Android handsets top hardware failures list
Summary: Android device returns costing mobile operators a staggering $2 billion per year.
Android handsets are more likely to suffer from hardware faults than Windows Phone 7, iOS or BlackBerry handsets, according to research published by wireless experience management experts WDS.
WDS examined more than 600,000 support calls received over the past 12 months and found that Android handset hardware failures are twice as common as for iOS devices, with 14% of all Android support calls related to hardware failures. By comparison, only 11% of Windows Phone 7 calls were because of hardware failures. iOS did even better, with only 7% being down to problems with the hardware. BlackBerry handsets come out on top, with only 6% of the support calls being related to hardware failure.
Hardware-related support calls:
- Android: 14%
- Windows Phone 7: 11%
- iOS: 7%
- BlackBerry: 6%
WDS also offers a breakdown of hardware failures, which makes interesting reading:
Source: WDS
Source: WDS
WDS estimates that Android device returns alone is costing mobile operators a staggering $2 billion per year, with each handset return costing operators up to $130. While this might seem bad, Android does have a advantage over the competition, and that is that it is deployment across multiple hardware reference designs and component variants. This means that the Android brand itself is unlikely to be associated with a specific hardware issues.
The report also looks at the importance of handling hardware issues properly:
When hardware failures do occur, operators must take care to protect their consumers against potentially unbalanced and negative attention. Loyal consumers are both an asset to a brand and a threat to its competitors through the display of ‘oppositional loyalty'. This is the term used to describe the expression of unfavorable bias toward an opposing brand and its consumers (for example, Apple vs Android ‘fanboys'). The smartphone category has become a hypercompetitive environment and the prevalence of brand rivalry both within the industry and amongst consumers has formed a promising hook for media attention. Where an underlying theme of hardware failures can be linked to a specified brand, rival brands and consumer groups very quickly leverage this opportunity to launch an attack.
In other words, the 'fanboys' can make or break a handset.
On the subject of fragmentation, WDS believes that Android fragmentation 'has driven additional cost into many operators' businesses, either through support costs or product returns' and that 'the only way to truly combat both hardware and software version fragmentation would be to slow down the pace of development and/or mandate tighter deployment requirements.'
Full report can be found here [registration required].
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Talkback
I found this almost meaningless.
As it is, did WP7 only have 50 support calls while BB or iOS had 400,000? Without that, this does not mean much.
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
Taker a look at the Guardian website tech section where there is a bit more detail. Call volumes overall were roughly in line with market share other than for WP7. The $2bn figure seems pretty speculative.
Missing info
iPhones do not cost back to the carrier but to Apple.
Based on this the iOS numbers are inaccurate.
Do any other phones follow the Apple return guidelines?
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
More than repair costings that's has a rotten core
Iphone's had a hude problem (might still have) with phone casings. Yet the stats list andriod as worst in class. Ha. Most iphone user's nearly had cracked cases until recently. Where's this data in the stats??
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
I disagree that they do not go hand in hand
A large part of the problem would seem that while the iOS, WP7, and Blackberry OS's are installed on mid range to high end hardware, Android, since it is a free OS, is routinely placed on low end hardware (the free, to $29 handsets) in an attempt to make money from the sales of phones.
And the less expensive phones are likely more prone to breakage and manufacturig issues.
That, coupled with deficiencies in the OS (as all of the OS's have some issue) may exacerbate internal problems with the low end hardware, where the said OS is unable to compensate for the hardware limitations.
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
Yes, Android tends to be on cheaper phones (as well as some expensive ones), but it's not Android that causing the hardware issues. A high end Android phone could be better than any other on the market; it's misleading to imply that Android is at fault.
That's why I feel it's meaningless.
Heads we win, tails you lose
We can bet that the carriers are keeping track of which hardware causes them the most grief; they're out looking for replacements now.
True, the carriers will stop selling phones with issues
I had one screen issue right out of the box, but it was under warranty and so it was replaced for free. Im hoping ICS is a big improvement...if not, then I may have to go with Apple...
Interesting, but only goes to show what I've been saying
Pagan jim
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
The difference is that people with Windows PC's know that they are running Windows....but most people with Android phones don't even know what 'Android' is....to them it isn't an 'Android phone', it's an HTC or Samsung or Motorola or whatever...
Perhaps at this time but it is early yet.
Pagan jim
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
Lack of intelligence lead to dumb comments
Apparently you are too dumb to understand basic info. The percentages of failure shown are based on the total per OS, not on market share.
Even a kid in 5th grade understands that simple fact .......
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
It is not '14% of all returns' it's '14% if all Android phones', there's the difference....
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list
This is just one thing missing that should be in all phones for all platforms. Being already familiar with the process regardless of manufacturer would cut down support/returns. Most android phones (not droid's, htc's) need something like Rom Manager/ClockWork mod installed for any kind of recovery feature at all. Better hope they know before something happens or oops, off to the manufacturer...
With apple products you just plug it in and hit restore unless there is a hardware failure and the device just isn't detected. I'm not saying it has to be exactly like apple's process, droid's and htc's have the feature built in with button combonations but to the average user not so tech savvy, how are they supposed to know? See my point?
RE: Android handsets top hardware failures list