Clean energy: For President Obama, it's more than a talking point

By | March 2, 2010, 1:57pm PST

Summary: President Kennedy inspired an entire future generation with the space program. President Obama is following up with a vision for clean and renewable energy.

Ideas have to start somewhere. Take clean energy. To be defined as clean, energy can’t require a continuous carbon foot print to produce power. That’s the goal. Innovation and passion requires a sustained source of inspiration, and mentors to follow such ideas through to completion.  Creating these kinds of ideas and future technologies is the easy part. No matter who you are, you have to believe in it, or it will surely fail in its progress. And then you have to be convinced and convey to others around you that it is a worthwhile goal, or else it will not attract development and research required to move forward with sustainable products and long term life cycles.

President Kennedy inspired an entire future generation with the space program.  President Obama is following up with a vision for clean and renewable energy. There are always demands made of any President to practice what they preach. Saving energy at the White House was the first step, ensuring Federal Agencies followed best practices for energy conservation and sponsor through the OSTP and Department of Energy new research set the example. That would be enough, most might argue.

President Obama recognizes it demands more. If the country is to be a world leader in this technical space, it also needs to develop a new generation of thinkers, engineers and designers to continue the process into the future. In other words, it has to be a complete life cycle of clean energy products and services. The desire to ensure its success means relentless and continued development, and the President is not taking the, I’m too busy to be involved hands-off approach. In fact he’s closer to his vision than President Kennedy was to the space program, as I think this video illustrates.

Update: March 4: President’s address at Savannah Tech (where this walk through took place)

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Doug Hanchard

http://government.zdnet.com/?page_id=5774

Biography

Doug Hanchard

Doug is the principal of Rapid Response Consulting, an advisory group that integrates ICT solutions. He has worked at some of the largest telecommunications firms in Canada, including Bell Canada, Telus and AT&T and is a guest lecturer for several universities and associations. He serves on several advisory boards in Canada and the United States.

Starting with a new national ISP in 1993 in sales, positioning internet access, web sites and network services began the path of telecommunications technologies from the early Bulletin Board Services (BBS) to the first web pages for commercial clients.

Became the National Data Network Service Manager for Frame Relay and Internet access for AccTel Enterprises which was acquired (after 3 mergers already) by AT&T Canada. Interested in how marketing could expand service availability, he moved to Telus to become the Frame Relay / ATM Product Manager and expanded the network across Canada. In 2002 he went to Bell Canada becoming a Solution Architect to get back to his passion for technology working with enterprise clients. In 2006, became the Director of R&D and Senior Solution Architect for Bell Canada Security Solutions Inc, developing I.P. based physical and logical security platforms and ICT services.

This position created new commercial concepts such as Crisis and Disaster technology solutions required for emergency use after an event occurred. He designed interoperable technologies and application combinations allowing any to any I.P. service through landline, broadband, satellite and wireless technologies to be deployed anywhere

5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Pure Political Posturing. Mr. President - Prove it!
GuntherGump 3rd Mar 2010
Clean energy is a reality. We as a nation have created it! But the president isn't interested in buying it. He's just posturing. If he wasn't, this company would be in the headlines and would have a visit from him.

http://www.startech.net/

Their reactor produces energy from garbage - no joke.

Here are 3 strikes against this administration's clean energy pursuit.

1. This administration just Federalized a canyon near me that was suitable for a hydroelectric dam.

2. The ground is hot out here too, but not a dime has been contemplated for Geothermal exchanges for energy production - even of the pentane variety.

3. We have Uranium here - fuel for nuclear reactors - but no one's said anything about mining it again. Oh, but now he says that nuclear energy is a pursuit of his.

3 strikes - he's out! (lying).

We have other energy reserves here too. Cleverly, just after the election - the newly appointed Sec of the Interior halted further natural gas field development/drilling in our area. Salazar was hand picked and appointed by President Obama to do just that all over the mid-west.

No, sorry, the president isn't serious. If he was, my Senators (who love him) would be gearing up clean energy operations here and they'd be writing all the clean energy bills and earmarks they could get away with for funding.

I'd love a mini Lake Powell/Glen Canyon dam to be a 20 minute drive from here, but that'll never happen. Beleive me - I wish the president really was for clean energy. My area would benefit tremendously from that initiative.
0 Votes
+ -
Not at all comparable
Dorkyman 2nd Mar 2010
To Each His Own, I guess, but in my view Obama's push is nowhere comparable to the Kennedy Lunar challenge. In case you haven't noticed, the whole "Global Warming" panic is blowing apart and has become a running joke on late-night TV shows. The impetus behind solar and wind has thus lost a great deal of momentum, as people realize that they really aren't practical at current fossil fuel prices, which also aren't going up any time soon, as enormous new reserves continue to be discovered.

Theory is one thing, practice is another. We need jobs, not government jobs, not public union sector jobs, not green jobs. Jobs.
0 Votes
+ -
You are entitled to your opinion and view but...
doug.hanchard@... 2nd Mar 2010
I have no idea how old you are and what generation you come from.

Do some research on your own to determine a few things.

Do you know just how many people thought the space program was faked? Some STILL think it was. It remains one of the longest surviving conspiracy theories in U.S. history. (oh and by the way, the world really is flat and...)

You want to talk about a jobs program, the Space program employs HOW many? I know how many NASA employs - do you? All through the 1950's space exploration was a 'joke'... where are we now.

Guess how many spin off jobs in the private sector have been created by that program. Any guess - have you bothered to look? No, I didn't think so. Instead you simply wanted to state that clean energy is a waste of ?????

Clean Energy is program with a very small budget. There are lots of tax incentives for solar, wind turbine and other programs but direct research funding, guess how much in comparison to what NASA's budget is.

Global warming - where did I state in this post that GW is apart of this topic? Answer this question - how many barrels of oil does the U.S. import from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela...should I go on? Where do you want your money to go? Outside the United States?

Please identify where the United States imports the majority of it oil from.

You want to try your arguement again? I am often suprised by reader feedback which takes one tact and very specific approach to respond and offer opinion without any thorough consideration for what the article is really about.

The Presidency requires two very valuable skillsets - leadership and ideas that go hand in hand with conviction, passion and stubborness. Without those qualities, I sincerely doubt the United States would be the international scientific leader it has to date.

To recommend your own ideas regarding jobs, contact the President here;

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact


Thanks for writing.

Doug
0 Votes
+ -
Poor comparison
Takalok 2nd Mar 2010
Kennedy did his homework before throwing down the challenge. He made darn sure going to the Moon was possible. For a good account, read the beginning of "Stages to Saturn." Obama, on the other hand, with the exception of nuclear power, I believe is relying on delusions and force of personality to magically create something from nothing.

The problem with Green Tech is a lack of comprehension of scale, or size. It's easy to walk outside, feel the warm sun on your face and say, "Oh, gosh golly gee wiz, free energy, if I could only capture it." But to produce any appreciable portion of the 4 billion megawatts (and growing) of electricity this country uses, requires dense sources, such as hydrocarbon and nuclear. Non-dense sources, such solar and wind, are non-starters. They are mathematically impossible now and forever more - no matter what.

Time, eventually, will prove this point, but I fear the economic repercussions will be permanent.
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah, sure, right...
Rick_K Updated - 3rd Mar 2010
Barraka Osama Hussein Obama, is nothing more than a typical
talking head. He would like nothing more than to be crowned
as the "King of the country?, and end elections altogether.
The public is catching on to his false programs designed to
divide the country. Does anyone even know his real name? He
has used six aliases, what else is this Arab hiding?
0 Votes
+ -
Clean energy is a reality. We as a nation have created it! But the president isn't interested in buying it. He's just posturing. If he wasn't, this company would be in the headlines and would have a visit from him.

http://www.startech.net/

Their reactor produces energy from garbage - no joke.

Here are 3 strikes against this administration's clean energy pursuit.

1. This administration just Federalized a canyon near me that was suitable for a hydroelectric dam.

2. The ground is hot out here too, but not a dime has been contemplated for Geothermal exchanges for energy production - even of the pentane variety.

3. We have Uranium here - fuel for nuclear reactors - but no one's said anything about mining it again. Oh, but now he says that nuclear energy is a pursuit of his.

3 strikes - he's out! (lying).

We have other energy reserves here too. Cleverly, just after the election - the newly appointed Sec of the Interior halted further natural gas field development/drilling in our area. Salazar was hand picked and appointed by President Obama to do just that all over the mid-west.

No, sorry, the president isn't serious. If he was, my Senators (who love him) would be gearing up clean energy operations here and they'd be writing all the clean energy bills and earmarks they could get away with for funding.

I'd love a mini Lake Powell/Glen Canyon dam to be a 20 minute drive from here, but that'll never happen. Beleive me - I wish the president really was for clean energy. My area would benefit tremendously from that initiative.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix