ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Apple issues "stealth" anti-malware security update

By | June 18, 2010, 5:09am PDT

Summary: It’s clear that Apple really doesn’t want users to think about security that much. So much so that the Cupertino giant is resorting to stealthy security updates.

It’s clear that Apple really doesn’t want users to think about security that much. So much so that the Cupertino giant is resorting to stealthy security updates.

This from security firm Sophos:

Although there is no mention of it that we could find in Apple’s release notes for Mac OS X 10.6.4, or the accompanying security bulletin, Apple has updated XProtect.plist - the rudimentary file that contains elementary signatures of a handful of Mac threats - to detect what they call HellRTS.

Did you know that Mac OS already has a very basic built-in virus scanner? I’m pretty sure that most Mac users don’t know this.

HellRTS is your standard malware fayre - it can be used to send spam, access your files, take screenshots of what you are doing and copy your clipboard. But Apple don’t want users to know this:

Unfortunately, many Mac users seem oblivious to security threats which can run on their computers. And that isn’t helped when Apple issues an anti-malware security update like this by stealth, rather than informing the public what it has done. You have to wonder whether their keeping quiet about an anti-malware security update like this was for marketing reasons. “Shh! Don’t tell folks that we have to protect against malware on Mac OS X!”

Apple doesn’t want users to think about security, but in this day and age that’s hardly a realistic approach. Given that threats can evolve on a minute to minute basis, ad hoc updates like this aren’t going to cut it for long.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

64
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Apple issues
vamike999 30th Jun 2010
Apple also gets viruses. I know i got one. I would check this out out http://www.tapdrive.com/ they have really figured this all out. I got one and have not got a virus since
0 Votes
+ -
Just feed the ignorance.....
OhTheHumanity 18th Jun 2010
That is the Mac user about security. They convince non-technical people that they are safe as safe can be and they usually don't have the will or the knowledge to find out the truth, because most times they don't care about the truth. As long as it sells products they don't care.
0 Votes
+ -
truth
banned from zdnet 18th Jun 2010
@OhTheHumanity
mac os x doesn't have a built in virus scanner, because there are no viruses for mac os x. what it does have however is a rudimentary built in TROJAN scanner, looking for malicious code in programs that a user might want to install.

is it really so hard to ask from a tech blogger to have at least the slightest basic understanding of the topic he is writing about? cheez.
0 Votes
+ -
@banned from zdnet; mac os x doesn't have a built in virus scanner, because there are no viruses for mac os x. what it does have however is a rudimentary built in TROJAN scanner,

It is well accepted that the term "virus" can refer to all forms of malware.
0 Votes
+ -
thank you
davebarnes 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet,
Thank you for being pedantic.
It seems to be the only way to [maybe] keep the tech bloggers on the correct path.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
RedRoman 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet
"mac os x doesn't have a built in virus scanner, because there are no viruses for mac os x"

Really? A simple google search allowed me to find at least one true Mac virus for OS X which has been around since at least 2006. "OSX/Leap-A or OSX/Oompa-A" sound familiar? Take a look on the site securemac.com.

Are you so insecure about your platform ideology that you actually have to lie? Argue your points all you want, but a lie is a lie is a lie.
0 Votes
+ -
malware
banned from zdnet 18th Jun 2010
@ye
no, if you had any clue, you would know that malware is the umbrella term for different kind of threats (and not the same as a virus, the virus however is a form of malware).

there are three different kind of malware subsets:
1. there are worms and viruses
2. there are exploits
3. there are social scams (like trojans and phishing)

virus and worms are by far the most dangerous form of malware, infecting millions of windows systems and costing billions every year (macs and linux systems unaffected)
0 Votes
+ -
OSX/Leap-A
banned from zdnet 18th Jun 2010
@RedRoman
is not a mac virus but a trojan. The program required the user to download, decompress and execute the file then enter their admin password to cause any damage. thus it is a trojan (a program that pretends to be something else). trojans have been around on the mac forever and there are still a lot of trojans out there but no viruses or worms.

again: a trojan is a malicious program that a user has to individually download, install and authorise by password. it is a kind of social scam, like phishing. a virus or worm on the other hand replicates itself with no user interaction or even knowledge and thus can infect millions of systems via a network in no time.
@banned from zdnet: ...as I said it is generally used to describe all malware:

"The term "virus" is also commonly but erroneously used to refer to other types of malware, including but not limited to adware and spyware programs that do not have the reproductive ability."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virus

Stop with the pedantry. We all know you're desperate to somehow have a point but everyone is seeing through it.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
bobiroc 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet

"no, if you had any clue, you would know that malware is the umbrella term for different kind of threats (and not the same as a virus, the virus however is a form of malware)."

Go to the computer users and not the tech users. Just the ones that use a computer for their job or at home and to them the term virus is a general term. They do not know all the categories like trojans, spyware, adware, scareware, worms, and the list goes on. That is what he is referring too. The term virus has become general to most just like kleenex is a general term for facial tissue or Xerox is a general term for making copies.

Now quit trying to nit pick just to defend your own ignorance.
0 Votes
+ -
bs
banned from zdnet 18th Jun 2010
@bobiroc
using the word virus erroneously is a smoke screen by the windows defenders to pretend that all platforms are exposed to the same kind of threats. whereas the reality is that only windows users are threatened by virus and worms, by far the most dangerous threat out there on the internet.

yes, some mac users lack the common sense not to download programs from websites they can't trust but no os can protect a user from himself (otherwise you couldn't install a single program on your system). should apple do more to talk about the threat of installing trojans on your systems? yes, maybe. do mac users need anti-virus software or are they exposed to viruses and worms? no.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
Jeremy-UK 18th Jun 2010
@bobiroc It's still the wrong term. As this is a tech story, it should use the correct technical terms. If they really are often misunderstood, and the author fears that such misunderstanding will mean he won't be understood then he should define them at the head of the story.

Just because it's a common mistake doesn't stop it from being a mistake.
0 Votes
+ -
erroneously
banned from zdnet Updated - 18th Jun 2010
@ye

you gotta be kidding! you understand the word "erroneously"?
0 Votes
+ -
Changes nothing.
ye Updated - 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet: You can sit here and attack me while trying to make a point. It changes nothing. Plenty of people use the word virus to include all forms of malware. That doesn't make it correct (as the word erroneously makes clear). But that doesn't mean people don't do it.

So please, do us a favor and stop the pedantry because we all see through your lame attempt at trying to make a point. The sooner you accept this the sooner you'll stop looking desperate.
0 Votes
+ -
point
banned from zdnet 18th Jun 2010
@ye
yes people like you use the word virus erroneously. i get it. was that your point? your incompetence?
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Apparently you don't.
ye 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet: yes people like you use the word virus erroneously. i get it.

Otherwise you wouldn't make post after post after post trying to defend the Mac by being pedantic about the use of the word virus.
0 Votes
+ -
pedantic
banned from zdnet 18th Jun 2010
@ye
using the word virus correctly is pedantic?
but using it erroneously is somehow ok.
wow, that's an argument.

you're either totally ignorant or spreading FUD deliberately.
0 Votes
+ -
The way you are it is.
ye 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet: using the word virus correctly is pedantic?

Like it or not people use the word virus to cover all types of malware. Your insistence of the definition of the word and not the discussion at hand is an act of obsfucation.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't shoot the messenger.
ye 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet: yes people like you use the word virus erroneously.

Unless you can show where I've done so I'm merely conveying how other people use it.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
WinTard 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet

Stop spreading your BS+FUD around! Apple is vulnerable to malware. PERIOD. Don't try to dress it up or obfuscate the term with semantics.

Anyway I don't expect you to understand; you look like, sound like and smell like a paid for shill bought for by Apple.

