ie8 fix

Will there be a new energy and air pollution law?

By | November 2, 2009, 6:17am PST

Summary: Senate commitee battle over energy and emissions bill.

Current wisdom among the Beltway blatherers: it will take six Republican votes to get an energy bill through the Senate. That might be done if the bill becomes a big enough gift to energy corporations and other vested interests. The move to get bi-partisan support might even include an effort to get more nuclear power plants built in the U.S. Nuclear’s been political no-go territory now for three decades. Nuclear in the U.S. gets little support from most American enviornmental groups and is disliked by fossil fuel companies.

So far there’s been no overt Republican support for the Kerry-Boxer bill as it is now. The House last spring passed its own energy and climate change legislation (Waxman-Markey) but the Senate chose to start over.

There’s going to be a move by Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) to get the Senate version of an energy bill marked up and out of her committee this week. One of the provisions of the current Senate bill is cap and trade on greenhouse gas emissions. Yet, the seven Republican members have vowed to boycott any such committee work. And without two Repubs present, the committee cannot act under Senate rules. Will they suspend the rules? Is the Senate bill DOA? Boxer intends to move ahead with the bill tomorrow. Not clear what movement can be taken.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Harry Fuller

http://blogs.zdnet.com/green/?page_id=2

Biography

Harry Fuller

Harry Fuller is a media veteran, having spent decades in TV news in the San Francisco Bay Area. As GeneralManager of KPIX-TV (CBS) he founded one of the nation's first TV station websites in early 1995. He was News Direcor at TechTV when it was founded in 1998. In 2001 he moved to London to become Executive Producer for CNBC Europe. Four years later he returned to San Francisco as Executive Editor for CNET's news.com.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

In that case..
Economister 2nd Nov 2009
why don't you post links to some of that "resarch" so we can all have a look.

Is your research of the same quality as that which proves that the earth is 6000 to 10,000 years old?

0 Votes
+ -
NO
Tim Patterson 2nd Nov 2009
If we the People have anything to say about it this legislation will die a quick death.

"cap and trade" = the economic destruction of the US based on junk science.

This is the largest fraud ever perpetrated against the people of the World.

It's not about the environment. It's about power, money, and almost unlimited control over the lives of the people.

I sincerely hope you wake up someday Harry.
0 Votes
+ -
He is fully awake
Economister Updated - 2nd Nov 2009
It is the likes of you who for whatever reason refuse or are totally unable to realize that the world has changed and we either change with it or perish. I just hope it will not be too late, even for your sake.

Do yourself a favor and study up on a bit of economics, especially free goods. If you do it with any kind of open mind and sincerity, you may just come to realize that out past way of doing things will HAVE to change, period. We can do it willingly or we can fight it. If we fight it, the eventual outcome will probably be a LOT worse.

0 Votes
+ -
Yup
Tim Patterson 2nd Nov 2009
You provide alot of hyperbole but there is no 'there, there'.

The real, objective data contradicts the claims of the Hansens and Gores of the world. In fact with all of their manipulation of data, omissions of 'inconvenient' data, and continuing wild claims which never come to pass, this religion of yours and Harry's and Gore's is fundamentally dishonest.

Clearly, unlike yourself, I have researched this for over ten years now. Any objective person soon realizes the fraud being perpetrated on the World.
0 Votes
+ -
In that case..
Economister 2nd Nov 2009
why don't you post links to some of that "resarch" so we can all have a look.

Is your research of the same quality as that which proves that the earth is 6000 to 10,000 years old?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix