Best gaming graphic cards

Summary: A number of graphics cards at various price points that feature both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs.

Question from the Hardware 2.0 mailbox:

"I'm planning to upgrade my existing gaming PC. I've got the motherboard and processor figured out -- I'm going for the Intel Core i7-3770 Ivy Bridge processor paired with an ASUS Sabertooth Z77 motherboard -- but I'm stuck when it comes to the graphics card. Any suggestions?"

As far as the CPU and motherboard goes, you've made some very good choices. Those components will make for a solid foundation to a gaming PC.

When it comes to which graphics cards to choose, what you should go for depends a lot on your budget. Since you're buying a $320 processor and $230 motherboard, I'm assuming that your budget isn't that limited. However, what I'll do is list a number of graphics cards at various price points that feature both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs and let you choose what fits in best with your budget.

Best gaming graphic cards


Image Gallery: Best gaming graphic cards Image Gallery: Charge Image Gallery: Charge

$99 budget-end

Depending on when you last bought a graphics card, you might be quite surprised to learn that you can pick up a very decent graphics card for under $100. Sure, they're not going to let you crank up all the in-game graphics settings to maximum on any of the modern titles, but these cards are still going to give you an excellent gaming experience.

Here are two cards worth taking a look at.

NVIDIA: ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB

  • Core Clock: 822 MHz
  • Shader Clock: 1644 MHz
  • CUDA Cores: 96

Price: $95.

AMD: XFX HD-675X-ZDFC Radeon HD 6750 1GB

  • Core Clock: 700 MHz
  • Stream Processors: 720 Stream Processors
  • Effective Memory Clock: 1000 MHz (4.0 Gbps)

Price: $90.

$250 performance

By bumping up the budget to $250 we can start to look at some serious GPU power. This is the sort of hardware that will have no problems handling modern games cranked pretty much to the max.

Here are two cards I think are worth considering.

AMD: XFX Double D HD-695X-CDFC Radeon HD 6950 2GB

  • Core Clock: 800 MHz
  • Stream Processors: 1408 Stream Processors
  • Effective Memory Clock: 1250 MHz (5.0 Gbps)

Price: $230.

NVIDIA: EVGA 01G-P3-1561-AR GeForce GTX 560 Ti FPB (Fermi) 1GB

  • Core Clock: 850 MHz (overclocked compared to 822 MHz for reference hardware)
  • Shader Clock: 1700 MHz (overclocked compared to 1645 MHz for reference hardware)
  • CUDA Cores: 384

Price: $230.

$500 high-end

NVIDIA: Galaxy 67NPH6DV5ZJX GeForce GTX 670 2GB

  • Core Clock: 915 MHz
  • Boost Clock: 980 MHz
  • CUDA Cores: 1344

Price: $420.

AMD: SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 7970 OC 3GB

  • Core Clock: 950/1000 MHz
  • Stream Processors: 2048 Stream Processors
  • Effective Memory Clock: 5700/5800 MHz

Price: $480.

Image source: XFXSAPPHIRE.

Related:

Topics: Processors, Hardware

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

6 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Do you have any links to actual performance for them?

    Just curious, as the video card is usually the first thing I consider upgrading (even if it's working fine).
    spdragoo@...
  • Price so far:

    The mentioned processor is $330, and the motherboard pricing is all over the place from $150 to $350 (I have no idea what the differences in product are to cause that price swing). Add $100 for the power supply, $70 for the case, 1TB hard drive, $100, NIC card $20, sound card $20, and blue-ray disk drive $75. That's about $1000 total, before the graphic card.
    Geedavey
  • meh

    you can usually find a GTX 460 for $100 and it has 336 cores and 192-bit memory bus. Its more than triple the performance of the 440 which is really a junk card.
    wendellgee2
    • agree

      A better low-end option may have been a Radeon HD4850 or HD5770 - either of which bench (..punch) well above their value($)-to-performance ratio. Both aren't exactly new cards either (and the 4850 is relatively ancient by, post millennial, tech' evolutionary standards).
      thx-1138_
  • got an almost identically spec'd gigabyte GTX 560 Ti

    I got an almost identically spec'd Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti 5 or 6 months ago. Also overclocked, and it was $10 cheaper. It is possible prices are up or EVGA just costs a bit more (it was cheaper than the EVGA when I bought it, too). And yes it is a Ti (the non-Ti/non Fermi is about $20-30 cheaper and bumping to the Ti is worth every penny - twice the streams when compared to my laptop's 550M). The downside of both the Gigabyte and Sapphire cards is the 1GB of RAM - my laptop has 2GB (it also has 10GB RAM where my desktop has 6, but my desktop's RAM specs and speed destroy my laptop's - CAS is 12 lower and it is quad channel vs dual channel - when you build your own machine you have control over these things, whereas with a laptop you do not).
    Clewin
  • This only in my opinion..

    In my opinion, NVIDIA is indeed the best when it comes to providing the best gaming gpu. They are durable and can really give gamers the best gaming experience. That is one reason why I always prefer to buy and use NVIDIA products over other brands. Yes, they may be a little expensive, but they are surely worth the money you'll spend.
    renjamolin