Report: Sales boom coming for energy and carbon management software

Report: Sales boom coming for energy and carbon management software

Summary: Groom Energy's latest report on the state of the carbon and energy management software marketplace suggests that sales leapt more than 400 percent in 2010, spurred by big-company purchases by the likes of Bayer, R.J.

SHARE:
2

Groom Energy's latest report on the state of the carbon and energy management software marketplace suggests that sales leapt more than 400 percent in 2010, spurred by big-company purchases by the likes of Bayer, R.J. Reynolds, Safeway and Wyndham Hotels.

"The 2011 Enterprise Energy and Carbon Accounting (EECA) Software Market -- A Buyer's Guide," also predicts growth of 300 percent over the next 12 months. Says the report's author, Groom's vice president of sustainability services, Paul Baier:

"During the past year, we've seen strong adoption of EECA solutions by large corporations with several leading vendors beginning to break away from the rest of the providers. Reflecting the market maturity, there were fewer venture capital investments and limited M&A activity as compared to previous years. With the new demand for energy consumption reporting along with carbon management, the vendor landscape has expanded and now comprises the EHS software providers, energy management firms and well-capitalized specialist firms."

As I've suggested a number of times, this is a category ripe for consolidation, especially as established enterprise resource planning software vendors like SAP, Oracle and Microsoft look toward this new category aspirationally. Some of the players to watch, according to Groom Energy's report, are Advantage IQ, Enablon, EnerNOC, Enviance, Hara, IHS, Johnson Controls, PE International, SAP and Summit Energy. In all, the report covers 75 of the software vendors angling for a piece of this market.

Based on other activity that I've seen, I think you'll see many of these companies and others ally themselves with the big technology services firms. One example is the deal announced this week by CA Technologies and Capgemini, which will see the latter create a sustainability data collection service based on CA's ecoSoftware application.

If you're in the market for software in this category, you should also consult these other articles:

Topics: Software, CXO, IT Employment

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • And the Rich get Richer Milking the Green Lie

    The real reason Cap & Trade is being foisted on the world is it creates a 13 trillion dollar commodity market for you guessed it: hot air. Finally politicians have found a way to put a price on their most abundant resource! And for politicians there is no downside as nothing has to be actually produced.
    The real beneficiaries are the rich special interest who will get wealthier setting up and trading in this new commodities market. But citizens will pay more taxes to operate new regulatory bureaucracies and more for goods as business passes the cost along.
    And all this is based on the premise that operating automobiles is resulting in global warming. Question: did Fred Flintstone?s truck fleet cause the last period of global warming or is global warming a cyclical event that is more affected by sun spot cycles. The Earth has had multiple tropical and glacial ages over the millennia. The most recent news is that the oceans of the world will be cooling for the next 25-30 years.
    Furthermore, it is my understanding that the most prevalent hot house gas is water vapor. Should citizens of earth try to stop the rain cycle?
    And if we are going to implement Cap and Trade who will decide what the optimal CO2 carrying capacity of Earth is?
    And there are questions about how to implement financial controls and reliably audit such a system. Will every person and business on the planet be issued C02 permits? Is the permit an asset a business can liquidate when it goes out of business? If a business in California goes out of business and sells its CO2 permit to a company in England, will a new company in California have to find another seller to open his business and replace lost jobs? After all, if there is an optimal CO2 carrying capacity then an increasing population of people and businesses means a lower standard of living and reduced CO2 allotment for each new person or business.
    Upon their death can Mom and Dad leave their CO2 permits to their children? Should Mom and Dad be limited to having two children?
    What about the countries that do not subscribe to Cap & Trade. Will multi-national companies export new construction and jobs to 3rd world non-subscribing countries? And the flipside, will the people of the Amazon miss out on new opportunities because an American company bought 1000s of acres to be left unused to acquire carbon sequestration credits.
    I am against Cap and Trade in the best of times but it is national suicide to consider implementing this costly new program when America's economy is teetering on the brink! The only Cap and Trade I will vote for is handing their Caps to politicians who vote yes on the issue and trading them in for new representatives!

    Germany fought WWII with gasoline made from coal. It is proven technology developed in 1917.

    America is the Saudi Arabia of coal with 1/4th of the deposits on the planet. The US could eliminate American dependence on foreign oil.

    And reducing America?s trade imbalance would keep money, technology and jobs here in America. It is estimated that every billion in trade deficit equals 13,000 US jobs lost. And we could quit sending billions to countries that sponsor terrorism.

    But coal is rich in CO2. Isn?t the timing interesting? The world is in recession, US unemployment figures are hovering around 10% and the EPA determines CO2 is a pollutant that must be regulated.

    SO WHO BENEFITS FROM CAP AND TRADE AND KEEPING AMERICAN COAL IN THE GROUND:

    The United States agreed to transfer jobs and technology to developing countries under INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT Algiers Declaration Algiers, Algeria, 4-6 March 1975

    In this context, they emphasize the necessity for the full implementation of the Programme of Action adopted by the United Nations General Assembly at its VI Special Session, and accordingly they emphasize the following requirements [excerpt from full declaration]

    "With regard to the depletable natural resources, as OPEC?s petroleum resources are, it is essential that the transfer of technology must be commensurate in speed and volume with the rate of their depletion, which is being accelerated for the benefit and growth of the economies of the developed countries"

    A major portion of the planned or new petrochemical complexes, oil refineries and fertilizer plants be built in the territories of OPEC Member Countries with the co-operation of industrialized nations for export purposes to the developed countries with guaranteed access for such products to the markets of these countries. [Excerpt from declaration] Read sections 10 and 11]
    Repeal
  • RE: Report: Sales boom coming for energy and carbon management software

    Regardless of the real reason behind global warming, whether cyclical or man-made there should still be a big push for carbon accounting software to become mandatory. Especially in the oil and gas sector, where greenhouse gas software like this: http://commengineering.com/commtracker-ems.html will keep tabs on what's really being emitted by whom.
    ComitSteve