealt with in a way that will teach them a lesson," the official IRNA news agency quoted senior judiciary official Ebrahim Raisi as saying on state television late on Monday. He said a special court was studying the cases.

"The rioters should be dealt with in an exemplary way and the judiciary will do that," Raisi said.

The killing and the response marks the end of the Iranian people's respect for the Supreme Leader, one Iran observer says. Bloomberg reports:

The killing took away any “vestige of respect” people had for Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has called for an end to the protests and allied himself with Ahmadinejad, because “a spiritual leader should not be leading carnage,” said Haleh Afshar, a professor of politics and women’s studies at University of York.

There is no doubt the authorities have created a potent martyr in Neda, as evidenced on the blogs:

“He had a clear shot and could not miss her,” wrote a man who said he was a doctor and posted one of the videos showing Soltan’s death, referring to the gunman. “The impact of the gunshot was so fierce that the bullet had blasted inside the victim’s chest.”

“It could be me, simple as that,” said Zahra Khedri, a 24-year-old Iranian postgraduate student at the U.K.’s University of Essex. The video “will help us with the support we need. Ahmadinejad must not be recognized.”

Topic: Government

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

127 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Iranians should demand an American invasion

    If some Iranians would petition us, we should folow through with the operation Iran's freedom.
    This operation will be a lot cheaper and more successfull than the Iraq's freedom in 2003.

    But Obama is a girlie man who whould jeopardize his 'green policies' if US would own half of the world's oil reserves in Iran and Iraq.
    Linux Geek
    • That would be very unwise

      The current wave of opposition in Iran, is a direct result of a popular feeling that there is no external threat to the country anymore.

      Nothing unifies a country more, than an external threat. The wisest thing for the world to do, is to make abundantly clear that there is no threat of invasion for Iran.

      Give moral support to the opposition as much as you can, but don't give the regime the excuse that it's defending the national security against potential foreign invaders.
      pjotr123
      • on the contrary

        this is the best time to launch a preemtive strike to liberate the people from tirany.
        It will be a great success like we had with Germany and Japan during WWII.
        Linux Geek
        • WWII wasn't a civil war...

          You mean like the success you had in Iraq, Vietnam, Bosnia, and North Korea.. How is that working out for you, by the way?

          Japan and Germany were not civil wars, and you were not the invaders.
          daftkey
          • does not matter

            The civil war is not relevant for the American interests.
            We should still bomb them just to make sure they can not build WMDs.
            Linux Geek
          • Regardless of the stupidity of that sentiment

            it's totally irrelevant to this discussion. People who want Obama to declare the government illegitimate would make the US the Great Satan all over again. Obama is right that this is time to bring intl pressure to bear but to not act like we should decide who won the election. The Iranians have not forgotten the US installation of the Shah.
            rkoman@...
          • Hello?

            Do you get what you just said?

            "The Iranians have not forgotten the US installation of the Shah."

            This means we are and still will be the great satan to those older generations no matter what. I say side with the young generation and voice opinion on the matter in support of those young people. Not saying to try and replace the supreme leader, but we could surely give them help and assistance in some way to show that we support them. Heck France and Germany are standing up more than we are about this and letting them know how they feel.

            I feel that playing both sides is more confusing than helpful and may make those that want to be liberated feel the U.S. let them down. They see Iraq becoming free and realize they could have that too, but this time America won't be there to help them. Either way you will make a fraction of the country unhappy with the U.S., but I feel the young generation is the one to side with and fully back in my view.

            OhTheHumanity
          • Of course - that'll stop Iraq, too, won't it?

            No, but your ability to handle a foreign civil war is - to put it mildly - lacking. Bombing a nation with one of the richest natural deposits of Uranium isn't going to stop them from producing nukes if they have the technology to do so.

            It might just help paint a target on your own soil though. I don't expect that rogue nations will necessarily have the restraint that the USSR had, and making them de facto allies against the US isn't likely to help, either.
            daftkey
          • Your examples

            are what WWII would have looked like had it been fought by the modern
            Democrat party.
            frgough
          • Civil war?

            I don't know that this is a civil war. It's a "war" for liberty from tyranny. It's more a revolution.

            The US should ALWAYS show support for ANY people who are trying to gain their freedom from oppression. Period. End of Story.

            People who have hated us will always hate us, so why should we tiptoe around them? Stand up, support the younger generation who want to live in a free society.
            ElCondor11
      • Why Banners in English/French/Spanish?

        Why are Iranian's waving around banners in languages they don't even understand?

        Why are the Iranian's trying so hard to let the world know of their efforts?

        They want our support.
        mikefarinha
        • Thanks to President W ...

          ... there's probably a pretty good chance that your average Iranian citizen sees American support as "they come and blow up your city".
          RationalGuy
          • Ok......

            How about you move on for a change. I would bet that many of those people see Iraq and are jealous. The young Iranians are not the old Iranians and they are wanting alot more than you are led on to believe. Sure they don't want their cities bombed, but its so funny how no one stands up for us liberating the Iraq people that went through Saddams reign of terror.

            I guess I view it differently than some, I feel greatful for America saving my family in Germany during WWII. I think everyone deserves the basic freedoms we do and thank god for a country like ours that has stood up to evil things in the past and I would hate to see the world if others had ruled the day. You probably don't care, but just think a little and you will realize that America has done great things for the world, not perfect, but has tried hard to change the world and protect people's freedom.
            OhTheHumanity
          • That logical fallacy is called a non-sequitur ...

            ... it simply doesn't follow that since the US was justified in fighting in
            WWII that all military action the US takes is justified.

            Japan attacked the United States. Iraq did not. Regardless of what
            Saddam did or did not do, the US were not justified in being there,
            regardless of the result (i.e., the ends do not justify the means).
            RationalGuy
          • non-sequitur? are you kidding me?

            You are calling his comment a non-sequitur after your absurd response to my comment.

            Really?

            Please tell me this response was heavy sarcasm.
            mikefarinha
          • hello?

            Anyone home? We were not attacked by Germany during WWII we took it to them to help other countries survive.

            Not sure where we were justified in that? Please explain. You really do not understand history do you? I agree with us taking action then, it saved my family from horror.
            OhTheHumanity
          • @mikefarinha: No sarcasm

            Your post seemed to defend Linux Geek's position that Iranians should
            demand an American invasion of their own country. I think that Iranians
            have seen our handiwork in the region in the last 8 years and want
            nothing of it. My comment directly followed the line of the discussion.

            The Iranians are writing their protest signs in other languages because
            they want their message heard and repeated. They don't want to be
            invaded by the United States. They are protesting, not conducting a civil
            war.
            RationalGuy
          • @daMan25: You do know Germany declared war on the US?

            For someone who understands history so much, you don't seem to know
            much about it. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. US (among others) declared
            war on Japan in response. Germany (and others) then declared war on
            the US. When we deployed troops to Europe, the US was in a formally
            declared war with the Axis powers.
            RationalGuy
          • Just saying.....

            They did not attack us, so in your mind we should have just ignored them. You know take the easy route. We could defend our home if they tried to attack here, but we took it to them in their land.
            OhTheHumanity
          • U.S. WAS justified invading Iraq

            Saddam continued to violate the agreement to end the 1st Gulf War. Therefore, it was never over.

            I'm glad Saddam and his two murderous, raping sons of britches are dead. And no amount of hand-wringing by the looney left will bring them back.
            sfriedrich