ie8 fix

Wikipedia mystery: Who was improving Palin's entry?

By | August 30, 2008, 3:20pm PDT

Summary: Check out the change log on Sarah Palin’s Wikipedia page.(The photo on the left is her in 1984, placing No. 2 in the Miss Alaska competition. On the right, as governor.) NPR reported yesterday that an unidentified Wiki user made at least 30 changes to Palin’s entry in the hours before John McCain announced that [...]

Check out the change log on Sarah Palin’s Wikipedia page.(The photo on the left is her in 1984, placing No. 2 in the Miss Alaska competition. On the right, as governor.)

NPR reported yesterday that an unidentified Wiki user made at least 30 changes to Palin’s entry in the hours before John McCain announced that she was his pick for VP.

On Friday, 15 minutes before the rumor that John McCain had picked Palin as his running mate, a Wikipedia editor discovered 30 mostly favorable changes had been made to the Alaska governor’s profile.

She was called “a politician of eye-popping integrity” and sections on her participation in a beauty pageant and her alleged use of influence to get her former brother-in-law fired were diminished.

Wikipedia is now restricting who can alter Palin’s page.

Whoever changed the page minimized her status as beauty queen and played down the controversy over whether she tried to get her brother-in-law fired from his job as a state trooper after a nasty divorce with her sister.

NPR interviewed Wikipedia editor Justin Diehl:

24 hours before she became the nominee … someone spent hours essentially rewriting the article in a way that comes across better but also much more favorably. … I dug a little deeper and it became clear that this account had only ever been used to make these changes to a single article on a single candidate. At Wikipedia that’s usually a pretty big red flag.

The screen name of the change artist? YoungTrig.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Richard Koman

http://government.zdnet.com/?page_id=3731

Biography

Richard Koman

Richard Koman is an attorney admitted to practice in California. As a technology writer since the mid-1980s, Richard Koman has documented the role of computing in the transformation of the graphic arts, the growth of the Web and the birth of the peer-to-peer phenomenon. He worked as a book and web editor for O'Reilly Media throughout the 1990s, editing several influential websites and numerous best-sellers. As a lawyer, as well as a tech writer, he brings a unique perspective to the blog's intersection of law, government and technology.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

This is why...
John L. Ries Updated - 2nd Sep 2008
...Wikipedia really needs to be moderated. Over and over again, we see apparent efforts to manipulate it for PR purposes, and we'll see it again and again as long as it's run in the way it is. It's a problem inherent in the Wiki process and there is no way to fix it, short of employing moderators.

Otherwise, the stories of changes to both Gov. Palin's and Sen. Biden's articles are a tempest in a teapot, though it's clear from Mrs. Palin's two photos that she's aged very well since she competed in the Miss Alaska pageant (not at all relevant to her candidacy). Of course, PR types are going to edit Wikipedia articles; they'd be stupid if they didn't.
0 Votes
+ -
Unbias journalism
carlino 30th Aug 2008
.. would require that a more in depth explanation of the brother-in-law controversy be explained. Said individual was a state trooper who had been arrested for spousal abuse, a fire-able action in many jurisdictions. At any rate the person actually fired was guy in charge of the state police. I believe a special prosecutor or commission investigated the issue.
Of greater newsworthiness is whether the editor was from the McCain camo, the Republican National Party, Palin's staff or merely a Sara fan. There has been a blog up since 2007 pushing for her selection as VP. Was this the same person and what are their connections to the governor.
Wikipedia has had this problem before, as evidenced by the bio of thier own chairman's girlfriend.
0 Votes
+ -
But
frgough 30th Aug 2008
that blows the sinister conspiracy implications.

Of course, the whole tone of this piece is silly. Who says de-emphasizing her beauty queen history was a bad thing? Seriously, how relevant is it to being governor. In a bio, it would get a one-line mention, tops.

As far as the brother-in-law, yeah he got busted for tasering his stepson.
0 Votes
+ -
why?
rkoman@... 1st Sep 2008
Why am I required to do an in-depth inquiry into the nature of the controversy? It is a known question mark on her record and the post merely stated that was one item that was massaged.
0 Votes
+ -
Sure, it's what politicians do ...
rkoman@... 30th Aug 2008
But it's very bad form from WP's point of view. So if it was the campaign ... I think it matters. You're not supposed to do it. It's bad netiquette. If it's just a fan, no one cares. But since it happened over several hours and was discovered just 15 mins after the announcement, and since the deal was kept under very tight wraps, the implication is it was someone with some inside information (eg, the campaign, or at least someone within her circle).

So at the very least, who it was does matter, netiquette-wise.
According to this Washington Post Article Cyveillance reported that the same thing happened to Biden's site on the eve of his selection announcement.
0 Votes
+ -
Did you contradict yourself?
K B 31st Aug 2008
You cited a Washington Post article that talks about both Palin's and Biden's Wiki entries, so obviously the media noted both of them, not just the Republican's. I'd also guess that Biden's would not change so drastically since he is much better known that Palin.

Palin is also a bigger buzz word right now, since she just came on to the national political scene and people are wondering who the hell she is.
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe he was refering to Koman
AllKnowingAllSeeing Updated - 31st Aug 2008
in terms of "the media"

Komen never mentioned the fact that Biden's site had the same thing happen to it, though he did go out of his way to point out that Palin's site was changed.
0 Votes
+ -
Actually as I read that article
rkoman@... 1st Sep 2008
The changes to Biden's were chiefly for accuracy:

"We saw a lot of accuracy and footnote changes on Biden's, while on Kaine's page there were a few but not too many. Also, a couple of the same editors were working on both the Obama and Biden Wiki pages."

I don't think there's a story in terms of the campaign fixing up a candidate's page to make sure it's as accurate as possible. The story here appears to be that the changes to Palin's page were not just factual but were frequently spinning her story -- massaging, rewording, making it sound better, not just more accurate.

So I don't see the partisan basis for your complaint
0 Votes
+ -
The partisan basis is simply this.
Letophoro 2nd Sep 2008
In the 6 days prior to her unveiling, Palin's page was updated 122 times.

In the 6 days prior to his unveiling, Biden's page was updated 151 times.

Here's the premise for partisanship:
The former is newsworthy even though there were fewer edits. Why? I suspect it's because the former concerns a Republican.


"I don't think there's a story in terms of the campaign fixing up a candidate's page to make sure it's as accurate as possible. The story here appears to be that the changes to Palin's page were not just factual but were frequently spinning her story -- massaging, rewording, making it sound better, not just more accurate."

How is making something sound better newsworthy? Her page didn't need to have the polish that Biden's did. She was the governor of Alaska. An important job, but ultimately of little interest to those outside of Alaska.

Biden was a presidential candidate. His page should have been more finely polished than the main reflector on the Hubble telescope. At the time of his unveiling his page should have been so incredibly accurate that no changes should have needed to be made other than to add information about being a Veep candidate.
0 Votes
+ -
This is why...
John L. Ries Updated - 2nd Sep 2008
...Wikipedia really needs to be moderated. Over and over again, we see apparent efforts to manipulate it for PR purposes, and we'll see it again and again as long as it's run in the way it is. It's a problem inherent in the Wiki process and there is no way to fix it, short of employing moderators.

Otherwise, the stories of changes to both Gov. Palin's and Sen. Biden's articles are a tempest in a teapot, though it's clear from Mrs. Palin's two photos that she's aged very well since she competed in the Miss Alaska pageant (not at all relevant to her candidacy). Of course, PR types are going to edit Wikipedia articles; they'd be stupid if they didn't.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix