In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
Summary: Mainland China is a rapidly evolving world powerhouse, poised to become a competitor, a threat, or both.
Mainland China is a rapidly evolving world powerhouse. As the country gains power, moves its population more fully into the 21st century, and learns to compete and win against Western nations, China is poised to become a competitor, a threat, or both.
I started my China studies as part of my research for How To Save Jobs. China, as it turns out, has rapidly entered the world economic stage, is undercutting traditional industrial nations not only in manufacturing, but in IT, and has an almost infinite hunger for more -- more of everything.
Over the last few years, I've started to developed a rather nuanced psychographic meta-model of what makes China tick. No matter how you run the numbers, the single biggest factor to keep in mind is the country's population, which is the largest in the world.
It's the size of this population that colors all other decisions and policies coming out of China. The country gives birth to more babies each year than the entire population of Canada. China has more honor students than we have students.
While many Chinese people are still dirt poor (and, in fact, live in huts with dirt floors), more and more of the Chinese population are leaving poverty and gaining an education. These Chinese citizens are both smart and aggressive, and are often the offspring of parents so poor, they make most of America's worst impoverished seem almost wealthy by comparison.
Militarily, while China has historically shown up on our radar, they haven't really been a direct threat. Oh, sure, as I discussed last month in Is China gearing up to start World War III?, China has always has a "thing" about Taiwan and has often conducted exercises intended to send a message to the world about their sense of entitlement regarding the small nation.
Overall, China hasn't posed much of a threat to us.
This was, in part, because of China's perception of a Soviet threat. To some degree, the elderly Chinese leaders in power considered all of the West a threat, but other than making sure they had some nukes, the threat was generally theoretical in nature, while the Soviet threat was very tangible, indeed.
However, an article in The New York Times has added a new factor to the meta-model of China: younger vs. older leaders.
As Michael Wines describes it, younger Chinese military leaders don't have a decades-long history of looking to the Soviet Union as a major threat. While both the Soviets and the Chinese shared a Communist heritage, China has always felt somewhat threatened by the old Soviets' empire-building proclivities.
Although China was somewhat protected to the north by Mongolia, their north western border was with the former Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic (now Kazakhstan) and on the north eastern border, their direct neighbor was Russia itself. Since the Soviets had a history of invading and annexing their neighbors, the perceived threat amongst older Chinese leaders wasn't just unfounded paranoia.
These old school Chinese leaders subscribed, at least to some extent, to that old saw, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" and felt somewhat more secure with American interests because they knew most of our cold war military strategy was geared towards the Soviets.
But there's a new generation of leaders coming into power.
The current Chinese leadership are people in their late 60s and 70s (think Michael Bloomberg and Joe Lieberman) while a new generation (think Barack Obama and Sarah Palin) are just coming into power.
While some of these younger leaders can actually see Russia from their windows, they have never really had to consider the Soviet Union as a threat. Instead, to them, their biggest direct threats are economic and logistic.
While older leaders were content to let most of their population fester (or at least had little motivation to change the status quo), the younger generation of Chinese leaders know that moving their population into the middle class is the key to creating a powerhouse nation. But they also know that a huge middle class population will consume excessive amounts of food, oil, water, and other resources of all types. I modeled this growth patten in How To Save Jobs and it's not pretty.
While these younger leaders see America as a market in much the same way their elders did, the younger leaders also see America as a competitor for increasingly scarce resources that they need in ever increasingly large quantities.
They also don't trust us.
While older Chinese leaders had long seen America conduct Cold War relations with a predictable level of severity, the younger leaders have seen us invade sovereign nations and they've seen our capricious governing style. They've seen how our poor economic management can have worldwide repercussions. And they've seen how willing we are to mortgage our future for a few votes today.
To these young Chinese leaders, America seems like the dangerous old bear, not Russia.
There's another difference between younger Chinese leaders and older ones. The younger leaders, while not quite young enough (yet) to be digital natives, are still quite tech savvy. They understand computers and computer networks. They understand hacking. They understand cyberwarfare.
They understand how a cyberattack could disrupt a nation or a company.
They also understand traditional military. That's why China is not only building its own carrier, they're also investing in carrier-killing technology.
And, they also understand that they can undercut Americans for jobs and provide similar work output for a tenth of what American IT workers can afford.
These younger Chinese leaders need to be watched.
Unlike their elders, these young leaders and young warriors are not just capable of playing on the traditional military battlefield, they're also fully prepared to battle us economically and even across the Internet.
Terrorists are one thing. But a fully empowered China, testing us politically and in cyberspace, while at the same time loaning us trillions (with all the resulting entanglements and obligations) -- that's almost terrifying.
As time goes on, more and more younger, digital generation Chinese leaders will come into power, and the United States will have to alter its policy to take their changing attitudes into account.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
Sorry, but I couldn't resist since I said "septical" instead of "skeptical" instead. :)
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
China loaning "us" trillions shackles them.
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
I agree. China loaning us money is a trick to manipulate currency markets, but it doesn't oblige us to China. Our debt relation to China right now is more like what these people with underwater homes are doing. If we decide we don't like it, we can just default. It will hurt our credibility, but we'd probably get away with it. Why? Everyone hates China. The U.K. for instance would probably keep loaning to us because they would believe, quite rightly, that we wouldn't do the same thing to them.
btw, China is actually investing just as much in the Euro and the in Greece. As you pointed out, clearly these are neither good nor safe investments. The only rational conclusion is that China is pumping cash into foreign currencies to increase their purchasing power and preclude the formation of local low cost labor markets.
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
Haha
Another boogeyman from David Gewirtz
Clearly he covets at seat at the Hoover Institution
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
View as a threat, and have the capability to act on it.
Our problem with a nuclear response to China isn't so much their blowing up any of our citys as it is that we eat the long range fallout, and everyone will have to put up with the global cooling that will accompany it. (Maybe we should blow them up anyway as a means of correcting AGW?)
China does not hobble their economy the way the U.S., or even Europe does with restrictive environmentalism. Wipe out the red tape of impact permits and studies and we could double our economy in a year.
If you've read Sun Tsu's, "Art of War", you'll see that China is unlikely to commit to military actions of any kind without being sure of success. And they won't use military action if political and economic pressures gain them what they want without violence.
The big 3 economic monoliths of 2010 are The U.S, China, and India. Russia is monolithic, but nowhere near the volume; and while EU is in the volume range, they're hardly monolithic. And Russia and the EU are both also suffering from the currently depressed economic conditions.
M.A.D. take 2
Welcome to cold war 2.0
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy
As far as the restrictions, beyound the fact that I like living in a country that does not require masks to walk to work, or bottled water to keep from getting sick, there is a logistical advantage to environmentalism. When the Middle East runs out of oil and China's precious metals dwindle and populations are so great that they consume all livable area, the US will still have the resources, the land and hopefully better breathable air. I can never see why people do not see this, guess they are always living in the now where I am always thinking of retirement so all my thinking is about where I will be in 20 years, so I drive a old car while people that make the same as me drive audi's, BMW's, Lexuses etc. When I retire I will get to do what I want and I do not have to wait until I am so old I can't do anything.
I wish that is how our policticians thought, that is one thing I like about Obama, he seems to think more of the future and sustained growth and not so much with making things good now. To be honest America has been living beyound it's means for quite some time, we should feel lucky it is only 10% unemployment, it could be a lot worse. More often then not slow gowth is more sustainable and reliable to a quick upshot in growth then layoffs.
Nuclear Subs
Unfortunately for China, the US has a terrifyingly advanced nuclear submarine force; which means that, even if they did attack the US, their largest cities would be obliterated in a matter of hours.
Our nuclear sub force has one major purpose: to instill in a potential enemy the knowledge that any nuclear attack on the US means their ultimate destruction.
You also have to remember that - in time of nuclear war - China's large population becomes a detriment.
You're talking oranges and tangelos.
The U.S. and China will probably never shot at each other [i]again[/i], most people forget that the U.S. spent more time fighting the Chinese in Korea than the North Koreans. If we [i]do[/i], I think it will escalate fast, and the U.S. will settle a lot of "family business" rather quickly. B-52s from Diego Garcia, B-2s from Guam and cruise missiles from the 3rd, 5th, and 7th Fleets will set the Chinese economy back to something Chaing Kai Shek might recognize. Again, it's something I doubt would ever happen, but consider this, the U.S. owes China trillions of dollars. Other wars have been started for far less.
Here is the problem: We want to be the "good guys"
This is why, in my opinion, an effective ballistic missile defense is so critical. If you can stop the missile from hitting its target in the first place, then the president doesn't need to kill a billion or so people in response. And if we do need to make a military response, there needs to be some high tech way for us to respond without setting the Chinese economy "back to something Chaing Kai Shek might recognize" and of course prompting China to respond with it's own strategic nukes.
Finally, all that said, when you are in business, going to war with your best customer is not really in your best interest and I think the Chinese are aware of that.
RE: In China, many younger military leaders view America as the ultimate enemy