Election-day technology watches the polls
Summary: I'm in Reno, Nevada, preparing to do some poll watching for the Obama campaign. We went to a training last night where they explained what seems like a convoluted reporting system, but organizers promise it actually works well.
I'm in Reno, Nevada, preparing to do some poll watching for the Obama campaign. We went to a training last night where they explained what seems like a convoluted reporting system, but organizers promise it actually works well.
Poll watchers basically hang around and wait for the county workers to post lists of who's voted at regular intervals. Then they call in the voter numbers to an Obama system that records voter numbers and transmits revised information to canvassers, who hit the streets, reminding – and probably irritating – supporters who haven't voted yet to get out to the polls.
I talked to a few volunteers who spent the weekend here and reported that some voters have heard plenty of reminders about voting. "I'm going to vote already!" one resident said.
Reno organizers were expecting about 60 people to their election-eve training; about 200 people were there. So it seems clear Obama has practically too many volunteers. One volunteer who had worked early voting in New Mexico last week explained, "The poll watching reporting system seems confusing but you just have to stay calm, try again if it's busy and have faith."
It's clear this really is a grass-roots campaign. But at the same time, technology is being deployed throughout the effort. It's chaotic on the surface but well engineered beneath. I'll get a first-hand look at how well it works today.
Meanwhile, AP reports that Obama released a last-minute video on tech policy, featuring excerpts from a speech at Google.
In the nearly three-minute-long video, Obama pledges to double federal funding for basic research and implement policies that would "keep the door open for the next generation of startups." He vows to put more government data online in an Obama administration and "ensure that every American has broadband access."
And ZD's own Robin Harris reports that according to OpenSecrets.org, Silicon Valley employees overwhelmingly support Obama. At virtually every major tech company, donations to Obama represented more than 90% of the giving. The only exceptions: Dell at 84%, Cisco at 82% and even EMC edged for Obama at 56%.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Another thinly veiled Obama add ....
Whereas McCain
But you are correct in that it will be interesting to see how many of Obama's promises get kept. I'm particularly interested to see if those middle class tax breaks really do come through as promised, and to see if he really does get us out of Iraq. If he breaks those promises you can bet he'll be a one-termer.
Reffer back to President Clinton for a clue.
Yes, Obama = Clinton
Give it a rest yourself.
My biggest concern.
There will be no plans, nor any start on any new nuclear plants. Simply put, his laudable goal of only renewable will cause a lot of pain until we transition, which, at best, will be 10-15 years out.
He is on record as stating he is "no proponent of nuclear", and seems to miss middle America and certainly the lowest income earners when he said "I am in favor of higher gas prices, just not that they rose so quickly".
Without a good (imho) transition strategy of everything for energy while we wait for technology, we are in for 4 years of much higher prices.
Believe it or not, the only silver lining to all of this, no matter who wins, they will be a lame duck for years because we have no more money. If he is moderate and centrist, ok, if he isn't, and we have a huge left swing, we only have to wait 2 years to balance things out in the Senate and Congress.
I just don't believe any of his energy promises. He is not "for" any conventional sources, the best he will say is he is "not opposed" to any conventional sources of new energy. There is a huge difference. I think you would concede that in this respect, McCain has been extremely clear and extremely "for" all energy sources.
On much of the rest, healthcare, no way to pay for the current plan, either side. On the Iraq war, America will not accept snatching defeat from jaws of victory, no matter how much the left leans on him. We will get locked into 3-4 years of "entitlements" with his tax plan, etc...
The biggest real threat we face is energy. Saudi Arabia cut production today, oil is up 11%, and once the world learns we were not serious about drilling any new sources, expect the rising price of gas to happen again.
TripleII
Afraid of Obama
if you want a free country you should be afraid.... very afraid!
I know, he's so intelligent and well spoken! I'm just shaking in my boots!
This is a guy who actually wants to talk things out instead launching preemptive strikes on the wrong countries while Bin Laden is relaxing in a air conditioned cave!
To make things even worse, instead of stealing your money and giving it to the richest people in America, he wants hand some of it back to working class scum! I'm talking about people who don't even have their own yachts!
This is scary. We might not even get to have a World War III with Russia Iran and Korea, instead we'll be stuck with 4 years of lousy peace and prosperity!
I don't know what is more pathetic.
To bad McCain is neither
You might be right about Obama. But I know I'm right about McCain. Personally I'd rather roll the dice with someone who's talking the talk than with someone you know can't get the job done.
Though I'll be honest and say Obama is not the best man (or woman) for the job. He's just the best man for the job who is on the ballot.
He has zero leadership experience.
Proven leader how?
Military Officers are trained leaders.
Not every military officer should be president.
Exactly correct. nt
wow very nice
Yes, he has refined his ideas well over 20 months.
For the record, my deciding factor was R.W. Any person who says G.D. America, calls it the US of KKK and blames us for 911 is someone to cut out of your life. Obama didn't, remaining in the church, being married by him, letting him baptize his children, and only threw him "under the bus" when it was politically correct.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2B6EcDQrLkY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft_Mb-4nXJk
I can post dozens of similar links, but it doesn't matter, because "When the Messiah Speaks...you will listen".
I came from Canada, and you know what happens when you give money to people who don't earn it, it becomes an entitlement, almost impossible to claw back, ever. It is a socialist tenet, get people on some kind of social assistance, and you will have them for life. It doesn't even matter whether you believe it or not, but it is the primary reason I left Canada.
TripleII
Here's a perfect example of where it leads.
[B]Equalization is a national program that redirects money to poorer provinces from wealthier ones to ensure all Canadians have access to comparable public services.[/B]
And you know what this causes, when you shift money from one place to the other, what incentive is there to fix your own problems? Can you imagine the backlash, today, if, say, Texas, through sound fiscal management, was forced to give it's surplus to California to "spread the wealth"?!
Today, it would be impossible, but Canada didn't start that way, it started with smaller programs, and as the saying goes "you slowly boil the frog".
I'll ask a question. If you know you are going to get free money if you remain below a certain income level, what incentive do you have to go above that level, it costs you more.
I am 100% for giving a hand up, but having seen the effects (and felt with taxes, most American's have no idea how incredibly terrible they are in Canada) of a hand out and it is something to be seriously avoided.
TripleII
I can post hundreds more...
You say Obama was "around" bad people, I can show that McCain and Palin ARE bad people.
McCain cheated on and divorced his loyal wife who waited for him to return from POW camp. McCain's character is full of holes.
only a few lobbysts donated to Obama
Those money from the tech companies were actually redirected from Freddie-Mac and Washington lobbists to make Obama look geeky.
We, the real techies, can hear the hissing of the liberal snake in our year and his anti American and socialist rants cant make us bite from the forbiden apple.