Ex-Googler subject to trumped-up claims about White House CTO wrongdoing

By | July 26, 2010, 7:36am PDT

Summary: McLaughlin might actually be guilty of wrongdoing. The only problem is, the emails these guys are citing don’t actually show any direct contact with Google.

There’s so much actual wrongdoing and wrong-headedness in Washington D.C. that it seems like a waste of time to make up fake stories. But exactly that’s what one Virginia-based “public policy group” is doing. First, some background.

Back in May, I wrote about how Obama administration Deputy CTO Andrew McLaughlin might be mixing his Google past with his government service, possibly violating his ethics obligations.

His Google Buzz account was exposed to the public and there was some evidence that even though he no longer worked for Google, he was in regular contact with his old Google buddies.

We haven’t heard too much about McLaughlin since May, but apparently the National Legal and Policy Center has decided to target him with a smear campaign.

Let me be clear that I have a bias when it comes to these guys. In September, I wrote an article debunking paranoid blogosphere delusions that the White House’s compliance with the Presidential Records Act was a plan to spy on all Americans.

National Legal and Policy Center

Even though I’d never heard of the fun folks at the National Legal and Policy Center until after I wrote the article, they decided I’d written it about them, and then proceeded to flame me on their site. I offered to discuss the issue with them but I never heard back, and so I assume they were happier complaining than engaging in open dialog.

Now these guys are back and making up accusations about McLaughlin out of thin air. On Friday, they issued a press release entitled White House Emails Show More Extensive Improper Contact With Google where they dig into Deputy CTO McLaughlin.

Making stuff up to get press

There is always the possibility that McLaughlin might actually be guilty of wrongdoing. The only problem is, the emails these guys are citing don’t actually show any direct contact with Google.

Oops.

Instead, the email threads cited show a discussion between McLaughlin and an attorney named Markham Erickson. In these messages, the bulk of the interaction is about whether or not McLaughlin and Erickson are going to meet for coffee. Erickson, it turns out, is interested in net neutrality, as it McLaughlin.

While Google is one of Holch & Erickson LLP’s clients, so is Amazon, eBay, Skype, and Yahoo, along with the Open Internet Coalition. Having coffee isn’t a crime and neither is meeting with one of the law firms exploring net neutrality but the National Legal and Policy Center is practically foaming at the mouth because McLaughlin might be sharing lattes with an attorney who counts most of America’s big Internet companies as clients.

Next in the trumped up email trail is a complaint that McLaughlin’s been talking to one Ben Scott who used to work for a nonprofit called FreePress.net and now works for the U.S. State Department. Apparently, Scott’s crime is that he “attended joint meetings with Google at the FCC and White House” and was now making plans to meet McLaughlin for coffee.

Yep, Scott’s crime was he attended a meeting that Google also attended. By extension, according to the National Legal and Policy Center, because McLaughlin wanted to have coffee with someone who once attended a meeting with Google and now works for the State Department, McLaughlin’s a baaaaad man.

Sheesh!

Further wasting everyone’s time, the guys at the National Legal and Policy Center decided to involve everyone’s favorite under-informed Congress-critter, Representative Darrell Issa. Issa’s made something of a name for himself by taking on technical topics, making various accusations using words he’s apparently heard, but knows nothing about.

I once caught him making claims in congressional hearings about IBM that were totally false. He publicly stated he wouldn’t want to do business with anyone using one of IBM’s flagship products.

As it turns out, many of Issa’s contributors were using those products and many of them wound up checking in with him, asking if he still wanted to do business with them. Oops.

Real problems need real attention

Which brings me back to my opening comment. There is tremendous wrongdoing and wrong-headedness in Washington, real stuff that’s causing serious damage to America and Americans.

It’s just a shame that an organization like the National Legal and Policy Center isn’t investigating real wrongdoing and trying to solve real problems and instead is wasting time making stuff up.

Well, I guess any press is good press. Sigh.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets.

Disclosure

David Gewirtz

At various times during his adult life, David has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, and has been disappointed by both. He is deeply disturbed by how partisanship has come before patriotism in America, which gives him the freedom to pick on both sides.

David is a frequent guest on TV and radio stations across America and can usually be heard or seen on-the-air at least once a week. He writes weekly commentary and analysis for CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 and has been interviewed by Fox News, CNN, various ABC and NBC affiliates, and Canada’s Global TV. He has been a featured guest on National Public Radio and has also been featured on Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty where his commentaries on technology, industry, and emerging nations have been broadcast into 46 countries (all in their own unique translations).

David is the executive director of U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization. He is the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security and a special contributor to Frontline Security Magazine. He is a member of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the security partnership between the FBI and industry. David is also a member of the U.S. Naval Institute and the National Defense Industrial Association, the leading defense industry association promoting national security.

David is an advisory board member for the Technical Communications and Management Certificate program at the University of California, Berkeley extension. He is also a member of the instructional faculty at the University of California, Berkeley extension.

David’s “day job” is as publisher and editor-in-chief of ZATZ publishing, an online publisher of technical magazines. Other than than his ownership stake in Component Enterprises, Inc. (the parent company of ZATZ), David has no additional industry investments.

ZATZ has many advertisers who do, in part, provide for David’s lush income and extravagant lifestyle. Most of them are IBM and Lotus aftermarket suppliers, some of them make goodies for Microsoft Outlook, and a few make all sorts of strange mobile devices and add-on products. David has been a regular judge of the IBM Awards, but has no formal financial interest in or with IBM.

Because the ZATZ online magazines often review products, David and ZATZ are sent an overwhelming stream of unsolicited, silly, and often useless products to review. Because they’re such a pain to track and ship back, these products often wind up in a dumpster or fill up the corner of a large closet. Although David has no plans to review products in connection to his ZDNet blog, if he does do a product review, he will disclose any relationship completely in that posting.

Both through ZATZ and independently, David derives a small income through various advertising and sales relationships with Amazon.com and Google. These are minor relationships and they will not impede his willingness or ability to chastise either company should they deserve it.

David has many other business relationships, but none of them relate to anything he covers in his ZDNet blog. David does have a bit of the sales-guy bug and if he’s not doing a sales deal with someone at least once a month, he goes through withdrawal. He has a number of consulting clients, but none of them relate to anything he covers for ZDNet (and if they ever do, he will either disclose that fact, or decline to write about them).

Back in the 1980s, David held the unusual title of “Godfather” at Apple. He has written and published 40 incredibly simplistic applications for Apple’s iPhone.

Although David is forbidden to disclose the terms of his iPhone developer agreement, he isn’t drinking the Apple Kool Aid, will never be confused with a metrosexual, and feels free to mock Apple, and Apple users, any time the occasion permits, on alternate Tuesdays, or if he’s bored.

Biography

David Gewirtz

In addition to hosting the ZDNet Government and ZDNet DIY-IT blogs, CBS Interactive's Distinguished Lecturer David Gewirtz is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets, is one of America's foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs. He is also director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute as well as the founder of ZATZ Publishing.

David is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberwarfare Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a regular CNN contributor, and a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is the author of Where Have All the Emails Gone?, the definitive study of email in the White House, as well as How To Save Jobs and The Flexible Enterprise, the classic book that served as a foundation for today's agile business movement.

17
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Ex-Googler subject to trumped-up claims about White House CTO wrongdoing
Alex_St 27th Jul 2010
@Eddie Wilson It's called a smoke screen. While they are trumping up charges and attacking an insubtantial issue, they are distracting the public from far more relevant issues.
Is David Gewirtz a member of Journolist? Sure seems like it.
@ralgeni@... Nope. But I do have a level 70 warlock of the Horde! Does that count?
@David Gewirtz Lame. I have a 90th level Paladin with a +12 Vorpal Avenger that could kick your ass.
that enables the woodwork in Washington to be so overfull of the creepy crawlies who labour for the so-called ?National Legal and Policy Center? and other organisations of that ilk ? Myself I trace it back to the judicial decisions which extend, e g, First Amendment protections to corporations, something which presumably has had Mr Jefferson revolving at high speed in his grave since the turn of the last century....

Henri
"It?s just a shame that an organization like the National Legal and Policy Center isn?t investigating real wrongdoing and trying to solve real problems and instead is wasting time making stuff up."

The problem is that they don't really know what the real problems are. They're like a bunch of lemmings. One says, "Hey look, over there is a problem with a story", and no matter what the reality is, the rest of them say, "were right behind you, (were are we going?)". Seriously tho, how in the world can people flame someone when they don't really know what they are talking about. How can people do a good job in they don't even know what their job is supposed to be? Very strange.
@Eddie Wilson It's called a smoke screen. While they are trumping up charges and attacking an insubtantial issue, they are distracting the public from far more relevant issues.
My one question is: Who in the world is the "National Legal and Policy Center?" This one question inspires others. For instance, who are their backers? Who are their employees? Their leaders? What is their purpose, their charter, their mission statement? Do they enjoy any privileged relationship with the government - federal, state, county, municipal? Do they have any regulatory role? Finally, is this one of those "front" organizations set up by partisan political operatives whose sole purpose is to pick apart the current Administration's policies, personnel, and advocates, all in the name of muddying water and derailing any meaningful reform in Washington?

An initial tour through web searches indicates that NLPC is "conservative in nature" according to their Wikipedia article, but does target some Republicans as well as a lot of Democrats.

Interesting stuff...
0 Votes
+ -
most likely it's some kid
AtlantaTerry 26th Jul 2010
I am willing to bet a dollar to a doughnut the "NLPC" is some 15 year old fat kid wearing dental braces who can't get a date so he kills time in his bedroom creating stories like the one cited.

The more people talk about him just encourages him. Ignore him and he will go away.

Tom Lee
Atlanta
Can you say that again in English?
Partisan politics, plain and simple. The real story is that nearly half the electorate is gullible enough to believe what they're spoon fed by the privateers and neocons, who will do anything they can do to derail net neutrality. Telling lies? The previous administration in Washington elevated it to an art form! The "National Legal and Policy Center" is just a shill for them.
@omb00900@... Oh, okay. And NO left-leaning White House EVER lied, right? Who's the partisan here? Look in the mirror for the answer.
0 Votes
+ -
You left out the crucial element...
semi-adult 26th Jul 2010
When you present a discussion that purports to set two arguments against each other, you really should define the sides along with their views.

Speaking of the "National Legal and Policy Center" as if it's in any way a non-partisan or even a reasonable source of anything is a true dis-service to legitimate conversation. It's another winger operation, praised by Rush and his tribe, that consistently takes cheap shots at them nasty libruls. Their bias, based on who they target, is about ten to one in one direction, and they only aim at the blatantly unforgivable when they do appear to eat their own. One can only wonder where they get their funding.

It's not that they should have no voice, far from it. It's just that when you give a forum to one screaming rabid raving howl of madness, as if it's equivalent to rational thought, the conversation is permanently damaged.
You have it all wrong. It is not the fact that they are meeting, it is the fact that they are having coffee. We need to find out what the National Legal and Policy Center has against coffee.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: NLPC and coffee.......
rick.sheeley 26th Jul 2010
... I'll bet the Columbians are somehow involved...... those java beans are just a red herring for the takeover of US coffemakers everywhere..
And say...isn't "Starbucks" Russian for "red star latte" ???????
0 Votes
+ -
Another revolution may be the answer
klumper 26th Jul 2010
McLaughlin, an attorney named Markham Erickson, the National Legal and Policy Center, a nonprofit called FreePress.net ... yada yada yada (sounds like extra sensory clues from an old Carnac the Magnificent skit from years ago).

Lawyers backed by hordes of lobbyists out the kazoo. Is it any wonder nothing gets done when it comes to the federal abyss? All these cobbled together, academic ''think tanks'' amount to - the ones that litter the capitol like turds floating down municipal sewer mains - are expensive, high maintenance toilet tanks! Fluuuush goes our government sanctioned, government dispensed money!

Which brings me back to my opening comment. There is tremendous wrongdoing and wrong-headedness in Washington, real stuff that?s causing serious damage to America and Americans.

How much more straight forward and effective things would be if we could throw out every last lobbyist and lawyer crawling around on all fours in DC and replace them with salt of the earth types -- like farmers from the nation's breadbasket. Uncultivated, unsophisticated, unwashed backwoods agrarians. The kinds of folks who are used to getting their hands dirty to produce yields, solving problems on the spot and working hard for their pay.

Before you grin or smirk, kindly note that I am serious. Things that get put off perennially and ignored ad infinitum by those insulated erudites and lawyerly lickspittles in DC would straighten themselves out in no time flat. (Wouldn't mind seeing a few tractors running down some of those luxury limousines choking up Pennsylvania Avenue either).
0 Votes
+ -
There is an old Chinese proverb
frgough 26th Jul 2010
about an emperor who is given a gemstone that will let him see into the heart of everyone in the court. He looks through it and finds they are all corrupt except for one young servant. The emperor executes all the corrupt men and promotes the young servant to the most powerful position in the court. A few months later, the emperor looks through the gem and finds the young servant as corrupt and evil as the men he had executed.

The moral: Power corrupts. You want to remove corruption from government, take away its power and quit thinking that it is the solution to your problems.
Gewirtz has reading problems. The NLPC posting twice specifically cites McLaughlin emails with Google in addition to the many McLaughlin was admonished for by WH Director Holdren in May. Plus numerous others with Google lobbyists, lawyers, etc. The fact that the Google emails were not in the limited example file apparently has Gewirtz confused. Then he claims its a shame NLPC isn't investigating real wrongdoing - apparently not noticing that the front page Rangel story was based on NLPC's original finding of his tax evasion for his beach villa. And Rangel lost his Chairmansip based on an NLPC complaint on his illegal corporate junkets. Perhaps Gewirtz should trade his sunglasses for reading glasses.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix