Is Windows too expensive?
Summary: Do I think Windows is too expensive? Yes. Oh, you were expecting me to say more.
Question from today's mailbox:
Do you think that Windows is too expensive, especially given that Apple is now offering OS X upgrades for $30?
Do I think Windows is too expensive? Yes. Actually, for such a short question, we can actually break down the answer into three different categories.
Let's break down the answer.
Windows on a new PC
Most people get a Windows upgrade when they buy a new PC. The cost of the operating system is bundled in as part of the purchase price. In fact, it's hard to find out how much that copy of Windows on your shiny new PC has set you back. Microsoft and the hardware OEMs keep this sort of information secret, hiding it behind NDAs (Non Disclosure Agreements).I've been shown numbers off the record that suggest consumer operating systems, such as Windows 7 Home Premium, adds between $50 and $90 to the price of a new PC, depending on the sale price of the system. Considering that you can pick up a new PC for around $250, Windows accounts for a fair bit of the cost.
It's hard to find a big name PC OEM that sells systems without Windows pre-installed. I can find outlets in the UK that sell PCs without operating systems (for example, Novatech), and there Windows 7 Home Premium adds some £75 excluding tax (or around $120) to the price of a new PC. But remember, this is the base desktop version of Windows and upgrading to higher versions can skyrocket your OS costs.
So yes, Windows on a new PC is expensive, and as PCs get cheaper, the amount that you're spending on the OS will increase as a proportion of the total system price.
Upgrade versions
If you think that a pre-installed copy of Windows on a new PC is expensive, wait until you try to upgrade. An upgrade copy of Windows 7 Home Premium (this is for people who have an existing eligible upgrade product) costs a whopping $120 (shop around and you'll get it with a few bucks off).A System Builder copy has the same recommended retail price as an upgrade, but if you shop around you can pick it up for around $100.
Note: I know that there are rules surrounding the use of System Builder versions, but as long as they remain on sale in places such as Amazon and Newegg and are available to all, people will continue to buy and use them.
So yes, buying upgrade versions of Windows is expensive.
Full versions
If you don't have an eligible upgrade product then expect to pay out serious money. A full version of Windows 7 Home Premium is an eye-watering $200 (again, shop around). If you want to push the boat out and go for the Ultimate package that will set you back an unbelievable $320.So yes, buying the full versions of Windows is expensive.
Conclusion
Bottom line, yes, Windows is expensive, especially if you're thinking of grabbing a copy without buying a PC at the same time. Upgrades look especially expensive when you consider that Apple charges $30 for an upgrade that you can install on up to five systems. However, you do need to factor in the fact that Microsoft will provide you with updates for a long time (Windows 7 will see security updates until 2020).Note: Compare Microsoft's support policy to that of Apple, which only supports the two versions of the operating system at any one time.
Do you think Windows is too expensive? How much do you think Microsoft should charge?
Related:
- Is Microsoft hoping for the best but preparing for the worst with Windows 8?
- Ed Bott: Microsoft quietly extends consumer support for Windows 7, Vista
- Apple’s secret weapon against Windows 8 (and why OS X 10.8 will be Apple’s most important OS release since iOS)
- Microsoft’s branding crisis comes to a head with Windows 8
- Preparing your PC for the Windows 8 Consumer Preview
- Apple’s secret weapon against Windows 8 (and why OS X 10.8 will be Apple’s most important OS release since iOS)
- Ignore Microsoft, Office will be coming to the iPad real soon
- Microsoft gets it right with Windows 8 on ARM, and why Apple should be worried
- Windows 8 ARM devices to have a ‘classic’ desktop experience?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
You hit the nail on the head
Run a cost comparison between support lifecycles and cost of entry for hardware, and Windows will come out cheaper every time.
Mac is supported for a while
You missed the point
What astounds me is that people will cry and complain if the new version of Windows does not make drivers for their 3rd party printer that is 10 years old but seem content when Apple cannot even support their own hardware that may only be 4 years old. "Oh you want the latest MacOS or iOS?... Then buy new hardware"
How did they end support?
But Apple is SUPPORTING THE PRODUCT WITH PATCHES. That's all that matters.
@"itguy"10
RE: windows 7 on a first generation Pentium.
That being said you can, however, install Windows 7 on a Pentium 3 computer running at 1Ghz technically or essentially a machine about 12 years old. Probably wouldn't run all that well but it would work. Also Microsoft supports their 2001/2 Operating system still for another couple years so what is your point?
You are obviously too clueless to realize that when Snow Leopard came out in 2009 it stopped support for Macs with G-Series processors made up until about 2006(ish). So people with a 3 - 4 year old Apple computer were left out. That is what is meant by support was discontinued. Not that you could not get security updates. I don't know why I am bothering but I am pretty sure you were one of the Anit-Microsoft crowd complaining when Microsoft would not support IE9 and some other newer features on XP which is an OS released in late 2001 and here you are praising Apple because all they still give you is security updates. You cannot use any of the new technologies like iCloud, Facetime, App Store that Apple advertises and is basically shifting everything too. Pretty soon your G-series computer will be practically useless all thanks to Apple.
I'm running the Lion OSX on my early 2008 MBP...
You can consider yourself lucky...
Don't hit your finger
Question:
You say that Apple charges for upgrades to their OS? Microsoft does not charge for upgrades to their OS. I've never had to pay for a service pack.
You need to compare Apples with Apples not Apples and Oranges.
You'll never hear him say
I agree - Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows 8 are all different OS's.
If you look at Apple's OS it's OS X "tiger", OS X "Leopard", OS X "Lion" - All variations of [b]OS X[/b]. The last major upgrade of the OS happended years ago, going from OS 9 to OS X.
These latest ones aren't upgrades at all, they're service packs, IMHO. If it was a true upgrade then it would have been OS XI, OS XII, ect.
Several overpriced serivce packs to Windows come to mind
That's untrue, to be honest
Claiming it is doesn't make it so.
Macs are not expensive whan you compare them.
"Windows XP was not a service pack, nor was Windows 7.
Claiming it is doesn't make it so. "
Just like claiming all upgrades to OS X are service packs isn't true, but that doesn't stop the Windows fanboys from saying it.
Ummm, no
I don't own a single piece of Apple equipment, consumer or otherwise, and I _still_ know you're way off base.
Windows XP was 2000 with service packs, and that's all MS put out for seven years. Win7 is just Vista with fixes. That's, what, going to be another 5-6 years? Windows 8 will be Microsoft's first real desktop arch switch ever, including the DOS days. (Yes, they supported Alpha and Itanium poorly on servers, but they weren't serious about either.)
Get Your Apples Right
MS charges for version upgrades, as does Apple
Apple release cycle is more often than MS, but the upgrade price is significantly less.
Few would claim the wait for Vista (a disaster) from XP was a good thing. Really it was a wait for Win7 before it got any traction. The delays MS had in bring out a new version (the result of untangling their spaghetti code-base) forced the extension of support for older versions.
Your post is uninformed.
Cost of OSX
Is this a 'looking for click money' article, Adrian?
Wrong, what you should have said was [i]install on up to five [b]Apple[/b] systems.[/i]
I can't install that $30 OS on a Dell, HP, Acer, Lenovo, ect. Of course Apple can charge you $30 for an OS, when the profits from those 5 Macs [b]far[/b] exceedes any loss they may get from charging only $30 for the OS.
By leaving that out it changse the whole dynamic of what you're "attempting" to say.
Microsoft is in the business of making money