Geo-engineering can save this planet

Summary: An article in the next issue of "Atlantic" puts geo-engineering front and center for stopping the ill effects of global warming. Faster and cheaper than the more political proposals like cap and trade or efficient cars.

An article in the next issue of "Atlantic" puts geo-engineering front and center for stopping the ill effects of global warming. Faster and cheaper than the more political proposals like cap and trade or efficient cars. It's written by Graeme Wood, called "Moving Heaven and Earth." When they finally post it online, it will be here. Some of the schemes include pumping SO2 into the atmosphere to block much of the incoming solar radiation and cool the planet. Another scheme calls for spraying seawater into the air, forming heavier white clouds to reflect sunlight back where it comes from. A frisbee fan, my favorite: setting up big electromagnetic guns that would shoot thousands of reflective frisbees into space. Those in turn would turn back the solar energy. Wow! Another is to create a "Blade Runner" atmosphere, too dense for solar radiation to penetrate. We'd better hurry. "Blade Runner" is set in 2019. Wood's article claims any of these ideas could be carried out for less than $100-billion. Not much compared to what we're paying for bank bail-outs, saving decrepit auto makers or waging war in far-flung parts of Asia. Hell, Bill Gates could do it on his own. Various geoengineering schemes date back to the early phases of global warming concern. Here's one blog that's nearly a year old. The poll reflects a great deal of reader skepticism. The only large-scale attempt at geoengineering took place in the South Atlantic this year, and failed. It was called Lohafex. The micro-organisms of the ocean organized to take advantage of the iron oxide, cancelling out its supposed ability to capture carbon. For Gaia advocates a victory for Mother Nature. Once again: Nature 1, Science O. [poll id="114"] Here's webpage for John Latham, proponent of churning up seawater to form clouds. Here's a look at the diplomacy of huge geoengineering projects, authored by proponent of the "Blade Runner" solution. Wood's most fascinating writing is about the cost and politics of geoengineering. To use another movie example he writes of a possible "Greenfinger," the future parallel of the James Bond's hated Goldfinger. A wealthy freelancer who tries signlep-handedly to change the climate. Wood says there are already a few dozen people who singlephandedly control enough cash to do such a thing. And right now this is a libertarian playground. There are very fewe rules or treaties about what anybody can do in the atmosphere. SO2 aerosol anyone?

Topics: Banking, Cloud, Hardware

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

6 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Too funny

    I love it, socialism and government control of your daily life.


    Nothing like United Socialist States of Amerika....
    Christian_<><
    • Too Sad.....

      the highly predictable nonsense you manage to come up with on a too regular basis. Do you ever have anything interesting or constructive to say? Apparently not.
      Economister
  • Population control is a better target

    If that kind of money was spent educating people about overpopulation - and how the earth can only support a finite number of humans - then perhaps people could try a little harder to avoid having so many kids. It may or may not be a human [i]right[/i] to have as many kids as you want, but if you do then in a few years it will be standing room only on earth.
    Don Collins
    • Population growth

      is a function of the wealth/level of advancement of a country. Most rich, modern nations have negative (native) population growths, made positive by immigration. Underdeveloped nations "contol" population growth via infant/child mortality and short lifespans - a highly undesirable situation.

      Contraception has not proven particularly effective in developing nations due to several factors such as cost, lack of education, perceived "security" of many children etc. Therefore the only long term viable avenue for world population growth control is education, health and economic opportunities in underdeveloped and developing nations.

      Of course, some level of sanity in the Vatican might be helpful as well, but that may be too much to expect.
      Economister
    • Too late

      We're already well beyond a sustainable world population. both North American and world-wide.
      epcraig
  • RE: Geo-engineering can save this planet

    Climate manipulation under the guise of Global Warming.
    http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=wq.essay&essay_id=231274
    WASHINGTON, April 5 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/

    In the Spring issue ofThe Wilson Quarterly, James R. Fleming - expert in science history, weather and climate and founder of International Commission on History of Meteorology - urges caution about adopting a quick technological fix to global warming. Scientists, such as Pentagon futurist Lowell Wood and Nobel laureate Paul Crutzen, are often dangerously oblivious to the political and military implications of their work, which includes proposals to pump millions of tons of reflective nanoparticles into the atmosphere or launch giant mirrors into orbit to reflect the sun's rays back into space.Inevitably, argues Fleming, national governments will try to weaponizeweather-altering technologies. And even if climate engineering succeeds, who will control the global thermostat ?

    Excerpt

    ?Mitigation is not happening and is not going to happen,? physicist Lowell Wood declared at the NASA conference. Wood, the star of the gathering, spent four dec?ades at the University of California?s Law?rence Livermore National Laboratory, where he served as one of the Pentagon?s chief weapon designers and threat analysts. (?He reportedly enjoys the ?Dr. Evil? nickname bestowed by his critics.) The time has come, he said, for ?an intelligent elimination of undesired heat from the biosphere by technical ways and means,? which, he asserted, could be achieved for a tiny fraction of the cost of ?the bureaucratic suppression of CO2.? His engineering approach, he boasted, would provide ?instant climatic gratification.?

    ...

    Military leaders in the United States and other countries have pondered the possibilities of weaponized weather manipulation for decades. Lowell Wood himself embodies the overlap of civilian and military interests. Now affiliated with the Hoover Institution, a think tank at Stanford ?University, Wood was a prot?g? of the late Edward Teller, the weapons scientist who was credited with developing the hydrogen bomb and was the architect of the ?Reagan-?era Star Wars ?missile ?defense system (which Wood worked on, too). Like Wood, Teller was known for his advocacy of controversial military and technological solutions to complex problems, including the chimerical ?peaceful uses of nuclear weapons.? Teller?s plan to excavate an artificial harbor in Alaska using thermo?nuclear explosives actually came close to receiving government approval. Before his death in 2003, Teller was advocating a climate control scheme similar to what Wood proposed.
    climatemanipulation