ie8 fix

The Cold War just got hotter. Deep undercover with a sexy Russian spy.

By | June 29, 2010, 1:37pm PDT

Summary: Not only do you have a throwback to the Cold War, secret agents, and spies, you also have the hot model Anna Chapman, who is allegedly a secret mole spying on Americans.

Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock, you know that the FBI arrested 11 Russian spies. According to FBI officials, the Russians were spying on the United States and operating “deep cover” agents who were attempting to penetrate “policy making circles”.

It seems so 1974, doesn’t it?

It’s also interesting and perhaps even coincidental that these arrests happened shortly after Russian President Medvedev met with President Obama. President Medvedev even had the opportunity to experience the life-changing world of 140-character-at-a-time tweets.

This modern-day Russian spy thing is also a great story. Not only do you have a throwback to the Cold War, secret agents, and spies, you also have the hot model Anna Chapman, who is allegedly a secret mole spying on Americans. She even has a Facebook page with 684 friends! (Update: another profile link, with 162 friends — are people de-friending now?)

It’s a great story, but — perhaps more importantly — it’s almost not surprising. After all, spycraft is as old as civilization and whether or not the “Russkies” are spying for secret information on our nuclear strategy, trying to influence our foreign policy, or stealing high-tech trade secrets, this is what countries and companies do.

A few years ago, I wrote about the worrisome implications of the Mexican theft of White House BlackBerry devices, where an agent of the Mexican government stole BlackBerry devices belong to White House officials while at a conference.

The Russian story is why it’s so important that America’s intelligence agencies remain fully-funded and continue to improve their techniques, skills, and technology. Mark my words: Russia is not the only country spying on us. They’re not even the only “frenemy”. Expect our allies to have deep cover spies in the United States as well as our more serious enemies.

Be careful who you trust. But also be aware that the risk isn’t just from spies who operate under cover. Companies and government agencies regularly engage in practices so incomprehensibly stupid when it comes to security that it almost makes old-school spying seem unnecessary.

For example, many of our financial services companies (yeah, those jokers) provide access to our confidential financial information to people in foreign countries — you know, the people we call for customer service. U.S. government agencies routinely outsource IT operations, often to countries not necessarily on our friend’s list.

American universities routinely bring in foreign nationals as graduate students and provide them access to the most secret of research projects, and then send them home once they graduate — complete with all that knowledge.

And, of course, companies like AT&T can’t seem to get something simple like an iPhone purchase right, so they send credit card information out via email to, well, pretty much random people on the Internet.

So, yes, the story of hot Anna and her spy cabal makes for good buzz. And yes, there could be more deep cover spies among us. But we need to take real and reasonable precautions as well, and stop going out of our way to sacrifice our own security, outsource our own financial and IT operations, and stop sharing so much information freely and openly.

When it comes to security, the Russians may be our frenemies, but we may be our own worst enemies.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets.

Disclosure

David Gewirtz

At various times during his adult life, David has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, and has been disappointed by both. He is deeply disturbed by how partisanship has come before patriotism in America, which gives him the freedom to pick on both sides.

David is a frequent guest on TV and radio stations across America and can usually be heard or seen on-the-air at least once a week. He writes weekly commentary and analysis for CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 and has been interviewed by Fox News, CNN, various ABC and NBC affiliates, and Canada’s Global TV. He has been a featured guest on National Public Radio and has also been featured on Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty where his commentaries on technology, industry, and emerging nations have been broadcast into 46 countries (all in their own unique translations).

David is the executive director of U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization. He is the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security and a special contributor to Frontline Security Magazine. He is a member of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the security partnership between the FBI and industry. David is also a member of the U.S. Naval Institute and the National Defense Industrial Association, the leading defense industry association promoting national security.

David is an advisory board member for the Technical Communications and Management Certificate program at the University of California, Berkeley extension. He is also a member of the instructional faculty at the University of California, Berkeley extension.

David’s “day job” is as publisher and editor-in-chief of ZATZ publishing, an online publisher of technical magazines. Other than than his ownership stake in Component Enterprises, Inc. (the parent company of ZATZ), David has no additional industry investments.

ZATZ has many advertisers who do, in part, provide for David’s lush income and extravagant lifestyle. Most of them are IBM and Lotus aftermarket suppliers, some of them make goodies for Microsoft Outlook, and a few make all sorts of strange mobile devices and add-on products. David has been a regular judge of the IBM Awards, but has no formal financial interest in or with IBM.

Because the ZATZ online magazines often review products, David and ZATZ are sent an overwhelming stream of unsolicited, silly, and often useless products to review. Because they’re such a pain to track and ship back, these products often wind up in a dumpster or fill up the corner of a large closet. Although David has no plans to review products in connection to his ZDNet blog, if he does do a product review, he will disclose any relationship completely in that posting.

Both through ZATZ and independently, David derives a small income through various advertising and sales relationships with Amazon.com and Google. These are minor relationships and they will not impede his willingness or ability to chastise either company should they deserve it.

David has many other business relationships, but none of them relate to anything he covers in his ZDNet blog. David does have a bit of the sales-guy bug and if he’s not doing a sales deal with someone at least once a month, he goes through withdrawal. He has a number of consulting clients, but none of them relate to anything he covers for ZDNet (and if they ever do, he will either disclose that fact, or decline to write about them).

Back in the 1980s, David held the unusual title of “Godfather” at Apple. He has written and published 40 incredibly simplistic applications for Apple’s iPhone.

Although David is forbidden to disclose the terms of his iPhone developer agreement, he isn’t drinking the Apple Kool Aid, will never be confused with a metrosexual, and feels free to mock Apple, and Apple users, any time the occasion permits, on alternate Tuesdays, or if he’s bored.

Biography

David Gewirtz

In addition to hosting the ZDNet Government and ZDNet DIY-IT blogs, CBS Interactive's Distinguished Lecturer David Gewirtz is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets, is one of America's foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs. He is also director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute as well as the founder of ZATZ Publishing.

David is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberwarfare Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a regular CNN contributor, and a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is the author of Where Have All the Emails Gone?, the definitive study of email in the White House, as well as How To Save Jobs and The Flexible Enterprise, the classic book that served as a foundation for today's agile business movement.

23
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: The Cold War just got hotter. Deep undercover with a sexy Russian spy.
cosuna 15th Jul 2010
@inversius

Agreed. Although espionage is also common in place one might think would be safe. Or else how could you explain Armaggeddon and Deep Impact showing off just weeks after another, if you conclude that it takes years to plan and stage a Hollywood flick.

Another case is the WePad and the Cisco Cius. How would those people know what the iPad would look like without inside knowledge.

Last, but not least, the iPhone 4 'leaks' in San Francisco and Vietnam.

And, BTW, let David continue with his rants. He seems to be unaware that the U.S. traded the 11 spies for 4 american guys. Why so few? Did the U.S. had less active people, or were those 4 valued more than the 11 ones. One must never accuse the other of doing what one regularly does. Paranoia is just that...
What a load of rubbish! A team of historians combed though decades of declassified documents not long ago and concluded that espionage had little to no impact on significant events and the course of history. It's all about posturing and we shouldn't be encouraging it by giving more money to these yobs. On the other hand we definitely should be encouraging more spies like Anna to come over and hang out...
@inversius:

Uh huh. Tell that to the people who broke the Enigma code. Tell that to the people who worked to break the Japanese JN25 codes.

Those are but two examples. You, and the "historians" you rode in on do not know what you're talking about.
@inversius

Ever heard of Sun Tzu? He wrote a bit about intelligence and I suspect that he would disagree about the importance of espionage. I suspect he knew more about intel than you do and he's been dead for about 2500 years.

If this cell has been monitored since 2004 then it's probably been active for a few years before. Maybe that's how W got elected...who knows how deep this goes.
0 Votes
+ -
Cave dwelling and beyond
klumper 30th Jun 2010
@inversius
A team of historians combed though decades of declassified documents not long ago and concluded that espionage had little to no impact on significant events and the course of history.

It's about the only thing the English had over the Germans in WWII. As for its ultimate impact, that's always debatable, but let's put it this way: No government would dare leave home without it. That extends back to time immemorial, where Neanderthal spy dwellers no doubt did their thing from cave to cave. wink

As for Anna coming over to hang out, well... she is easy on the eyes... *doh!*
@inversius

Agreed. Although espionage is also common in place one might think would be safe. Or else how could you explain Armaggeddon and Deep Impact showing off just weeks after another, if you conclude that it takes years to plan and stage a Hollywood flick.

Another case is the WePad and the Cisco Cius. How would those people know what the iPad would look like without inside knowledge.

Last, but not least, the iPhone 4 'leaks' in San Francisco and Vietnam.

And, BTW, let David continue with his rants. He seems to be unaware that the U.S. traded the 11 spies for 4 american guys. Why so few? Did the U.S. had less active people, or were those 4 valued more than the 11 ones. One must never accuse the other of doing what one regularly does. Paranoia is just that...
0 Votes
+ -
What is this "friends" stuff?
HollywoodDog 30th Jun 2010
There are no friends in government or between governments.

If you believe what's printed in the newspapers, the country that by far is conducting more espionage against the US government than any other is Israel. But of course, we aren't rounding up nests of Israeli spies. Why is that?

Google "Israeli Art Students."
@HollywoodDog
Probably because they have more influence in the great halls than the people supposedly running your country.
0 Votes
+ -
And though the press goes to lengths to hide this fact, Israel's influence throughout our government, particularly at the federal level, is nothing short of criminal. Is it any wonder, with the billions upon billions we ship off to them every year! And for what? To turn a pack of well disguised spies loose on the benefactor host schmucks! How does that saying go, something about biting the hand that feeds you?

With all that free annual jack from tax paying red, white and blue stiffs, they simply invest a healthy portion of it to buy and place (or sustain) the politicians they want into seats of influence and on both sides of the aisle, just so this privileged and absurd hand-out cycle repeats ad infinitum. Their purchased congressional brats assure that fact. It's a sham of the highest order, one that increasingly compromises our sovereignty.

Naturally their kissin' cousin pals in Hollywood, a close (and closed) knit fraternity if there ever was one, see to it that very little of this gets publicized. The end result: Our stars and stripes fly permanently at half mast in the current age, just below - and in the shadow of - an ascendant Star of David.
0 Votes
+ -
Age old tired libels trotted out again
naibeeru Updated - 13th Jul 2010
@HollywoodDog @Mike062 @klumper
You guys are so enamoured of Satan and his Muslim lackies that you wouldn't know truth if it bit you on your posterior! Newsflash: the Jews aren't the problem, their enemies like you are. And your one-worlder mates like Obamessiah, the UN, the "western media", and every other Jew-hating group around the world. But don't worry, you'll have it all "explained" to you in short order. A pity most of you won't survive the "explanation"...
0 Votes
+ -
The Russians Are Still Our Enemies
Albee_Freeoneday 30th Jun 2010
Their mentality is still the same. Trying to rebuild the Tsarist/Communist empires to cover all of Eastern Europe, parts of Western Europe, and eventually the pacific.

Building nuclear reactors in Iran. Selling all sorts of "defensive" actually offensive weapons to Iran, Syria, and any other troublemaker around the world.

This is a friend?
@Albee_Freeoneday
It's called Capitalism. Not that they weren't doing this when they were blatantly Socialist. Got to keep the wheels of the Military/Industrial Machine turning.
P.S. I'm not sure if you can conjoin Tsarist and Communist. It would seem to be contradictory.
@Mike062 I think the Tsarist/Communist blend was meant illustrate a geographic claim, not an ideological one.
@Albee_Freeoneday

Russia is still a superpower, perhaps more of a regional superpower but it's a BIG region. They are also an emerging economic power. Why wouldn't they participate in the global arms market, because it's not in the interest of the US? This doesn't make the Russians enemies, just competitors.

When the Soviets WERE enemies of the US we still were heartbroken when they lost that sub and it's crew. The same men that would have dropped them like a bad habit in war would have lined up for as far as the eye could see just to help save those submariners. That's respect.

Blind hatred is immature and foolish. This way of thinking may still consider the Germans or Japanese enemies when in fact they are great and valued allies and partners. How much time must pass before we get past the old Cold War mentality?
@HollywoodDog
It's a good way to make the CinC look bad without getting your sorry butt fired. Too bad McChrystal didn't use this runaround. Lost a good man on that RS fiasco.
As far as a security threat I'm sure these "spies" gave their handlers the bare minimum and a lot of BS just so they could live the life of Reilly in the good ol' USA. I wonder how Siberia will be after a comfortable life in the States. If I was the three letter agencies involved I would of flipped them and used them to my benefit. But then again, apparently their tradecraft was seriously lacking.
@Mike062

I don't think they caught because their tradecraft was bad... I think they were shopped by their handler. Did you notice the news item that the "ringleader" was caught in Cyprus and then released on bail. I think the first plan was for ringleader, turned by the US, to "escape" back to Russia. The escape plan didn't work as expected, and he got arrested by the Cypriot authorities - who did actually need to be looking for him to make the escape look authentic - but now the US has asked for him to be released so that he can be "disappear" while on bail and reappear with an assumed identity in Iowa.

The FBI new about the ring of 10 years, I read. They were feeding the ring all sorts of garbage, and probably ran it 'til they felt it was time to their double agent back to Russia.
0 Votes
+ -
Handler
HollywoodDog 30th Jun 2010
@HollywoodDog ... sounds like the culprit alright. Not a bad gig: convince the Russians you can run a network of deep cover spies, then sell them to the US for big money. He'd better take care to order his tea without pulonoium.
0 Votes
+ -
Of course they're de-friending now
John Zern 30th Jun 2010
don't want to let the FBI think they're Russian spies, too!
0 Votes
+ -
A story like this
klumper Updated - 30th Jun 2010
reminds me of why I'm so proud to be an American. -And- a champion of American corporations and the federal government with their dutiful functionaries (where I'm even prouder). Hot diggety!
0 Votes
+ -
International Students?
portofmocha 30th Jun 2010
"American universities routinely bring in foreign nationals as graduate students and provide them access to the most secret of research projects, and then send them home once they graduate ? complete with all that knowledge."

Where exactly did you learn that international students get access to secret research projects? You might want to check your sources again.
As an international student at a university department where more than three quarters of funding comes from defense projects, I know how international students are not allowed access. And yes, I have contacts at other universities and know the situation to be the same there too.
So do you see what you have accomplished with a single wayward line there?

On a side note, that above quoted line sounds as if the universities are doing a favor to the students by bringing them in. We all know the know the financial motives behind this act- intl. student fees, state grants et al.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@portofmocha Actually, I have excellent sources, some of which I can let you read, even. Here are a few things you can read that'll get you started:

http://usspi.org/how-to-save-jobs/research-resources/
@David Gewirtz I will keep this short.. impressive list of sources, yes I went through it all and did not find a single reference to international students allowed access to secret projects. And I wouldn't consider US citizens of foreign origin and green card holders in this discussion ( I hope you don't expect me to justify that).
Why not just subscribe to The New York Times???? Faster and cheaper.
0 Votes
+ -
Little works as it should here anymore
klumper Updated - 1st Jul 2010
@spin498
Unless your post is like one or two lines long. Beyond that, it's a crapshoot each time you go to post. Not sure if it is due to all the censored words and syntax they have elected to excise, or just a raft of bugs they introduced with the new makeover that they seemingly cannot get on top of.

End result - the shitz.

[As for the spam, fouggetaboutit]

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix