Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchasing upgrades [UPDATED]
Summary: Two iSO developers - James Thomson and Patrick McCarron have reported receiving threatening legal letters from an as yet unnamed third party.
This is interesting ... and worrying for iOS developers using in-app purchase in their apps.
Two iSO developers - James Thomson and Patrick McCarron have reported receiving threatening legal letters from an as yet unnamed third party.
Thomson used in-app purchasing in his PCalc Lite app (PCalc is one of those apps that I use all the time)while McCarron used it in a game called Shanghai Mahjong.
Neither are willing to discuss the matter much as they want comment from Apple's legal folks, but to me this smells like a patent troll.
Other iOS developers using in-app purchasing are understandably worried, such as Gedeon Maheux:
Seems there's a patent troll about who doesn't have the courage, confidence (or money perhaps) to go after Apple so is instead going after indie developers.
Apple needs to do the right thing here and indemnify developers why use the iOS SDK (Software Development Kit) to create apps from patent issues relating to the SDK.
[UPDATE: It is now being suggested that Lodsys LLC is the company behing the legal threats.]
[UPDATE 2: Dev Matt Braun who makes the MASH iOS game for kids has also been hit with legal threats.]
[UPDATE 3: Here's what intellectual property activist Florian Mueller had to say in an email:
"While the patent system works quite well for large players with deep pockets, little 'indie' app developers don't have the resources to defend themselves against such threats. In most cases they don't even operate under the legal umbrella of a limited liability company, so in a worst-case scenario they could be financially ruined for life if they lose a patent infringement lawsuit."
Serious stuff!]
[UPDATE 4: OK, some more information. I've receiveed information that suggests that it is indeed the Lodsys that is behind these legal threats to developers. The patent in question here is 7,222,078 (which is listed on Lodsys) 'Methods and systems for gathering information from units of a commodity across a network.' And yes, it is as vague as the title makes it sound.]
Any readers who happen to be devs having a bad Friday 13th thanks to being hit by legal threats? Let me know either in the comments of via the contact form here on ZDNet.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
These guys who do not even have the cajones to say who they are and go after the smaller developers are nothing more than cowardly patent trolls.
Opportunity
1. Apple cares about the developers (imagine that).
2. The trolls cannot pick on the little guy unless they want to deal with the 800 pound gorilla too.
Agreed!
And it's high time that a judge gets a chance to review this so maybe even invalidate it if they feel it should be, end this before it begins with the help of Apple.
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
These trolls suing the app developers is akin to a troll with a cellular patent suing you, your mother, and every other person, for having cell phones that use the alleged patent violation instead of trying to sue Verizon.
If there is actually a patent violation here, they should be suing Apple, not trying to extort settlements out of small app writers. I personally believe that if there were a valid patent violation, they would go after Apple. Since they are going after small time app developers, it leads me to believe they are full of crap and are trying to scare some easy money out of the little guys.
Go ahead and hate Apple if you want to, I am not that fond of them either, but try to be rational in your posts.
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
Read the patent!
Lawyers might twist this into what is being threatened but reading the garbage patent itself does not indicate that the patent troll would prevail.....
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
VALID is the right word.
Try reading this patent: customer's use of an application or customer's desire for a new feature within that application being reported back to the developer electronically is such a radical new feature that it is protected by this patent.
Apparently in December 2003 this was a signifcant invention that noone was doing and the concept was worthy of patent protection. Really?
Anyone heard of web support prior to December 2003? According to this patent, if the customer tells you of a bug fix or enhancement and you use this info to influence future product design - you owe them a royalty or you are infringing their patent.
Total BS
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
The fact that they do not identify themselves or the patent(s) in question automatically makes them trolls.
RE: Developers hit by legal threats over iOS in-app purchases
I get the feeling that when "trolls" do not say what specifically they are claiming as IP; they are usually skating on thin ice, and want to intimidate and cash-in with weak IP; rather than subject the IP to the scrutiny of the technical community and the courts.
If you have "real quality IP" then by all means assert it. Explicitly. And be ready to withstand searches for prior art and all the other things that can ultimately make a patent invalid.