ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Has Apple made an iPhone 4 port of Siri 'legally' possible? No!

By | December 16, 2011, 3:09pm PST

Summary: I hate to be a spoil-sport but I feel the need to point something out.

Apple Makes Siri iPhone 4 Port Legally Possible With Today’s iOS 5.0.1 Update,’ the headline over at Cult of Mac breathlessly screams. But is there any substance to the hype?

Let me hand you over to Alex Heath over on Cult of Mac for a moment:

‘Siri is by far the iPhone 4S’s most-desired feature, and many non-4S users have been clamoring for hackers to make the voice assistant available on older iOS devices. While Siri ports have been demoed to the public before, it’s been made clear that public distribution is not possibile at this time due to legal issues.

Apple has made a Siri port legally possible with today’s iOS 5.0.1 revision by offering wide-open access to system files that were previously encrypted.

So Apple decrypts some files, and all of a sudden it’s legal to distribute them? Ummm, I hate to be a spoil-sport but I feel the need to point something out. Here’s a little tidbit from Apple’s software license agreement for the iPhone 4S [emphasis added]:

2. Permitted License Uses and Restrictions.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, you are granted a limited non-exclusive license to use the iOS Software on a single Apple-branded iOS Device. Except as permitted in Section 2(b) below, and unless as provided in a separate agreement between you and Apple, this License does not allow the iOS Software to exist on more than one Apple-branded iOS Device at a time, and you may not distribute or make the iOS Software available over a network where it could be used by multiple devices at the same time. This License does not grant you any rights to use Apple proprietary interfaces and other intellectual property in the design, development, manufacture, licensing or distribution of third party devices and accessories, or third party software applications, for use with iOS Devices. Some of those rights are available under separate licenses from Apple.

In other words, if you try to distribute any Apple code without permission, the company will bury you in legal paperwork.

While the files were encrypted, attempting to circumvent that encryption would have fallen foul of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) which criminalized the circumvention of an access control mechanism, but decrypting these files doesn’t mean that it’s fair game to start distributing Apple intellectual property. Copyright infringement, while not criminal, is still a civil matter.

So by decrypting the files, Apple has made a port of Siri ‘technically’ possible, but calling it ‘legal’ is a huge stretch.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Not quite
use_what_works_4_U 19th Dec
@gluxon
Interesting idea, but I would bet that use of such a method would still violate the "...or make the iOS software available" provision. After all, it's the meta installer that is making the connection and thus "making the software available".
0 Votes
+ -
Typical Microsoft behavior
otaddy 16th Dec
Oh...wait.

Well I wanted to be the first to blame Microsoft just to get that out of the way...

And they say MS...er, M$ forces people to upgrade!
@otaddy
If you are talking about hardware upgrades, why would MS force you to upgrade? They sell their OS at 3x the price at most retail stores than they would to a hardware manufacturer.

Besides, how is not having any Siri like feature (and therefore not need dual-core, which they also don't support) any better.
0 Votes
+ -
Just like any business does
Mister Spock 17th Dec
@anono
sell their OS at 3x the price at most retail stores than they would to a hardware manufacturer.

And how is that any different the Apple purchasing their touch screens for their iPads and iphones at a cost 3 times less then you or I could aquire them?

Selling to a manufacturer is less cost intensive as Microsoft does not sell them individual physical DVD media. They also have no need for anti-theft packaging, and they do not have the added cost of distribution, either.

That is no different then any other company in the world.
@anono Did you miss the fact that otaddy was mocking the anti Microsoft fanbois? Yup that was sarcasm Sheldon.
You missed the fine line that makes Siri porting legal. You are right to say that bundling Apple copyrighted material is indeed illegal, but the idea here is to download iOS 5.0.1 off Apple's server after the Siri port installer has started running on the user's computer. Essentially, the user is the one dowloading the Siri files. This method is called a "meta installer", and essentially a loop hole.
0 Votes
+ -
Not quite
use_what_works_4_U 19th Dec
@gluxon
Interesting idea, but I would bet that use of such a method would still violate the "...or make the iOS software available" provision. After all, it's the meta installer that is making the connection and thus "making the software available".
according to DMCA, it is legal and possible to get exempted from circumvent digital locks for compatible reason. The case law was lexmark vs. an ink refiller who reverse engineering ink cartridges protection chip for ink refills:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexmark_Int%27l_v._Static_Control_Components

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix