ie8 fix

Israeli firm claims patent on URL shortcuts

By | October 2, 2009, 10:39am PDT

Summary: When you type a company name into a URL field and it resolves to an actual domain name … we’ve patented that says Israeli firm.

In the annals of patent abuse, this looks like a good one. TechCrunch reports that the stock of Israeli public company Netex has skyrocketed, thanks to a patent that could have Google, Microsoft and Yahoo scrambling to pay licensing fees. Or the companies could stand their ground and force Netex into a very expensive patent prosecution action.

The patent, filed Dec. 8, 2008, describes a system in which users type in a string into a browser’s URL field and get back the appropriate webpage, as in “google news” returns “http://news.google.com.”

26-year-old CEO Aviv Refuah has big plans for the patent, now that he’s got the U.S. Patent Office to issue it. He tells Ynetnews:

We are entering the American market and we will try to make the most of our patent, but it’s still too soon to discuss it. We’ve been waiting for this patent for 10 years and the goal was to get in the US. Now that we’ve received the approval I have a good feeling, but there is a lot more to do in order to realize the potential.

It seems amazing that no prior art exists on this thing, or that it would be considered non-obvious. Perhaps a court case could further weaken the ability of patent holders to extract millions based on such “good ideas.”

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Richard Koman

http://government.zdnet.com/?page_id=3731

Biography

Richard Koman

Richard Koman is an attorney admitted to practice in California. As a technology writer since the mid-1980s, Richard Koman has documented the role of computing in the transformation of the graphic arts, the growth of the Web and the birth of the peer-to-peer phenomenon. He worked as a book and web editor for O'Reilly Media throughout the 1990s, editing several influential websites and numerous best-sellers. As a lawyer, as well as a tech writer, he brings a unique perspective to the blog's intersection of law, government and technology.
33
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Israeli firm claims patent on URL shortcuts
bandersnatch42vt 20th Oct 2009
I refuse to comment on this thread just in case anyone has taken out a patent on the process of commenting on threads.
0 Votes
+ -
The issued patent is Number 7,596,609. You
linked us to the pre-grant publication of the
divisional which was filed late last year and
won't be issued for probably a few more.
I guess they know what they are doing - reviewed their website
0 Votes
+ -
lol, good luck enforcing it..
0 Votes
+ -
You have got to be freaking kidding us. There is a patent for this crap? Someone needs to get the people in the patent office under some kind of control. They need to start applying common sense to these things.
0 Votes
+ -
Patent office...
Fark 2nd Oct 2009
is paid by the number of patents they issue - and they are NOT penalized for patents overturned by courts. So the more they issue, the bigger their checks get.

BRILLIANT!
0 Votes
+ -
Really? Where is the oversight?
No More Microsoft Software Ever! 2nd Oct 2009
Isn't this what TAXES are for!
0 Votes
+ -
Too late "common sense" has already been patented
brad@... Updated - 2nd Oct 2009
No one is allowed to use it anymore....
0 Votes
+ -
To the rescue...
Cayble 2nd Oct 2009
Tomorrow I will be registering a patent for the method of registering a software patent in the U.S.

And due to the fact that I will not license out this patent the absurd debacle that software patenting has become will rapidly draw to a close.

NUFF SAID.
0 Votes
+ -
There was a patent for making roads high in the middle so the water runs to the ditch. I thought that was the ultimate "patent joke". I stand corrected.
0 Votes
+ -
patents are absurd
bblackmoor@... 2nd Oct 2009
Yet another example of the absurdity of patents.
0 Votes
+ -
Just think...
Cayble 2nd Oct 2009
..if the first caveman who thought up hitting an enemy over the head with a rock could have patent it, his family would still rule the world today.

In fact its far worse then that. He didn't actually have to be the first guy to think it up. All he had to be was a guy who seen other caveman hitting each other over the head with various and sorts of objects and then realized a big rock would be a MONDO bigtime head splitter and rush to the patent office with the notion before any of the other thousands of cavemen who were either already using big rocks to split heads or had figured out the "big rock" smack-down was the way to go.

The trick is that there should be no patenting of basic operations of anything. Patenting the "walk left then turn right to get to the room" kind of patenting is what goes on in the world of software patenting on a regular basis.

Next we will find someone has patented the "production of legible text by way of electronic media". It seems so obvious sane companies have not tried to patent it yet, but one loony will, if there isnt a patent in the mill already waiting for approval.
0 Votes
+ -
NO MORE PATENTS! NO MORE COPYRIGHTS!
adornoe@... 5th Oct 2009
Right!

Patents should not exist.

Copyrights should not exist.

In fact, there should not be any kind of protection for any inventions or ideas.

The better mouse trap should never be patented. The products which are the result of heavy research and long hours and heavy thinking and lots of imagination and lots of investment money, should not be protected by patents.

The literary work that took a writer many years of work and life learning and lots of imagination, should not be protected by law.

Why?

Because, eventually, someone at one time or another, under exactly the same circumstances, will come up with the same exact product or invention. Even if it takes a million years, someone will come up with the same exact thing.

Meanwhile, we will all have to make do without the new product, and without the new invention, and without the literary work from someone's imagination, and without the internet which would not have been invented. We won't have to worry about those things because, eventually, somebody will be creative enough and kind enough to let us have his invention or literary work free of charge. And, though we might still have been left in the middle ages with that kind of thinking , we wouldn't have to worry ourselves into being inventive or being creative because, even without patents or copyright protection, the inventions and ideas and literary works would've happened anyway.

I want to patent air. Better yet, I want to patent the method in which oxygen is extracted form the air by the act of inhaling and exhaling. Sure, it is obvious and we have been doing this for ions, but if I can just squeeze this into the patent office, then you all owe me!

....Go on now, start holding your breath.
0 Votes
+ -
I think you meant EONS. IONS is a product of our exhalation. (NT)
No More Microsoft Software Ever! 2nd Oct 2009
NT
0 Votes
+ -
Ha!
djmik 2nd Oct 2009
Now that was a funny eff-up on my part. Thanks for the corrction and the laugh!
0 Votes
+ -
I want to patent cell division
HollywoodDog 2nd Oct 2009
I intend to enter the american market very soon
and want to make the most of my idea.
0 Votes
+ -
I've been doing this with Google since 2000!
No More Microsoft Software Ever! 2nd Oct 2009
How can a firm file a patent in 2008? Don't get it!
0 Votes
+ -
International Harmonization
odcchaz 2nd Oct 2009
When an inventor files for a patent in his/her
own country, they have a whole year to file it
accordingly in the US. Then if their
application happens to be determined to contain
more than one inventive concept (as in the case
here), the PTO makes them divide it up.
However each invention of that application is
given priority to the filing of the very first
application, in their home country. It also
takes several years to examine applications.
Add all that up and the chance that this application has an effective filing date in the
early 00s or late 90s is rather good.
0 Votes
+ -
January 1999
odcchaz 2nd Oct 2009
That's how far back the protection (In Israel)
goes on the issued patent. US protection goes
back to September 2000.
0 Votes
+ -
January 1999...
buyer@... Updated - 5th Oct 2009
...when 26-year-old CEO Aviv Refuah was 16.

I used to have prefered stock in a private company that had a patent for low-temp RFID tag ink. They bought a company in Israel, spun themselves off as a company using their original name, reissued stock (now worthless), sold themselves the patent, and skipped out on their creditors and common equity owners.

Sounds like they had the same patent advisors as these shysters.
should be death. That's right, death. Execution by electric chair, the cruelest form. That'll clean this mess up real fast.
0 Votes
+ -
I hope they loose all their material pocessions defending this thing.
0 Votes
+ -
and many others as well
pupkin_z 2nd Oct 2009
I recall that my internet service provider started to do this for mistyped addresses long long time ago. I believe that AOL had a similar feature as well as many proxy servers. So the prior art already existed as a technological solution for typos that users make.
0 Votes
+ -
What a bunch of bilski
D T Schmitz Updated - 2nd Oct 2009
nt
At issue seems to be a system that rewards people who can creatively sit back and come up with ideas to use the system to benefit them at the expense of others who were already using similar ideas that had key sameness. Reward for ideas and knowledge which is so interlinked these days could do with a major paradigm shift.
0 Votes
+ -
I am ashamed
Daniel Breslauer 3rd Oct 2009
As a half Israeli (I'm a Dutch citizen, but a permanent resident of Israel), I am ashamed of this.

There are indeed several Israeli IT companies with very bad business ethics. This one sounds really bad. Foul play.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Israeli firm claims patent on URL shortcuts
SiMahDan Updated - 3rd Oct 2009
Just another absurd tax....My little coastal Oregon community, seeking to enhance Waste water revenue, has implemented a "Rain Tax". Rain falls on my sand dune property. even though there is no "Runoff", (the entire community is on sand, except for the concreted areas), I get to pay the tax.
The rain water filters down to the water table and is then pumped back to the surface, generously treated with chemicals that cause cancer and sold back to me as Potable water. Within the "City Limits", I cannot opt out.

America is going to tax and patent itself to death.
The patent was filed in 1998 - I think they have a very strong case here. The USPTO approved this patent after 10 years which means the approval was made after a long time of consideration - that's strong.
0 Votes
+ -
It seems that this is the new easy-money frontier. Just pick out something everyone does and slap a patent on it. But I want to see this guy go head to head against Google, MS and Yahoo. He'll be blown out of the water.

A quick look at the Netex website makes it sound as though they did indeed develop the technology. However, one should take into consideration parallel development by others, unaware of the patent application.

My guess here is that MS or Google might come along and swallow Netex whole, dissolve it and release the technology into the public domain. That would allow everyone to keep doing what they're doing.

I'm no expert on patent law, but I do believe people should be able to reap the benefits of their hard work and creativity. Still, Netex sounds as though they're looking to cash in on something that should already be public domain technology.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Like I said, I'm no expert on patent law.
0 Votes
+ -
Patent is moot by now
twaynesdomain 5th Oct 2009
Whether it was 2008, 1998 or 108 BC, it's "public use" now and won't be seen as patentable because they did absolutely nothing to protect it. Send them a polite, no thanks and go to hades.
0 Votes
+ -
Italian firm patents the wheel...
pvandck 6th Oct 2009
...well, I think I should. But before that maybe I should patent skullcaps!
0 Votes
+ -
The patient will be revoked as trival upon review.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Israeli firm claims patent on URL shortcuts
bandersnatch42vt 20th Oct 2009
I refuse to comment on this thread just in case anyone has taken out a patent on the process of commenting on threads.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix