New Orleans is up and running with muni Wi-Fi
Summary: Does it take the worst sort of disaster to provide a city with a glimmer of modern technology? New Orleans will become the first city to operate municipally owned Wi-Fi today, with a system deployed in the French Quarter. Launched with donated equipment, the network will meet a number of crucial public safety needs.
Does it take the worst sort of disaster to provide a city with a glimmer of modern technology? New Orleans will become the first city to operate municipally owned Wi-Fi today, with a system deployed in the French Quarter. Launched with donated equipment, the network will meet a number of crucial public safety needs, the Post reports:
Already, WiFi communications for government services are helping the city speed its recovery. The biggest benefit, (Deputy Mayor) Meffert said, has been enabling building inspectors to quickly process paperwork for reconstruction permits without having to travel back and forth to city offices.Moreover, Meffert said the hurricane provided valuable lessons on the ability of traditional, wired telecommunications systems to withstand natural disasters.
"I know what failed," Meffert said. "Staying with the status quo would be the single most reckless thing I could do. . . . If I put it back the same way that it was, people should fire me before I finish."
Chris Drake, operations manager for New Orleans, said the system also proves invaluable for law enforcement. Although first responders will still communicate over a radio-band network, background data checks and other police functions can be done on the WiFi network, relieving pressure on the radio system.Before the hurricane, city government already had moved to a voice-over-Internet system to save money. And it had deployed a new-generation, wireless "mesh" network for anti-crime surveillance cameras in parts of the city.
Ironically, horribly, Louisiana has passed a law making it illegal for governments to offer more than 144Mbps service. New Orleans received an exemption to the law because of the emergency, but the city is intent on not going back.
City officials said they will battle to overturn the 144-kilobit speed limitation that will take effect when the state of emergency is over.
"It's the blessing of this tragedy," Meffert said. "It's harder to win the been-here-forever vendor argument. Either we do this, or we die."
If it's crucial for a city in ruins, are there any policymakers out there who think it might actually be good for normal strapped and overburdened cities?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Great, But...
Cerritos in California has been up and running for over a year. Fullerton in California has a small one running. I have heard of other cities, but these are the only ones I know of that are runnning, and have experience of.
Matt
Re: Great, But...
In the pantheon of idiotic laws...
And if you are a commercial telco or ISP vendor sitting around on your backside, rather than deploying a competetive product, they are the best laws lobbying money can buy.
What else do legislators limit?
Why are those items exempt from the anti-city legislation?
Some of those cities distribute power generated from methane from sewage and garbage disposal. It's a lot cleaner for air and water, and no big power company is willing to do it.
Yes, the cities did them back when there businesses would not or could not do it. We still have a lot of areas in this country (rural and small towns) where high speed access is not available and cable and phone companies are unwilling to pay for the infrastructure, even when they are guaranteed a minimum profit (as monopolies in Arizona are) on their total cumlative cost (from the beginning) of their investment.
What else do legislators limit?
Why are those items exempt from the anti-city legislation?
Some of those cities distribute power generated from methane from sewage and garbage disposal. It's a lot cleaner for air and water, and no big power company is willing to do it.
Yes, the cities did them back when there businesses would not or could not do it. We still have a lot of areas in this country (rural and small towns) where high speed access is not available and cable and phone companies are unwilling to pay for the infrastructure, even when they are guaranteed a minimum profit (as monopolies in Arizona are) on their total cumlative cost (from the beginning) of their investment.
Welcome to the 21st century
Peace unto the people of Earth....