ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

And Windows 7 is to be called ... Windows 7

By | October 13, 2008, 4:21pm PDT

Microsoft puts us out all of out misery as to what the next version of Windows will be called - Windows 7.

And, as you probably know, since we began development of the next version of the Windows client operating system we have been referring to it by a codename, “Windows 7.”  But now is a good time to announce that we’ve decided to officially call the next version of Windows, “Windows 7.”

While I know there have been a few cases at Microsoft when the codename of a product was used for the final release, I am pretty sure that this is a first for Windows. You might wonder about the decision.

The decision to use the name Windows 7 is about simplicity. Over the years, we have taken different approaches to naming Windows.  We’ve used version numbers like Windows 3.11, or dates like Windows 98, or “aspirational” monikers like Windows XP or Windows Vista.  And since we do not ship new versions of Windows every year, using a date did not make sense.  Likewise, coming up with an all-new “aspirational” name does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve, which is to stay firmly rooted in our aspirations for Windows Vista, while evolving and refining the substantial investments in platform technology in Windows Vista into the next generation of Windows.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Actually...
bojan@... 3rd Nov 2008
Windows 3.xx = 3.xx
Windows for workgroups = NT 3.5.xxx
Windows 95 = 4.0.xx
Windows NT 4 = NT 4.0.xx
Windows 98 = 4.10.xx
Windows ME = 4.90.xx (End of the road for non-NT)
Windows 2000 = NT 5.0.xx
Windows XP = NT 5.1.xx
Windows 2003 = NT 5.2.xx
Windows Vista/2008 = NT 6.0.xx
Windows 7 = NT 6.1.xx (Yes that's right)
0 Votes
+ -
That's just crazy enough to work
TheMostToysWins Updated - 13th Oct 2008
I hope that with the simplistic approach used in the naming of Windows 7. They use the same approach on end-user experience. For the 1% of us that will argue security this and compatibility that. As for the other 99% of the user base (my mother)they will be able to power on their machines and see pics of her grand kids with little or no trouble at all. Confirm\Deny.
0 Votes
+ -
And this new naming scheme will last....
Hallowed are the Ori 13th Oct 2008
...until next time, when they'll abandon yet another naming scheme and decide to call the new version something stupid, like "Windows Supercalafragalisticexpialodocius", or "Windows ∞"
0 Votes
+ -
How about .... (tada) Closed Windows
ron.cleaver@... 13th Oct 2008
I was really losing sleep over this. Now I can relax!
0 Votes
+ -
So, it's official....
MGP2 13th Oct 2008
Vista II will be called Windows 7. Hmmmmmm....
0 Votes
+ -
Clueless Microsoft
croberts 13th Oct 2008
I'm waiting for the "Windows 7 Deadly Sins" parodies. Here is my speculative list:

1) UAC still poorly done

2) Bloated codebase. XP was like 40 million lines, Vista like 55, and Lucky-7 will probably be 77 million lines. I bet Microsoft will release it on BluRay.

3) No real-time support. Any takers on whether MS will be able to finally introduce true realtime scheduling into Windows 7? Kinda hard to make a media player without it. Oh wait, that's why Vista RTM was hardcoded to grab CPU capacity from the network subsystem.

4)Inept multi-processor support. Anyone else think you should be able to permanently set processor affinity simply by right-clicking on an EXE and setting it? For that matter, windows components should automatically be set to "spread out" over various cores if available.

(For those using 32 bit windows, you can use "imagecfg" to permanently set affinity)

5) "Pin" arbitrary windows to stay on top. Come on, if Linux can do it....

6) Better included apps. Seriously. Just buy Paint.Net, polish it up slightly, and include the damn thing with the OS.

7) Open up terminal services to allow at least five sessions.

Considering it was possible to add terminal services to Windows 2000 workstation using the NTSWITCH hacker tool, it's pathetic this is still promoted as some sort of feature. This is Linux's single best ability.

(And no, I shouldn't have to buy a home server for this)
0 Votes
+ -
nah, too complicated - try "lucky number 7"
eggmanbubbagee@... Updated - 13th Oct 2008
Tech writers will be helpless to avoid the 'is 7 MS's lucky number' theme - and since Vista was trashed it's now time to flip flop from the loser theme to the winner theme - shallow? Why yes, yes it is. But you watch.
0 Votes
+ -
7 ???
scottmat Updated - 15th Oct 2008
How can this one be called 7. Shouldn't it be 10?
windows 3.xx ... 3
windows 95 ..... 4
windows 98 ..... 5
windows ME ..... 6
windows 2000 ... 7
XP ............. 8
Vista .......... 9
7 .............. 10
0 Votes
+ -
Actually...
bojan@... 3rd Nov 2008
Windows 3.xx = 3.xx
Windows for workgroups = NT 3.5.xxx
Windows 95 = 4.0.xx
Windows NT 4 = NT 4.0.xx
Windows 98 = 4.10.xx
Windows ME = 4.90.xx (End of the road for non-NT)
Windows 2000 = NT 5.0.xx
Windows XP = NT 5.1.xx
Windows 2003 = NT 5.2.xx
Windows Vista/2008 = NT 6.0.xx
Windows 7 = NT 6.1.xx (Yes that's right)
0 Votes
+ -
I guess cos they have 7.0 for PPC
they are naming it Windows 7 for the PC
happy

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix