ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

IE9 vs Chrome 10 vs Firefox 4 vs Opera 11.01 vs Safari 5 - The BIG browser benchmark!

By | March 22, 2011, 9:12am PDT

Now that Mozilla has finally released Firefox 4 to the masses, it’s time for a BIG browser benchmark where we take the leading browsers and pit them against four of the toughest benchmark tests available to see which is the tortoise, and which is the hare.

Note: This post has been updated for the final release of Firefox 4.

Here are the browsers that will be run:

  • Internet Explorer 9 (9.0.8112.16421) 32-bit
  • Internet Explorer 9 (9.0.8112.16421) 64-bit
  • Firefox 4
  • Chrome 10.0.648.151
  • Safari 5.0.4
  • Opera 11.01

Here are the tests that the browsers will face:

  • SunSpider JavaScript 0.9.1 - A JavaScript benchmark developed by Mozilla with a focus on real-world problem solving.
  • V8 Benchmark Suite - A pure JavaScript benchmark used by Google to to tune the V8 JavaScript engine.
  • Peacekeeper - FutureMark’s JavaScript test which stress-tests features such as animation, navigation, forms and other commonly utilized tasks.
  • Kraken 1.0 - Another JavaScript benchmark developed by Mozilla. This is based on SunSpider but features some enhancements.

All testing carried out on a Windows 7 64-bit machine running a Q9300 2.5GHz quad-core processor with 4GB of RAM and an NVIDIA GTX 260 graphics card.

On with the testing!

SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark –>

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

70
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Agreed!
BillDem 30th Dec
@Loverock Davidson Ditto. In my mind, all of the browsers passed the minimum rendering speed threshold a few years ago. The speed of the computer and speed of the connection make more difference than the browser, now. These days, it is more about the features and user interface preferences. I won't be switching from my IE + FF combo any time soon.
0 Votes
+ -
With that settled, maybe talk features?
bmgoodman 22nd Mar 2011
I found that the various betas of FF 4 would oftentimes lose my tab groupings, and sometimes the tabs themselves. This seemed to improve in the newest betas, though.

The absence of a drop-down for the back button is a "feature" I don't understand. Notice the behavior when you go to a site that submits form data. Just TRY to go back to the page BEFORE the form, using just that back button. I don't think you CAN. Thankfully, I found an add-on that restored the drop-down. Small a thing as it is, it would have been a deal-breaker for me. Out of curiosity, WHY did they dump it?
@bmgoodman - What's settled? Presenting a few select "benchmarks", some of which include tests for features which have been deprecated from the HTML5 specs (Acid3) and one browser-vendor's benchmarks (V8?), but not others?

How about including some of Microsoft's comprehensive performance tests from http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive? And how about including the currrent results from the W3C's HTML5 Conformance Tests: http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/reporting/report.htm?
@bitcrazed
I'm with you, what good is speed if the browser doesn't render a page correctly. How about showing us how well they do with rendering open standards of today.
0 Votes
+ -
Hold Down the Back Button for History!!!!!
Browser Fanatic Updated - 22nd Mar 2011
@bmgoodman You can just hold the back button and your history for that tab will drop down from the button. There is no need for the extra button or an addon. The functionality is still there.
@Browser Fanatic Cool! I didn't know that. I like it.
@bmgoodman

I wish that, before people make public criticisms of software, the would learn to USE it. If you right click on the back button, or left click and hold, you will find your dropdown.
0 Votes
+ -
Same for IE9
LiquidLearner 22nd Mar 2011
@rphunter42

Although the delay in FF4 is slightly longer when you click and hold. Perhaps that throws people off?
@rphunter42 and @bmgoodman
You can also right click for the same functionality
@bmgoodman The dropdown is still there, but for some reason they took away the down arrow. Click and hold the left mouse button and the dropdown shows up. Weird decision.
@bmgoodman Actually if you hold your click on the Firefox back button you get exactly that functionality.
@bmgoodman
In FF you now use the history button for recently visited sites...it works the same as the drop down from the old back button.. it only shows the viewed pages from the session of the tab you are on...simply select a different tab and do the same .
Please present your data on a log scale so that we can actually appreciate the differences in terms of what they mean for performance.

"Twice as fast" (0.3 log units) is the important measure, not raw ms.
Looks like I'll continue to use IE9 and FF4. They are plenty fast.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed!
BillDem 30th Dec
@Loverock Davidson Ditto. In my mind, all of the browsers passed the minimum rendering speed threshold a few years ago. The speed of the computer and speed of the connection make more difference than the browser, now. These days, it is more about the features and user interface preferences. I won't be switching from my IE + FF combo any time soon.
please run something at least a little bit more meaningful and comprehensive. This isn't the 90's anymore. End to end page load, dom, layout, rendering, etc. If the page loads and all the script is jit'd and it still runs like crap because it has a weak rendering engine the bench marks should hammer it...
@Johnny Vegas - couldn't agree more. Sadly, Adrian's own biases are sadly amplified through "reporting" like this and inaccurate stereotypes are being reinfoced.

Very sad.
Dude, if you include Kraken & V8 to your tests (which are their own browser optimized) you should add Microsoft's HTML5 demos... Since Chrome will be ALWAYS top in V8, Firefox will be ALWAYS top in Kraken...
0 Votes
+ -
If he did that
LiquidLearner 22nd Mar 2011
@AmediaN

He would have to say that IE9, at least in technical terms, is at the very least tied with Chrome in speed, assuming the MS tests were all counted as one benchmark. Of course we'll also hear that's unfair, since it's an MS benchmark, neglecting the fact that both FF and Chrome got tested on their own benchmarks.
What do adobe developers do all day ?

Play pocket pool ?

Can it really take this long to make a 64bit version of flash.
0 Votes
+ -
For whatever reason, there are too many half boiled articles in ZDNet these days. How can you benchmark by including the same vendor's tests? What a crap !!
If you had IE8 64bit on your Win7 Professional PC, it will be automatically upgraded to IE 9 when you upgrade the 32 bit.
In addition, any changes you made in the appearance of 32 bit are automatically reflected in 64 bit- curious.
0 Votes
+ -
Now about Chrome 11
Harold Miller 22nd Mar 2011
So, question is there is Chrome 11 which I am happily running. It is in beta so have to use caution with it but it seems very stable. Chrome 11 seems to beat out Chrome 10, at least from my observation.
@Harold Miller Same here. It certainly seem faster at loading pages.
I uninstalled the 64-bit version, downloaded the 32-bit version, and was told that the installer is incompatible. So how do you get 32-bit IE9 on a 64-bit Windows7 system?
@jarome -- You don't. It is even mentioned in the article that you can't run 32-bit IE9 on a 64-bit system. Just load Chrome and be done with it.
0 Votes
+ -
BZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTTTTTTT
dazzlingd Updated - 22nd Mar 2011
@NelsonUSA
YOU ARE VERY WRONG.
Download the 64 bit version and it also installs the 32 bit version. 32 bit IE9 runs just fine on a 64 bit system. In fact 32 bit IE9 is the default IE9 browser for 64 bit.

Consider 64 bit IE9 as a technical preview as it runs slower than the 32bit version and there are few plugins compatible with it.
@NelsonUSA
You are out of your mind. You have to go *out of your way* to run the 64-bit IE even on 64-bit Windows. It can't even be set as the default.

In fact, it is only there so that it can be embedded in 64-bit applications that use IE as part of their display engine.

But, do download *FireFox* (not that POJ Chrome) anyway.
@jarome When you install IE 64 bit in your 64 bit system, you install BOTH 32 bit version and 64 bit version. BY DEFAULT, you run 32-bit version... 64-bit version running is optional and not default at all... So you have to specially search for IE9 64-bit on your programs list to start it... It can't be made as default-browser. So you don't need to worry about anything....
0 Votes
+ -
What about Maxthon?
kanehi 22nd Mar 2011
Maxthon is another browser that's should be tested and benchmarked as it's the browser mostly used in Asia.
0 Votes
+ -
@kanehi : Don't you think that those results will only be relevant in Asia?
0 Votes
+ -
Guess what...
james347 22nd Mar 2011
...these benchmarks don't matter.
@james347

...which is more or less Adrian's conclusion!
0 Votes
+ -
Benchmarks, Schmenchmarks
krauskopf 22nd Mar 2011
I am sitting here on a current iMac Corei7, with a current Windows 7 Corei& machine next to it. On both, Firefox starts out fast but in an hour or so of use, slows down to the point where the spinning ball (or spinning logo) are taking up most of my time. The performance is so bad, that I have to restart the browser. None of these benchmarks captured this, which is a persistent bug. Talk on the Firefox forums consists mostly of developers trying to prove users wrong when the report it. The problem seems to relate to Javascript in that JS-heavy sites bring the problem on sooner. It's unacceptable - both the problem and that benchmarking doesn't catch it.
Are you sure these tests don't apply as much to the Java engines as to the browser's rendering?
Why the heck are you including Kraken? You need WebGL support to actually get a good score with that benchmark. WebGL is not even a W3C standard either.
0 Votes
+ -
I think that to round the comparison up, you could add the standards based tests such as Acid2 and HTML5

"Better" is in the eye of the beholder, so a slower browser with higher standard compatibility may be better for some. While a faster server with lousy compatibility may be better for others.-
0 Votes
+ -
http://html5test.com/results.html

Here Clearly IE9 is behind.

Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 130 5
Mozilla Firefox 3.6 155 4
Apple Safari 5.0.3 228 7
Opera 11.1 244 7
Google Chrome 10.0.648 288 13
Mozilla Firefox 4.0 RC 1 255 9
@rarsa HTML5test.com is completely based on "dreams" not standards, it tries to test tags which are not W3C approved and standardized.
0 Votes
+ -
What about Web3d?
ewartmj@... 22nd Mar 2011
Shouldn't a browser's graphics performance be measured in a modern browser benchmark comparison?
You state, "Bottom line, I really don?t think that JavaScript performance is an issue any more, and certainly in real-world testing it?s hard to see a difference between the browsers". However, in the first paragraph you declare IE9 64-bit a loser because of this. So I don't follow your logic.

Also, the headline of this article refers to Opera and Safari, but I see no mention in the article. Why?

I abandoned FireFox over a year ago, and only use IE for websites from Microsoft which don't work properly with Chrome. Chrome for me is the best.
Don't want M$ or Google Tracking me. FF USES 1/3 of my CPU? Switched to FlashPeak SlimBrowser, good settings moved all my favorites upon installation and FAST!!
It isn't just how many benchmarks you are fastest at, it is also how many you are SLOWEST at. Chrome is waaaaay slow on 2 and IE9(32) on 1. Bias anyone?? I would keep away from the Leftard product even if it really was better.
To quote Bart Simpson, "this article both sucks *and* blows"

What is the relevance of javascript speed these days, no real processing is done client side anymore
@jeffdyer
Oh, you're so wrong! Just imagine how many websites use lots and lots of JavaScript: GMail, Google Docs, Meebo, etc. even getting comment and posting this is done with Ajax.
I think Firefox 4 inspired A LOT from Opera 11 - the similarities are way too obvious. I'm disappointed - I expected much more from Firefox (I use both Firefox and Opera everyday) and all I got from Firefox 4 is a clone of Opera (not even complete, there are a lot more good things that I haven't found in any other browser). So.. Opera still rockz! I'm just puzzled that people can't just see what an amazing browser it is.
0 Votes
+ -
Opera vs Firefox 4
stan.cristian88 23rd Mar 2011
I think Firefox 4 inspired A LOT from Opera 11 - the similarities are way too obvious. I'm disappointed - I expected much more from Firefox (I use both Firefox and Opera everyday) and all I got from Firefox 4 is a clone of Opera (not even complete, there are a lot more good things that I haven't found in any other browser). So.. Opera still rockz! I'm just puzzled that people can't just see what an amazing browser it is.
0 Votes
+ -
Opera does NOT rock.
Tynach 27th Mar 2011
@stan.cristian88 I disagree. Opera 11 is just... I've had nothing but issues and problems with it. It fails to render nested lists properly (yes, I sound crazy. Yes, I have screenshots to prove that something even IE 6 did fine, Opera 11 fails at), and also does not support SOCKS proxies. I use SSH a lot as an encrypted SOCKS proxy, and Opera's lack of SOCKS functionality really seals the deal with me to stay AWAY from it.

I currently use Chrome for most normal browsing, and Firefox for anything like banking and using my SSH proxy (Chrome can use SOCKS, but only going through your OS's settings, which is annoying. Google is supposedly working on this). The tracking on Chrome can be turned off, and even if you don't trust it, you can compile Chromium yourself (and go through the code even) and make SURE you can turn it off/not compile it in to begin with.

Opera also has issues with it's look/feel here on Linux, my platform of choice. It's buggy, somewhat slow, and doesn't like blending in with the rest of my desktop (though it TRIES, it fails).

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix