Why old people still like their PDAs
Summary: This is a generational question. We prove it using data from the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control.
My mom's Tungsten E Palm device recently started to act up, causing a minor panic. She loves her Palm device and was worried what would happen if it died. Normally, we'd just go out and get her a new one, but now that Palm has been sold to HP and completely abandoned the venerable (and much-loved) Palm OS, my mom (and other Palm OS fans) are out of luck if they need a replacement.
Sure, there's always eBay, but as time goes on, even never-opened devices are going to have battery problems. There was just nothing like an actual new Palm OS device, back when it was just fresh off the factory floor.
But the real question is this: why the loyalty?
Why doesn't my mom just go out and by an iPhone, an iPod touch, a Droid, or some other smartphone? Why does she even need a PDA?
Would would anyone even need a PDA?
Sigh.
This is a generational question. I can prove it using data from the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control. Seriously.
I recently read Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, a CDC study by Stephen J. Blumberg, Ph.D., and Julian V. Luke, Division of Health Interview Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics. It's an absolutely fascinating study, and I'll be coming back to it over the coming months. For now, though, the interesting element is this chart:
Basically, the CDC studied the question of how many people are substituting the old-school wired phones with cell phones -- and what the various health-related indications are based on that substitution.
The chart above shows people (by age) who only have a wireless phone (read: cell phone) in their homes. As you can see, there's a big spike among relatively young people, but as you top about 38 years old, more and more people have wired phone lines.
People over 38 are older people. That includes me (I'm almost 50) and my mom.
Older people don't have as much of an affinity for cell phones. My mom has a very simple one, and when I suggested I might replace it with something that could do double-duty as a PDA, she got quite upset. She's never really had a comfortable relationship with cell phones, eying them with the same level of distrust she did the summer I brought a cat home from college (true story).
The thing is, she doesn't really have much of a need for a cell phone. She does most of her talking on her wired line. She uses her Palm device constantly, but she's probably dialed her cell phone once in the past 12 months.
There's another issue: nothing replicates the Palm Desktop's integration with the PC desktop nearly as well as that ancient piece of software. It's simple and lets you easily edit your addresses, notes, calendar, etc. If she were to use, say, an iPhone, she'd somehow have to rely on the abortion that's iTunes for all her data entry.
I love my mom. I wouldn't ever want to do that to her.
"Well, what about Outlook?" some of you might say. My mom doesn't use Outlook, so we'd have to transition her over. An Android phone comes close, because there's moderately good integration into Gmail and Google calendar, but there's still not the easy desktop connectivity she's come to know with the Palm Desktop.
There is no doubt the PDA market has collapsed, eclipsed completely by the demand for the iPhone and similar devices. But there is still a market for simple PDAs, whether it's because us over-40 types don't rely solely on our mobiles or because a PDA still has some use in various business and industrial applications.
Something to think about for those trying to find new markets. Perhaps an old market might still have some legs.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
It's not an "old" person issue.
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
young people nowadays will always want the latest gadgets. the Iphone is backwards feature wise compared to other phones, but kids nowadays, "Iphone4? Ditch the Iphone 3Gs now !!!"
Shoe thing!
In 4 words you have answered the article's obvious question.
&
note to Mr. Gewirtz:
Old? "Older" is a bit kinder to your readers over 25.
Oh, YOU'RE over 25? Then you're "older" too. It's all relative, but who likes all their relatives?
Do you seriously not know?
Your mother found that the Palm did exactly what she needed. Fine; there is now absolutely no need to try other devices that involve a new learning curve. What's so hard to understand about that?
The whole essence of youth is learning and experimentation. An older person has been through that painful process and is satisfied with the outcome.
I'd try eBay.
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
You're absolutely right! I'm not "old" yet but I do recognize things like "progress for the sake of progress" and "full of un-needed features" and so on.
Basically there are two reasons for them to upgrade: It will somehow save money, or, it will do a job they wish they could do. So offering instant ticketmaster access is a lost cause when the current product does everything they need and want it for.
Even the toy-players, which is most of the market, don't really use these things long term; once they're not novel many are tossed aside and no longer used and a few might get upgraded to another latest & greatest toy. Fine; if that supports a market, go for it. But for the most part spammers and legit advertisers alike waste their time on me.
One word: Stylus
Well, that and
It's also a value issue
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
Even if you bought a smartphone on eBay
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
ATT and T-Mobile will let you bring your own smartphone, and sign up for voice/text only, on either a prepaid, pay-as-you-go, or a monthly basis. I'm currently using a first-generation, unlocked iPhone with T-Mobile--I told them I was going to use an unlocked iPhone, and they had no problem with that. They sold me a T-Mobile SIM card for about $7, and I then activated it online, and started buying prepaid minutes. ATT's data-less plans are somewhat more expensive than T-Mobile.
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
@beat a dead horse that's one of many reasons I hate verizon. At least with at&t if you don't use the service you don't need to pay for it, unless it's a BB.
I bought a smartphone with a data plan
and WITHOUT a calling plan because I wanted a super-PDA which I could tether my netbook to... so I carry both an aging Motorola phone for my prepaid provider and a Blackberry I'm using as a PDA. I could use my blackberry as a phone ... for 20 cents a minute over and above my data plan charges.
My Blackberry is a FAR better PDA than my old Zire 31... it's easier to read as e-reader, it sounds better as an MP3 player, and I can watch videos on it, which is something my Zire 31 simply can't do. Though my netbook is a better multimedia platform... I'd hate to try attaching it to my belt.
I just received a low-end google android tablet direct from a Chinese supplier for $133 including shipping. But it's not going to replace either my phone or PDA ... bought it as a development platform for my next project.
BTW, I'm in my mid-50s.
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
For people not familiar with the subsidized cost of phones: A carrier (ATT, etc.) buys phones from the manufacturers for somewhat of a discount, but not a large discount from what I understand, meaning the carrier might be buying an iPhone, an HTC Evo, etc. from the manufacturer for roughly $500 (anyone with closer figures, chime in). The carrier then sells the phone to its customers for $100-$300. This means, depending on the retail cost of the phone, it may take between one and two year's worth of service for the customer to pay off the actual cost of the phone (the amount the carrier can put towards its own purchase of the smartphone is less than the data plan's $30 a month). Because of this, I think lock-in contracts should be for no longer than the actual length of time it takes to pay off the subsidized cost of the phone, rather than an automatic two-year contract even with cheaper PDA-like phones.
One alternative for the customer, to avoid a two-year lock-in and a data contract, is to buy a phone outright, from the carrier, at retail price (which often also means you can buy it unlocked, so you can use it later with other carriers if you choose to or need to), and then sign up with the carrier for a pay-by-the-month voice/text only, or other plan. But for many people, depending on their usage, this still won't reduce their monthly bill by a huge amount (depending on what each person considers huge), and this is pretty much like pre-paying the penalty anyway for early contract cancellation. But you might still save some money over the course of a couple years.
RE: Why old people still like their PDAs
It's also about the money.
Back when I had my functioning Palm Pilot, the only cost was the initial purchase price. If I were to get one of these new "smart" phones, I'd have a rather hefty monthly connection fee for features I'd probably use but definitely can live without. My current voice only cell phone will cost me $100 for the entire year. I have friends with iPhones who are paying that per month.
Keep us posted with what happens with your mother's search for a replacement.