Need for speed: AMD touts carbon-shrinking potential of new chip

By | January 31, 2011, 11:27am PST

Talk about great (unexpected) timing for a marketing campaign. As Intel grapples with a chipset design flaw, arch-rival Advanced Micro Devices is touting the ability of its new AMD E-350 Accelerated Processsing Unit (APU) technology to generate a serious reduction in carbon footprint impact compared with previous generations of its technology.

Let’s be clear, these developments are in no way related, and I was going to write about this AMD development anyway. But Intel’s travails helped determined my timing.

Here’s the skinny. Specifically, according to the research that AMD has done, an AMD Fusion APU reference system offers a 40 percent reduction in carbon emissions, compared with a system using the AMD Athlon Neo II Dual Core processor with an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 graphics processor. The study looks at the entire lifecycle — from silicon fabrication into the use phases of the technology within an integrated system. Most of the green IT benefits come from the much lower amount of energy that the technology uses, compared to previous generations of AMD technology.

The E-350 APU is a single-chip processor that combines a dual-core CPU with a DirectX11 discrete-class graphics processing unit. This particular technology is targeted at portable PCs, a market that is expected to reach 233 million units this year. Here’s more about the whole AMD Fusion APU technology platform.

According to AMD’s carbon footprint study, if AMD Fusion chips were to make it into just one-third of of those portable products, approximately 500,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions could be saved annually. That’s the equivalent of the emissions from 95,160 passenger vehicles.

I know, I know, the greenness of one chip versus another probably is just one thing you consider when you’re choosing the processor for your new desktop or notebook. But given all that is going on for Intel right now, it might be time to step back and reconsider your other choices.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist with a passion for green technology and corporate sustainability issues.

Disclosure

Heather Clancy

Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I am also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I am covering in my blog.

Biography

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist with a passion for green technology and corporate sustainability issues. Her articles have appeared in Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, The International Herald Tribune and The New York Times. In a past corporate life, Heather was editor of Computer Reseller News, where she was a featured speaker about everything from software as a service to IT security to mobile computing.

Heather started her journalism life as a business writer with United Press International in New York. She holds a B.A. in English literature from McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, and has a thing for Lewis Carroll.

6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

A Worthwhile Mention on LCA but Progress Can Be Inhibitive
donnydo77@... Updated - 15th Feb 2011
Among many factors toward effective resource utilization while reducing waste and pollutants, it is worth mentioning both customer or operator use along with all that is involved with methods of production. Both of those really effect whether the item will be wasted or returned to the material stream for reutilization. Still, much of the e-waste generated is due to predetermined obsolescence or supposed progress espoused by dubious advertising that motivates impressionable people to consume without any restraint, regard, or critical thought toward whether the matter really provides an improvement on the tech already available or in use. It would be interesting whether a standard can be developed that can provide an accurate assessment fit for labeling on items such as that provided for food and even drugs. Although those methods are even in doubt at times but at least something can begin to help compare and differentiate from mere greenwashing tactics. Thanks for indicating what AMD is doing toward the effort.
I think I'll stick with my Intel. Period.
I like AMD now. When they were outpacing Intel with the Athlon 64 X2 vs. Intel's lackluster Pentium D, the Pentium D had something of a stable platform. When you got a Pentium D, you got an Intel 945 chipset along with it. It was a stable quantity, while AMD lacked a cohesive platform. Pop quiz: what chipset did AMD offer back then?

Now the tables are turned, and I think AMD holds a better position. Their top-end chips are priced fairly competitively to equivalently priced chips from Intel, but their top end doesn't reach Intel's top end. However, their last few chipset designs have won numerous wins with OEM's in low-end and mainstream systems, and the now have the Vision platform marketing campaign name along with the new integral component: the Fusion APU. Intel has the Atom: lacking modern multimedia performance, not being particularly powerful from a CPU perspective. Intel's Sandy Bridge is lacking both DX11 support, and multiple-GPU support ala Hybrid SLI or Hybrid CrossFireX, and is really only a measure of extending their lead in the high-end, high-markup CPU space. The chipset failure is a big black eye on Intel's newest platform, and one that mirrors the similar disaster that befell NVIDIA chipsets in the past couple of years which customers are still feeling the effects of. Intel and NVIDIA no longer have much of my faith. ATI is the lone man out (aside from VIA, but their stuff is nearly 3 years behind the curve). I like what I see coming from AMD: better platform, better value in CPU's. I'm curious to see what comes of Llano APU's later this year. From what I'm reading about the GPU cores, they'll feature an integrated GPU consisting of enough performance to equal one of today's Radeon 5650-or-so cards. That's, frankly, quite amazing, and that'll be shipping in APU's that price out about the same as today's Athlon II's. I can't wait to get my hands on a quad-core processor and 5650 combination in one chip - for about $100. Hell, I'm still waiting for the initial wave of E-series motherboards to start shipping.

Where does Intel come close to that kind of value for the mainstream?
0 Votes
+ -
@jcpt928
wizardb@... 31st Jan 2011
while your doing that remember if it wasn't for AMD you would still be running under a gig and would be paying Inhell a $1000+ for the privileged
0 Votes
+ -
500,000 metric tons of CO2 saved?
tora201 31st Jan 2011
Potentially, (if AMD sell 1/3 of new portables) "approximately 500,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions could be saved annually. That?s the equivalent of the emissions from 95,160 passenger vehicles."

One problem: in Beijing alone,2,000 new cars are added to the roads per day!
http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/shanghai/node23919/node23923/userobject22ai41863.html
AMD = Always Melting Devices. No thanks.
0 Votes
+ -
A Worthwhile Mention on LCA but Progress Can Be Inhibitive
donnydo77@... Updated - 15th Feb 2011
Among many factors toward effective resource utilization while reducing waste and pollutants, it is worth mentioning both customer or operator use along with all that is involved with methods of production. Both of those really effect whether the item will be wasted or returned to the material stream for reutilization. Still, much of the e-waste generated is due to predetermined obsolescence or supposed progress espoused by dubious advertising that motivates impressionable people to consume without any restraint, regard, or critical thought toward whether the matter really provides an improvement on the tech already available or in use. It would be interesting whether a standard can be developed that can provide an accurate assessment fit for labeling on items such as that provided for food and even drugs. Although those methods are even in doubt at times but at least something can begin to help compare and differentiate from mere greenwashing tactics. Thanks for indicating what AMD is doing toward the effort.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix