Shuttle Discovery launch marks the beginning of the end

By | April 5, 2010, 7:30am PDT

Summary: The Space Shuttle program launched Discovery Mission 131, one of 4 remaining flights of the Shuttle Program. Should it be saved?

This morning’s launch of the Space Shuttle Discovery marks the second to last scheduled launch of the Shuttle, one of four remaining launches prior to the Shuttle’s retirement. It costs roughly $500 million for each launch. Each Orbiter cost $1.7 billion not including spare parts. The program is now in  38 years old from the time President Nixon initiated a spacecraft that could be reused in 1972. The first shuttle Enterprise signaled a new era in space exploration. By the time Columbia launched in 1981, questions were already being raised: What’s the Shuttle’s mission?

The Shuttle has never left earth’s orbit, its role simplified to be a space tow truck to broken satellites and cargo container delivery mechanism to the International Space Station. Since the Shuttle program began, each White House Administration’s agenda never prioritized or put into place long term NASA mandates and became occupied with more pressing issues; thus, NASA has wandered aimlessly with far too many internal agendas of its own and not enough focus on a select few. NASA throughout the entire space shuttle program has been rather boring to cover unless disaster struck which it did twice with the loss of Challenger and Columbia in 1986 and 2003 respectively. Even the ’simple’ missions with unmanned missions to Mars have been ridiculed with the famous math errors engineers mixing metric and imperial measurement systems.

There’s been talk of extending the Space Shuttle program. Politicians in Florida don’t care about the optics of preserving assets in their backyard. So there’s no surprise that Florida Senator Bill Nelson included funding to extend the Shuttle’s mission in the Senate Budget Committee legislation in early 2009. Prior to that attempt H.R. 4837 had provisions submitted by Congressman Dave Weldon of Florida’s 15th district to extend funding and a proposal that no foreign space ships may exclusively resupply ISS . That was in 2008 and has never made it past committee review. Other attempts to restart funding have come and gone. With the current economic crisis, NASA has a momentum problem. Even the proposed Constellation program is mired in controversy and was not included in the 2010 or 2011 budget.

The last remaining shuttle missions are:

Date: May 14 +
Mission: STS-132
Launch Vehicle: Space Shuttle Atlantis
Launch Site: Kennedy Space Center - Launch Pad 39A
Launch Time: 2:28 p.m. EDT
Description: Space shuttle Atlantis mission will carry an integrated cargo carrier to deliver maintenance and assembly hardware, including spare parts for space station systems. In addition, the second in a series of new pressurized components for Russia, a Mini Research Module, will be permanently attached to the bottom port of the Zarya module.

Date: July 29 +
Mission: STS-134
Launch Vehicle: Space Shuttle Endeavour
Launch Site: Kennedy Space Center - Launch Pad 39A
Launch Time: 7:51 a.m. EDT
STS-134 Description: Space shuttle Endeavour will deliver an EXPRESS Logistics Carrier-3 (ELC-3) and an Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) to the International Space Station.

Date: Sept. 16 +
Mission: STS-133
Launch Vehicle: Space Shuttle Discovery
Launch Site: Kennedy Space Center - Launch Pad 39A
Launch Time: 11:57 a.m. EDT
STS-133 Description: Space shuttle Discovery will deliver the Express Logistics Carrier 4 (ELC4), a Multi-Purpose Logistics Module (MLPM) and critical spare components to the International Space Station.

Do you have any memorable moments to share over the past 29 years of space shuttle flight? Share them in a talk back.

Thanks to brewakeg for helping me find one of the more dazzling launches of Discovery STS-119 on March 15, 2009 uploaded to Youtube.com

Poll

Should the Space Shuttle Program be extended past 2010?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Doug Hanchard

http://government.zdnet.com/?page_id=5774

Biography

Doug Hanchard

Doug is the principal of Rapid Response Consulting, an advisory group that integrates ICT solutions. He has worked at some of the largest telecommunications firms in Canada, including Bell Canada, Telus and AT&T and is a guest lecturer for several universities and associations. He serves on several advisory boards in Canada and the United States.

Starting with a new national ISP in 1993 in sales, positioning internet access, web sites and network services began the path of telecommunications technologies from the early Bulletin Board Services (BBS) to the first web pages for commercial clients.

Became the National Data Network Service Manager for Frame Relay and Internet access for AccTel Enterprises which was acquired (after 3 mergers already) by AT&T Canada. Interested in how marketing could expand service availability, he moved to Telus to become the Frame Relay / ATM Product Manager and expanded the network across Canada. In 2002 he went to Bell Canada becoming a Solution Architect to get back to his passion for technology working with enterprise clients. In 2006, became the Director of R&D and Senior Solution Architect for Bell Canada Security Solutions Inc, developing I.P. based physical and logical security platforms and ICT services.

This position created new commercial concepts such as Crisis and Disaster technology solutions required for emergency use after an event occurred. He designed interoperable technologies and application combinations allowing any to any I.P. service through landline, broadband, satellite and wireless technologies to be deployed anywhere

25
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Shuttle Discovery launch marks the beginning of the end
birumut 3rd May 2011
Great!! ! thanks for sharing this information to us!
0 Votes
+ -
Typical American short-sightedness
croberts 5th Apr 2010
Where was the R & D to improve the system? The current shuttle-on-side design started in the late 1970's.

There should have been new shuttle bodies (composite??!!) by now, new non-peal insulation, and maybe even a next-gen external fuel tank where the shuttle was positioned at the top instead of the side.

Instead, 30 years of opportunity went down the drain and now there is a mad scramble to find an alternative.

Very sad that the only country land humans on the moon will be left with nothing for the next few years.

If Americans had any self-respect left as a nation, they would feel humiliated that China and Russia have taken a leadership role. Somehow, I doubt Americans feel very much at all...
0 Votes
+ -
truth
jeffk464 5th Apr 2010
The truth is that the manned space program really isn't all that beneficial and it siphons money off of the unmanned programs. From what I have read scientists are pretty upset that manned space has killing their budget while not really doing much for scientific studies. Manned space at its current level is really nothing more then nifty and good for national pride. If you ask me this is the real reason why we haven't gone that far with our manned space program, there just isn't that much interest.
0 Votes
+ -
Incremental improvements have continually been made throughout the
life of the shuttle. The external tank is on its 3rd iteration, which has
substantially increased the payload capacity and range of the shuttle
(the original shuttle would not have been able to reach ISS). Moving the
shuttle to the top of the ET would be a massive redesign, not an
incremental improvement, with very little in the way of real benefit. Not
sure if you remember, but a replacement next generation reusable
launch vehicle was in the works back in the 90's, culminating in the
flawed VentureStar program which was eventually recognized for the
boondoggle it was and killed off.

Ultimately, I'm not sure a reusable launch vehicle is really more cost-
effective than older style Soyuz technology. Comparing shuttle to
Soyuz on paper, it certainly doesn't seem to be. And there are other,
less expensive ways to get cargo to and from orbit. Man-rating your
cargo vehicle has never made much sense. It's much more effective to
man-rate a smaller, cheaper vehicle and then have a separate vehicle to
carry cargo - they can rendezvous after they're launched if necessary.

Ultimately, until our manned program becomes about something more
than minding the store at a space station which has dubious value,
we're going to continue to see aimlessness and indecision in our space
program. The Chinese are making great progress because of two
things: 1) they don't have politics, 2) they have a clear goal of besting
the United States at its own game and that means getting to the moon
and getting some kind of crappy tin can in orbit they can call a space
station. There's no ambiguity there and they don't have to worry about
budget since the U.S. is de facto paying for it all with our massive trade
deficit and the people don't really get a say in it (authoritarian regimes
are convenient that way).

I can tell you this, if the Chinese do manage to pull in front of us, I bet
you're going to see a blame game and subsequent push to get back in
front in space like we haven't seen since Sputnik and the original Space
Race. I don't know where it will lead, but my bet would be first one to
Mars wins.
0 Votes
+ -
Stupidity on a monumental scale.
Hallowed are the Ori Updated - 5th Apr 2010
While the Chinese and Russians focus on getting to the moon, NASA will now be "refocused" on global warming, oops, I mean, "climate change".

Unconscionable stupidity. November 2012 cannot arrive soon enough.
0 Votes
+ -
Not at all obvious....
Economister 5th Apr 2010
that space exploration is more important than making sure we will not destroy our planet.

Where will you go?
0 Votes
+ -
Don't blame the 44th President - blame the 43rd
doug.hanchard@... 5th Apr 2010
It was President Bush that failed to renew the
Space Shuttle Program when he authorized Oct.
2008 the NASA Authorization Act for only ONE
additional Shuttle flight and no further
flights after extensive review of NASA's entire
program the year before which mandated the
retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet.

Thanks for writing.
Doug
0 Votes
+ -
bush was right
jeffk464 5th Apr 2010
The shuttle has proven to be expensive and has serious safety problems. Its either time to go back to the drawing boards or get out of manned space.
0 Votes
+ -
All it is going to take....
Hallowed are the Ori 5th Apr 2010
...is ONE big rock to come along, and we're all, ALL OF US, going to have a very, very bad day.

We, PEOPLE, should have landed on Mars at least 20 years ago.

By now we should have, at minimum, large colonies on the moon and Mars, with an eye on the asteroid belt and the mineral and chemical rich outer planets.

The real money sinkhole that people should be pissed about is the "International Space Station".
0 Votes
+ -
You're half right
gigabot71 6th Apr 2010
I'm no Bush fan, but he also approved a supposed replacement for the
shuttle (Orion). While I didn't agree with him about a great many
things, Bush was mostly right on about the space program IMO. We
need to do something more than putter around in LEO or it's simply not
worth doing. Orion was going to change that by returning us to the
Moon and then on to Mars. Granted he didn't give them nearly enough
money to do it, but the direction was sound.

The Obama administration has de facto decided to end U.S. manned
spaceflight. Oh sure, they didn't come out and put it that way, but
that's exactly what their endgame is. Obama doesn't care about
manned spaceflight any more than he cares about pocket lint. To him
it's a waste of money and a distraction. Being an adept politician, he
would never come out and say that, but you can read between the lines.
For now, they'll continue to plow the money into the ISS that is
necessary to honor our international commitment there and let the
Russians and the Euros do all the heavy lifting to and from the station.
In a couple of years, once we get used to not having a manned
spaceflight capability of our own and assuming Obama is still in office,
they will quietly announce the end of funding for the U.S. portion of
ISS.
0 Votes
+ -
Painfully No
Richard B 5th Apr 2010
As much as it pains me, the shuttle should has ended a long time ago. Constellation program is a pure joke, a step back to Apollo rather than an innovative step froward.
I feel the space started to go wrong Between Bush 41 and Clinton eras with the X-33 and shuttle replacement program.
NASA went from failure is not an option to failure is what we do.
Oh Quick !!! Let's Blame Bush for the current anything !!! Oh please, let's just take some responsibility for yourself. Why don't we just say that we can't afford Obama-care and anything else (except bailing out Wall Street and the auto industry) and be done with it ?
0 Votes
+ -
... thw Shuttle without a replacment being IN-PLACE as it was to make all of the design compromises that were made in the 1970s & 80s which made it necessary to retire the shuttle in the near future.
0 Votes
+ -
Short sightedness is what we excel at
klumper Updated - 5th Apr 2010
It's inherent to the nature of democracies, more so in capitalist and corporate driven ones that know few bounds but profits at all costs.
The loss of our space program in just one example of our slide into third world status. The question I have is why are we giving these countries aid when we're going broke. They have enought money for space programs, but not for other things?
0 Votes
+ -
The fall of the American Society
azoldak 5th Apr 2010
Can anyone explain why we're giving aid to these other countries when they can afford space programs? To find out about all the money we give away do a search at Grants.gov there's nothing there for small american businesses, but we're certainly supporting the rest of the world.
0 Votes
+ -
In turn, so too are a large chunk of the incentives to push further and quicker the reaches of interplanetary spaceflight and travel.

The space program was largely based on one-upsmanship, to wit, direct competition with the Red menace, especially initially. Both sides pitted their teams of de-Nazified engineers and scientists against each other in a race for supremacy (and influence) as viewed from the eyes of the rest of the world.

With that era now behind us (ironically sealed with the fall of the Berlin Wall), the incentives to be biggest and baddest in this expensive "race" have largely evaporated. Left to our own devices, and without a competitive ideology to compel us ever further, we're largely lost as to what to do next.
0 Votes
+ -
Shuttle memories
brewakeg 5th Apr 2010
Memories of the shuttle...
Seeing the twisted contrails of the Challenger explosion from St. Petersburg in 1986. Watching a lot of launches in the years since from Fort Lauderdale, FL. The launch last year at dusk where the smoke trail was colored blue/gray near the ground, to orange, yellow and white as the shuttle rose above the setting sun. And the launch this morning where I got to see about 2 seconds of that bright orange light before it disappeared into the pre-dawn cloud bank. I have never gotten tired of it, it still amazes me what we have built. Remember, it was designed to be a re-usable "pickup truck to earth orbit" to replace the disposable Saturn launch vehicles. It did accomplish that. But it's time has past... certainly with today's technology we should be able to do it better and cheaper than $500M a shot.
0 Votes
+ -
By chance
doug.hanchard@... 5th Apr 2010
Do you remember which Shuttle launch date was
the one you witnessed at dusk? I have been
looking for video of that liftoff. It wasn't
broadcast that I'm aware of, by any national
outlet. I recall the same memories as you have.
I can not find any video of that specific event
on google or any other site.

That was definitely one of the great visual
launches to witness in Shuttle history.

Thanks for writing.
Doug
0 Votes
+ -
Shuttle colored contrail
brewakeg 6th Apr 2010
This was March 15, 2009. Mission was STS-119. Search google images or video on "STS-119 launch".
Glad to help, it was a memorable launch.
0 Votes
+ -
thanks!
doug.hanchard@... 6th Apr 2010
I've added it to the post.

thanks for finding it for me.

Doug
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Heard it this morning
David Gewirtz 5th Apr 2010
Doug, thanks for posting this.

I live about 40 miles south of Cape Canaveral. As I was falling asleep this morning (yeah, around 6am), I heard this enormous wooosh and didn't know what it was. I didn't think the Shuttle flight was due for a while yet, and I though maybe it was a low-flying jet. For a second I thought it might have even been a tornado, but the weather was fine.

Now, I know.
0 Votes
+ -
My pleasure
doug.hanchard@... 5th Apr 2010
I clearly remember when the "USS" Enterprise
(OV-101) made its debut in 1976 as a wide eye
kid, 6" away from the television as it rolled
out of the Palmdale California plant at what
was then, Rockwell International, now sadly
long gone, with the only legacy of its
existence, the Space Shuttle and 90 B-1 Lancer
Swept-wing Strategic Nuclear Supersonic
Bombers. And like the Space Shuttle (orphan),
the B-1 is the only swept wing supersonic
aircraft still flying with the USAF with the
retirement of the F-111 (Raven)in 1998 and F-14
(Tomcat) in 2006.

As a sidebar for anyone that cares, it was
Rockwell Semi-Conductor that produced the first
super cheap 14.4 baud modem chip set.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, Bush was right, but....
Uncle Stoat 5th Apr 2010
... right now there are no other heavy lift AND RETURN capable vehicles available.

Zero, nada, zip - and while soyuz brings prople down, it lands HARD - which knocks the stuffing out of them (to put it nicely).

Shuttle should be retained for a while yet. There's a fair amount of large stuff to bring back down occasionally. It should NOT be being used for resupply missions when there are better disposable tools available. (Japan + EU)

I'm quite sure we will see a manned moonbase before 2050 and I'm also pretty sure that the language there won't be english or russian.
0 Votes
+ -
Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
sesli sohbet sesli chat
Great!! ! thanks for sharing this information to us!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix