Internet free speech protected in the Middle East

By | August 30, 2010, 7:21am PDT

Summary: There are a number of valuable lessons we Americans can take from this discussion. The most important is that we need to watch our lawmakers very carefully.

If you haven’t been following Jordanian politics particularly closely (and why would you?), you might have missed an important debate.

Jordan (the Middle Eastern country, not the insanely endowed British model or the best basketball player of all time), has been working towards enacting an Information Systems Crimes Law (which is also known as their Cyber Crimes Law). In doing so, they’ve been trying to define for their nation exactly what constitutes a cybercrime and/or an act of cyberterrorism.

What makes this discussion interesting from our American perspective is where the attempt to protect their nation’s interests ran afoul of the Hashemite Arab Kingdom of Jordan’s version of freedom of speech.

In an original draft of the law, the law essential punished any Jordanian who sent any message via the Internet that contained “defamation, contempt or slander”.

Jordanian journalists and bloggers exploded, claiming that there were no good definitions of the terms, that this new law was meant to stifle speech and expression, and overall expressed as much contempt as they could before being squelched permanently.

The outcry lasted ten days, after which the Jordanian government amended the law, focusing it more tightly on the issues of government security and expressly supporting Internet free speech.

Lessons to learn

There are a number of valuable lessons we Americans can take from this discussion. The most important is that we need to watch our lawmakers very carefully.

Cyberterrorism and cybercrime will continue to get worse and, as a nation, we’re going to need to evolve our laws to keep up. But as with all America’s laws, we need to walk that fine line between protection and freedom, and we need to make sure we don’t pass ultra-restrictive laws in the name of cyberterrorism protection.

But there’s another interesting lesson here as well. Many Americans tend to paint all Middle Eastern countries with the same broad (and often not particularly kind) brush.

Many Americans tend not to think of these nations as particularly forward-thinking or as providing their citizens with American-style freedoms. While I’m sure I wouldn’t agree with all of Jordan’s laws, it’s good for Americans to see the Middle Eastern nation grappling with issues of free speech and coming down on the side of right.

Feel free to comment — as long as you don’t express any contempt! Seriously, be cool. This is an important topic and worthy of smart discussion.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets.

Disclosure

David Gewirtz

At various times during his adult life, David has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, and has been disappointed by both. He is deeply disturbed by how partisanship has come before patriotism in America, which gives him the freedom to pick on both sides.

David is a frequent guest on TV and radio stations across America and can usually be heard or seen on-the-air at least once a week. He writes weekly commentary and analysis for CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 and has been interviewed by Fox News, CNN, various ABC and NBC affiliates, and Canada’s Global TV. He has been a featured guest on National Public Radio and has also been featured on Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty where his commentaries on technology, industry, and emerging nations have been broadcast into 46 countries (all in their own unique translations).

David is the executive director of U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization. He is the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security and a special contributor to Frontline Security Magazine. He is a member of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the security partnership between the FBI and industry. David is also a member of the U.S. Naval Institute and the National Defense Industrial Association, the leading defense industry association promoting national security.

David is an advisory board member for the Technical Communications and Management Certificate program at the University of California, Berkeley extension. He is also a member of the instructional faculty at the University of California, Berkeley extension.

David’s “day job” is as publisher and editor-in-chief of ZATZ publishing, an online publisher of technical magazines. Other than than his ownership stake in Component Enterprises, Inc. (the parent company of ZATZ), David has no additional industry investments.

ZATZ has many advertisers who do, in part, provide for David’s lush income and extravagant lifestyle. Most of them are IBM and Lotus aftermarket suppliers, some of them make goodies for Microsoft Outlook, and a few make all sorts of strange mobile devices and add-on products. David has been a regular judge of the IBM Awards, but has no formal financial interest in or with IBM.

Because the ZATZ online magazines often review products, David and ZATZ are sent an overwhelming stream of unsolicited, silly, and often useless products to review. Because they’re such a pain to track and ship back, these products often wind up in a dumpster or fill up the corner of a large closet. Although David has no plans to review products in connection to his ZDNet blog, if he does do a product review, he will disclose any relationship completely in that posting.

Both through ZATZ and independently, David derives a small income through various advertising and sales relationships with Amazon.com and Google. These are minor relationships and they will not impede his willingness or ability to chastise either company should they deserve it.

David has many other business relationships, but none of them relate to anything he covers in his ZDNet blog. David does have a bit of the sales-guy bug and if he’s not doing a sales deal with someone at least once a month, he goes through withdrawal. He has a number of consulting clients, but none of them relate to anything he covers for ZDNet (and if they ever do, he will either disclose that fact, or decline to write about them).

Back in the 1980s, David held the unusual title of “Godfather” at Apple. He has written and published 40 incredibly simplistic applications for Apple’s iPhone.

Although David is forbidden to disclose the terms of his iPhone developer agreement, he isn’t drinking the Apple Kool Aid, will never be confused with a metrosexual, and feels free to mock Apple, and Apple users, any time the occasion permits, on alternate Tuesdays, or if he’s bored.

Biography

David Gewirtz

In addition to hosting the ZDNet Government and ZDNet DIY-IT blogs, CBS Interactive's Distinguished Lecturer David Gewirtz is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets, is one of America's foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs. He is also director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute as well as the founder of ZATZ Publishing.

David is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberwarfare Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a regular CNN contributor, and a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is the author of Where Have All the Emails Gone?, the definitive study of email in the White House, as well as How To Save Jobs and The Flexible Enterprise, the classic book that served as a foundation for today's agile business movement.

Talkback Most Recent of 31 Talkback(s)

  • I agree that we ...
    Americans need to watch our lawmakers so that they do not pass laws that take away too many freedoms but the lawmakers need to make laws that can be read with in a few hours and that most people would understand when they read the law. What that means is no thousand page laws.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    CPav
    30th Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    @CPav
    Amen - or at least no 1000 page laws that our own lawmakers can't be bothered with reading themselves.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Joe Dufflebag
    30th Aug 2010
  • Lawmakers that can read? Novel. Read and understand? More novel.
    Perhape reading and certifying under oath that full understandin and knowlege of the impact on the public should be a requirement for voting on legislation.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ThriceRetired
    30th Aug 2010
  • Where do I sign?
    I'll gladly put my Klumper John Hancock scratch at the top of the CPav-Dufflebag-Montague bill when it is submitted to Congress so they can't miss it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    klumper
    30th Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    @Joe Dufflebag A congressman saying a bill is a thousand pages is an excuse. If you take the 2500 health care bill and copy the all 2500 pages in the Congressional Record format and paste it into a word document in standard page, 12pt font, it is under 300 pages.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    chuckp42@...
    31st Aug 2010
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    lincc263
    1st Sep 2010
  • thanks
    Great article...thanks!

    gary
    ZDNet Gravatar
    gdstark13
    30th Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    I would have appreciated some info on what happens to offenders; what are the punishments for breaking them?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    twaynesdomain
    30th Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    There are a number of valuable lessons we Americans can take from this discussion. The most important is that we need to watch our lawmakers very carefully.


    "There are a number of valuable lessons we Americans can take from this discussion. The most important is that we need to watch our lawmakers very carefully."
    They AND judges have become our oppressors, and little dictators.

    Jordan deserves a lot of praise.

    Defamation can only be proven if someone intentionally got the facts wrong.

    Contempt or slander are defined only by the individual who takes offense or gets offended.

    Laws protecting someone from getting offended can't work unless you want to live under a heavily restricted speech and thought environment.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Albee_Freeoneday
    30th Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    @Albee_Freeoneday

    The US is working on getting that way. Crosses are offensive. So are the Ten Commandments. So is objecting to a mosque near "ground zero." It won't be long before government is telling churches what they can say over their pulpits lest they offend anyone....

    As for Jordan, I commend them for fighting for their right to free speech. As is in freedom to speak. Not to be confused with "free" speech as in government paid for and controlled speech. Nor to be confused with speech free of content. Perhaps they should thank their neighbors in Israel. Not that I think Israel is a great example of freedoms, but I think Israel's presence sure has stirred up an awareness of freedom in that region. Perhaps that is why so many of their neighbors want them gone?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dedrizen
    30th Aug 2010
  • Not so.
    @dedrizen No one ever said you can't put up a cross or the ten commandments on your front lawn, at your church or nearly anywhere else you want...except on government property (or on my front lawn without my permission). When it is allowed on government property, it is effectively the government endorsing your particular religion - unless that is you want to give equal treatment to every religion. For example, what will you say when the local Satanists (or Wicca or whatever other minority religious group comes forward) want to put up whatever their holy words are right next to your ten commandments. If you say you don't want to allow it, then I say you can't have yours either.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    cornpie
    30th Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    @cornpie
    >>When it is allowed on government property, it is effectively the government endorsing your particular religion - unless that is you want to give equal treatment to every religion.

    Actually (i.e. as in the Real World) governments have been required to remove crosses and creches and other symbols of the Christian religion while symbols of other religions (Star of David, etc.) have been allowed to remain - on the same property.

    So - yea. Governments should be allowed to display symbols from all religions; so why are only Christian symbols outlawed?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    aureolin
    30th Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    @dedrizen >>> So is objecting to a mosque near "ground zero."

    Yeah, what's up with that. Outraged at the thought of building a religious center and house of worship because they are Muslims? Because of 9/11? Isn't that like being outraged at the thought of having a christian church built because of the KKK? Just saying.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    richdave
    31st Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    @dedrizen - Just to be clear and concise. Israel still has censorship laws. The press is not at liberty to tell it like it is. Often one can listen to a news broadcast or read an article and hear or read "as reported in the London Times or International Herald Tribune or BBC" Makes one wonder what they have to hide?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    max_schofield
    31st Aug 2010
  • RE: Internet free speech protected in the Middle East
    @Albee_Freeoneday

    Your definitions are based on US law, not Jordanian law. Other jurisdictions may use definitions that vary quite broadly, hence the valid question posed by the the journalists.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    nkfro
    31st Aug 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
Click Here

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources