The real-life energy battles are NOT fought in Congress
Summary: Here's another sign that whatever happens on energy in Congress, if anything, will be a sideshow: the EPA plans to reject a permit for a new coal mine in West Virginia. The planned mine would be yet another mountaintop removal.
Here's another sign that whatever happens on energy in Congress, if anything, will be a sideshow: the EPA plans to reject a permit for a new coal mine in West Virginia. The planned mine would be yet another mountaintop removal. That is a direct slap at Big Coal in the most coal-dependent state in America. No more: mine, baby, mine. This will be the first time such a permit has been rejected since the Clean Water Act was signed into law in 1972 by President Nixon. The EPA will veto a permit for the coal mine that was issued previously by the Corps of Engineers, never accused of being overly protective of the planet. This will surely end up in court and lengthly litigation, not to mention highly toxic fulminations in the U.S. Senate. Both Senators from West Virginia are Democrats and both are opposed to the EPA exercising its power this way in their state. The coal company execs are shocked, shocked, I tell you. WEST VIRGINIA COAL Here are some facts showing the importance of coal to the state's economy and politics. Like $2 billion in payrolls annually. West Virginia, dominated by the coal industry, is the second poorest state in the U.S. Sound familiar? We electricity users get cheap energy, West Virginians get screwed and the local environment gets trashed. And now the EPA has effrontery to break up this business cycle? [poll id="191"] GREEN OR GHASTLY? It's not simply coal that's controversial in West Virginia. Is a wind farm green or ghsatly? Local activists are now fighting against a planned mountaintop wind farm. Meanwhile other green activists are asking for a mountain top wind farm, instead of another coal mine blasting off the peak.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
humm, I don't think we have all the facts.
I'm gonna say that there's probably a lot of
details involved, and the EPA probably didn't
wake up one day, grow a green heart, and take
action just because they turned green one day.
And don't look now, but the Democrats aren't
exactly on the side of the EPA in this:
"West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin and U.S. Sen.
Jay Rockefeller, both Democrats, criticized the
EPA. Rockefeller called it "wrong and unfair" to
change the rules for a permit that already was
approved."
I'm gonna file this under "we don't have all the
facts." I don't think we have the whole story
here.
Ignore the facts
commercial and residential electric rates in the US. Their economy grew
at a rate of 2.5 percent in 2008, more than 3.5 times larger than the
national growth rate. It is one of the few US states living within their
means (for now), it actually had a surplus.
But no need for real jobs for the states 9.4% unemployment. Time to get
on the green funding bandwagon (if there's any room left). The future of
industry is subsidiaries, future of government deficits.
And this, folks, is the world Fuller wants
There are two lessons to learn from this: Environmentalism is anti-liberty. And the tyranny that makes you feel morally superior is the tyranny you embrace.
Spot on
screwed and the local environment gets trashed". I'm sure Americans will
prosper with more expensive, unreliable power and one more hill.
Nutjob
Righhhhht. Did you miss the part where GE dumped a
million pounds of PCBs into the Hudson River? By
your logic, pollution is freedom. Quite a nice
argument you've got there.
RE: The real-life energy battles are NOT fought in Congress