ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Here's something Apple should spend some of that $65.8 billion cash reserve on

By | May 5, 2011, 8:32am PDT

Summary: Apple is facing a problem. A large proportion of users believe that Mac is invulnerable to malware and that security software is unnecessary, despite Apple making it clear that it supports neither view.

Apple is sitting on a massive cash reserve totalling $65.8 billion. Enough cash for the company to be able to operate until 2018 even if it decided to stop selling everything. So, what should Apple do with this cash? Put it all on red? Move its HQ to the moon? Buy us all (and I do mean all of us … everyone on the planet) a few beers? Or what peeling off a few bills and buy up a security firm and giving all Mac OS and iOS users access to free security tools?

See, Apple is facing a problem. A large proportion of users believe that Mac is invulnerable to malware and that security software is unnecessary, despite Apple making it clear that it supports neither view. Until now this hasn’t been a problem because hackers and scammers have been too busy hammering Windows users. But that’s changing, and criminal elements are now showing an interest in Mac OS X. Security über-journalist Brian Krebs has the details:

Crimekit makers have focused almost exclusively on the Windows platform, but today Danish IT security firm CSIS Security Group blogged about a new kit named the Weyland-Yutani BOT that is being marketed as the first of its kind to attack the Mac OS X platform.

The seller of this crimeware kit claims his product supports form-grabbing in Firefox and Chrome, and says he plans to develop a Linux version and one for the iPad in the months ahead.

There’s no form-grabbing for Safari at present because ‘too many problems in that browser’ but you can bet money on the fact that it’ll come.

Another type of emerging threat facing Mac user is one that’s been plaguing Windows users for a while now - rogue security software.

Bottom line, malware is headed to Mac OS X, and most Mac users think that they’re invulnerable to malware. That’s a recipe for disaster. Sure, Apple could hope that its users have a modicum of common sense and practice safe computing habits, but back in the real-world we all know that people are idiots.  A well-distributed attack could leave tens of millions of Macs loaded to the brim with malware, and leave Apple with egg on its face.

Solution - Buy a security firm. There are a few to choose from. The cost to Apple would be chump change, but the good will generated from offering customers an Apple-branded solution (hopefully a free Apple-branded solution) would be huge. For those choosing not to have security software installed Apple could bundle an optional system scan in with each OS X update.

Why couldn’t Apple just bundle security software with each Mac? Well, it could (I’m unsure as to whether this would attract regulatory scrutiny), but it would be too disruptive to the market. Just offering an Apple-branded security solution would be as good as pre-installing it on systems.

The storm’s coming. Fortunately Apple has the cash to prevent this becoming a PR nightmare.

What do you think? Should Apple spend some of that cash on securing Mac OS so users don’t have to?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

59
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

My guess
binuvarghese 1st Jun
@Economister

That is what I think will get more people sucked into the bandwagon. Custom CPU for apple that does not run any software other than apple licensed. I am all for it.
0 Votes
+ -
1) Give it all to me. Nice but unlikely
2) Buy a small country. Again, nice but unlikely
3) Buy zdnet, and close it down. Useful, but again unlikely
4) Buy a brewery and create Apple beer. Has potential, as seen in the Redds brand.
5) Point and laugh at those poorer than themselves. Amusing and probably true to some degree
6) Spend a bit, maybe making kick in the bollocks server systems, maybe even a supercomputer. Fun, perhaps my ideal after the give it all to me and beer options
7) Keep it all. Make it a huge mystery and see the rest of the world live in fear and awe. Probably the way they will go
@ego.sum.stig@...

#3 is a great idea
@thofts

You can always just stop coming and pretend it's closed. There's really no *need* for you to come here in the first place, is there?
0 Votes
+ -
Humor
ego.sum.stig@... 5th May 2011
Something that is entirely outside the realm of some people's understanding.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
GoPower Updated - 5th May 2011
@GoPower You are exactly the type the apple needs to protect. No one is saying dump aaple for windows. We are just saying that your malware free life is nearing it's end. I'm glad apple has worked well for, now wouldn't it be great if apple took some of it's cash and helped protect you from malware?
In a sense you are more vunerable to malware than windows users, at least the ones who are fully patched, up to date with virus definitions. What do you think the value of 15 years worth of data is? For me it's much greater than the annual cost of virus subscriptions times 15.
In other words, for fifteen years he and I have been computing WITHOUT the hassles of Windows. Despite (since OS X) annual predictions that THIS will be the year when OS X comes crashing down and all those Apple using fools will get caught with their pants down. And yet, each year, we continue to have a more hassle free computing experience.
@GoPower "If the Mac OS or iOS become targets there will be solutions, and until then I've a lot less to worry about than my Windows plagued peers."

You and I think alike.

I believe that Apple spends just enough on security. Much less, and Macs would be "plagued". Spending much more would be irresponsible to the shareholders. If these new potential threats actually turn out to dangerous, then Apple should (and will) be judged on its response to actual infections. I think Apple cares enough about its 'malware-free' reputation (earned or not) that it will indeed spend the resources to keep OS X malware immune (relatively speaking).

So until these "hypothetical" threats become "actual" ... I'm not losing any sleep. But I do read Mac news sites so that I will know if/when it's time to become wary. Until then.... I surf with carefree abandon (Bwahaha)...
@snberk341 Except that they currently do nothing about security on their OS as there are many holes in their software. Windows is "battle hardened" from all the years of attacks. MacOS time to be attacked is just starting.
Also Apple cares so little about their security that they don't even code their own OS. Its basically ripped from open source free license products and pasted together. Running OSX in debug mode shows you all the stuff they have stolen. They do the same with their desktops as they do with all their other products, steal technology/ideas make them pretty, sell at huge profits.
@GoPower
Come on, only someone 50 cards short of a full deck would think people actually care about the the drivel you post.

Maybe Apple can shoot some money your way to cover your obvious mental issues.
@Bill Pharaoh are you kidding? Apple isn't going to part with their money.
.....something like MSE into OSX. It can be installed silently with no visible footprint and Apple can say they're staying ahead of the curve when/if malware arrives.

Seems prudent and I really don't see a downside. More useful than buying the world a beer or two.
0 Votes
+ -
But think about .....
Economister 5th May 2011
@alsw

the good (s)will that would create. wink
0 Votes
+ -
My guess:
Economister 5th May 2011
@alsw

They are working towards their own CPU designs across the board and will embed the security in the HW, not the OS.
@Economister They don't know anything about CPU development. Their "Apple CPUs" are just rebranded Samsung variants of ARM based CPU's.
0 Votes
+ -
My guess
binuvarghese 1st Jun
@Economister

That is what I think will get more people sucked into the bandwagon. Custom CPU for apple that does not run any software other than apple licensed. I am all for it.
0 Votes
+ -
can't do it
stevejg61 5th May 2011
@alsw if Microsoft tried something like that they would be hit so fast with an antitrust suit your head would spin. I would expect Apple would be subject to the samee
0 Votes
+ -
Nope
Michael Alan Goff 5th May 2011
Microsoft got hit with an anti-trust for IE, Apple has never been hit with one for Safari on OSX.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Market share
WilErz 5th May 2011
@ stevejg61

Competition authorities only intervene if market share is high enough for a firm to be considered dominant. Usually this is about 30 per cent, but there's some variation by geography and industry.
attempted to put a competitor out of business through their market dominance. Something Apple has never done. Now, if Apple started breaking Windows Media player upon installation of iTunes on PCs, you might have a case to make.
@stevejg61 nope, because they are apple. Apple always avoids antitrust, even though their whole platform is basically antitrust.
Or Apple can sign a multi year, multi billion dollar foundry deal with Intel that includes programmable chips with Mcafee's tech built in?
The problem is that the money is not in USA. Its spread across the world which Apple like other large us companies cannot bring back because of the steep 35% tax...35% of $65.8 Billion is HUGE...It can solve the many financial problems for the states of both Texas and California.
0 Votes
+ -
Buy Tivo!
dmz__@... 5th May 2011
Instead of continuing with the current Apple TV, Apple should buy Tivo, an integrate it with Apple TV. Imagine the power of a dual tuner HD Tivo running on iOS. Add iOS apps on top of that, and it is a sure winner for the living room.
0 Votes
+ -
Bingo!
ShazAmerica 5th May 2011
Just like Apple is currently using those reservers for brilliant strategical moves (like buying chips and touchscreens with upfront cash payments) I'm sure their next big step is television. And I'm sure they are working on something like this right now, it only makes good business sense.
Spend cash on some bloatware? Why?
I think I've been seeing these "any day now" articles on the impending infestation of OSX for 5 years. Still hasn't happened. One or two Trojans do not a deluge make. No rational person thinks that a Mac is invulnerable but when you daily experience is devoid of the daily crap you put up with on a PC, there is a certain complacency.

If it ever hap
0 Votes
+ -
@His_Shadow: No rational person thinks that a Mac is invulnerable but when you daily experience is devoid of the daily crap you put up with on a PC, there is a certain complacency.

I don't have annual problems with my PC let alone daily. Maybe I've got a special PC? Or a special copy of Windows?
@His_Shadow You've been seeing the "any day now" warnings because we've known it has always been possible. The difference this time is that there is a published kit for exploiting a know vulnerability. More importantly there seems to be a growing interest in the hacking comunities. You need to understand that hacking is no longer just a hobby. Now its a business. Apple now has enough of a market share that it makes financial sense to target OSX. My bet is the real prize is iOS.
0 Votes
+ -
Daily crap? Most call that work
Bill Pharaoh 5th May 2011
@His_Shadow
You know, wake up, go to your employer's business and use your computer daily to do work. Maybe you say "I hate this crap, I need a new job", but still that's the onlything I do with a computer on a daily basis.
...as Steve Jobs says, "Magical" !
@thofts

That won't happen unless Woz come back.
Better yet invest in Steve Jobs' immortality.
0 Votes
+ -
@Scrabbler
until he can design the perfevt cyborg body!
@Bill Pharaoh That raises an interesting question--if he did it gradually, how much would he have to change before he's no longer Steve Jobs as we know him?
0 Votes
+ -
How often does security software on Windows add value? From what I've experienced, it basically sucks up CPU and memory and issues false positives from time to time. I don't see why Apple should invest in security software at this point. I think it would make more sense to renew their security focus and deliver more timely patches.
Why not pay a little corporate income tax with it?
@FeralUrchin

Apple paid corporate taxes of over 20% in the last fiscal quarter.
@msalzberg
If Apple paid $13.2 billion in taxes last quarter that would be big news. Instead Apple is trying to get the law changed so they can bring back the money and not pay tax on it.
http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/apple_joins_group_pushing_corporate_tax_holiday/
0 Votes
+ -
What makes everyone think
oncall 5th May 2011
Apple doesn't already have either a company in mind to buy or have a malware package ready to go the day it is actually needed?
0 Votes
+ -
If they're going to do it...
lostarchitect 5th May 2011
...They should bake it in to the OS, and update through the same process they use to update the OS. Keep it simple, keep it quiet, keep it out of my way while I'm working.
0 Votes
+ -
...why not get a job in some other field? happy No computer is completely safe. The question you have to ask yourself (if you're a home user), is the risk of running without any protection worth it? If you're providing support for a Firm, then pose the question to them. Part of our job is managing risk, so anyone who blows off the significance of malware on Mac really (REALLY) is in the wrong business.

Don Montalvo, TX
0 Votes
+ -
@donmontalvo No-one has said Macs are not vulnerable. They are saying that they hear about a deluge of malware is but weeks away every year for at least the past 7 years and it is still yet to manifest itself. That's not to say that it won't, but you all sound like the boy who cried wolf.
0 Votes
+ -
Serious response
Rick_R 5th May 2011
Serious response--people keep forgetting that Apple has always been primarily a hardware vendor and innovator. If they're going to plunk down several billion dollars (which they probably should do) the realistic question is what new hardware field should they look to investing in?

How about either wind turbines or tide-driven generators? Or maybe some software/hardware combo to make driving safer? Or even just $10-50 million for improving agricultural yields? Or maybe water desalinization.
0 Votes
+ -
<b>MAC</b>Defender!!!
Grayson Peddie 5th May 2011
I will defend a MAC (Media Access Control) with a sword and a shield! grin
Why would buying a security company solve the problem. Especially in cases where people fall for the scams and install the software. What could apple do about it. It would be an endless battle with the criminals.

I am sure there is much better use of the money. Like they are doing now, using their funds to tie up supplies. Its a great use of the money and the return on that money will be huge, but its also a big risk.

Buying a security company isn't going to solve anything. Otherwise why has the problem continued to exist on the Windows platform?
0 Votes
+ -
Quick questions
Steve Webb 5th May 2011
Which security firm should Apple buy?

Which security firm has a better security record than Apple.
The problem with zdnet (and it's readers) is that the think too small.

For a few billion a year, you could buy a small country, say Monaco. Use the power of the (purchased) monarchy to change the tax laws to your benefit. Set up shop and rake in many more millions, tax free. 8^D

Psssst - for a few billion more, you could buy the US Congress. [It's called 'lobbying']
0 Votes
+ -
Apple needs to start distributing some of that money. There is almost nothing they can do with $66 billion dollars. They should start paying out a dividend much like Microsoft did in 2003 when they had an absurd amount of cash on hand.

Giving out a dividend would prove to shareholders they they have faith in their long-term growth. If they hold onto it for too long, they are basically telling the world, "While we're doing great now, we will probably flop at some point and need to hold onto the money for dear life."

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix