U.S. Army Commander 'General order #1': Ban on becoming pregnant for soldiers serving in Iraq
Summary: Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo, Commander of the Multi-National Division-North in Iraq has generated standing orders for soldier's under his command; General Order 1, bans female soldiers from getting pregnant.
Highly qualified personnel are demand across all industries. Keeping such talent is a competitive challenge in the work place. It's no different in the military. Analysts, engineers, communications specialists are highly trained individuals and are the backbone of the logistics, command and control intelligence divisions in the Armed Forces. When a woman working in a corporate environment becomes pregnant, they simply go on maternity leave, and her role is often filled on a temporary basis. But what happens in the military creates a different set of challenges, especially in war zones like Iraq or Afghanistan. Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo, Commander of the Multi-National Division-North in Iraq has generated standing orders for soldier's under his command; General Order 1, bans female soldiers from getting pregnant. But the order doesn't just hold women accountable, male soldiers fall under the same guidance and responsibility. In a press release on the Dodlive.mil website, Maj. General Cucolo points out clear reasons for such an order:
"I can't tell you how valuable my female soldiers are," he said. "They fly helicopters. They run satellites. They're mechanics. They're medics. Some of the best intelligence analysts I have happen to be female. You start losing them when you're facing a drawdown, and you really hurt the unit."
Cucolo discussed the policy that bans soldiers from becoming pregnant while on duty in Iraq on a phone interview today. This policy falls under the Command's General Order No. 1 and he said he was prompted by his experience as Division Commander with the 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Airfield, Ga. and his intense desire to maintain fighting strength any way possible for a very tough and complex mission.
He said the purpose of this rule is to cause soldiers to pause and think about the decisions they make and how a personal decision has major consequences, like leaving their teammates shorthanded in combat, not the consequence of punishment. He also said that he believes he can handle violations of this aspect with lesser degrees of punishment and has not considered court marshalling.
"I don't ever see myself putting a soldier in jail for this."
The soldiers will not face a general court, but there are several reprimand options that command has at its disposal and for some, it will be permanently entered into their service records.
Seven soldiers have been reprimanded under the new ban. The four female soldiers who became pregnant were given letters of reprimand that will not remain in their permanent military file as were two of the male soldiers. A third soldier who is married received a permanent letter of reprimand for impregnating a subordinate who is not his wife and fraternization. The four female soldiers were all reassigned outside of Iraq and the three men remained.
There were also four other female soldiers who were sent home without punishment, after finding out they were pregnant shortly after arriving in Iraq.
The U.S. Navy is reviewing its own policies with respects to women and its Nuclear Submarine service, which routinely head out on extended sorties, often lasting 70 plus days at sea, without ever going into port. Since September, the U.S. Navy has been reviewing the possibility of women serving on submarines.
"I believe women should have every opportunity to serve at sea, and that includes aboard submarines," Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said Thursday in a statement to Navy Times.
His comment comes one week after Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen told congressional lawmakers that he thought it was time to end the ban against women on submarines.
Should a woman hide her pregnancy and be aboard a ballistic missile submarine, it could raise significant operational challenges; including a significant change to operations and procedures, including a new requirement to surface should medical complications arise. One of the sacred tactics of Ohio class submarine commander's is to remain submerged and mitigate as much risk possible in preventing detection. Being forced back to port or rendezvousing with a surface ship will be a topic of heated policy debate both within the Pentagon and on the Hill. A possible solution maybe women officers and sailors are required to take a pregnancy tests prior embarking on a sortie.
According to the Navy Times, the Navy as of May had 7,900 female officers and 44,000 female sailors, comprising about 15 percent of officers and sailors in the 330,500-strong active component.
Additional Resources:
Special Report: F-35 Fighter Lightning II to be delayed to 2015/16 - Lightning does strike twice.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Norplant
spends the $220 on Norplant for you for the
duration of your term of service. Issue largely
solved.
We pay that much for overseas vaccinations. Why
not vaccinate against pregnancy?
There's only one problem with that logical solution...
Uhm...
But a few points...
1: Majority of religious people are pro-birth control.
2: Birth control has NOTHING to do with "right to life". As you are not killing a baby like you do with abortion. You are preventing its creation.
Issues with religion? You bet.
And oh by the way...I have TWO ministers of differnet religions in my family (one a former District Superintendant for her church), who are the most narrow-minded people I know, and have little tolerance for religions outside of theirs. And the illegal and immoral crap I hear from them about what their colleagues have done...and are currently doing...is sickening. They steal from their churches, they cheat on their spouses, lie about other transgressions, yet these same hypocrites get up in front of their flocks every Sunday, and pontificate about how people should be more "Christian". Bull$hit!
"1: Majority of religious people are pro-birth control."
OK...I'll give you that one.
"2: Birth control has NOTHING to do with "right to life". As you are not killing a baby like you do with abortion. You are preventing its creation."
Really? Well don't tell THAT to these folks:
http://www.prolife.com/BIRTHCNT.html
...or these folks:
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-bcpill.html
...or these folks:
http://prolifeaction.org/events.php?page=case
...or these folks:
http://www.illinoisrighttolife.org/PlannedParenthood.htm
Shall I go on?
Ignorant blanket accusations
Regardless, birth control is considered bad by at least by Catholicism since sex according to them exists only for the purpose of creating children.
Are their religious people that say one thing and do another? Of course, but that human behavior and anywhere you find people, you will find dishonesty.
If you want to understand a belief system do not look at a few believers, look at the doctrine. Study what it teaches and think for yourself. The believers are only human and as such will always have flaws.
Sorry...not buying into the doctrine.
"Ignorant blanket accusations"?
Ah Sparky...you may want to re-read my FIRST paragraph. Simply statements backed up by facts.
^ Troll
Troll much? sheesh.
Oh.. just incase you don't know what that means look it up.
Your first line in that post clearly shows
So why are you still talking on the subject.
So, the preacher steals and tells his flock not to? I guess that's hypocritical.
Definatelly a lot different then those non-preacher types who steal, and tell their friends and family not to. No hypocrocy there.
Maybe the problem isn't with the religion, but those pretending to follow and uphold it.
Really no different then law: Is the law wrong if a police officer bust a person for drunk driving, then drives home drunk from a party the next night?
Better solution...
You aren't supposed to be having sex on military duty anyway. Chances are you violated a fraternization rule just by thinking about it. This is active duty in war, not free time at college/university.
just say no?
I will assume married folks have a reason not to stray, although some ignore the reason. That is a private matter between those involved, except when other issues become important (pregnancy, breaking regulations, etc).
There are many cases where there is not a fraternization issue. The military does not try to control these cases, except where there are other problems. This new policy is dealing with one of those problems.
I happen to be a Christian, but am all for birth control, and do not try to beat abstinence into other folks. It is a silly task, like teaching a pig to sing.
"You aren't supposed to be having sex on military duty anyway."
On watch, no. That is a court-martial offense, like sleeping on duty. On your own time or on leave, completely separate issue. You show ignorance of reality.
you can't equate corporate employment to army
good rule
Any activity that prevents a soldier from deploying or takes them out of their current deployment is subject to penalty, so why not pregnancy? It's a deliberate act and can easily be avoided with the military's available family planning and birth control.
Women have fought hard to be considered on equal footing with men in the military. They deserve to have both the advantages and disadvantages of having that footing, namely the requirement to be available to serve at all times.
If they don't want that penalty, then I would ask that the male soldier that got that female pregnant should also have the same time off, all things being equal. You see where that will get us?
ya know
My...my...my MStalnecker...we sure are sensitive.
NO...He is not...and neither are you...(NT)
Think long term!
That is why it's time to leave Iraq and Afghanistna
That will only lead to MORE hatred against the United States, more suicide bombings, and more terrorists being created.
Simply put, terrorism cannot be fought with military methods..... it has to be fought with POLICE METHODS, like the ones that were used to find Timothy McVeigh.
Escaping from Iraq
Um, dude...
A little education is a dangerous thing. Better get some more...
Not anymore it is not 'voluntary'
It is voluntary to sign up for it at first.... but then, they get you with these 'stop-loss' things (which should have been made illegal) and keep you in the Army.
Really, we need to say that unless another foreign country attacks us, we are NOT going to attack another foreign country, period and done with.
Neither the war in Afghanistan after we got rid of the Taliban, nor the ENTIRE war in Iraq, were really necessary.... they were wars based on lies, misdirections, fabrications, etc.