But other rational people will notice...

~~~~~~~~~~
Ignorance is trainable - Stupidity is terminal.
~ Jerry Fleming

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
~ Benjamin Franklin
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
Jeremy-UK 18th Jun 2010
@OhTheHumanity You think? Given the fact that there isn't (yet) a widespread problem with malware on the Mac, this seems like a pragmatic approach. They user doesn't need to do anything, the albeit basic protection "just happens".

Until there is a serious problem this solution seems quite reasonable. I'd agree if the situation were to significantly change then this approach isn't going to work, but until then it seems find. Probably better than something the user has to opt-in to.

The common understanding is that Mac users don't understand security, however I have clients who have Macs, in general they are no less aware than clients using Windows. Subjectively they seem to be more diligent about applying Apple's patches, than clients running Windows are with Microsoft's patches.

I'm not sure if this is because of the higher prominence given to applying patches on the Mac (for people unfamiliar with Mac OS X it's in the "Apple Menu", shown in all non-fullscreen applications, and is the second option).
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
CaptainCharlesBandersnatch Updated - 19th Jun 2010
Can't we all just get along? I mean, my God, you guys need to behave like normal homo sapiens. I was enjoying my coffee until I read the whole MacAppleOS-virus-is-not-a-virus-but-it-has-a-Trojancondom-blah,blah,blah. Pedandicschmantics, shaddup already and just focus on the common knowledge that Macs ala Apple mode are better hardware boxes with built-in features. And, yes, virus, trojans, malware, et al need to be taken seriously and addressed with rapid response defense (as anything worth defending). I'm going to stop here with this conceptual framework because I'm not going to allow my ego to get in the way (apparently as some people have). Didn't you learn in school? It's called a "thesis," so get one. And since we are all homo sapiens, I expect you homos to put out more qualified statements in a fair and rational way.

By the way, this reply was addressed to all parties. I ain't taking sides. Next argument will be schoolgirl juvenile pedantics over whether a Barbie doll is really a doll or a toy or she is really a Barbara and not a Barbie No wonder Ken is gay.
0 Votes
+ -
All software vendors try this and fail. Customers will demand transparency and selectivity once Apple drops a p-bomb that leaves their macs nonfunctional.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
gtdworak 18th Jun 2010
Say what you will, but ask any Mac user when's the last time they had to deal with a Malware, Virus, Spyware or Trojan attack. I'm sure the answer will be close to zero. Apple must be doing something right.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
Pete "athynz" Athens 18th Jun 2010
@gtdworak Perhaps but by your logic then Microsoft must be doing something right as well considering I have not had to deal with any of those on my work PCs or my home PCs all running Windows 7... But I also know that there ARE indeed threats that could incapacitate those PCs just as there are threats that could incapacitate Macs - just because it hasn't happened to you does not mean it cannot happen.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
gtdworak 18th Jun 2010
@athynz
that's you, ask 10 of your friends and my guess over half of them have had to deal with some form of malicious attack.
0 Votes
+ -
yup, once again cue the double standards...
SonofaSailor 19th Jun 2010
@athynz
"... but ask any Mac user when's the last time they had to deal with a Malware, Virus, Spyware or Trojan attack."

To which a Windows user replies " I have not had to deal with any of those on my work PCs or my home PCs all running Windows 7... "

Your reply? "that's you, ask 10 of your friends and my guess over half of them have had to deal with some form of malicious attack. "

Why is it necessary to only poll one Mac user, but we have to poll 10 Windows users?

Are you scared if we ask more than one Mac user we will find someone who's been owned? or (more likely), is your bias just getting in the way of you making an actual point?
0 Votes
+ -
Ahh..keep living the dream
bobiroc 18th Jun 2010
and for every 1 Windows computer that gets attacked by similar infections there are thousands that run virus/trojan/spyware/malware free day in and day out.
0 Votes
+ -
0 Votes
+ -
The point is not...
rapson 18th Jun 2010
@gtdworak

...the presence or absence of malware, but rather the "stealth" manner of patching. Microsoft was thoroughly criticized for doing such things, and Apple should be also.
0 Votes
+ -
Nobody is questioning anyone you know.....
OhTheHumanity 18th Jun 2010
@gtdworak
The simple point is that a Mac can get infected. They are patching all kinds of holes that could be exploited so why patch when it can't be infected. Your argument is the same old washed up one that is feeding the ignorance and making people more vulnerable that believe you. Linux, Mac, Windows, they all need protection.
0 Votes
+ -
infection
banned from zdnet Updated - 18th Jun 2010
@OhTheHumanity
no, a mac can't get infected by viruses or worms because there aren't any. none, zero. thus no infection possible.

a hacker can however exploit flaws in mac os x software programs (safari, flash etc.) to hack your single machine. this is called an exploit, not an infection.

and then there are trojans. theses are programs a user has to single handily download from the web, install and give his password as permission. from a semantic standpoint this isn't an infection either, but of course dangerous.

to make it short, on mac os x you have:
- no viruses or worms (by far the biggest threat on the internet)
- exploits, yes (a hacker can hack your machine if the hole isn't closed as soon as possible)
- trojans, yes (but you have to install the malicious programm on your computer yourself)
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
You've got that backwards.
ye 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet: no viruses or worms (by far the biggest threat on the internet)

It's actually the opposite. Trojans are the most prevalent form of malware on the Internet today.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
bobiroc 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet

"no, a mac can't get infected by viruses or worms because there aren't any. none, zero. thus no infection possible"

See what you and many blind mac zealots seem to forget is that most users dump viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, etc.... into one big category. I believe that is why the term Malware is often used today to describe all forms of malicious software. You, like many others, dismiss the fact that there are none (as you say) spreading in the wild that you are ultimately safe and secure. Also you seem to forget that much of the malware on the Windows side also requires some sort of user action. Viruses do not just sneak into windows like they did 10 years ago. If you have the FREE Windows firewall, a Free anti-malware program like Security Essentials then you have to do something like download an infected file usually from a P2P program or some questionable site, click on a link in an email or on your social network site, visit "questionable" or unsafe websites, or open/access an infected file from some other outside source like a flash drive.

So while you have less of a chance of being compromised on a Mac (for now) the threat is still there and that is the ultimate point. But you will continue to defend MacOS with your blind and ignorant ways and people like me will just reserve the right to say "We told you so"
0 Votes
+ -
trojans
banned from zdnet 18th Jun 2010
@ye
no, not true. a virus spreads without knowledge or interaction of a user via a network (lan or internet) and can infect thousands, even millions of systems in a short time. a trojan has to be installed individually user by user thus is spreads very slowly, affects less systems and is therefore a lesser threat.
0 Votes
+ -
And this changes what I said how?
ye Updated - 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet: no, not true. a virus spreads without knowledge or interaction of a user via a network (lan or internet) and can infect thousands, even millions of systems in a short time. a trojan has to be installed individually user by user thus is spreads very slowly, affects less systems and is therefore a lesser threat.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
bobiroc 18th Jun 2010
@banned from zdnet

"no, not true. a virus spreads without knowledge or interaction of a user via a network (lan or internet) and can infect thousands, even millions of systems in a short time. a trojan has to be installed individually user by user thus is spreads very slowly, affects less systems and is therefore a lesser threat. "

Thanks for the lesson but many people that visit or post on this site know the differences amongst the malware so you constantly repeating yourself (forcing us to repeat ourselves) about the differences is not the issue here. You can rest easy on your belief that you are secure but it is 2010 and most of the computers (no matter what OS) being compromised are being infected with malware types that users have to initiate or by brute force and you cannot deny that. These methods are more effective in stealing your information or conning people out their money and information. Once these initiated infections get on they are the ones that usually download the viruses so I fail to see why you are being so adamant in trying to justify yourself by explaining the technical differences amongst the malware. We know the term virus is misused even amongst people in IT related professions which is why I made the general term comment and related it to terms like Kleenex and Xerox. But at the end of the day an infection is still an infection no matter what the type of malware it may be.

I think you just keep this charade up to try and do what Apple has been trying to do and to fool people into thinking MacOS is infallible but the hard truth is it can be compromised just as easily if someone wants to take the time to do so or if the operator of the computer does not practice safe computing. I cannot think of an infected Windows computer out of the the thousands I work on between my job or personally for family, friends and clients that has had an infection that just magically found it's way on the computer. Every one of them was the result of one of the following scenerios.

A. Been browsing unsafely with no protection on the computer and/or going to unsafe sites to get their porn fix, gambling fix, or looking to pirate media and software

B. Using a P2P program to pirate media and software. And then trying to install, use, or run those media files and software.

C. Clicking on links or downloading a file in suspicious emails that they believed was from their friends/family or a trusted institution they may do business with.

D. Brought in on a flash drive or cd from an infected computer that was doing either A, B, or C.

If you cannot comprehend that then you just need to be quiet.
0 Votes
+ -
clueless
banned from zdnet 18th Jun 2010
@bobiroc
the problem with you windows morons is that you don't have any idea what you are talking about and yet you shout and scream and make a even better fool of yourself. again (i have not yet given up on you):

a mac system can only be compromised by PROGRAMS or exploits. not by the files you mentioned. no matter where they come from. any music, video or whatever file is perfectly fine to run on a mac. it can't harm the computer. no matter where it comes from. a website, a stick, an email. it can totally harm a windows system. the file runs and installs a virus in the background without the user ever knowing.

that's the fundamental difference in security between unix systems (linux, mac) and a windows system. no file can harm a mac. only a PROGRAM that i chose to install and give my password for authentification can. do you understand the magnitude of that fundamental difference?

viruses and worms infecting thousand or million of windows systems in a short time on one hand and trojans that have to be installed one by one on the other hand.

again, all the media files you are so afraid of can't cause any harm to any mac.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
"Clueless"...yes, banned, you are
SonofaSailor 19th Jun 2010
@banned

you mention 'fundamental differences between unix systems (linux, mac) and windows systems...' First: Linux Is Not UniX

Second, the files that Bobiroc was referring to being downloaded from p2p and installing malware on computers aren't audio or video files, their presented that way, they're named that way to facilitate someone downloading and opening...but it's not as if it's a true mp3 with a virus embedded. In reality, it's an executable that the user is unknowingly downloading then opening, thinking they just downloaded their favorite song. So, no, Windows systems aren't susceptible to audio, video content either, just like your beloved Mac.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
bobiroc 19th Jun 2010
@SonofaSailor

Thank you... at least someone got what I was referring to. Banned just likes to nit pick and try to justify his BS by spitting out more BS and twisting words to suit his own agenda. The fact remains all OSes and software can be compromised IF a person or group wants to take time to exploit it. The methods may differ slightly but no OS and no software is safe which is why the user/operator or manager of the system(s) must take steps to ensure the systems are as safe as possible. Maybe that is why I have not had a virus/piece of malware on any of my personal PCs in over 10 years and the 2500 or so I manage daily (Macs and PCs and Linux) have not been either. The ONLY time a piece of malware has found it's way on my systems is when it was brought in from the outside and when you deal with roughly 10,000 high school students and teachers every day that is bound to happen but it is always stopped at the desktop and either cleaned by the local security software or quickly remedied.
0 Votes
+ -
The funny thing is
Michael Kelly 18th Jun 2010
that I think most people (both pro- and anti-Apple) would appreciate anything Apple does to protect their users' security.
0 Votes
+ -
i think you need to change the name of your blog
g_keramidas@... 18th Jun 2010
add "apple... " or something into the title. out of the last 32 posts, 23 are apple related. at least if you changed the name a lot of us could just skip reading the blog.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
Loverock Davidson 18th Jun 2010
Apple must be hung! They cannot and should not do stealth updates without the user's approval! This same logic applied to other operating systems so lets apply it to Apple as well. I can't believe Apple is doing this. The users have a right to know about these updates and should get the customer's consent first!
0 Votes
+ -
#3 troll wakes up!
frabjous 18th Jun 2010
@Loverock Davidson ...and contributes nothing, as usual
0 Votes
+ -
Yas, yas..from "Think Different" to...
Feldwebel Wolfenstool 18th Jun 2010
"DON'T THINK."
0 Votes
+ -
Yawn!!!
mlindl 18th Jun 2010
The religion of technogeeks is never shocking. In some religions, eating pork is oh, so bad, although nobody ever gets hurt from it. In other religions, sex outside of marriage is just the most heinous thing! Still in others, don't pray 5 times per day and you will certainly go to hell.

Apple has something built into its software to protect the user from nefarious things. Because Microsoft does or doesn't do something doesn't mean Apple have to play by the same rules. Lots of security is built into things you use every day without them telling you about it.

Purism is just dogma. Apple buyers don't care what's under the hood. They want computers that work. That's what they get.

No one does it better than Apple. Big, soft and lazy is never as good as small, solid and hardworking, right?
0 Votes
+ -
The issue being...
ye 18th Jun 2010
@mlindl: Apple has something built into its software to protect the user from nefarious things. Because Microsoft does or doesn't do something doesn't mean Apple have to play by the same rules. Lots of security is built into things you use every day without them telling you about it.

...the double standard by Mac advocates. When Microsoft has done something similar the Mac advocates were all up in arms vilifying Microsoft for not disclosing the update. When Apple engages in the same behavior what do we see? We see the following:

Apple buyers don't care what's under the hood. They want computers that work. That's what they get.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
bobiroc 18th Jun 2010
@ye

Except when Macs do not work then the blame is shifted off onto the user or something other than Apple. Then they wonder why many people think Apple and their die hard fans are smug, arrogant, and act like a cult. In their minds Apple can do no wrong.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
EmperiorEric 18th Jun 2010
Is it really so bad that Apple updates their security? That doesn't mean someone exploited it and Apple is trying to keep it hush. It means Apple found a mistake before anyone else and is fixing it before anything happens. No one cares about a single text file getting some changes to improve security thats why they don't say anything. We care that our computer is secure and that we aren't dealing with **** on Windows. At least Mac updates security, where as Windows releases security updates once a week and never manages to close a single hole. I wish everyone would quit trying to treat Apple like a giant dictator controlled monopoly. They have been doing the same business for 25 years and now that they are kicking ass with their iOS everyone wants to complain about their tactics and how they take care of their customers which btw, are happier than any other tech company's right now.
0 Votes
+ -
@EmperiorEric: nt
0 Votes
+ -
Indeed, Why...
CowLauncher 18th Jun 2010
is it so excepted that the user of a product needs to be so intimately involved with it's internal function? The world of the personal computer is so strange and different from any other electronic product. How did this happen? That idea is obsolete.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple issues
vamike999 30th Jun 2010
Apple also gets viruses. I know i got one. I would check this out out http://www.tapdrive.com/ they have really figured this all out. I got one and have not got a virus since

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix