ie8 fix

DOJ wants to pay companies to retain data for two years

By | July 26, 2007, 2:47pm PDT

In order to gain access to data on terrorists, the FBI is asking Congress to require telecommunications companies to keep data records for up two years, reports the Washington Post.

The FBI would still need to present a subpoena or an administrative warrant, known as a national security letter, to obtain the information that the companies would keep in a database, officials said.

“We have never asked for the ability to have direct access to or to datamine telephone company databases,” said John Miller, the FBI’s assistant director for public affairs. “The budget request simply seeks to absorb the cost to the service provider of developing an efficient electronic system for them to retain and deliver the information after it is legally requested.”

The request has civil liberty groups up in arms, especially in light of the recent domestic surveillance debacle and a recent Justice Department inspector general’s report on FBI abuse of national security letters.

The proposal “is circumventing the law by paying companies to do something the FBI couldn’t do itself legally,” said Michael German, American Civil Liberties Union policy counsel on national security. “Going around the Fourth Amendment by paying private companies to hoard our phone records is outrageous.”

Legislation pending in Congress would require companies to keep the data. What type and for how long would be up to the attorney general. The administration is also pushing for immunity for telecom companies from criminal and civil liability for any role in the surveillance program.

The telecom companies have been providing data at a cost of about $1.8 million a year since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, said one official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Richard Koman

http://government.zdnet.com/?page_id=3731

Biography

Richard Koman

Richard Koman is an attorney admitted to practice in California. As a technology writer since the mid-1980s, Richard Koman has documented the role of computing in the transformation of the graphic arts, the growth of the Web and the birth of the peer-to-peer phenomenon. He worked as a book and web editor for O'Reilly Media throughout the 1990s, editing several influential websites and numerous best-sellers. As a lawyer, as well as a tech writer, he brings a unique perspective to the blog's intersection of law, government and technology.

The discussion hasn’t started yet. Why don’t you begin it?

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix