FCC releases 'Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan'

By | March 16, 2010, 9:06am PDT

Summary: The FCC released the National Broadband report being sent to Congress for review.

The report is finally complete. Months of meetings, public input and feedback from websites like reboot.gov, broadband.gov and others, the FCC has released the report being submitted to Congress; Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan. The 360-page report to Congress details recommendations that will impact everyone over the next decade and beyond. There are no startling revelations in the report but the FCC suggests investments need to be made and some reforms are required.

The commissioners recognize change has already past them. Technology and services (television, radio, multimedia/social networks) are coming together as integrated consumer product offerings. Many of the regulations in place are out of date and are difficult to apply to the next generation of services that are already 2 or 3 versions ahead of existing law. In essence, the FCC recognizes that it needs to jump a few editions to FCC 4.0 .

Among the big ticket items, the FCC envisions broadband providers building 100 Megabit connections to the home. It also wants to shake up the television set top box device market space allowing more competition and rebuild the public safety network.

Highlights;

  • Review Competition policies
  • Wireless roaming expansion including expansion incentives to increase rural wireless construction and upgrades
  • Review Management of Government owned Spectrum, Poles, Rights of Way, allowing new Competitive entry (into markets). Includes all Federal building rooftops and conduits
  • Modify television set top box rules (Section 629) of the Telecom Act to ensure competition in “Navigation Devices”
  • Reform universal service: Voice and Internet BB
  • Open dialogue with Congress on State and local government on broadband initiatives
  • Reform laws, policies and standards in Public Education, health care and government operations
  • Review how content and social media portals collect personal information
  • Establish new competition policies (overhaul how analysis of industry information tools) and publish results
  • Provide high speed broadband network for military installations for personnel and families living on DoD facilities (separate from sensitive network systems and infrastructure)
  • Revise Telecommunications Consumer disclosure rules : ToS, Pricing and Performance expectations
  • Create CAF - Connect America Fund: to support voice and broadband of minimum 4 Mbps download SUSTAINED speed.
  • Consumer Transparency rules
  • Shift up to $15.5 Billion over the next 10 years from existing Universal Service Fund (USF) to support Broadband Plan
  • Allocate additional wireless spectrum for unlicensed use
  • Recommend to Congress that it provide $2 to $3 Billion annual funding to support additional Broadband Plan initiatives

The plan has some bold initiatives and includes the goals:

100 megabits per second download speed AND 50 megabit UPLOAD speed in 100 million homes by 2020.

Build the fastest wireless network in world

Affordable broadband (not identified is what the definition of “affordable” is)

Community facilities such as schools, hospitals and government buildings should have 1 Gigabit access

Public Safety first responders should have access to wireless network that is interoperable with commercial and private broadband public safety network.

Build the infrastructure with clean energy policies

Request for comments from national ISP’s and Social Media providers were sent out to Sprint, Google, Facebook, Myspace, AT&T and Comcast. Sprint is working on a response. Update: Sprint Response: Commends report;

Sprint is particularly pleased that the FCC has included a set of pro-competitive recommendations in the plan. Sprint believes that expeditious adoption of these recommendations will increase broadband competition, which in turn will create jobs, spur capital investment in new broadband networks, and bring lower broadband prices and increased capacity to customers.

. The others, except Comcast, have not responded or declined further comment until it can digest the report.

Comcast was the first to respond late last night. The comments are also posted on their blog site.

“We commend the FCC for the immense effort involved in researching and writing the National Broadband Plan. The Plan appears to reflect the emerging consensus on a number of paramount broadband goals, most notably the need to achieve universal adoption and digital literacy; the need to fix and redirect outdated subsidy schemes to more efficiently deliver broadband to unserved areas and to close the affordability gap for low-income families; and the need to break down policy barriers that keep broadband from serving critical national purposes such as health care, education, and employment.

With the demand for bandwidth doubling every two years, most recognize the critical need for continued private investment in faster competitive broadband networks, and the importance of maintaining a regulatory environment to promote that investment.  We hope that implementation of the many recommendations contained in the Plan will help to achieve that critical balance and we look forward to playing our part in helping to make America the most connected nation on earth.”

Joe Waz, SVP, External Affairs and Public Policy Counsel, in Public Policy offered further comment on his blog;

Most of what I read about the Plan in the article is consistent with what FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski and Blair Levin, the executive director of the FCC’s Omnibus Broadband Initiative, have been previewing for the last several weeks.

A major focus on addressing the full range of barriers to broadband adoption? We think that approach is right on, as evidenced by our advocacy on the subject since “the plan to do a Plan” was first announced. And we think the proposed “digital literacy corps” is a brilliant idea that can build on the success we have had in our Digital Connectors partnership with One Economy.

Coming up with a better way to get broadband to the remaining corners of America where it’s not economically viable to serve? We’re for that, too. Working with the cable industry, we’ve advanced a number of constructive ideas that we anticipate will find their way into the Plan.

Getting faster networks in front of Americans over the next decade? We’re on board, and we’re doing our part with the rapid rollout of DOCSIS 3.0 technology, which we’re using to deliver 50 Mbps speeds, and soon 100 Mbps speeds, just about everywhere we serve over the next year or so.

Finding more spectrum to promote mobile broadband? It is long overdue and needs to be done.

Additional resources:

Update: CSPAN coverage of FCC Commissioner’s of National Broadband Plan

Office of Science & Technology Policy - Overview: Connecting America

Google links up with Dish Network; Opening gambit against Apple TV?

Cable and satellite providers want revised FCC rules and fees

Cisco’s timing announcing the CRS-3 was, shall we say, “well planned”

FCC Chairman forecasts wireless spectrum crunch

FCC: Broadband Recommendations, Education E-Rate Programs and Future of Media Presentation

Google dives into ISP ocean; will search giant float or sink?

FCC releases broadband agenda

FCC publishes rural broadband report

Does ICT need a stimulus package?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Doug Hanchard

http://government.zdnet.com/?page_id=5774

Biography

Doug Hanchard

Doug is the principal of Rapid Response Consulting, an advisory group that integrates ICT solutions. He has worked at some of the largest telecommunications firms in Canada, including Bell Canada, Telus and AT&T and is a guest lecturer for several universities and associations. He serves on several advisory boards in Canada and the United States.

Starting with a new national ISP in 1993 in sales, positioning internet access, web sites and network services began the path of telecommunications technologies from the early Bulletin Board Services (BBS) to the first web pages for commercial clients.

Became the National Data Network Service Manager for Frame Relay and Internet access for AccTel Enterprises which was acquired (after 3 mergers already) by AT&T Canada. Interested in how marketing could expand service availability, he moved to Telus to become the Frame Relay / ATM Product Manager and expanded the network across Canada. In 2002 he went to Bell Canada becoming a Solution Architect to get back to his passion for technology working with enterprise clients. In 2006, became the Director of R&D and Senior Solution Architect for Bell Canada Security Solutions Inc, developing I.P. based physical and logical security platforms and ICT services.

This position created new commercial concepts such as Crisis and Disaster technology solutions required for emergency use after an event occurred. He designed interoperable technologies and application combinations allowing any to any I.P. service through landline, broadband, satellite and wireless technologies to be deployed anywhere

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
20
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: FCC releases 'Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan'
birumut Updated - 3rd May 2011
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
seslisohbet seslichat
0 Votes
+ -
One key part missing....
No_Ax_to_Grind 16th Mar 2010
Not a word about who is going to pay for it or how. I do NOT want to finance it for the ISPs, period, the end!

If it's going to be government financed then I want ownership! After all, it is my (everyone's) money.
0 Votes
+ -
Another key part missing....
trybble1 16th Mar 2010
Where was the language about Net Neutrality? If the US Gov't is forking over $15.5 billion over the next 10 years, the _We_The_People_ own a big chunk of the network. If we own it, then there is no reason for an ISP to tell me I am using too much bandwidth. They have no right to try to charge me more or throttle my connection.
0 Votes
+ -
If the government owns it...
cornpie 16th Mar 2010
...what makes you think you won't still have someone telling you how much bandwidth you can use. It would just be a government agency rather than an ISP.
0 Votes
+ -
Oh yeah, I see your logic...
ReadWryt (error) 17th Mar 2010
...so the same folks attempting to cram Smart Meters for power are NEVER gonna meter your bandwidth, NO!! Of course not, they would never try to tell you that you were using more than your share! *eyeroll*
Time to give them a collective finger in the coming elections.
0 Votes
+ -
We already have socialism just in case you missed the bailout. If you drive on our roads, get your water from a water system, get your power from wherever (it's all subsidized), fly anywhere, and so on, and so on... you're "guilty" along with the rest of us. Every other intelligent country in the world is pro-active on these issues. We choose, instead, to let the telecomms use a public resource, the airwaves, for private gain. They cherry pick the markets that will give them 30% profit and the rest of us get crap.

That happens over and over again. It's safe to say that the bulk of enterprises in the US make their money from subsidized public benefits. They're all socialists. Then the big joke on the public is that they're told that this is capitalism and they have to put up with it. Time for a change, no?

The purist ideology you expound has no basis in reality, not a shred. It's straight out of Trotsky (think neo-cons here).
0 Votes
+ -
Total nonsense!
adornoe@... 17th Mar 2010
We already have socialism just in case you missed the bailout.

You are, unfortunately, correct on that point. And we're suffering because of it.

If you drive on our roads,

That's infrastructure, which I don't mind, but it's also infrastructure that belongs on the local level, not the federal, except for the interconnection of interstates.

get your water from a water system,

That, again, is a local responsibility and not a federal service. People pay for local services and don't need the federal to get involved in those areas. Big government, as is the case with the feds, is not needed in local services.

get your power from wherever (it's all subsidized),

Yet one more localized service which needs no "big" government intervention. Regulations are fine, but government control is not warranted. If big government regulations were not so intrusive, we might have had better service and more competition at the local levels.

fly anywhere, and so on, and so on...

When a service is national and regulations are national, then it's okay for some big government intervention. If a service is local, like water and roads and education, then big government, via the federal, should not be involved.

you're "guilty" along with the rest of us.

Everybody is guilty of allowing the federal government to become intrusive, and we oftentimes forget that a lot of services would be better managed and less expensive if the big government aspect was removed from our lives.

Every other intelligent country in the world is pro-active on these issues.

Every other "intelligent" country which you might be referencing is also experiencing the bad effects of big government intrusion into our lives and into our economies.

We should be learning the bad lessons of those other "intelligent" countries rather than emulating their stupidity.

The world economies won't be recovering anytime soon as long as there are so many stupid people who believe that government is the answer to our problems. In fact, big government is the problem and until that big government is brought under control, then you can kiss your economies and your comfortable lives good-bye.

One last point: government at local levels, as long as they don't get intrusive and controlling, is okay by me. The federal government was never intended to exert so much control over our daily lives as we have now. The 10th amendment to the constitution was added to keep the feds from violation of states rights and of our civil rights. The big federal government has gone out of control and the U.S. and the rest of the world is suffering the consequences.
0 Votes
+ -
and then charge higher rates to us for the faster speeds.

Of course they're all happy.
0 Votes
+ -
Definitions
Yagotta B. Kidding 16th Mar 2010
Affordable broadband (not identified is what the definition of ?affordable? is)

That's the easy part. Look at what the Commissioners and their staff are already paying to be connected. That's obviously affordable.
0 Votes
+ -
The Devil is in the Details
bowenw@... 16th Mar 2010
Yagotta, you and "No-Axe" make some good points. The devil is ALWAYS in the details.

The present FCC definition of "high speed" internet access is 768KB down / 128 KB up. What is going to be the new definition? and, yes, WHO is going to pay for this upgrade?

Not only will a ton of money need to spent on local infrastructure but, to sustain the increase in traffic brought about by the higher speeds and more people accessing the system the backbone will need billions of dollars in upgrades.

So how will this affect the prices endusers pay, and what is the definition of "affordable"? What might be termed affordable by a techie with a $50K income might not be to a pensioner in an area like Inez, KY.

The FCC's plan is a good framework, but now the hard work begins.
Government ruins just about everything it touches. We've got to keep them out of it. Private enterprise and freedom from new internet taxation is the only way broadband will continue to evolve.
0 Votes
+ -
You mean we did with the SEC...
doug.hanchard@... Updated - 16th Mar 2010
...which we all should take confidence in after the banking regulations really helped out the taxpayers there over the last 10 years...
0 Votes
+ -
Damn right
Yagotta B. Kidding 16th Mar 2010
Government ruins just about everything it touches.

WWII, to name just one. And I'm really ticked off about the way the streets are always getting torn up -- they ought to turn them over to private enterprise so they're done right.

And don't even get me started on water and sewers.
0 Votes
+ -
Of course, were your tongue not in your cheek...
ReadWryt (error) 17th Mar 2010
...I would think you were totally serious. I mean, you aren't really comparing necessities like water and roads to that which is below even consideration as a Utility like the Internet! But while we are on the subject, what chemicals DOES the Government put into the water without your permission? What WOULD the Fairness doctrine do to "Net Neutrality"??
Congress should love this. Another big, expensive government project with tons of bureuacracy to oversee it. Who is going to pay for it? Well of course we are! The next step will be a national internet tax to help support all the bureaucrats, studies, reports, etc. needed to "manage" this boondoggle. Oh yes, let make that tax high enough that we can subsidize each and every underprivileged man, woman and child with a new Macbook! Pelosi and Reid are probably already making plans.
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly right. Wait til the liberal IT workers figure out what "on the house" means. Get ready for the righteous indignation when they find themselves in that small and shrinking group of people actually earning enough to pay 99% of the taxes... when they figure out THEY ARE "the house." By then, it'll be too late, of course.
0 Votes
+ -
When did Internet Access become a "right"?
ReadWryt (error) 17th Mar 2010
Please! If I were Sprint and I though that I might be able to force the Federal Government to buy bandwidth off my backbone I would DEFINITELY come out for THAT! This is nuts. I really wish all the carriers who have spent so much money on their infrastructure would tell the FCC to go build their own damned backbones and install their own high speed switches to provide for free what they are trying to market.
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting FACT. I worked with a representative of Comcast recently on this issue. They have NO INTENTION of partaking in this Initiative do to the obtrusive and onerous reporting requirements for any company wishing to take advantage of the grants being released by the government to support this national plan. Go figure, another good idea that is failing because of the bureauocracy of the current Administration.
great job, especialy broadband for rural areas. Would like to see the competition increased for providers - here it is very limited. Now,FCC, get the commercials concerning erections off the TV!!!
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
seslisohbet seslichat

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix